SB Nation User Blog: 2757

The Onion: "40,000 Revenge Seeking Bats Descend Upon Manu Ginobili"

2757 — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:46:10 -0000

The Onion: "40,000 Revenge Seeking Bats Descend Upon Manu Ginobili"

40,000 Revenge Seeking Bats Descend on Manu Ginobili

2757 — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:13:20 -0000

40,000 Revenge Seeking Bats Descend on Manu Ginobili

Ahhhhhh!!

Slate Article: No ACL's No Problem

2757 — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:00:09 -0000

Slate Article: No ACL's No Problem

Interesting article about the science of DeJuan's knees.

An Ode to Gregg Popovich

2757 — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 06:35:03 -0000

Oh Gregg Popovich. You are one of the greats. I doubt anyone on PTR or any true Spurs fan would trade him for really any other coach in the NBA. We don’t always agree with the man but are convinced that at his core he is the intellectual equivalent of a basketball assassin, who will devise schemes to win at any cost. Today begins the first part of my two-part series raising a glass to Coach Pop; the legend, the mystery, the man…

Just remember, I taught you everything you know... but not everything I know.

In his own right, Pop has developed a certain mythology that has reached near epic proportions. I feel no other coach in the NBA has more conspiracy theories about his motivations and strategies. There is a pervasive feeling that Pop constantly is hiding some advantage up his sleeve. Even in his weakest moments we all pull back before directing criticism, assuming he merely feigns weakness to trap his prey in his eventual ambush. How many times have you seen things written about Pop criticizing his decisions in a regular season game with the caveat, " But maybe he was just hiding his true strategy for the playoffs." How many other coaches in the league would ever even consider hiding strategies for exactly the right moment? One (Phil Jackson) or maybe two? Sure Pop has benefited from knowing for well over the last decade that he has unlimited job security and an almost guaranteed high seed in the playoffs no matter the amount of nonsense tinkering he does prior to them, but it still takes some cojones.

I believe there are three distinct qualities of Gregg Popovich’s coaching style that divide him from the rest of the NBA rabble.

1. Killer instinct

His passive demeanor and zen approach to the game is just a façade. Just ask Tony Parker and you’ll learn about his pension for profanity and screaming. When you are on the court, you are giving 110%, even if you are Michael Finley and your 110% is still only about 60-70% of a regular NBA player.

Caveat: This rule only applies to certain players and only in the playoffs. If you’re named Tim Duncan or Manu Ginobili and it’s the regular season you are contractually obligated to give no more than 65%(still more than 40% higher than regular NBA players).

#@$!&$% %#$@*!@ Pass the ball to $#!#@$&%&# Tim.

2. Willingness to try any strategy for an edge

No strategy is too bizarre. Even Pop’s steadfast hatred of unpredictability can withstand this man’s willingness to try out a peculiar but ultimately effective strategy.

In 2003 we had Stephen Jackson, who is equally likely to drain 8 3-pointers in a game as he is to stab an opposing players (yes literally stab them). Pop had no problem giving him 30 minutes a game and an open invitation to jack 3-pointers. We needed points and Stephen Jackson could deliver.

Another example is fouling Shaquille O’Neal in the playoffs in 2008. People had been Hack-a-Shaq’ing for years, usually to try to get back into games. Pop saw the potential to hold a lead. Sure it was cheap, sure it was an affront to the very game of basketball, sure it was not very entertaining, but damn it was cunning. Not only cunning, but it was incredibly effective. Phoenix never quite got into its groove. The looming comeback runs that Phoenix is famous for never materialized. It was a cold-blooded and unexpected strategy that only further proved the ruthless nature of Gregg Popovich.

You could also consider benching starters this previous season. From day 1 this year Pop knew that injuries and health was our main barrier to post-season success. It is easy to look back at the game against Denver and say that we probably should have played our best players. It even got close in the fourth quarter. At that moment he could of plucked Tony and Tim off the bench and told them to go close it out. But Pop truly believes we can win anywhere and anytime as long as we have our best players. Sure Ginobili got hurt and was out, but you can’t say it was for lack of Popovich foreseeing the possibility and trying to avoid it. Most coaches would scoff at sitting four-fifths of its starting lineup for an entire game and the league surely would. Arguments would be made about shortchanging the fans and disrespecting your opponents but Pop didn’t bat an eye.

