<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>SB Nation User Blog:  06Lion</title>
    <link>http://www.sbnation.com/users/06Lion</link>
    <description>Posts made by 06Lion on SB Nation</description>
    <item>
      <title>50 to 1 odds of winning the Championship</title>
      <link>http://www.blackshoediaries.com/2008/7/15/571957/50-to-1-odds-of-winning-th</link>
      <author>06Lion</author>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:20:39 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;h3&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.vegasinsider.com/college-football/odds/futures/"&gt;50 to 1 odds of winning the&amp;nbsp;Championship&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;div class="description"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Take a look at the odds all the teams are getting for winning the NC.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Apparently somebody thinks that Michigan (40/1) has a better chance of winning the national championship than Penn State (50/1) does.  And Virginia Tech at 22/1 with how many starters they lost?!  Maybe because the ACC is pathetic.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Draft Busts
</title>
      <link>http://www.blackshoediaries.com/2008/4/18/125632/050</link>
      <author>06Lion</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:56:32 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;After perusing ESPNs ranking of the top 50 draft busts, I couldn't help but notice we provided a good half dozen or so NFL busts. &amp;nbsp;And I didn't really count it up, but at first glance I got the feeling the Big Ten had the highest number of draft busts of any conference.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/draft08/news/story?id=3325995"&gt;http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/draft08/news/story?id=3325995&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's not much of a surprise to me, considering how different the Big Ten style of play is from the NFL style. &amp;nbsp;The conference spits out enormous, successful NFL linemen because we're 2 yards and a cloud of dust on offense. &amp;nbsp;But at the so-called skill positions, it would appear we are overhyped. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As an aside, this year's crop of QB draft prospects is bare. &amp;nbsp;I think it is a trend that is going to continue as long as major college football programs keep leaning towards getting that one athletic "quarterback" that can run a sub-4.5 forty. &amp;nbsp;Landing a prospect like that is great for a college program because it's like playing Nintendo with a GameGenie...the coach can call a bad play or the O-line can be as porous as swiss cheese, but who cares because that kid can outrun everyone except for the secondary, who are 20 yards upfield. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But NFL play suffers because the latest mobile QB craze in college doesn't translate so well into the pros. &amp;nbsp;Instead of spending the time and knowledge developing a pocket QB with the NFL potential, programs are falling all over each other to grab the fastest high schooler to get that edge. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;



  

  


      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
