
a fan of
Pittsburgh Pirates
Portland Trail Blazers
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Missouri Tigers
Missouri Tigers
Lefty
Carl Edwards
Meldrick Taylor!
Nottingham Forest
Greg LeMond!
Djokavic
Mizzou
RSSUser Blog
2012 Connecticut Huskies Football: Statistical Profile
Confused? See the glossary at the bottom.

2011 Schedule & Results
| Record: 5-7 | Adj. Record: 4-8 | Final F/+ Rk: 61 | |||||
| Date | Opponent | Score | W-L | Adj. Score | Adj. W-L |
| 3-Sep | Fordham | 35-3 | W | 29.0 - 21.1 | W |
| 10-Sep | at Vanderbilt | 21-24 | L | 17.8 - 20.3 | L |
| 16-Sep | Iowa State | 20-24 | L | 20.6 - 26.6 | L |
| 24-Sep | at Buffalo | 17-3 | W | 22.1 - 21.9 | W |
| 1-Oct | Western Michigan | 31-38 | L | 25.8 - 30.2 | L |
| 8-Oct | at West Virginia | 16-43 | L | 22.9 - 28.4 | L |
| 15-Oct | South Florida | 16-10 | W | 22.2 - 24.9 | L |
| 26-Oct | at Pittsburgh | 20-35 | L | 26.6 - 33.8 | L |
| 5-Nov | Syracuse | 28-21 | W | 27.7 - 28.0 | L |
| 19-Nov | Louisville | 20-34 | L | 23.9 - 27.0 | L |
| 26-Nov | Rutgers | 40-22 | W | 31.3 - 29.2 | W |
| 3-Dec | at Cincinnati | 27-35 | L | 23.0 - 22.4 | W |
| Category | Offense | Rk | Defense | Rk |
| Points Per Game | 24.3 | 82 | 24.3 | 50 |
| Adj. Points Per Game | 24.4 | 109 | 26.2 | 41 |
2012 Schedule & Projection Factors
| 2012 Schedule | ||
| Date | Opponent | Proj. Rk |
| 30-Aug | Massachusetts | 116 |
| 8-Sep | N.C. State | 54 |
| 15-Sep | at Maryland | 66 |
| 22-Sep | at Western Michigan | 69 |
| 29-Sep | Buffalo | 107 |
| 6-Oct | at Rutgers | 40 |
| 13-Oct | Temple | 73 |
| 19-Oct | at Syracuse | 78 |
| 3-Nov | at South Florida | 25 |
| 9-Nov | Pittsburgh | 41 |
| 24-Nov | at Louisville | 50 |
| 1-Dec | Cincinnati | 44 |
| Five-Year F/+ Rk | 42 |
| Two-Year Recruiting Rk | 98 |
| TO Margin/Adj. TO Margin* | +8 / +4.7 |
| TO Luck/Game | 1.4 |
| Approx. Ret. Starters (Off. / Def.) | 16 (8, 8) |
| Yds/Pt Margin** | -2.2 |
Offense

| Category | Yards/ Game Rk |
S&P+ Rk | Success Rt. Rk |
PPP+ Rk |
| OVERALL | 108 | 108 | 110 | 103 |
| RUSHING | 97 | 100 | 97 | 92 |
| PASSING | 84 | 108 | 108 | 104 |
| Standard Downs | 97 | 96 | 94 | |
| Passing Downs | 106 | 108 | 103 | |
| Redzone | 68 | 61 | 73 |
| Q1 Rk | 89 | 1st Down Rk | 107 |
| Q2 Rk | 114 | 2nd Down Rk | 71 |
| Q3 Rk | 74 | 3rd Down Rk | 112 |
| Q4 Rk | 96 | ||
| Adj. Line Yards Rk | 73 | ||
| Adj. Sack Rate Rk | 112 | ||
Quarterback
Note: players in bold below are 2012 returnees. Players in italics are questionable with injury/suspension.
| Player | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Rivals | Comp | Att | Yards | Comp Rate |
TD | INT | Sacks | Sack Rate | Yards/ Att. |
| Johnny McEntee | 6'3, 224 | Sr. | NR | 172 | 335 | 2,110 | 51.3% | 12 | 8 | 37 | 9.9% | 5.1 |
| Mike Nebrich | 6'1, 204 | So. | *** (5.5) | 5 | 14 | 69 | 35.7% | 0 | 1 | 2 | 12.5% | 3.1 |
| Scott McCummings | 6'2, 218 | So. | ** (5.4) | 5 | 10 | 157 | 50.0% | 2 | 0 | 2 | 16.7% | 11.8 |
| Chandler Whitmer | 6'1, 191 | So. | **** (5.8) | |||||||||
| Casey Cochran | 6'1, 207 | Fr. | *** (5.7) |
Running Back
| Player | Pos. | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Rivals | Rushes | Yards | Yards/ Carry |
Hlt Yds/ Carry |
TD | Adj. POE |
| Lyle McCombs | RB | 5'8, 172 | So. | ** (5.3) | 275 | 1,151 | 4.2 | 1.6 | 7 | -13.3 |
| Scott McCummings | QB | 6'2, 218 | So. | ** (5.4) | 72 | 301 | 4.2 | 1.1 | 5 | +1.5 |
| Jonathan Jean-Louis | RB | 23 | 79 | 3.4 | 0.5 | 0 | -3.0 | |||
| Johnny McEntee | QB | 6'3, 224 | Sr. | NR | 18 | 74 | 4.1 | 0.6 | 0 | -3.9 |
| Martin Hyppolite | RB | 6'0, 214 | Jr. | ** (5.2) | ||||||
| Max DeLorenzo | RB | 5'11, 213 | RSFr. | ** (5.4) | ||||||
| Joseph Williams | RB | 5'11, 201 | Fr. | *** (5.5) |
Receiving Corps
| Player | Pos. | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Rivals | Targets | Catches | Yards | Catch Rate | Target Rate |
%SD | Adj. Yds/ Target |
| Michael Smith (2010^) | WR | 6'0, 201 | Sr. | ** (5.1) | 86 | 46 | 618 | 53.5% | 25.8% | 60.5% | 5.7 |
| Isiah Moore | WR | 73 | 43 | 588 | 58.9% | 21.4% | 45.2% | 7.3 | |||
| Kashif Moore | WR | 71 | 41 | 604 | 57.7% | 20.8% | 49.3% | 7.5 | |||
| Ryan Griffin | TE | 6'6, 248 | Sr. | ** (5.2) | 62 | 33 | 477 | 53.2% | 18.2% | 56.5% | 5.6 |
| Lyle McCombs | RB | 5'8, 172 | So. | ** (5.3) | 39 | 19 | 172 | 48.7% | 11.4% | 69.2% | 3.2 |
| Bryce McNeal (2010^^) | WR | 6'1, 180 | Sr. | **** (6.0) | 34 | 19 | 187 | 55.9% | 8.5% | 52.9% | 4.9 |
| Nick Williams | WR | 5'10, 185 | Sr. | ** (5.1) | 27 | 11 | 236 | 40.7% | 7.9% | 44.4% | 4.4 |
| Tebucky Jones | WR | 5'11, 186 | So. | ** (5.4) | 18 | 5 | 42 | 27.8% | 5.3% | 50.0% | -1.0 |
| Geremy Davis | WR | 6'3, 211 | So. | *** (5.5) | 17 | 6 | 73 | 35.3% | 5.0% | 47.1% | 0.2 |
| Reuben Frank | FB | 6'3, 238 | So. | *** (5.6) | 10 | 8 | 30 | 80.0% | 2.9% | 50.0% | 3.0 |
| Mark Hinkley | FB | 10 | 7 | 49 | 70.0% | 2.9% | 70.0% | 6.3 | |||
| John Delahunt | TE | 6'3, 247 | Sr. | ** (5.2) | 10 | 6 | 43 | 60.0% | 2.9% | 70.0% | 4.1 |
| Shakim Phillips (2010^^^) | WR | 6'1, 200 | So. | **** (5.8) | 5 | 1 | 9 | 20.0% | 1.6% | 40.0% | 0.5 |
| Deshon Foxx | WR | 5'10, 170 | So. | ** (5.4) | |||||||
| Sean McQuillan | TE | 6'4, 238 | RSFr. | *** (5.6) | |||||||
| Ricky Gutierrez | WR | 6'1, 175 | Fr. | *** (5.5) |
^ Smith was suspended for the 2011 season due to academic ineligibility.
^^ McNeal is a Clemson transfer and will be eligible this fall.
^^^ Phillips is a Boston College transfer and will be eligible this fall.
Offensive Line
| Player | Pos. | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Rivals | Career Starts/Honors/Notes |
| Moe Petrus | C | 51 career starts, 2011 1st All-Big East | |||
| Mike Ryan | LT | 33 career starts, 2011 2nd All-Big East | |||
| Adam Masters | RG | 6'4, 292 | Sr. | ** (5.1) | 23 career starts |
| Kevin Friend | RT | 6'5, 300 | Jr. | ** (5.1) | 13 career starts |
| Steve Greene | LG | 6'4, 304 | Jr. | *** (5.6) | 8 career starts |
| Jimmy Bennett | LT | 6'9, 306 | Sr. | *** (5.7) | 3 career starts |
| Gary Bardzak | LG | 2 career starts | |||
| Stephen Brown | RT | 6'6, 290 | Jr. | NR | 1 career start |
| Tyler Bullock | LT | 6'4, 298 | Jr. | ** (5.1) | |
| Gus Cruz | RG | 6'4, 288 | So. | ** (5.0) | |
| Alex Mateas | C | 6'3, 293 | So. | NR | |
| Xavier Hemingway | OT | 6'4, 262 | RSFr. | *** (5.6) | |
| Dalton Gifford | OT | 6'5, 297 | RSFr. | *** (5.5) |
Defense