I have given some serious consideration to your argument and think you probably made the right call

3. Mastery of the x’s and o’s

Pop is an incredible wizard at setting up plays. Conversely, he can see through an opposing team’s plays like no other coach around. I feel Coach K may be Pop’s only equal at managing in-game efficiency. The San Antonio offense operates like a machine. At its height Manu and Tony are like pistons pumping in and out of the paint at regular intervals. Tim Duncan is the foundation that holds it all together. Jacque Vaughn was like the wrench that was mistakenly dropped into the gears and broke everything. Everyone has a role and a function that helps complete the machine. They’re kinda like a 1972 Ford Bronco. It wasn’t really a pretty car, and at times it didn’t have a lot of flash, but it always started and got the job done. Okay, enough of the machine/car analogy.

Pop’s inbounds plays are some of the best in the league. In game, our turnover rate is spectacular. The constant mantra when playing the Spurs is that we won’t beat ourselves, you have to beat us. Even last season, when our wings and bigs were frequently being out-athleticized and we know we have to play a perfect game just to have a chance we can always cling to the hope that if any team in the league exists that might play a perfect game, it will be the San Antonio Spurs.

The criticism of Popovich is well known. He can’t develop players. He lacks foresight in team development. He undervalues athleticism and values experience at the expense of talent and athleticism. Despite these shortcoming one thing you can’t question is his basketball philosophy. I may not understand everything about the man, but I know he has an incredibly consistent approach that I will attempt to sum up in 5 tenants.

I'll leave you with this video:

Tune in next time for a fine ’21 Merlot with full-bodied and complex structure, a splash of plum and shiraz, and just a hint of oak

Or…

The 5 tenants of Coach Pop’s basketball philosophy!

Top 10 NBA GMs of the last decade

2757 — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:36:33 -0000

Top 10 NBA GMs of the last decade

I think you know who's number 1...Marc Cuban. Just kidding it's R.C.

I'm Pulling a Phil Jackson

2757 — Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:53:58 -0000

So the Spurs are sticking to the team line. "Yes, the Lakers are the favorites. They won the Championship, thus they are the team to beat." But when you get right down to it, how good are the Lakers really. On paper, and now in terms of jewelry, they should have the best/most talented/ most proven lineup. But I for one, believe last season was a fluke. The Lakers Championship run was a fragile house of cards where everything had to balance just right to avoid a horrible collapse.

Note: Take everything I write with the caveat that despite these "excuses", yes the Lakers did what they had to do and got the job done.

via www.everyjoe.com

That only took 5 Shaq-less tries.

Exhibit 1: Injuries to Contenders: Seriously, of the 5 teams favored to make deep playoff runs after the all-star break, how many of them were healthy in the playoffs? Maybe 2. The Celtics were sans Kevin Garnett. The Spurs were sans El Contusion. Orlando was actively re-integrating Jameer Nelson which set off a slew of team chemistry questions throughout the Finals and either injury-wise or rhythm-wise limited him severely in his usual offensive potency. And even Cleveland had questions surrounding the ankle of Big Z. With next season looming there is no good reason to assume all of these contenders will not have their injury issues resolved, at least no better reason than thinking that Andrew Bynum won’t re-aggravate something come playoff time.

via photos.upi.com

Garnett was of course held out of the playoffs due to a splitting headache from unknown causes.

Exhibit 2: Who they did play: What seemed an inevitability of Laker dominance in the playoffs, post the departure of the perennial threats of the Celtics, Spurs, and Cavs, turned into actual competition. This potentially would have been excusable had they been playing a proven contender that we should expect to turn in championship caliber performances. But the Rockets without Yao Ming and Tracy McGrady took the Lakers to 7 games. The incredibly potent offensive force of Carl Landry, Aaron "is he really that short" Brooks, Ron "the brick-layer" Artest, and Von "Nilla" Wafer cobbled together 3 wins and, for a very short period of time, had home court advantage on the LA Lakers.

Add in the Thuggets, even with Mr. Big Shot, who had the series evened at 2-2 at one point and I nearly lose respect for the Lakers. There were seriously periods where the Denver frontcourt composed of Nene, Kenyon Martin, the Birdman, and Kleiza appeared more talented than Bynum, Gasol, and Odom. And finally though its difficult to fault a team that wins a series 4-1 for nearly blowing it, remember that Orlando was one wide open layup at the buzzer and one Dwight Howard free throw away from taking a commanding 3-1 lead in that series. Again, the Lakers finished it and got the baskets when it counted, but this was an Orlando team in mild disarray shuffling point guards and rotations throughout the finals.

via pictopia.com

This guy seriously struck fear in to the heart of the Lakeshow.

