Red Sox Buy Liverpool: Reaction Through England's Papers

As compelling as today's drama surrounding Anfield is how it's being perceived around England. If today's layouts from England's most prominent papers are any indication, there is a bit of caution to the coverage - perhaps an latent feeling that we might not be as close to closure as Liverpool's announcement hints?

Let's start with the NPR of British coverage, the BBC:

Screen_shot_2010-10-06_at_9
Straight-forward, unimaginative: Disappointing. I can feel my inner-monologue switching to Terry Gross.

Let's spice it up a little bit and see what Sky Sports has to say:

Screen_shot_2010-10-06_at_9

As long as an aging, under-performing icon approves the move, there's really no need for the courts to get involved.

If we're going to go lunacy, might as well go straight for the Daily Mail:

Screen_shot_2010-10-06_at_9

No!  No, no no!  Sanity? Straight-forward reporting? An opportunity wasted, Mail Online. Surely some baiting of the anti-U.S. factions of the footballing public is in order?

As along we're going sane, may as well go to the Guardian who, unlike some of the above outlets, has the coverage on the front page:

Screen_shot_2010-10-06_at_9

It's a question that Reds will be asking themselves for some time, as saving Liverpool this season looks out-of-the-question. Speaking of questions, could the Guardian have found a more type-ing picture than a rich American businessman with a disproportionately large cee-gar raising his hand in triumph after a baseball game? If only Henry's fist was clenched around a Remington.

Let's see what some of the Guardian's competitors did, starting with the Telegraph:

Screen_shot_2010-10-06_at_9

All the reaction? And I thought this post was somewhat original.

We could get The Times' take, but ...

Screen_shot_2010-10-06_at_9

This is all we can see on the wrong side of their pay wall (hey Times, hook an editor up!).

The Independent takes a different route:

Screen_shot_2010-10-06_at_9

Oh, yeah.  There's that.  The whole "is it legal" thing.  We'll cover that more, but first, let's see how the Liverpool Echo's handling the story:

Screen_shot_2010-10-06_at_9

The Echo heralds Broughton heralding, though again on the right, the question: Who is John Henry? These papers may as well ask the real question on more Liverpudlians' minds: Is John Henry different than Tom Hicks? Probably doesn't help that they're two older, white businessman who owned baseball teams and have a couple of the most American (yet English) sounding names you'll find in this country.

And finally, a healthy reminder from the blog-o-verse, courtesy of The Gaffer at EPL Talk: Screen_shot_2010-10-06_at_9

And when that beard talks, I listen.

All screenshots were taken at roughly 9:30 a.m. PST on Wednesday, October 6.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join SBNation.com

You must be a member of SBNation.com to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at SBNation.com. You should read them.

Join SBNation.com

You must be a member of SBNation.com to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at SBNation.com. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.