| Category | Yards/ Game Rk |
S&P+ Rk | Success Rt. Rk |
PPP+ Rk |
| OVERALL | 51 | 39 | 22 | 55 |
| RUSHING | 3 | 10 | 7 | 20 |
| PASSING | 113 | 84 | 67 | 88 |
| Standard Downs | 51 | 31 | 80 | |
| Passing Downs | 34 | 17 | 46 | |
| Redzone | 99 | 45 | 111 |
| Q1 Rk | 31 | 1st Down Rk | 71 |
| Q2 Rk | 26 | 2nd Down Rk | 42 |
| Q3 Rk | 73 | 3rd Down Rk | 22 |
| Q4 Rk | 72 | ||
| Adj. Line Yards Rk | 4 | ||
| Adj. Sack Rate Rk | 48 | ||
Defensive Line
| Name | Pos | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Rivals | GP | Tackles | % of Team | TFL | Sacks | Int | PBU | FF | FR |
| Kendall Reyes | DT | 12 | 35.0 | 5.4% | 13.5 | 4.5 | 4 | 1 | |||||
| Trevardo Williams | DE | 6'1, 231 | Sr. | *** (5.5) | 12 | 34.5 | 5.4% | 15 | 12.5 | 2 | 2 | ||
| Tywon Martin | DT | 12 | 27.5 | 4.3% | 9.5 | 3.5 | 1 | ||||||
| Jesse Joseph | DE | 6'3, 262 | Sr. | ** (5.0) | 9 | 20.0 | 3.1% | 2.5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||
| Ted Jennings | DE | 6'5, 248 | Sr. | ** (5.1) | 10 | 18.0 | 2.8% | 8 | 3.5 | 1 | |||
| Shamar Stephen | DT | 6'5, 315 | Jr. | ** (4.9) | 12 | 12.0 | 1.9% | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Marcus Campbell | DE | 6 | 3.0 | 0.5% | 0.5 | ||||||||
| Ryan Wirth | DT | 6'2, 268 | Sr. | ** (5.1) | 9 | 1.5 | 0.2% | ||||||
| B.J. McBryde | DE | 6'4, 277 | So. | ** (5.2) | 3 | 1.0 | 0.2% | ||||||
| Kenton Adeyemi | DT | 6'4, 259 | RSFr. | *** (5.5) | |||||||||
| Mikal Myers | DT | 6'0, 300 | Fr. | *** (5.5) |
Linebackers
| Name | Pos | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Rivals | GP | Tackles | % of Team | TFL | Sacks | Int | PBU | FF | FR |
| Jory Johnson | OLB | 6'1, 227 | Sr. | ** (4.9) | 12 | 71.0 | 11.0% | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | |
| Sio Moore | OLB | 6'1, 232 | Sr. | ** (4.9) | 12 | 70.5 | 11.0% | 16 | 6.5 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 1 |
| Yawin Smallwood | MLB | 6'2, 229 | So. | *** (5.5) | 12 | 65.0 | 10.1% | 2.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
| Brandon Steg | LB | 6'2, 221 | So. | ** (5.4) | 12 | 8.0 | 1.2% | ||||||
| Andrew Opoku | OLB | 6'4, 223 | So. | *** (5.5 | 12 | 7.5 | 1.2% | ||||||
| Ryan Donohue (2010^) | LB | 6'0, 242 | Sr. | *** (5.5) | 13 | 5.5 | 0.7% | 1 | 1 | ||||
| David Kenney | OLB | 6'0, 206 | Jr. | ** (5.2) | 11 | 2.0 | 0.3% | ||||||
| Jefferson Ashiru | LB | 6'1, 227 | RSFr. | *** (5.6) | |||||||||
| Marquise Vann | LB | 6'0, 224 | RSFr. | *** (5.5) | |||||||||
| Jazzmar Cox | LB | 6'0, 239 | Fr. | *** (5.5) | |||||||||
| Jason Sylva | LB | 6'2, 245 | Fr. | *** (5.5) |
^ Donohue is a Maryland transfer and will be eligible this fall.
Secondary
| Name | Pos | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Rivals | GP | Tackles | % of Team | TFL | Sacks | Int | PBU | FF | FR |
| Jerome Junior | S | 11 | 45.0 | 7.0% | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 1 | |||
| Dwayne Gratz | CB | 6'0, 195 | Sr. | *** (5.7) | 12 | 44.0 | 6.8% | 4.5 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | |
| Byron Jones | S | 6'1, 187 | So. | ** (5.4) | 12 | 42.0 | 6.5% | 2 | 4 | 1 | |||
| Ty-Meer Brown | S | 6'0, 192 | So. | ** (5.3) | 12 | 32.5 | 5.1% | 1 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 1 | |
| Blidi Wreh-Wilson | CB | 6'0, 192 | Sr. | ** (5.2) | 8 | 30.0 | 4.7% | 2 | 0.5 | 2 | 7 | ||
| Harris Agbor | S | 12 | 18.5 | 2.9% | 2.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||||
| Gary Wilburn | CB | 12 | 18.0 | 2.8% | 1 | ||||||||
| Chris Lopes | CB | 8 | 5.5 | 0.9% | |||||||||
| Tevrin Brandon | CB | 11 | 5.0 | 0.8% | |||||||||
| Gilbert Stlouis | S | 5'11, 183 | Jr. | *** (5.5) | 7 | 2.0 | 0.3% | ||||||
| Taylor Mack | CB | 5'9, 169 | Jr. | *** (5.5) | 8 | 1.0 | 0.2% | ||||||
| David Stevenson | CB | 5'8, 173 | RSFr. | *** (5.5) | |||||||||
| Obi Melifonwu | DB | 6'4, 195 | Fr. | *** (5.5) |
Special Teams
| Punter | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Punts | Avg | TB | FC | I20 | FC/I20 Ratio |
| Cole Wagner | 6'2, 211 | Jr. | 80 | 41.1 | 5 | 29 | 21 | 62.5% |
| Kicker | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Kickoffs | Avg | TB | TB% |
| Chad Christen | 6'2, 201 | Jr. | 62 | 65.7 | 14 | 22.6% |
| Cole Wagner | 6'2, 211 | Jr. | 1 | 61 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Place-Kicker | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
PAT | FG (0-39) |
Pct | FG (40+) |
Pct |
| David Teggart | 29-30 | 10-10 | 100.0% | 12-18 | 66.7% |
| Returner | Pos. | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Returns | Avg. | TD |
| Nick Williams | KR | 5'10, 185 | Sr. | 37 | 24.9 | 0 |
| Deshon Foxx | KR | 5'10, 170 | So. | 4 | 21.0 | 0 |
| Taylor Mack | KR | 5'9, 169 | Jr. | 2 | 17.5 | 0 |
| Nick Williams | PR | 5'10, 185 | Sr. | 22 | 5.6 | 0 |
| Category | Rk |
| Special Teams F/+ | 24 |
| Net Punting | 48 |
| Net Kickoffs | 52 |
| Touchback Pct | 28 |
| Field Goal Pct | 29 |
| Kick Returns Avg | 16 |
| Punt Returns Avg | 96 |
---
Glossary
Adj. Line Yards: A line measure derived from the formula found here. The idea is to divvy credit for a given rush between both the runner and the blockers.
Adj. Pace: Part of the offensive footprint, this takes into account both the number of plays a team attempts and the type of play. Since passes, on average, take up less time (thanks to the fact that 30-50 percent of them are incomplete and stop the clock), pass-heavy offenses are prone to run more plays, therefore limiting the effectiveness of a general plays-per-game measure. Adj. Pace takes a team's run-pass ratio into account.
Adj. POE: An opponent-adjusted "Points Over Expected" measure for running backs that looks both at what a runner gained and what would have been expected given the opponents involved. For more information, start here.
Adj. Points: A look at how a team would have performed in a given week if playing a perfectly average team, with a somewhat average number of breaks and turnovers. The idea for the measure is simple: what if everybody in the country played exactly the same opponent every single week? Who would have done the best? It is an attempt to look at offensive and defensive consistency without getting sidetracked by easy or difficult schedules. And yes, with adjusted score you can allow a negative number of points. For more, start here.
Adj. Record: See Adj. Points.
Adj. Sack Rate: An opponent-adjusted measure of sack rates.
Adj. Score: See Adj. Points.
Adj. TO Margin: What a team's turnover margin would have been if they had recovered exactly 50 percent of all the fumbles that occurred in their games. If there is a huge difference between TO Margin and Adj. TO Margin (in other words, if fumbles, dropped interceptions, or other unlucky bounces were the main source of a good/bad TO margin), that suggests that a team's luck was particularly good or bad and might even out the next season.
Adj. Yards Per Target: A look at a receiver's total receiving yards divided by the number of times he was targeted. Slight adjustments are made for the percentage of times a receiver was targeted on standard ("%SD") and passing downs. Players targeted more on passing downs are likely to have a lower overall per-target average, since passing is more difficult on passing downs.
Bend-Don't-Break: Part of the defensive footprint, this is a comparison of a team's Def. Success Rate (efficiency) to its Def. PPP (explosiveness). The higher the number, the higher percentage of a team's overall S&P was made up by success rate, i.e. the more willing a team was to sacrifice efficiency to prevent big plays. (The lower the number, the more likely a team was to take aggressive risks.)
Covariance: Covariance is a statistical tool that provides a measure of the strength of the correlation between two or more sets of random variates. For these purposes, it is used to compare a team's performance (using opponent-adjusted Adj. Score) to the quality of the opponent at hand. Some teams play their best games against their worst opponents, and some teams do the opposite. This measure is used for both the offensive and defensive footprint. For more, go here.
Go After the Ball: Part of the defensive footprint, this looks at a team's forced fumbles, interceptions and passes broken up. In other words, it looks at their ability to go after the ball. The higher the number, the more they got their hands on the football.
Highlight Yards: The portion of a given run that is credit only to the running back; after a certain number of yards, the line has done its job, and most of the rest of the run will be determined by the running back himself. For more information, start here.
Need for Blitzes: Part of the defensive footprint, this compares a team's standard downs sack rate to its passing downs sack rate. The lower the number, the more they were able to generate pressure on standard downs, and the less need for blitzes.
Turnovers Luck: Presented in Points Per Game fashion, Turnovers Luck looks at the difference between a team's Turnover and Adj. TO Margins and, using the average point value of a turnover (~5.0 points), projects how many points a team gained or lost per game last season.
Yards Per Point: A measure long tracked by Phil Steele as a means of looking at teams that were a little too efficient or inefficient the previous season. A positive YPP Margin means a team's offense was less efficient than opponents' offenses, and to the extent that luck was involved, their luck might even out the next year.
The Rafters, Class of 2012: Melvin Booker
Fittingly, the Rafters Class of 2012 is a four-guard lineup. Here's your point guard.

Melvin Booker (1990-94)

1990-91: 8.3 PPG, 3.5 APG, 2.2 RPG, 1.0 SPG
1991-92: 11.6 PPG, 3.9 APG, 3.8 RPG, 1.0 SPG
1992-93: 15.8 PPG, 3.7 APG, 4.3 RPG, 1.4 SPG
1993-94: 18.1 PPG, 4.5 APG, 3.8 RPG, 1.3 SPG
Little fanfare accompanied Melvin Booker’s arrival in Columbia. Norm Stewart discovered the unassuming point guard from Moss Point, Mississippi, while recruiting a more heralded peer. Good thing he did, because Booker spent the next four years maximizing his ability as well as any player in the Stewart era. A starter as a freshman, Booker deferred to Doug Smith and Anthony Peeler on the court. But he began to come into his own as a sophomore, averaging 11.6 points and 3.9 assists. With Peeler’s departure after the 1991-92 season, Booker assumed leadership of the team. His 15.8 points per game led the club in his All-Big Eight junior season. But it was Booker’s remarkable senior season that sealed his place among Mizzou’s all-time greats. His averages of 18.1 points and 4.5 assists per game do not begin to tell the story. On his way to becoming the Big Eight Player of the Year and a second team All-American, Melvin Booker imposed his will on each game, hitting every clutch shot in a season that saw the Tigers go a perfect 14-0 in the Big Eight and advance to within one game of the Final Four. Though his career began in virtual anonymity, it ended with Booker ranking among the greats in Missouri Tiger history.
5 comments
|
5 recs |
Tweet
Mizzou Links, 5-30-12
Commitment No. 13
You know you're a Missouri fan when...
...a commitment from a random, unranked, unheard of Texas defensive end excites you as much as one from a high-three-star recruit.
Mizzou scored a commitment from Marcus Loud, a 6-foot-4, 235-pounder from Houston Wheatley, sight unseen; as I clicked on his profile, I found myself hoping for two things: either a four-star rating (and since I hadn't heard of him, I assumed that was not the case), no rating whatsoever. It was the latter. There is no film of Loud on YouTube or Rivals.com, only some decent offers (Texas Tech, Colorado) and another out-of-nowhere Texan. Loud has solid size for a high school end, though obviously that's the only judgment we can make of him until some film emerges. (Well, that and his name is fantastic.)
Loud's commitment means Mizzou's 2013 class is over half-full. The Tigers have one quarterback (Trent Hosick), one likely running back (Chase Abbington), one receiver (J'Mon Moore, who will probably still be taking other visits), four offensive linemen (Jake Campos, Clay Rhodes, Harneet Gill, Alec Abeln), one defensive end (Loud), one tackle (Antar Thompson), two linebackers (Nick Ramirez, Joe Burkett), one defensive back (Aarion Penton) and a wildcard athlete (Anthony Sherrils). That's strangely well-rounded.
Based on the distribution of offers, I would expect the final nine to 12 spots in this class to focus on 1-2 more defensive tackles and at least one more receiver/tight end (two if Moore goes elsewhere), defensive end and defensive back. Beyond that, I think the focus shifts more toward "best available."
- Hello There, Mr. Loud
PowerMizzou: Quiet no longer
Rivals.com: Marcus Loud Profile
Mizzou Football Links
There were a lot of fun tidbits emerging from yesterday's SEC Meetings in Destin, FL, but only one piece of information truly matters in the present tense: James Franklin's recovery is ahead of schedule. We haven't talked a ton about it, but Mizzou's ceiling gets lowered quite a bit if Franklin isn't healthy in 2012.
Beyond that, however, yesterday was pretty fun and informative. We're one step closer to getting to fully hate Arkansas, and we might get to have a fun "THE NEW PHONE BOOKS SCHEDULES ARE HERE!" live thread on Friday.
- QB No. 1
The Trib (Dave Matter): Pinkel says Franklin's "ahead of schedule"
ESPN.com (SEC): James Franklin ahead of schedule - YES!
Birmingham Times: SEC meetings notebook: Pinkel believes Arkansas & Missouri will be football rivals
KC Star: Southeastern Conference notebook
KC Star: Former MU basketball coach Anderson was happy for Tigers' success
Mr. SEC: Pinkel Says Arkansas-Missouri Will Be Cross-Division Foes - More Turf Talk
The Trib (Dave Matter): Faurot Field gets a facelift
We Are Mizzou: Mizzou Turf Install - I Smell Live Thread
CBS Sports: SEC to announce 12-year conference scheduleSEC consultant Larry Templeton told the Birmingham News on Saturday that the league would go with a 6-1-1 scheduling model.
Sources told CBSSports.com that the SEC is expected to announce the league's scheduling opponents for the next 12 years and that the rotating cross division game will be a one-year rotation instead of a two-year home and home rotation. However, commissioner Mike Slive said "we'll see what emerges with the schedule."
The SEC's spring meetings began Tuesday in Sandestin. An official announcement on the league's future schedule could come on Friday, the final day of meetings.
In other words: an SEC West team would play six games against the other six SEC West opponents, one game against a permanent SEC East rival and one game against a rotating SEC East team.
That rotating opponent will change every year, meaning each league team will play every other league member at least once every six years. If the league had opted for a home and home series between the rotating teams, it would have taken 12 years for each SEC school to play each other.
Mike Anderson on facing #Mizzou in #SEC, says media will add drama to it but has makings of a good rivalry
— Dave Matter (@Dave_Matter) May 29, 2012
(By the way, you definitely want to read the Alden-on-SEC article after the jump.)
We Have Been Arguing About The Same Things In College Football For 75 Years
Kleph and Todd from Roll Bama Roll put together an interesting couple of posts (here's kleph's) regarding controversial bowl selections in the mid- to late-1930s. All we're missing is a reference to a four- or eight-team playoff, and we will officially have been arguing about the same thing since before World War II.
The Faurot Field Turf Is All But Finished