Clearly only one thing to do. The Lakers Championship deserves a heartfelt asterisk.

There I did it. Doesn’t count unless they can do it again. The gauntlet has been thrown. Bring on some real teams in the playoffs and we’ll see. Hindsight is 20/20, and we’ll know soon enough. 2009-2010, it’s on!

Rookie Playoff Retrospective: George Hill (from draft express)

2757 — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:41:29 -0000

Rookie Playoff Retrospective: George Hill (from draft express)

Interesting article about George's experiences in the playoffs.

Revisiting Finley’s Late 3 – A History of Referee Ineptitude

2757 — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:29:53 -0000

So an interesting debate sprung up on message boards across the country as news of Finley’s non buzzer beating three against Sacramento came out. Undoubtedly a Spurs fan would write on a wall post "Bout time we finally get a call after years of blown calls that have cost us championships" or something to that extent. This was immediately followed by a post (probably from a Suns fan) that the refs had been blowing calls in the Spurs favor for years and only an arrogant Spurs fan could possibly believe that they had not been the beneficiary of hundreds of bad calls. This got me thinking about whether or not every team has this constant debate. It is not hard to come up with a list of calls that have gone against San Antonio throughout history.

· The .4 second shot made by Fisher.

· Duncan being ejected from a game while sitting on the sideline because Robert Horry made a funny joke at an inconvenient time.

· Brent Barry last year getting fouled in the waning seconds of game 4 against the Lakers because he didn’t "sell the foul".

· The failure of the refs to eject the entire Seattle and Denver frontcourt for repeated attempts to murder Manu Ginobili in the 2005 Playoffs.

· Any call that has ever been called against Tim Duncan, since he has clearly never committed a foul in his 12 year career (why else would he argue and get all bug-eyed?)

As previously mentioned Suns fans feel there might have been a foul or two that have actually gone in our favor over the years. Take for example exhibit A

EXHIBIT A

via cache.daylife.com

Horry's feet don’t look like they are moving…I think it was clean.

A list of calls in the Spurs favor is less easy to individually identify but most other teams would say that Bruce Bowen should just start with 3 or 4 fouls every time he enters a game to make everything equal. Similar allegations would fly about Manu’s flopping, Tim getting favorable calls because he’s a super star, or even Tim Donaghy reffing game whatever in whichever playoffs cause he’s a crook.

To me the obvious response to this “the games are fixed” or “David Stern wants the Spurs to win” approach is that is doesn’t make sense. Tim Donaghy aside, for the league to make money it has been rather clearly established that it needs big market teams with outspoken superstars to make it to the finals. Kobe and Garnett last year was a much better ratings draw than Duncan and Billups in 2005. Why would the league want a team of defense-oriented, quiet, low-scoring, well-balanced players from a small market that go out of their way to eschew the spotlight led by a sarcastic pockmarked little man that loves nothing more than to mess with the league’s establishment and bench his best players on a whim. Seems to me that they wouldn’t create special rules and surreptitiously inform refs to help us win games so that they can have yet another record low ratings bonanza in the finals of the NBA playoffs.

Then this occurred to me. Maybe this is the deal for all teams. You remember vividly the calls that went against you because they were so important and left you with that gut-wrenching feeling of doom and injustice while the calls that go your way are just all parts of the FSM’s good plan for your team or destiny or whatever high-carbohydrate deity it is that you turn to for guidance.

So I’m not sure exactly what my conclusion is. I guess it could one of three things. First, I am not real sorry for the Sacramento Kings. It happens to everybody and you were probably going to lose anyways. Plus, when you get Blake Griffin in the first round of the draft next year you might be thanking us. Second I think I can conclude that maybe we should all realize that refs are people too and mistakes happen and bad calls go both ways and we should all quit our bitchin’ and play some ball. But clearly my final conclusion is that the previous conclusion was crap and the Spurs have had way too many calls go against them and we are clearly owed a few by the league. Oh, and Joey Crawford is the devil.

Kinda makes you sick, doens't it

2757 — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:50:09 -0000

Kinda makes you sick, doens't it

To think we let this walk out the door.

A Misleading Game (Clippers Summary)

2757 — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:53:25 -0000

Don’t be fooled by the Spurs’ 3 game win streak. If we play another game like that we may not win another one. Thank the gods that this particular game was played against possibly the only team in the league that could adequately have screwed up as many opportunities as we served up, the Los Angeles Clippers.

Make no mistake that Tim Duncan should definitely be on the short list for League MVP through the first 10 games of the season. He is dragging a team of mistake prone rookies and old, old, really old guys to a .500 record whether they want to come along for the ride or not.

