http://www.nba.com/fantasy/draftkit/gs_08.html

I really can't find anything that I disagree with, this is a rare non-warrior affiliated article that I feel does justice to the situation that we are in, even if it's from a fantasy perspective. I agreed with him on wright, on marcus williams being a biggest potential sleeper, on harrington being the biggest potentiol disappointment. the writer completely nails it/ 1 2 3

http://www.prosportsdaily.com/comments/dc-not-an-option-for-tinsley-09-18-2008.html

Good news from espn, found the specific link on prosportsdaily, warriors are not trading for tinsley. I was worried they were going to give even harrington away for him and I didn't understand why we would want to comit an extra 7 million dollars to somebody who shouldn't be a part with our long term plans. I still want harrington gone though!

Just read a good artcile, http://blogs.mercurynews.com/kawakami/2008/08/27/mullin-on-ellis-there-will-be-no-panic-emergency-moves-but-hell-take-a-look-at-livingston-tomorrow/

Tell me if im wrong, but doesn't it sound like mullin's talking about shifting jackson down to the point and not starting marcus? he mentioned just "opening up the games" more, and incorperating turiaf and biedrins as starters and more in the offense. sounds like jackson, magette, harrington, turiaf and then biedrins. very very intriguing. Another thing he mentions is anthony randolph having a bigger role now!