Based on what we heard about the new turf before it was officially unrolled, I was a little concerned about the end zones and borders. It will take me a while to get used to the new font in the end zone diamonds, but all I am pretty damn pleased with this. I love that they didn't make the Tiger logo too big at midfield, I (obviously) love the SEC logos, and the "Mizzou Football" on the sidelines are solid.
Your turn: thoughts? Things that particularly impress or annoy you?
103 comments
|
1 recs |
Tweet
The SEC "spring meetings" (technically, it is indeed still spring, though the current weather would beg to differ) are underway. Watch the SEC Digital Network's live coverage of the event here.
Mizzou Links, 5-29-12
Mizzou Diamond Sports Links
- Next Stop: Tucson
MUtigers.com: Tiger Baseball Headed to Tucson Regional
Mizzou Network: Baseball Selection Show Reactions
SimmonsField.com: MU's NCAA Regional Destination: Tucson, AZ
The Trib: Missouri to play in Tucson Regional
The Missourian: Missouri headed to Tucson for NCAA Tournament
KC Star: Mizzou baseball team gets spot in Arizona regional
Post-Dispatch: Mizzou will face Arizona
PowerMizzou: Tigers are Tucson bound
Dallas Morning News: Longhorns' Augie Garrido: Missouri winning Big 12 tourney, auto bid into NCAA tourney dealt 'final blow' to Texas tourney chances
SimmonsField.com: MizzouTube: ChampsKBIA Sports: Surprising win and surprising loss for Mizzou baseball and softball - Time To Get To Work On 2013
The Trib: MU softball team forced to stew in its own juices
The Missourian: Elimination stings Missouri softball team even more with loss of Fleming"I’ve been scratching my head all season long," Earleywine said. "We’ve worked so tirelessly with these girls on their mechanics and their mental approach. I think the most frustrating part from a coach’s perspective is that you know they’re capable of having a pretty good mechanical swing. Obviously, every hitter is going to have some things wrong. But if you just line them up in batting practice and watch them hit, they’re pretty sound across the board.
"But when they get into games, I don’t know what happens. I guess it’s the panic button, but they change. They either get jumpier or longer or they try to swing harder or they stride a different direction. That’s the hurtful part, because you know you’ve created this kid that has a very good swing, but they’re not allowing themselves to be successful because of the panic." […]
The problem was offense. Earleywine admitted that he was reduced to counting down the at-bats until Fleming’s turn at the plate, because it seemed preposterous that Missouri might string three hits together. Even when MU scored five runs in Game 2, it was the result of exuberant baserunning and botched throws. Missouri’s 12th-inning outburst began with dropped third strike and turned on a not-so-classic three-run fielder’s choice.
At times this season, Missouri's No. 3 hitter was the Tiger's only offense. She proved that when she hit a walkoff, ninth-inning home run in the Columbia regional against DePaul that gave the Tigers a 1-0 victory and sent them to the title game.
"It's unfortunate, but all day long you're going, 'When's Ashley up?'" Earleywine said after Sunday's games. "It's going to be tough to lose that kid, especially the way she's played these last two seasons. ... We'd like to keep her forever, but what are you going to do?" […]
Fleming was never the vocal presence of this young team, but to a player, everyone considered her a leader. She simply led by example. The lefty with the sweet swing from Silex, who thrived in pressure situations, showed young starters like Kayla Kingsley how to overcome early struggles to become a productive player. She also showed them what she believes are the truly important parts about being a Missouri Tiger.
Football Links
- A Football Nerd's Dream
CBS Sports (Bruce Feldman): Q&A Talking 'Smart Football' with Chris B. Brown - PLAYoff?
Senator Blutarsky: It's so easy...
SEC
- SEC Meetings
The Trib (Dave Matter): Greetings from Destin - The New SEC
Team Speed Kills: SEC 2012: The New SEC - Scheduling
ESPN.com (CBB Blog): Figuring out SEC schedule
EXPANSIONAPALOOZA™ 2012
- Part Two
Bring On The Cats: Conference Realignment: What Matters In Realignment (Post 2) - The Big 12 Still Has Big 12 Tendencies
Blatant Homerism: Whoa, DeLoss, light a match (and forget about Notre Dame) - SECEXPANSIONAPALOOZA™ 201_
Senator Blutarsky: What we should be talking about with SEC expansion - EXPANSIONAPALOOZA™ 1991
Dallas Morning News: Former LSU athletic director: Texas A&M inquired about a move to the SEC in 1991
Other
- Really Nice Pieces From Yesterday
SB Nation YouTube: Veterans' Favorite Sports Memories
Shutdown Corner: Things to know about NFL men who served in WWII, Korea and Vietnam
Mizzou Links, Memorial Day Edition
First things first: we seem to have quite a few members of military families on this site, I want to wish everybody a happy, somber Memorial Day. We tend to use the word "ultimate" too much these days, but we don't use it enough in talking about the ultimate sacrifices made by those for whom Memorial Day was created.
Mizzou Baseball Links
As mentioned in comments last night, though Mizzou Softball is done, we should all think about transferring some of our prop bets (or making new ones) to account for the brilliant run Mizzou Baseball made this past weekend, and the one they might continue to make next weekend. Mizzou Baseball loves children too!
And what a well-timed run this was. The Big 12 Tournament has just taunted Tim Jamieson through the years, as Mizzou has lost dramatically in the finals multiple times, including last year, when the Tigers built a similarly large lead (6-0 last year, 7-2 this year) and lost it. Oklahoma evened things up at 7-7 late, but Mizzou prevailed anyway. Great to see. Welcome back to the NCAAs, Coach.
- Big 12 Tournament Champions
MUtigers.com: Tigers Win Big 12 Baseball Championship
Big12Sports.com: Mizzou Wins Phillips 66 Big 12 Baseball Championship
Big12Sports.com: Missouri vs. Oklahoma Highlights
The Trib: Tigers win Big 12 baseball championship
The Missourian: First Big 12 baseball title special for Missouri's Jamieson
KC Star: Mizzou takes Big 12 baseball title
Post-Dispatch: Tigers win Big 12 baseball crown
Fox Sports MW: Mizzou tops Oklahoma to win first Big 12 title
Daily Oklahoman: Missouri beats Oklahoma to win Big 12 Tournament
Daily Oklahoman: Coach Tim Jamieson, Missouri baseball leave conference on top - Trripleplay's Posting Parade
SimmonsField.com: We are the champions !!!
SimmonsField.com: Big 12 Tournament Championship Photos: Celebration
SimmonsField.com: Big 12 Tournament Championship Photos: Congratulations
SimmonsField.com: Big 12 Tournament Championship Photos: Dogpile
SimmonsField.com: Big 12 Tournament Championship Photos: Award Ceremony
SimmonsField.com: Big 12 Tournament Championship Photos: Trophy
SimmonsField.com: Big 12 Tournament Championship Photos: The Ultimate Honor
SimmonsField.com: HI NOTES: Big 12 Champs move on to NCAA RegionalsThe Big 12 win awards the Tigers an automatic berth in the NCAA Regionals. The at-large teams, top-eight national seeds, first-round regional pairings and site assignments will be announced at noon ET, Monday, May 28. The one-hour program will be shown live on ESPNU.
Mizzou Softball Links
Good run, ladies. Start a new streak next year. #TremendousStubble
— Rock M Nation (@rockmnation) May 28, 2012
- LSU Hates Children
MUtigers.com: Missouri's Season Ends at Hands of LSU
The Trib: Same ole same ole -- lack of an offense does in Tigers
The Missourian: Defeat in home super regional tough end for Missouri
KC Star: LSU keeps MU softball team out of World Series
KC Star: MU softball falls short of College World Series
Post-Dispatch: Mizzou runs out of gas
Mizzou Football Links
- Upgrades
Mizzou Network: Building The New Faurot - The Move™
Post-Dispatch: Mizzou returns to school - Mailbag!
The Trib (Dave Matter): The New Nameless Twitter Mailbag Blog@novakmchris: What offensive and what defensive player on the team do you think is poised to have a breakout season this year?
Offense: Marcus Lucas. As a sophomore last year, his production was erratic. Game-winning TD catches against Texas A&M and Texas Tech. Zero catches against Oklahoma, Kansas State, Texas and North Carolina. As far as talent goes, no reason why he can’t be one of the top outside receivers in the SEC this year.
Defense: Kony Ealy. He has all the tools to be an impact player on the edge.
- Posters
We Are Mizzou: Football Poster Photo Shoot
SEC
- Scheduling
Birmingham Times: Meet the SEC schedule guru fitting square pegs in round holes
SB Nation: SEC Confirms '6-1-1' Scheduling For Future Conference Games - Recruiting & Development
Mr. SEC: A School-By-School Comparison Of The SEC's NFL Pipelines
EXPANSIONAPALOOZA™ 2012
- Catching Up
Bring On The Cats: Conference Realignment: Why Is This Happening? (Post 1)
Other
- USMNT
Dirty Tackle: Donovan hat-trick powers hooped Yanks over Scotland in friendly
Pro Soccer Talk: The Big Three: trio of talkers in U.S. romp over Scotland
NCAA Softball Super Regionals: Mizzou Vs. LSU For All The Rally Bowls
Chelsea Thomas has thrown approximately 1,734 pitches in 24 hours ... and it JUST. DOESN'T. MATTER. IT JUST DOESN'T MATTER. IT JUST DOESN'T MATTER.
BONUS SOFTBALL.
#TremendousDelirium
294 comments
|
1 recs |
Tweet
Mizzou Baseball & Softball Live Thread: The Stakes, They Are High
So yesterday featured a huge baseball game and a huge softball game. Today, the stakes have been raised considerably. Thanks to Mizzou's run-rule win over Kansas (tee hee), the Tigers have a chance to win their final Big 12 tournament today against Oklahoma. Meanwhile, thanks to the rare rough outing for Chelsea Thomas, Mizzou Softball must win twice today to make their fourth straight Women's College World Series.
1:05 p.m. CT
Big 12 Baseball Tournament Finals
Missouri vs. Oklahoma
TV: Fox Sports Midwest (full list of outlets here -- warning: PDF)
2:30 p.m. CT
NCAA Softball Super Regionals
Missouri vs. LSU
TV: ESPNU
5:00 p.m. CT (If Necessary)
NCAA Softball Super Regionals
Missouri vs. LSU
TV: ESPNU
Baseball
Mizzou traveled to Norman in mid-April, in the middle of a four-game conference losing streak. They left in the middle of a seven-game conference losing streak. Oklahoma swept Tim Jamieson's Tigers, but one can take solace in two things: 1) Mizzou is playing quite a bit better now than they were then, and 2) two of the three losses in Norman were by one run. They lost the opener, 6-5 in 10 innings, and they lost the closer, 5-4. They absolutely have a chance to pull off a win today. As good as Oklahoma has looked this week in taking out Baylor twice, Mizzou has looked just as good -- they outscored Texas, Texas A&M and Kansas by a combined 22-5.
Some links:
- Mizzou 12, Kansas 2
MUtigers.com: Mizzou Run Rules Kansas to Advance to Big 12 Championship Game
Big 12 Sports: Missouri Advances to Second Straight Big 12 Championship Game
The Trib: Missouri advances to baseball championship game
The Trib: Border War comes to merciful end for KU
KC Star: MU wins final Border War
SimmonsField.com: MU Run-Rules the Border War
Softball
There's a reason why teams don't typically make it to four consecutive World Series: it's really hard to do. It is difficult to pull off four straight years of regionals and super regionals without suffering poor performances at really poor times. Chelsea Thomas simply couldn't find the plate yesterday, and LSU executed its game plan (work the count, run the bases well, kill with defense) better than Missouri did. The good news is simply that LSU didn't do anything surprising; they simply played well. If Chelsea can locate her pitches today (and the odds are good that she will), and if the defense tightens up (LSU scored two runs on a bloop single that two different defenders should have caught, and the Bayou Bengals' fifth-inning explosion began with another iffy defensive play), Mizzou is more than capable of winning two games today. We'll see, huh?
Some links:
- LSU 6, Mizzou 1
MUtigers.com: Mizzou Drops Opener to LSU, 6-1
Mizzou Network: Ehren Earleywine Postgame Press Conference
The Trib: LSU surprises Missouri in super regional opener
The Trib: Win two ... or go home
The Missourian: Thomas, Missouri fall to LSU in super regional opener
KC Star: MU falls to LSU in game one of softball Super Regional
Post-Dispatch: MU softball team loses opener in super regional
KBIA Sports: Mizzou softball loses to LSU, must win two to advance to World Series
SOFTBALL RALLY THREAD
165 comments
|
2 recs |
Tweet
Saturday Live Thread
It is an interesting present-meets-future day on the diamonds today. Missouri faces off versus Kansas either once or twice on the baseball diamond today (and this really will be the last time the programs face as conference rivals) and in between, Mizzou takes on future conference rival LSU in the NCAA Softball Super Regionals. The stakes are high and getting higher for both programs. A win in either of two games today would put the Tigers in tomorrow's Big 12 Tournament finals (which, if they won, would give them an automatic bid into the NCAA Tournament. Meanwhile, as you probably know very well by now, a win by the softball game would put them within one step of an incredible, fourth straight Women's College World Series bid.
12:30 p.m. CT
Big 12 Baseball Tournament Semifinals
Missouri (2-0) vs. Kansas (2-1)
Watch Live
SimmonsField.com's "Last Grudge Match. Again." HI NOTES post
6:30 p.m. CT
NCAA Softball Super Regionals
No. 9 Missouri vs. LSU at University Field
TV: ESPNU
MUTigers.com Tournament Central
The Beef's Stellar Series Preview
7:30 p.m. CT (if necessary)
Big 12 Baseball Tournament Semifinals
Missouri vs. Kansas
Watch Live
And of course, check in on the Stubble Drive here and buy your Tremendous Stubble T-Shirt for future use here. Do it for Mizzou and Missouri Children's Hospital!
A potentially thrilling (or, technically, devastating) weekend begins at 12:30. And Rally Baby is prepared to intervene if necessary.
M-I-Z...
2012 Rutgers Scarlet Knights Football: Statistical Profile
Confused? See the glossary at the bottom.