So lets get to the game. The first play sort of summarized it. Baron Davis passed to the ball to Cuttino Mobley who had decided to face the opposite direction and not see it at all. The ball bounced off his back, Roger Mason grabbed it and the Spurs proceeded to score on a fast break. Ugly turnovers plagued this game on both sides and these two teams resembled more of the Washington Generals in a scrimmage to see who could control the ball the least. The Spurs did open with a 9-2 lead knocking down jumper after jumper. We then proceeded to turn the ball over on many subsequent plays and allow them right back in. The Spurs guard play especially lacked gusto as Curious George shot a blistering 0—5 from the field, whereas Jacque Vaughn threw up a much more respectable 2-9.

The rest of the half was a close and low scoring back and forth affair with each team trying to outdo the others gaffes. Our newest Spur Blake Ahearn took the field for 4 minutes, hitting 1-2 from the 3 point line and then was banished to the bench by Poppovich apparently for making George Hill feel jealous. With about 30 seconds left and the Spurs up by a point, Timmy hit a long jumper, then the Spurs got a rebound off an ill-advised Baron shot (they may all be ill-advised, except when he is playing the Mavs). On the ensuing play, Tim finds a streaking George Hill who is thrown to the ground by a grunting Chris Kaman in a goofy looking foul that only a 7 foot white guy could pull off. Kaman is called for the flagrant, George hits both free throws and the Spurs take a mildly respectable 5 point lead into the half.

The second half is highlighted by mildly improved Spurs play as Tim Duncan’s inside presence opens up open shots for Finley, Mason, and Bowen. The Clips fall behind by as much as ten and all seems right in the Spurs basketball world. This trend continues with the allowed fluctuations for losing the large lead every time Tim sits down for a breather and regaining it as he re-enters the game and repeatedly owns Kaman, Thomas, and Camby. Tim even got into it with Camby a little, but in his usual professional matter responded by throwing in consecutive baskets including a sweet looking 15-foot jump shot. Tim’s mid range shot really looks better than it ever has this season.

This trend continues until about the 2:18 mark when the Spurs, sitting on a comfortable 7 point lead, decide to self-destruct. George Hill transforms from the fairly calm and even mannered point guard we are trying so hard to appreciate into a rookie from a no-name school with more letters in it than the SEC complaint filed against Marc Cuban had. The details are not pretty but the Clippers manage to tie it with about 30 seconds left. The building is suddenly, and for the first time that night, really loud. Almost as loud as a Lakers game in the same building, assuming they are losing to a team no one cares about. The Spurs, after a timeout that clearly came about 2 minutes too late, inbounds to Roger Mason who, doing his best Manu impression lets the clock tick down to about 10 seconds, runs around a Timmy screen. No Clippers follow, seriously like at all, and he calmly knocks down a clutch three. Westside rentals man is heartbroken, though you’d never know it by has robotic and continuous dancing (you’d have to live here to get that one). The Clippers of course throw the ball to Baron who, unsurprisingly, takes another ill-advised shot and the Spurs win.

A couple of game notes.

Tim Duncan is really good.

Jacque Vaughn is not. George Hill, albeit with more upside, may not be much better. I feel his high assist to turnover ratio has a lot to do with merely throwing the ball to Tim Duncan and not his advanced grasp of this game we call basketball.

Roger Mason is a sniper, especially in close games. That was not an easy shot at the end and he did not even flinch.

Michael Finley looks good, you know , for Michael Finley. He still attempts the occasional athletic play, which 9 times out of 10 ends poorly but he definitely knows his role and is hitting anything remotely open.

I’m worried about the frontcourt. Oberto and KThomas are not going to carry us against teams with legit bigs. Those teams would probably be considered, the Lakers, the Celtics (I really like Powe), the Hornets, and possibly the rockets. Three of those four we would have had to go through last year to win a championship and that list appears to currently be unchanged. Unless Tim gets some help rebounding and defending down there I’m not sure we can take those teams. Excepting Mahinmi, who is still a major question mark, there is nothing waiting in the wings on that one either. I guess we will see.

Okay your big 3

3. Michael Finley- Hitting everything as long as he doesn’t pump fake or put the ball on the floor.

2. Tim Duncan- Definitely the best player on the floor tonight, but I gotta go with…

1. Roger Mason Jr.- For hitting the clutch three with all the momentum in the Clippers favor (possibly the last time the phrase “all the momentum in the Clippers favor” may ever be uttered again this season)