<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>SB Nation User Blog:  3 Fast 3 Furious</title>
    <link>http://www.sbnation.comhttp://www.sbnation.com/users/3%20Fast%203%20Furious</link>
    <description>Posts made by 3 Fast 3 Furious on SB Nation</description>
    <item>
      <title>Maybe Jocketty has risen from his nappy.</title>
      <link>http://www.redreporter.com/2008/7/29/581666/maybe-jocketty-has-risen-f</link>
      <author>3 Fast 3 Furious</author>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:40:38 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;From ESPN Insider today:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;Reds scout Texas catchers&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href=&quot;http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/clubhouse?team=cin&quot;&gt;Cincinnati Reds&lt;/a&gt; had a scout at the Texas-Oakland game on Saturday in order to take a look at catchers &lt;a href=&quot;http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/profile?statsId=7129&quot;&gt;Gerald Laird&lt;/a&gt; and Jarrod Saltalamacchia.&amp;nbsp; The Rangers are apparently willing to part with one of the two, and the Reds are looking to add a catcher since none of their three catchers are under contract for next season, the Cincinnati Enquirer reports.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now, I know there are always scouts at games, but isn't it nice to think that maybe Uncle Walt has noticed that Texas has a surplus of young talented catching prospects and that the Reds have no catchers signed for next year?&amp;nbsp; I'd personally like Saltalamacchia because that's a fun name to say (Tigrmetrics?).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What is the likelihood of this actually happening?&amp;nbsp; What would it take to get it done?&amp;nbsp; Would a Bailey / Thompson plus one or two marginal prospects be enough? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I know we've surmised about this before, but I just like to hope.&lt;/p&gt;

  
  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Neyer on Reds' CF Sitchoo
</title>
      <link>http://www.redreporter.com/2008/2/20/93612/2806</link>
      <author>3 Fast 3 Furious</author>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:36:12 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://insider.espn.go.com/espn/blog/index?name=neyer_rob&amp;amp;univLogin02=stateChanged&quot;&gt;http://insider.espn.go.com/espn/blog/index?name=neyer_rob&amp;univLogin02=stateChanged&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think it fundamentally comes down to what Rob mentions: Do the Reds want to win this year or 2009? &amp;nbsp;If they want to win this year, there's no reason as to why Bruce shouldn't be the everyday CF (Veteran presence and Dusty's favorites aside). &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm definitely in favor of the kid cutting his teeth up here from the first pitch rather than &quot;seasoning&quot; in Louisville. &amp;nbsp;I'm excited to see Bruce get the opportunity to play every day, whereas I'm markedly less excited for the potential Freel / Hopper show manning CF (Do we need a Hoppinger-esque mash up name for them? Fropper? Hopeel? Heel?). &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A final thing I'm glad Neyer mentioned is the reason why I let Norris Hopper pick my lottery numbers each week: &quot;Norris Hopper's a born fifth outfielder who got incredibly lucky in the second half last season.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yes, I only let 5th outfielders pick my numbers for me.&lt;/p&gt;



  

  


      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