2011 Schedule & Results
| Record: 9-4 | Adj. Record: 7-6 | Final F/+ Rk: 34 | |||||
| Date | Opponent | Score | W-L | Adj. Score | Adj. W-L |
| 1-Sep | N.C. Central | 48-0 | W | 21.1 - 16.3 | W |
| 10-Sep | at North Carolina | 22-24 | L | 21.0 - 25.5 | L |
| 24-Sep | Ohio | 38-26 | W | 30.9 - 29.6 | W |
| 1-Oct | at Syracuse | 19-16 | W | 18.3 - 23.6 | L |
| 8-Oct | Pittsburgh | 34-10 | W | 24.9 - 19.3 | W |
| 15-Oct | Navy | 21-20 | W | 26.6 - 22.9 | W |
| 21-Oct | at Louisville | 14-16 | L | 26.6 - 30.8 | L |
| 29-Oct | West Virginia | 31-41 | L | 26.6 - 29.4 | L |
| 5-Nov | South Florida | 20-17 | W | 21.7 - 24.0 | L |
| 12-Nov | vs. Army | 27-12 | W | 27.1 - 21.1 | W |
| 19-Nov | Cincinnati | 20-3 | W | 29.4 - 10.2 | W |
| 26-Nov | at Connecticut | 22-40 | L | 27.8 - 30.8 | L |
| 30-Dec | vs. Iowa State | 27-13 | W | 26.1 - 25.2 | W |
| Category | Offense | Rk | Defense | Rk |
| Points Per Game | 26.4 | 65 | 18.3 | 8 |
| Adj. Points Per Game | 25.2 | 97 | 23.8 | 14 |
2012 Schedule & Projection Factors
| 2012 Schedule | ||
| Date | Opponent | Proj. Rk |
| 1-Sep | at Tulane | 111 |
| 8-Sep | Howard | NR |
| 13-Sep | at South Florida | 25 |
| 22-Sep | at Arkansas | 14 |
| 6-Oct | Connecticut | 53 |
| 13-Oct | Syracuse | 78 |
| 20-Oct | at Temple | 73 |
| 27-Oct | Kent State | 92 |
| 10-Nov | Army | 95 |
| 17-Nov | at Cincinnati | 44 |
| 24-Nov | at Pittsburgh | 41 |
| 29-Nov | Louisville | 50 |
| Five-Year F/+ Rk | 44 |
| Two-Year Recruiting Rk | 29 |
| TO Margin/Adj. TO Margin* | +6 / -0.1 |
| TO Luck/Game | +2.4 |
| Approx. Ret. Starters (Off. / Def.) | 14 (6, 8) |
| Yds/Pt Margin** | -4.2 |
Offense

| Category | Yards/ Game Rk |
S&P+ Rk | Success Rt. Rk |
PPP+ Rk |
| OVERALL | 99 | 106 | 109 | 102 |
| RUSHING | 112 | 104 | 109 | 96 |
| PASSING | 52 | 100 | 98 | 100 |
| Standard Downs | 111 | 117 | 104 | |
| Passing Downs | 71 | 71 | 69 | |
| Redzone | 108 | 101 | 109 |
| Q1 Rk | 108 | 1st Down Rk | 97 |
| Q2 Rk | 88 | 2nd Down Rk | 106 |
| Q3 Rk | 106 | 3rd Down Rk | 106 |
| Q4 Rk | 77 | ||
| Adj. Line Yards Rk | 118 | ||
| Adj. Sack Rate Rk | 56 | ||
Quarterback
Note: players in bold below are 2012 returnees. Players in italics are questionable with injury/suspension.
| Player | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Rivals | Comp | Att | Yards | Comp Rate |
TD | INT | Sacks | Sack Rate | Yards/ Att. |
| Chas Dodd | 6'0, 200 | Jr. | ** (5.4) | 139 | 245 | 1,574 | 56.7% | 10 | 7 | 15 | 5.8% | 5.7 |
| Gary Nova | 6'2, 220 | So. | *** (5.7) | 116 | 227 | 1,553 | 51.1% | 11 | 9 | 15 | 6.2% | 5.9 |
Running Back
| Player | Pos. | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Rivals | Rushes | Yards | Yards/ Carry |
Hlt Yds/ Carry |
TD | Adj. POE |
| Jawan Jamison | RB | 5'8, 198 | So. | *** (5.6) | 231 | 897 | 3.9 | 1.5 | 9 | -7.5 |
| Savon Huggins | RB | 6'0, 200 | So. | **** (5.9) | 56 | 146 | 2.6 | 0.7 | 5 | -3.1 |
| Jeremy Deering | RB | 6'2, 205 | Jr. | *** (5.6) | 47 | 169 | 3.6 | 0.9 | 0 | -4.6 |
| Joe Martinek | FB | 24 | 123 | 5.1 | 1.7 | 0 | -1.5 | |||
| De'Antwan Williams | RB | 20 | 59 | 3.0 | 0.7 | 0 | -4.9 | |||
| Chas Dodd | QB | 6'0, 200 | Jr. | ** (5.4) | 12 | 29 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 0 | -1.8 |
| Michael Burton | FB | 6'0, 232 | So. | NR | 10 | 44 | 4.4 | 2.0 | 0 | +0.5 |
Receiving Corps
| Player | Pos. | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Rivals | Targets | Catches | Yards | Catch Rate | Target Rate |
%SD | Adj. Yds/ Target |
| Mohamed Sanu | WR | 176 | 115 | 1,206 | 65.3% | 39.7% | 55.7% | 6.3 | |||
| Quron Pratt | WR | 6'0, 185 | Jr. | *** (5.5) | 57 | 32 | 327 | 56.1% | 12.9% | 40.4% | 3.3 |
| Brandon Coleman | WR | 6'6, 220 | So. | **** (5.8) | 45 | 17 | 552 | 37.8% | 10.2% | 46.7% | 4.9 |
| Joe Martinek | FB | 37 | 27 | 262 | 73.0% | 8.4% | 54.1% | 7.2 | |||
| Mark Harrison | WR | 6'3, 230 | Sr. | *** (5.5) | 35 | 14 | 274 | 40.0% | 7.9% | 40.0% | 2.1 |
| Tim Wright | WR | 6'4, 221 | Sr. | 26 | 11 | 147 | 42.3% | 5.9% | 38.5% | 3.0 | |
| D.C. Jefferson | TE | 6'6, 258 | Sr. | *** (5.7) | 22 | 12 | 118 | 54.5% | 5.0% | 50.0% | 3.5 |
| Paul Carrezola | TE | 6'2, 241 | Jr. | *** (5.6) | 14 | 4 | 35 | 28.6% | 3.2% | 57.1% | -1.3 |
| Michael Burton | FB | 6'0, 232 | So. | NR | 12 | 10 | 68 | 83.3% | 2.7% | 83.3% | 7.0 |
| Jawan Jamison | RB | 5'8, 198 | So. | *** (5.6) | 11 | 8 | 62 | 72.7% | 2.5% | 36.4% | 7.2 |
| Leonte Carroo | WR | 6'1, 205 | Fr. | **** (5.8) |
Offensive Line
| Player | Pos. | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Rivals | Career Starts/Honors/Notes |
| Art Forst | RG | 40 career starts, 2011 1st All-Big East | |||
| Desmond Wynn | LG | 28 career starts, 2011 2nd All-Big East | |||
| Caleb Ruch | C | 28 career starts | |||
| R.J. Dill | RT | 6'7, 310 | Sr. | *** (5.5) | 21 career starts (at Maryland) |
| Desmond Stapleton | RT | 14 career starts | |||
| Andre Civil | LT | 6'3, 275 | Jr. | *** (5.7) | 13 career starts |
| Kaleb Johnson | LT | 6'4, 298 | So. | *** (5.5) | 10 career starts |
| Antwan Lowery | LG | 6'4, 301 | Jr. | *** (5.7) | 7 career starts |
| David Osei | LG | 6'4, 280 | Jr. | ** (5.0) | 5 career starts |
| Betim Bujari | C | 6'4, 290 | So. | *** (5.5) | 2 career starts |
| Matt McBride | RG | 6'6, 294 | Jr. | NR | |
| Taj Alexander | RG | 6'4, 290 | So. | ** (5.2) | |
| Dallas Hendrikson | C | 6'2, 295 | Jr. | ** (5.4) | |
| Chris Muller | OL | 6'6, 287 | Fr. | **** (5.9) | |
| J.J. Denman | OL | 6'7, 305 | Fr. | **** (5.8) |
Defense

| Category | Yards/ Game Rk |
S&P+ Rk | Success Rt. Rk |
PPP+ Rk |
| OVERALL | 12 | 24 | 17 | 30 |
| RUSHING | 49 | 39 | 14 | 66 |
| PASSING | 9 | 16 | 27 | 8 |
| Standard Downs | 28 | 13 | 42 | |
| Passing Downs | 8 | 23 | 4 | |
| Redzone | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Q1 Rk | 21 | 1st Down Rk | 33 |
| Q2 Rk | 30 | 2nd Down Rk | 14 |
| Q3 Rk | 14 | 3rd Down Rk | 10 |
| Q4 Rk | 34 | ||
| Adj. Line Yards Rk | 8 | ||
| Adj. Sack Rate Rk | 21 | ||
Defensive Line
| Name | Pos | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Rivals | GP | Tackles | % of Team | TFL | Sacks | Int | PBU | FF | FR |
| Justin Francis | DT | 13 | 48.5 | 7.3% | 13 | 6.5 | 1 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| Scott Vallone | DT | 6'3, 275 | Sr. | **** (5.8) | 13 | 39.0 | 5.9% | 8.5 | 2.5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |
| Manny Abreu | DE | 13 | 19.5 | 2.9% | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Ka'Lial Glaud | DE | 6'2, 230 | Sr. | *** (5.5) | 13 | 16.0 | 2.4% | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | ||
| Jamil Merrell | DT | 6'4, 255 | Jr. | *** (5.7) | 9 | 12.0 | 1.8% | 2.5 | 1 | 2 | |||
| Marcus Thompson | DE | 6'2, 260 | Jr. | *** (5.6) | 11 | 9.0 | 1.4% | 2.5 | 0.5 | ||||
| Isaac Holmes | DT | 6'3, 272 | Jr. | **** (5.8) | 13 | 8.0 | 1.2% | 2.5 | 1 | ||||
| Michael Larrow | DE | 6'4, 265 | Jr. | *** (5.5) | 6 | 7.0 | 1.1% | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1 | |||
| Kenneth Kirksey | DT | 6'1, 270 | So. | *** (5.7) | 9 | 6.0 | 0.9% | 2.5 | |||||
| Marvin Booker | DE | 6'2, 240 | Sr. | ** (5.2) | 2 | 2.0 | 0.3% | ||||||
| Marquise Wright | DT | 6'3, 295 | RSFr. | **** (5.8) | |||||||||
| Al Page | DT | 6'2, 280 | RSFr. | *** (5.6) | |||||||||
| Darius Hamilton | DE | 6'4, 245 | Fr. | ***** (6.1) |
Linebackers
| Name | Pos | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Rivals | GP | Tackles | % of Team | TFL | Sacks | Int | PBU | FF | FR |
| Khaseem Greene | OLB | 6'1, 220 | Sr. | ** (5.1) | 13 | 107.5 | 16.2% | 14 | 3.5 | 1 | 2 | ||
| Steve Beauharnais | MLB | 6'2, 235 | Sr. | *** (5.5) | 13 | 60.0 | 9.0% | 16 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Jamal Merrell | OLB | 6'4, 220 | Jr. | *** (5.7) | 13 | 33.0 | 5.0% | 3 | 0.5 | 2 | 1 | ||
| Kevin Snyder | OLB | 6'3, 225 | So. | *** (5.5) | 13 | 26.5 | 4.0% | 2.5 | 1 | ||||
| Nick DePaola | MLB | 6'0, 205 | Jr. | NR | 13 | 7.5 | 1.1% | ||||||
| Edmond Laryea | OLB | 13 | 4.0 | 0.6% | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| David Milewski | LB | 6'4, 230 | So. | ** (5.4) | 4 | 1.0 | 0.2% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Robert Joseph | OLB | 6'2, 220 | Jr. | ** (5.4) | 0.0 | 0.0% | |||||||
| Quanzell Lambert | LB | 6'2, 230 | Fr. | **** (5.8) |
Secondary
| Name | Pos | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Rivals | GP | Tackles | % of Team | TFL | Sacks | Int | PBU | FF | FR |
| Logan Ryan | CB | 6'0, 190 | Jr. | **** (5.8) | 13 | 57.5 | 8.7% | 5.5 | 0.5 | 3 | 14 | 2 | 2 |
| David Rowe | FS | 13 | 41.5 | 6.3% | 1 | 0.5 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 3 | |||
| Duron Harmon | FS | 6'1, 201 | Sr. | *** (5.6) | 13 | 41.0 | 6.2% | 2.5 | 5 | 1 | |||
| Brandon Jones | CB | 6'1, 186 | Sr. | ** (5.4) | 13 | 30.5 | 4.6% | 3.5 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | |
| Marcus Cooper | CB | 6'2, 187 | Sr. | ** (5.4) | 13 | 22.5 | 3.4% | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Wayne Warren | SS | 6'1, 205 | Sr. | *** (5.5) | 13 | 20.5 | 3.1% | 2.5 | 2.5 | 1 | 3 | 2 | |
| Patrick Kivlehan | DB | 13 | 11.0 | 1.7% | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Lorenzo Waters | SS | 6'0, 195 | So. | *** (5.6) | 11 | 7.0 | 1.1% | ||||||
| Jordan Thomas | DB | 13 | 6.0 | 0.9% | |||||||||
| Mason Robinson | CB | 5'10, 185 | Sr. | **** (5.8) | 1 | 2.5 | 0.4% | ||||||
| Gareef Glashen | CB | 5'10, 181 | So. | *** (5.5) | 4 | 2.0 | 0.3% | 1 | |||||
| Rashad Knight | FS | 5'11, 192 | So. | **** (5.8) | |||||||||
| J.T. Tartacoff | FS | 5'11, 191 | So. | *** (5.5) |
Special Teams
| Punter | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Punts | Avg | TB | FC | I20 | FC/I20 Ratio |
| Justin Doerner | 6'2, 200 | Sr. | 64 | 40.3 | 5 | 15 | 24 | 60.9% |
| Kicker | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Kickoffs | Avg | TB | TB% |
| Justin Doerner | 6'2, 200 | Sr. | 68 | 61.4 | 7 | 10.3% |
| Place-Kicker | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
PAT | FG (0-39) |
Pct | FG (40+) |
Pct |
| San San Te | 37-38 | 13-17 | 76.5% | 7-14 | 50.0% |
| Returner | Pos. | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Returns | Avg. | TD |
| Jeremy Deering | KR | 6'2, 205 | Jr. | 17 | 31.2 | 1 |
| Jordan Thomas | KR | 16 | 19.4 | 0 | ||
| Mohamed Sanu | PR | 12 | 4.6 | 0 | ||
| Mason Robinson | PR | 5'10, 185 | Sr. | 2 | 2.5 | 0 |
| Category | Rk |
| Special Teams F/+ | 12 |
| Net Punting | 58 |
| Net Kickoffs | 97 |
| Touchback Pct | 81 |
| Field Goal Pct | 80 |
| Kick Returns Avg | 34 |
| Punt Returns Avg | 84 |
---
Glossary
Adj. Line Yards: A line measure derived from the formula found here. The idea is to divvy credit for a given rush between both the runner and the blockers.
Adj. Pace: Part of the offensive footprint, this takes into account both the number of plays a team attempts and the type of play. Since passes, on average, take up less time (thanks to the fact that 30-50 percent of them are incomplete and stop the clock), pass-heavy offenses are prone to run more plays, therefore limiting the effectiveness of a general plays-per-game measure. Adj. Pace takes a team's run-pass ratio into account.
Adj. POE: An opponent-adjusted "Points Over Expected" measure for running backs that looks both at what a runner gained and what would have been expected given the opponents involved. For more information, start here.
Adj. Points: A look at how a team would have performed in a given week if playing a perfectly average team, with a somewhat average number of breaks and turnovers. The idea for the measure is simple: what if everybody in the country played exactly the same opponent every single week? Who would have done the best? It is an attempt to look at offensive and defensive consistency without getting sidetracked by easy or difficult schedules. And yes, with adjusted score you can allow a negative number of points. For more, start here.
Adj. Record: See Adj. Points.
Adj. Sack Rate: An opponent-adjusted measure of sack rates.
Adj. Score: See Adj. Points.
Adj. TO Margin: What a team's turnover margin would have been if they had recovered exactly 50 percent of all the fumbles that occurred in their games. If there is a huge difference between TO Margin and Adj. TO Margin (in other words, if fumbles, dropped interceptions, or other unlucky bounces were the main source of a good/bad TO margin), that suggests that a team's luck was particularly good or bad and might even out the next season.
Adj. Yards Per Target: A look at a receiver's total receiving yards divided by the number of times he was targeted. Slight adjustments are made for the percentage of times a receiver was targeted on standard ("%SD") and passing downs. Players targeted more on passing downs are likely to have a lower overall per-target average, since passing is more difficult on passing downs.
Bend-Don't-Break: Part of the defensive footprint, this is a comparison of a team's Def. Success Rate (efficiency) to its Def. PPP (explosiveness). The higher the number, the higher percentage of a team's overall S&P was made up by success rate, i.e. the more willing a team was to sacrifice efficiency to prevent big plays. (The lower the number, the more likely a team was to take aggressive risks.)
Covariance: Covariance is a statistical tool that provides a measure of the strength of the correlation between two or more sets of random variates. For these purposes, it is used to compare a team's performance (using opponent-adjusted Adj. Score) to the quality of the opponent at hand. Some teams play their best games against their worst opponents, and some teams do the opposite. This measure is used for both the offensive and defensive footprint. For more, go here.
Go After the Ball: Part of the defensive footprint, this looks at a team's forced fumbles, interceptions and passes broken up. In other words, it looks at their ability to go after the ball. The higher the number, the more they got their hands on the football.
Highlight Yards: The portion of a given run that is credit only to the running back; after a certain number of yards, the line has done its job, and most of the rest of the run will be determined by the running back himself. For more information, start here.
Need for Blitzes: Part of the defensive footprint, this compares a team's standard downs sack rate to its passing downs sack rate. The lower the number, the more they were able to generate pressure on standard downs, and the less need for blitzes.
Turnovers Luck: Presented in Points Per Game fashion, Turnovers Luck looks at the difference between a team's Turnover and Adj. TO Margins and, using the average point value of a turnover (~5.0 points), projects how many points a team gained or lost per game last season.
Yards Per Point: A measure long tracked by Phil Steele as a means of looking at teams that were a little too efficient or inefficient the previous season. A positive YPP Margin means a team's offense was less efficient than opponents' offenses, and to the extent that luck was involved, their luck might even out the next year.
Mizzou Links, 5-25-12
Mizzou Softball Links
If you read only one of the links below (and by all means, you should read them all!!), make it the Missourian piece on Corrin Genovese below. Great stuff.
- Super Regional Starts Tomorrow
MUtigers.com: No. 9 Tigers Eye Fourth Straight WCWS Bid
MUtigers.com: FAN PRIMER - NCAA SUPER REGIONALS
The Missourian: Genovese's talent almost got away from Missouri
Post-Dispatch: Marston's move to catcher helps propel Mizzou softball
KC Star: Injuries changed Missouri's Muller, but her spirit is unaffected
Mizzou Network: 1 on 1 with Ehren Earleywine - NERRRRRRRDS
MUtigers.com: Three Crowned Academic All-Americans
Mizzou Baseball Links
- One Win From The Finals
MUtigers.com: Mizzou Advances to Big 12 Semifinal with 5-3 Win Over Texas A&M
Big 12 Sports: Missouri Upends Texas A&M, 5-3
The Trib: Missouri advances at Big 12 baseball tournament
KC Star: Mizzou moves into bracket final at Big 12 baseball tournament - Other
SimmonsField.com: HI NOTES: Postseason for former Tigers; SEC Tourney
Mizzou Football Links
The 50 yard line is down. GP #MIZZOU twitter.com/mizzoufootball…
— Coach Pinkel (@mizzoufootball) May 24, 2012
Gary Pinkel and John L. Smith seem to be having a competition over who can tweet the most construction photos. John L. is winning.
— David Wunderlich (@Year2) May 24, 2012
- Atlanta = Dallas
ESPN.com (SEC): Missouri is ready to recruit the southeastPinkel said the main areas of importance outside of the Tigers' home state are Dallas and Atlanta. The good thing for Pinkel and his staff is that it's only about an hour longer drive to Atlanta compared to Dallas. It still accounts for 10-plus hours on the road, but if you're going to take the time to head to Dallas, you might as well make it out to the hub of the South.
And for Pinkel, it's well worth it.
"If you look at statistics and analysis of BCS players, they come out of the metroplex around Dallas and then you look at the greater Atlanta area," he said. "The parallels are staggering between those two cities. They produce a lot of athletes."
Currently, Missouri has just six players from SEC states -- three from Florida, two from Arkansas and one from Louisiana. Mizzou increased that number by two after signing two players from Florida in its 2012 class.
- Gabs
Big Cat Country: Blaine Gabbert's Footwork Already Improving
ESPN.com (AFC South): Why the Jags expect better pass protection - You're A Mean One, Mr. Gr ... Oh, Nevermind
We Are Mizzou: Alex Grinch
Mizzou Basketball Links
So this is an interesting tidbit. The good folks at PowerMizzou think Mizzou has a good shot at Stevie Clark, a junior point guard from OKC Douglass. Only ... his coach just left, he's not pleased about it, and he's trying to figure out if he can graduate in 2012 instead. If he does so ... then that probably means Missouri is not a player (because of that whole "we have no scholarships left to give" thing).
- 2013 Recruiting?
ESPN.com (Insider): PG Stevie Clark might graduate early
SEC
Excellent interview, though I'd like to know more about what Alden called the "30-month transition" at the end.
- Alden Speaks
Mizzou Network: Alden on Stadium, Softball and Conference Realignment
EXPANSIONAPALOOZA™ 2012
- The Train, It Keeps Rolling
SB Nation: John Swofford Confident ACC Schools Are Trustworthy, Uninterested In Big 12
SB Nation: Clemson BOT Chairman Says School "Would Listen" To Other Conferences
Shakin' In The Southland: Wilkins comments following BOT meeting
Saturday Blitz: Flashback Friday: Conference Moves of Yesteryear
Black Shoe Diaries: Delany Goes Corleone
Other Mizzou Links
- Mizzou Wrestling
MUtigers.com: Wrestling Announces Coaching Staff Additions
Other
- USMNT
SB Nation: USA Vs. Scotland: Jurgen Klinsmann's Squad Begins "Five Match Tournament"
2012 Louisville Cardinals Football: Statistical Profile
Confused? See the glossary at the bottom.

2011 Schedule & Results
| Record: 7-6 | Adj. Record: 5-8 | Final F/+ Rk: 44 | |||||
| Date | Opponent | Score | W-L | Adj. Score | Adj. W-L |
| 1-Sep | Murray State | 21-9 | W | 20.1 - 29.0 | L |
| 9-Sep | Florida International | 17-24 | L | 28.4 - 29.6 | L |
| 17-Sep | at Kentucky | 24-17 | W | 31.1 - 29.2 | W |
| 1-Oct | Marshall | 13-17 | L | 24.4 - 28.9 | L |
| 8-Oct | at North Carolina | 7-14 | L | 23.0 - 24.7 | L |
| 15-Oct | at Cincinnati | 16-25 | L | 25.1 - 29.2 | L |
| 21-Oct | Rutgers | 16-14 | W | 34.1 - 29.0 | W |
| 29-Oct | Syracuse | 27-10 | W | 27.6 - 21.1 | W |
| 5-Nov | at West Virginia | 38-35 | W | 32.7 - 30.7 | W |
| 12-Nov | Pittsburgh | 14-21 | L | 27.2 - 31.5 | L |
| 19-Nov | at Connecticut | 34-20 | W | 26.3 - 27.4 | L |
| 25-Nov | at South Florida | 34-24 | W | 31.7 - 25.2 | W |
| 27-Dec | vs N.C. State | 24-31 | L | 26.6 - 29.2 | L |
| Category | Offense | Rk | Defense | Rk |
| Points Per Game | 21.9 | 98 | 20.1 | 17 |
| Adj. Points Per Game | 27.6 | 56 | 28.1 | 66 |
2012 Schedule & Projection Factors
| 2012 Schedule | ||
| Date | Opponent | Proj. Rk |
| 2-Sep | Kentucky | 83 |
| 9-Sep | Missouri State | NR |
| 15-Sep | North Carolina | 32 |
| 22-Sep | at Florida International | 56 |
| 29-Sep | at Southern Miss | 46 |
| 13-Oct | at Pittsburgh | 41 |
| 20-Oct | South Florida | 25 |
| 26-Oct | Cincinnati | 44 |
| 3-Nov | Temple | 73 |
| 10-Nov | at Syracuse | 78 |
| 24-Nov | Connecticut | 53 |
| 29-Nov | at Rutgers | 40 |
| Five-Year F/+ Rk | 59 |
| Two-Year Recruiting Rk | 34 |
| TO Margin/Adj. TO Margin* | -1 / +3.3 |
| TO Luck/Game | -1.6 |
| Approx. Ret. Starters (Off. / Def.) | 14 (8, 7) |
| Yds/Pt Margin** | -1.1 |
Offense

| Category | Yards/ Game Rk |
S&P+ Rk | Success Rt. Rk |
PPP+ Rk |
| OVERALL | 103 | 60 | 60 | 61 |
| RUSHING | 93 | 62 | 64 | 64 |
| PASSING | 74 | 56 | 51 | 56 |
| Standard Downs | 64 | 59 | 74 | |
| Passing Downs | 55 | 75 | 45 | |
| Redzone | 11 | 15 | 10 |
| Q1 Rk | 30 | 1st Down Rk | 105 |
| Q2 Rk | 56 | 2nd Down Rk | 29 |
| Q3 Rk | 93 | 3rd Down Rk | 29 |
| Q4 Rk | 65 | ||
| Adj. Line Yards Rk | 57 | ||
| Adj. Sack Rate Rk | 97 | ||
Quarterback
Note: players in bold below are 2012 returnees. Players in italics are questionable with injury/suspension.
| Player | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Rivals | Comp | Att | Yards | Comp Rate |
TD | INT | Sacks | Sack Rate | Yards/ Att. |
| Teddy Bridgewater | 6'2, 193 | So. | **** (5.8) | 191 | 296 | 2,129 | 64.5% | 14 | 12 | 33 | 10.0% | 5.9 |
| Will Stein | 5'10, 176 | Sr. | NR | 52 | 84 | 620 | 61.9% | 5 | 1 | 8 | 8.7% | 6.2 |
| Luke Brohm | 6'1, 200 | RSFr. | NR |
Running Back
| Player | Pos. | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Rivals | Rushes | Yards | Yards/ Carry |
Hlt Yds/ Carry |
TD | Adj. POE |
| Dominique Brown | RB | 6'2, 221 | Jr. | **** (5.8) | 140 | 533 | 3.8 | 1.4 | 4 | -3.4 |
| Victor Anderson | RB | 114 | 539 | 4.7 | 1.8 | 3 | -2.3 | |||
| Jeremy Wright | RB | 5'11, 199 | Jr. | ** (5.4) | 73 | 334 | 4.6 | 1.5 | 1 | -1.9 |
| Teddy Bridgewater | QB | 6'2, 193 | So. | **** (5.8) | 56 | 247 | 4.4 | 1.2 | 4 | +4.1 |
| Will Stein | QB | 5'10, 176 | Sr. | NR | 16 | 57 | 3.6 | 1.1 | 0 | -2.9 |
| Senorise Perry | RB | 6'0, 201 | Jr. | *** (5.5) | 12 | 27 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 1 | +0.7 |
| Corvin Lamb | RB | 5'9, 207 | RSFr. | *** (5.6) |
Receiving Corps
| Player | Pos. | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Rivals | Targets | Catches | Yards | Catch Rate | Target Rate |
%SD | Adj. Yds/ Target |
| Eli Rogers | WR-H | 5'10, 184 | So. | **** (5.8) | 58 | 41 | 454 | 70.7% | 16.4% | 60.3% | 7.9 |
| Josh Chichester | TE | 55 | 28 | 393 | 50.9% | 15.6% | 65.5% | 4.8 | |||
| Michaelee Harris | WR-Z | 6'0, 198 | So. | **** (5.9) | 46 | 35 | 438 | 76.1% | 13.0% | 67.4% | 11.1 |
| Josh Bellamy | WR-H | 35 | 24 | 280 | 68.6% | 9.9% | 68.6% | 7.6 | |||
| Victor Anderson | RB | 32 | 28 | 232 | 87.5% | 9.1% | 40.6% | 8.6 | |||
| DeVante Parker | WR-X | 6'2, 180 | So. | *** (5.7) | 29 | 18 | 291 | 62.1% | 8.2% | 37.9% | 10.2 |
| Andrell Smith | WR-X | 6'4, 209 | Sr. | ** (5.3) | 22 | 11 | 207 | 50.0% | 6.2% | 40.9% | 6.5 |
| Dominique Brown | RB | 6'2, 221 | Jr. | **** (5.8) | 20 | 16 | 98 | 80.0% | 5.7% | 45.0% | 6.0 |
| Jarrett Davis | WR-Z | 5'10, 173 | Jr. | ** (5.4) | 20 | 12 | 102 | 60.0% | 5.7% | 50.0% | 3.9 |
| Scott Radcliff | WR-H | 5'10, 182 | Sr. | NR | 11 | 8 | 83 | 72.7% | 3.1% | 63.6% | 7.4 |
| Chris White | TE | 6'4, 243 | So. | NR | 6 | 5 | 73 | 83.3% | 1.7% | 83.3% | 12.2 |
| Nate Nord | TE | 6'5, 230 | Jr. | ** (5.4) | 4 | 4 | 24 | 100.0% | 1.1% | 75.0% | 6.0 |
| Damian Copeland | WR | 6'1, 186 | Jr. | ** (5.3) |
Offensive Line
| Player | Pos. | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Rivals | Career Starts/Honors/Notes |
| Mario Benavides | C | 6'4, 300 | Sr. | *** (5.6) | 34 career starts |
| Alex Kupper | LT | 6'3, 295 | Sr. | NR | 14 career starts |
| Jake Smith | RG | 6'3, 315 | So. | *** (5.5) | 13 career starts |
| Ryan Kessling | RT | 13 career starts | |||
| John Miller | LG | 6'2, 295 | So. | *** (5.6) | 10 career starts |
| Hector Hernandez | LT | 3 career starts | |||
| Jamon Brown | LG | 6'4, 305 | So. | *** (5.6) | 2 career starts |
| Kamram Joyer | LG | 6'3, 283 | Jr. | *** (5.5) | 1 career start |
| Aaron Epps | LT | 6'5, 265 | RSFr. | *** (5.5) | |
| Hunter Stout | RG | 6'4, 291 | Jr. | ** (5.2) | |
| Chris Acosta | RT | 6'3, 275 | So. | ** (5.4) |
Defense

| Category | Yards/ Game Rk |
S&P+ Rk | Success Rt. Rk |
PPP+ Rk |
| OVERALL | 23 | 68 | 73 | 74 |
| RUSHING | 10 | 54 | 66 | 45 |
| PASSING | 68 | 90 | 83 | 87 |
| Standard Downs | 61 | 79 | 48 | |
| Passing Downs | 84 | 72 | 91 | |
| Redzone | 51 | 40 | 60 |
| Q1 Rk | 50 | 1st Down Rk | 41 |
| Q2 Rk | 104 | 2nd Down Rk | 70 |
| Q3 Rk | 20 | 3rd Down Rk | 102 |
| Q4 Rk | 75 | ||
| Adj. Line Yards Rk | 42 | ||
| Adj. Sack Rate Rk | 43 | ||
Defensive Line
| Name | Pos | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Rivals | GP | Tackles | % of Team | TFL | Sacks | Int | PBU | FF | FR |
| Roy Philon | DT | 6'3, 272 | Jr. | ** (5.3) | 12 | 28.0 | 4.3% | 6 | 1.5 | 1 | 1 | ||
| William Savoy | DE | 13 | 21.0 | 3.2% | 8.5 | 5 | 1 | ||||||
| B.J. Dubose | DE | 6'4, 257 | So. | *** (5.7) | 13 | 18.0 | 2.8% | 3.5 | 2 | ||||
| Randy Salmon | DT | 9 | 16.0 | 2.4% | 5 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Greg Scruggs | DE | 9 | 15.5 | 2.4% | 6 | 4 | 1 | ||||||
| B.J. Butler | DE | 6'2, 275 | Jr. | *** (5.7) | 9 | 12.5 | 1.9% | 2 | 1.5 | ||||
| Jamaine Brooks | DT | 6'4, 318 | So. | ** (5.1) | 10 | 11.0 | 1.7% | 3 | 0.5 | 2 | |||
| Brandon Dunn | NT | 6'3, 295 | Jr. | *** (5.5) | 12 | 11.0 | 1.7% | 1.5 | |||||
| Marcus Smith | DE | 6'4, 255 | Jr. | *** (5.6) | 10 | 10.5 | 1.6% | 6.5 | 5.5 | 1 | 2 | ||
| Lorenzo Mauldin | DE | 6'4, 225 | So. | *** (5.6) | 13 | 3.5 | 0.5% | 0.5 | |||||
| Malcolm Mitchell | DE | 5 | 3.0 | 0.5% | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Sheldon Rankins | DE | 6'3, 260 | Fr. | *** (5.7) | |||||||||
| Larry Jefferson | DE | 6'5, 218 | Fr. | *** (5.7) |
Linebackers
| Name | Pos | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Rivals | GP | Tackles | % of Team | TFL | Sacks | Int | PBU | FF | FR |
| Dexter Heyman | MLB | 13 | 73.0 | 11.2% | 16 | 4.5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Preston Brown | SLB | 6'2, 258 | Jr. | *** (5.6) | 13 | 68.0 | 10.4% | 5 | 1.5 | ||||
| Daniel Brown | WLB | 6'1, 219 | Sr. | NR | 13 | 31.5 | 4.8% | 4 | 1 | 2 | |||
| Deionterez Mount | SLB | 6'5, 215 | So. | *** (5.6) | 9 | 8.0 | 1.2% | 2.5 | 1.5 | ||||
| Deon Rogers | WLB | 6'2, 200 | Jr. | *** (5.6) | 13 | 4.5 | 0.7% | ||||||
| Mike Privott | MLB | 6'0, 224 | Jr. | *** (5.6) | 0.0 | 0.0% | |||||||
| George Durant | SLB | 6'0, 229 | Jr. | ** (5.2) | 10 | 2.0 | 0.3% | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Nick Dawson | LB | 6'3, 228 | Fr. | **** (5.9) | |||||||||
| Keith Brown | WLB | 6'1, 229 | Fr. | **** (5.8) | |||||||||
| James Burgess | MLB | 6'0, 211 | Fr. | *** (5.6) |
Secondary
| Name | Pos | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Rivals | GP | Tackles | % of Team | TFL | Sacks | Int | PBU | FF | FR |
| Hakeem Smith | SS | 6'1, 183 | Jr. | ** (5.2) | 13 | 71.5 | 10.9% | 4 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 3 | |
| Adrian Bushell | CB | 5'11, 190 | Sr. | **** (5.9) | 10 | 44.0 | 6.7% | 2.5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | ||
| Mike Evans | FS | 13 | 42.5 | 6.5% | 2.5 | 2 | 3 | 1 | |||||
| Calvin Pryor | FS | 6'1, 190 | So. | *** (5.7) | 13 | 37.0 | 5.7% | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 2 |
| Andrew Johnson | CB | 5'10, 178 | So. | **** (5.8) | 11 | 21.0 | 3.2% | 1.5 | 4 | 1 | |||
| Shenard Holton | S | 7 | 21.0 | 3.2% | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1 | ||||||
| Anthony Conner | CB | 7 | 19.0 | 2.9% | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Terell Floyd | CB | 5'10, 170 | So. | *** (5.6) | 11 | 11.5 | 1.8% | 1 | |||||
| Stephan Robinson | CB | 5'8, 175 | So. | *** (5.6) | 7 | 7.5 | 1.1% | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Terence Simien | SS | 9 | 7.5 | 1.1% | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Kamal Hogan | FS | 6'0, 209 | So. | *** (5.7) | |||||||||
| Jordan Paschal | CB | 5'8, 180 | So. | *** (5.5) | |||||||||
| Jermaine Reve | SS | 6'0, 180 | So. | *** (5.5) | |||||||||
| Charles Gaines | CB | 5'11, 176 | RSFr. | *** (5.7) | |||||||||
| Gerod Holliman | DB | 6'0, 185 | Fr. | **** (5.8) | |||||||||
| Devontre Parnell | DB | 5'11, 163 | Fr. | *** (5.7) |
Special Teams
| Punter | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Punts | Avg | TB | FC | I20 | FC/I20 Ratio |
| Josh Bleser | 45 | 38.4 | 3 | 18 | 17 | 77.8% | ||
| Chris Philpott | 25 | 36.9 | 0 | 11 | 6 | 68.0% |
| Kicker | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Kickoffs | Avg | TB | TB% |
| Chris Philpott | 55 | 67.1 | 15 | 27.3% |
| Place-Kicker | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
PAT | FG (0-39) |
Pct | FG (40+) |
Pct |
| Chris Philpott | 33-35 | 8-10 | 80.0% | 4-8 | 50.0% |
| Returner | Pos. | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Returns | Avg. | TD |
| Jeremy Wright | KR | 5'11, 199 | Jr. | 18 | 23.6 | 0 |
| Adrian Bushell | KR | 5'11, 190 | Sr. | 9 | 30.7 | 1 |
| Scott Radcliff | PR | 5'10, 182 | Sr. | 9 | 4.4 | 0 |
| Eli Rogers | PR | 5'10, 184 | So. | 8 | 6.8 | 0 |
| Category | Rk |
| Special Teams F/+ | 34 |
| Net Punting | 63 |
| Net Kickoffs | 51 |
| Touchback Pct | 19 |
| Field Goal Pct | 70 |
| Kick Returns Avg | 28 |
| Punt Returns Avg | 102 |
---
Glossary
Adj. Line Yards: A line measure derived from the formula found here. The idea is to divvy credit for a given rush between both the runner and the blockers.
Adj. Pace: Part of the offensive footprint, this takes into account both the number of plays a team attempts and the type of play. Since passes, on average, take up less time (thanks to the fact that 30-50 percent of them are incomplete and stop the clock), pass-heavy offenses are prone to run more plays, therefore limiting the effectiveness of a general plays-per-game measure. Adj. Pace takes a team's run-pass ratio into account.
Adj. POE: An opponent-adjusted "Points Over Expected" measure for running backs that looks both at what a runner gained and what would have been expected given the opponents involved. For more information, start here.
Adj. Points: A look at how a team would have performed in a given week if playing a perfectly average team, with a somewhat average number of breaks and turnovers. The idea for the measure is simple: what if everybody in the country played exactly the same opponent every single week? Who would have done the best? It is an attempt to look at offensive and defensive consistency without getting sidetracked by easy or difficult schedules. And yes, with adjusted score you can allow a negative number of points. For more, start here.
Adj. Record: See Adj. Points.
Adj. Sack Rate: An opponent-adjusted measure of sack rates.
Adj. Score: See Adj. Points.
Adj. TO Margin: What a team's turnover margin would have been if they had recovered exactly 50 percent of all the fumbles that occurred in their games. If there is a huge difference between TO Margin and Adj. TO Margin (in other words, if fumbles, dropped interceptions, or other unlucky bounces were the main source of a good/bad TO margin), that suggests that a team's luck was particularly good or bad and might even out the next season.
Adj. Yards Per Target: A look at a receiver's total receiving yards divided by the number of times he was targeted. Slight adjustments are made for the percentage of times a receiver was targeted on standard ("%SD") and passing downs. Players targeted more on passing downs are likely to have a lower overall per-target average, since passing is more difficult on passing downs.
Bend-Don't-Break: Part of the defensive footprint, this is a comparison of a team's Def. Success Rate (efficiency) to its Def. PPP (explosiveness). The higher the number, the higher percentage of a team's overall S&P was made up by success rate, i.e. the more willing a team was to sacrifice efficiency to prevent big plays. (The lower the number, the more likely a team was to take aggressive risks.)
Covariance: Covariance is a statistical tool that provides a measure of the strength of the correlation between two or more sets of random variates. For these purposes, it is used to compare a team's performance (using opponent-adjusted Adj. Score) to the quality of the opponent at hand. Some teams play their best games against their worst opponents, and some teams do the opposite. This measure is used for both the offensive and defensive footprint. For more, go here.
Go After the Ball: Part of the defensive footprint, this looks at a team's forced fumbles, interceptions and passes broken up. In other words, it looks at their ability to go after the ball. The higher the number, the more they got their hands on the football.
Highlight Yards: The portion of a given run that is credit only to the running back; after a certain number of yards, the line has done its job, and most of the rest of the run will be determined by the running back himself. For more information, start here.
Need for Blitzes: Part of the defensive footprint, this compares a team's standard downs sack rate to its passing downs sack rate. The lower the number, the more they were able to generate pressure on standard downs, and the less need for blitzes.
Turnovers Luck: Presented in Points Per Game fashion, Turnovers Luck looks at the difference between a team's Turnover and Adj. TO Margins and, using the average point value of a turnover (~5.0 points), projects how many points a team gained or lost per game last season.
Yards Per Point: A measure long tracked by Phil Steele as a means of looking at teams that were a little too efficient or inefficient the previous season. A positive YPP Margin means a team's offense was less efficient than opponents' offenses, and to the extent that luck was involved, their luck might even out the next year.
Mizzou Links, 5-24-12
Mizzou Diamond Sports Links
So does it count as a "surprise" when you upset a team that you already beat two of three times in the regular season? Regardless, Mizzou took out Texas last night and will now face Texas A&M instead of Kansas. God, Kansas, do you always have to avoid playing us?
(For those interested, Mizzou and A&M played a ridiculously close series in College State at the end of March: Texas A&M won 8-6 and 7-6, and Mizzou won 4-3.)
And yeah, Mizzou almost certainly has to win the conference tournament to get an NCAA bid. Tim Jamieson has been saying for a while that the Tigers should be in good shape if they can get to 30 wins (they're currently 29-26), but that non-conference schedule was so weak that I can't imagine that's the case. The resume is certainly decent -- series wins over Auburn, Texas, Oklahoma State, Kansas State -- but the late series losses to Memphis and Kansas had to doom them. Either way, it won't matter if they can win a few more games and get the automatic bid.
- Super Regionals
The Trib: How LSU's softball coach got her job - Big 12 Baseball Tournament
MUtigers.com: Tigers Blank Texas, 5-0, In Opening Round of Big 12 Tournament
Big 12 Sports: Missouri Shuts Out Texas, 5-0
The Trib: Missouri shuts out Texas in Big 12 opener
KC Star: MU surprises Texas in Big 12 Baseball Tournament
Austin American-Statesman: Missouri shuts down Texas 5-0 in Big 12 tournament
Mizzou Football Links
North endzone going into The ZOU! GP #MIZZOU twitter.com/mizzoufootball…
— Coach Pinkel (@mizzoufootball) May 23, 2012
- E.J. Gaines Now Has DISRESPECT!!!!! Fuel
The Trib (Dave Matter): Seven Tigers land on Steele's All-SEC teams - SEC Defenses
CBS Sports: Missouri and Texas A&M prepare for tough sledding vs. SEC defenses
Other Football Links
- PLAYoff?
Pacific Takes: Larry Scott Says Plus-One Back On The Table
Mizzou Basketball Links
- No Wonder Mike Anderson Wanted To Go Back To The SEC ... Okay, That Was Mean
Rush The Court: Home Sweet Home: A Look Back At Home Court Advantage In The SEC - Sorry, Keyon ... First, You Lose the Rafters Playoff ... And Now This
SB Nation: Keyon Dooling Has His Head In The Game

EXPANSIONAPALOOZA™ 2012
- Tsk Tsk, TCU...
SB Nation: Big 12 Expansion Rumors All But Confirmed By TCU Athletic Director
EDSBS: TCU AD TELLS TRUTH, WILL LIKELY CLAIM HE WAS HIGH
Saturday Blitz: Positives & Negatives of Growing Media on College Football: Recruiting Tools vs. Conference Expansion - But Seriously, It's Probably Going To Happen
Tigernet: Clemson BOT to meet Thursday, discuss rumors of realignment and future
On The Banks: What's wrong with the ACC? - SEC Expansion Candidates Are Pretty Obvious At This Point
Wildcat Blue Nation: Is more SEC realignment on the way? - Everybody Join In!
SB Nation: Notre Dame To The Big 12 And Other Best/Worst Case Scenarios For Conference Realignment
MWC Connection: Mountain West Offered Boise State More Revenue To Stay In The Mountain West
BC Interruption: Conference Realignment: Conferences Based On Academics
Miner Rush: What Would It Be Like If Utah And BYU Never Broke Up The WAC?
Rock M Roundtable!

As I momentarily pull myself away from a suddenly mobile Rally Baby, let's crank out some roundtable questions! And no, Atch, no softball questions. We all expect Mizzou to win the WCWS and earn $10K for the Stubble Drive, right? We're in agreement there?
1 - Hey look, EXPANSIONAPALOOZA™ rolls on! How do you think the SEC would respond if the Big 12 added 2-6 ACC teams (and/or Notre Dame) to its roster? Stay at 14? Try to add Virginia Tech and N.C. State? Other?
2 - Big 12/SEC Football Challenge: love the idea or hate it?
3 - Continuing the "CHALLENGE!" theme, who would you want Mizzou to draw in the apparently upcoming Big East/SEC Challenge?
4 - Really, what kind of role model is Dora the Explorer? Adopting a jaguar? Really? And come on, Dora, I don't want to say "Arriba!" four times. Twice is more than enough.
Now For Sale: Tremendous Stubble T-Shirts

It's official: you can now purchase your very own Tremendous Stubble T-Shirt! Proceeds will go toward the Missouri Children's Hospital and the Stubble Drive. Here are the details.
1. The front of the shirt will look like the one Lisa Simmons posted last week (see above), only without the (licensed) Block M. The back of the shirt will have some combination of the Rock M Nation logo, the URL, and Stubble Drive information.
2. The price: $20. Half of the cost will go to the printing of the shirt, approximately 10 percent will go to shipping, and the rest will go toward the Stubble Drive.
22 comments
|
3 recs |
Tweet
2012 Temple Owls Football: Statistical Profile
Confused? See the glossary at the bottom.

2011 Schedule & Results
| Record: 9-4 | Adj. Record: 8-5 | Final F/+ Rk: 24 | |||||
| Date | Opponent | Score | W-L | Adj. Score | Adj. W-L |
| 1-Sep | Villanova | 42-7 | W | 28.8 - 25.8 | W |
| 10-Sep | at Akron | 41-3 | W | 27.7 - 22.5 | W |
| 17-Sep | Penn State | 10-14 | L | 19.3 - 25.8 | L |
| 24-Sep | at Maryland | 38-7 | W | 28.5 - 23.2 | W |
| 1-Oct | Toledo | 13-36 | L | 21.5 - 27.4 | L |
| 8-Oct | at Ball State | 42-0 | W | 29.5 - 21.1 | W |
| 15-Oct | Buffalo | 34-0 | W | 29.7 - 13.9 | W |
| 22-Oct | at Bowling Green | 10-13 | L | 23.8 - 24.1 | L |
| 2-Nov | at Ohio | 31-35 | L | 32.3 - 31.0 | W |
| 9-Nov | Miami (Ohio) | 24-21 | W | 28.0 - 29.5 | L |
| 19-Nov | Army | 42-14 | W | 40.0 - 26.9 | W |
| 25-Nov | Kent State | 34-16 | W | 27.8 - 33.6 | L |
| 17-Dec | vs Wyoming | 37-15 | W | 31.7 - 25.2 | W |
| Category | Offense | Rk | Defense | Rk |
| Points Per Game | 30.6 | 39 | 13.9 | 3 |
| Adj. Points Per Game | 28.4 | 49 | 25.4 | 25 |
2012 Schedule & Projection Factors
| 2012 Schedule | ||
| Date | Opponent | Proj. Rk |
| 31-Aug | Villanova | NR |
| 8-Sep | Maryland | 66 |
| 22-Sep | at Penn State | 37 |
| 6-Oct | South Florida | 25 |
| 13-Oct | at Connecticut | 53 |
| 20-Oct | Rutgers | 40 |
| 27-Oct | at Pittsburgh | 41 |
| 3-Nov | at Louisville | 50 |
| 10-Nov | Cincinnati | 44 |
| 17-Nov | at Army | 95 |
| 23-Nov | Syracuse | 78 |
| Five-Year F/+ Rk | 70 |
| Two-Year Recruiting Rk | 102 |
| TO Margin/Adj. TO Margin* | +9 / +7.4 |
| TO Luck/Game | 0.6 |
| Approx. Ret. Starters (Off. / Def.) | 7 (2, 5) |
| Yds/Pt Margin** | -9.9 |
Offense

| Category | Yards/ Game Rk |
S&P+ Rk | Success Rt. Rk |
PPP+ Rk |
| OVERALL | 63 | 46 | 72 | 29 |
| RUSHING | 7 | 33 | 78 | 19 |
| PASSING | 116 | 50 | 70 | 36 |
| Standard Downs | 49 | 87 | 26 | |
| Passing Downs | 100 | 100 | 92 | |
| Redzone | 94 | 109 | 70 |
| Q1 Rk | 56 | 1st Down Rk | 64 |
| Q2 Rk | 37 | 2nd Down Rk | 87 |
| Q3 Rk | 110 | 3rd Down Rk | 42 |
| Q4 Rk | 55 | ||
| Adj. Line Yards Rk | 40 | ||
| Adj. Sack Rate Rk | 114 | ||
Quarterback
Note: players in bold below are 2012 returnees. Players in italics are questionable with injury/suspension.
| Player | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Rivals | Comp | Att | Yards | Comp Rate |
TD | INT | Sacks | Sack Rate | Yards/ Att. |
| Chester Stewart | 54 | 83 | 743 | 65.1% | 2 | 2 | 13 | 13.5% | 6.9 | |||
| Mike Gerardi | 6'2, 206 | Sr. | NR | 32 | 63 | 442 | 50.8% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 7.4% | 5.9 |
| Chris Coyer | 6'3, 214 | Jr. | ** (5.4) | 30 | 50 | 463 | 60.0% | 6 | 0 | 3 | 5.7% | 8.3 |
| Clinton Granter | 6'3, 230 | Jr. | *** (5.5) | |||||||||
| Kevin Newsome (2009^) | 6'3, 240 | Jr. | **** (5.9) | 8 | 11 | 66 | 72.7% | 0 | 0 | 2 | 15.4% | 4.0 |
^ Newsome is a Penn State transfer who will be eligible this fall.
Running Back
| Player | Pos. | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Rivals | Rushes | Yards | Yards/ Carry |
Hlt Yds/ Carry |
TD | Adj. POE |
| Bernard Pierce | RB | 273 | 1,481 | 5.4 | 2.1 | 27 | +33.0 | |||
| Matt Brown | RB | 5'5, 170 | Sr. | ** (5.1) | 155 | 912 | 5.9 | 2.5 | 6 | +8.2 |
| Chris Coyer | QB | 6'3, 214 | Jr. | ** (5.4) | 66 | 586 | 8.9 | 5.2 | 3 | +14.2 |
| Chester Stewart | QB | 51 | 213 | 4.2 | 1.2 | 0 | -5.8 | |||
| Kenny Harper | RB | 6'0, 215 | So. | ** (5.2) | 33 | 128 | 3.9 | 1.2 | 1 | -3.1 |
| Darius Johnson | RB | 17 | 49 | 2.9 | 0.2 | 0 | -2.4 | |||
| Jamie Gilmore | RB | 5'8, 185 | Fr. | *** (5.7) |
Receiving Corps
| Player | Pos. | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Rivals | Targets | Catches | Yards | Catch Rate | Target Rate |
%SD | Adj. Yds/ Target |
| Joe Jones | WR-X | 50 | 30 | 322 | 60.0% | 26.6% | 42.0% | 5.4 | |||
| Evan Rodriguez | TE | 44 | 35 | 479 | 79.5% | 23.4% | 59.1% | 12.4 | |||
| Deon Miller | WR-X | 6'5, 210 | Jr. | *** (5.5) | 33 | 18 | 253 | 54.5% | 17.6% | 42.4% | 5.1 |
| Rod Streater | WR-Z | 31 | 19 | 401 | 61.3% | 16.5% | 54.8% | 12.5 | |||
| Bernard Pierce | RB | 9 | 3 | 52 | 33.3% | 4.8% | 11.1% | 0.6 | |||
| Alex Jackson (2010^) | TE | 6'4, 250 | Jr. | ** (5.4) | 11 | 8 | 127 | 72.7% | 4.0% | 90.9% | 16.0 |
| Matt Brown | RB | 5'5, 170 | Sr. | ** (5.1) | 6 | 3 | 7 | 50.0% | 3.2% | 33.3% | 0.8 |
| Malcolm Eugene | WR-Z | 6'4, 205 | Sr. | *** (5.5) | 4 | 2 | 30 | 50.0% | 2.1% | 50.0% | 7.5 |
| Ryan Alderman | WR-X | 5'9, 170 | Jr. | NR | 3 | 2 | 54 | 66.7% | 1.6% | 33.3% | 18.0 |
| C.J. Hammond | WR-X | 6'2, 193 | Sr. | ** (5.3) | 3 | 1 | 18 | 33.3% | 1.6% | 33.3% | 6.0 |
| Matt Balasavage | TE | 3 | 1 | 8 | 33.3% | 1.6% | 33.3% | 2.7 | |||
| Jalen Fitzpatrick | WR | 5'11, 180 | So. | ** (5.3) | |||||||
| Tyron Harris | WR | 6'3, 195 | Jr. | *** (5.5) | |||||||
| Romond Deloatch | WR | 6'4, 213 | Fr. | *** (5.5) |
^ Jackson missed the 2011 season with injury.
Offensive Line
| Player | Pos. | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Rivals | Career Starts/Honors/Notes |
| Pat Boyle | LT | 22 career starts, 2011 1st All-MAC | |||
| Derek Dennis | LG | 37 career starts | |||
| Wayne Tribue | RG | 33 career starts | |||
| John Palumbo | C | 32 career starts | |||
| Martin Wallace | RT | 6'6, 310 | Sr. | NR | 15 career starts |
| Jeremy Schonbrunner | C | 8 career starts | |||
| Darryl Pringle | LT | 6'6, 327 | Jr. | ** (4.9) | 2 career starts |
| Sean Boyle | C | 6'5, 324 | Sr. | ** (5.1) | 1 career start |
| Scott Roorda | LG | 6'3, 302 | Jr. | NR | |
| Jaimen Newman | RG | 6'4, 275 | So. | ** (5.2) | |
| Joe Cenatiempo | RT | 6'7, 315 | So. | ** (5.2) | |
| Zach Hooks | LT | 6'6, 280 | RSFr. | NR | |
| Jeff Whittingham | LG | 6'2, 295 | Jr. | ** (5.1) |
Defense

| Category | Yards/ Game Rk |
S&P+ Rk | Success Rt. Rk |
PPP+ Rk |
| OVERALL | 13 | 37 | 30 | 46 |
| RUSHING | 27 | 43 | 26 | 54 |
| PASSING | 15 | 47 | 45 | 52 |
| Standard Downs | 59 | 59 | 60 | |
| Passing Downs | 23 | 25 | 22 | |
| Redzone | 108 | 79 | 117 |
| Q1 Rk | 34 | 1st Down Rk | 50 |
| Q2 Rk | 28 | 2nd Down Rk | 33 |
| Q3 Rk | 44 | 3rd Down Rk | 35 |
| Q4 Rk | 85 | ||
| Adj. Line Yards Rk | 34 | ||
| Adj. Sack Rate Rk | 7 | ||
Defensive Line
| Name | Pos | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Rivals | GP | Tackles | % of Team | TFL | Sacks | Int | PBU | FF | FR |
| Adrian Robinson | DE | 13 | 40.0 | 6.0% | 13.5 | 6.5 | 1 | ||||||
| Morkeith Brown | DE | 13 | 31.0 | 4.7% | 5 | 4 | 1 | ||||||
| Levi Brown | DT | 6'2, 305 | Jr. | ** (5.0) | 13 | 16.5 | 2.5% | 3.5 | 0.5 | 1 | |||
| John Youboty | DE | 6'4, 258 | Jr. | *** (5.5) | 13 | 14.0 | 2.1% | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | ||
| Morris Blueford, Jr. | DE | 13 | 12.5 | 1.9% | 2 | ||||||||
| Kadeem Custis | DT | 6'4, 295 | Sr. | ** (5.0) | 11 | 10.5 | 1.6% | 3 | 1 | ||||
| Kamal Johnson | DT | 6'4, 285 | Jr. | ** (4.9) | 13 | 8.0 | 1.2% | 2 | 1.5 | 1 | |||
| Marcus Green | DE | 6'1, 240 | Sr. | ** (5.2) | 13 | 5.5 | 0.8% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Shahid Paulhill | DT | 6'3, 300 | Jr. | ** (5.1) | 9 | 3.0 | 0.5% | 1 | |||||
| Kiser Terry | DE | 6'3, 220 | Fr. | *** (5.5) |
Linebackers
| Name | Pos | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Rivals | GP | Tackles | % of Team | TFL | Sacks | Int | PBU | FF | FR |
| Stephen Johnson | MIKE | 13 | 95.5 | 14.4% | 4.5 | 2 | 5 | 3 | |||||
| Tahir Whitehead | SAM | 13 | 58.0 | 8.7% | 13.5 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 3 | ||||
| Ahkeem Smith | WILL | 6'0, 215 | Sr. | ** (5.0) | 13 | 36.0 | 5.4% | 3.5 | 3.5 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Blaze Caponegro | WILL | 6'1, 225 | Jr. | ** (5.1) | 12 | 28.5 | 4.3% | 4 | 1 | 1 | |||
| Quinten White | SAM | 13 | 13.0 | 2.0% | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Olaniyi Adewole | MIKE | 6'2, 228 | Jr. | ** (5.2) | 7 | 8.0 | 1.2% | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||
| Nate D. Smith | LB | 6'0, 220 | RSFr. | ** (5.4) |
Secondary
| Name | Pos | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Rivals | GP | Tackles | % of Team | TFL | Sacks | Int | PBU | FF | FR |
| Kevin Kroboth | FS | 13 | 65.5 | 9.8% | 1 | 3 | 7 | 1 | |||||
| Kee-ayre Griffin | CB | 12 | 42.5 | 6.4% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | |||||
| Justin Gildea | SS | 5'11, 190 | Sr. | ** (5.0) | 13 | 41.0 | 6.2% | 4.5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||
| Maurice Jones | CB | 5'10, 195 | Sr. | ** (5.2) | 13 | 39.0 | 5.9% | 2 | 4 | ||||
| Zamel Johnson | CB | 6'0, 180 | Jr. | ** (5.2) | 13 | 25.5 | 3.8% | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||
| Anthony Robey | CB | 5'10, 180 | So. | ** (5.2) | 9 | 15.0 | 2.3% | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | |
| Vaughn Carraway | FS | 6'2, 192 | Sr. | *** (5.7) | 13 | 11.5 | 1.7% | 1 | 2 | ||||
| Daquan Cooper | DB | 6'0, 180 | So. | ** (5.3) | 9 | 7.0 | 1.1% | 1 | |||||
| Chris Hutton | SS | 5'10, 185 | So. | ** (5.4) | 9 | 5.5 | 0.8% | 1 | |||||
| Brian Burns | DB | 6'0, 185 | So. | ** (5.1) | |||||||||
| Nate Smith | DB | 5'11, 176 | Fr. | *** (5.7) |
Special Teams
| Punter | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Punts | Avg | TB | FC | I20 | FC/I20 Ratio |
| Brandon McManus | 6'3, 190 | Sr. | 46 | 45.8 | 11 | 2 | 15 | 37.0% |
| Kicker | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Kickoffs | Avg | TB | TB% |
| Brandon McManus | 6'3, 190 | Sr. | 78 | 66.2 | 22 | 28.2% |
| Place-Kicker | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
PAT | FG (0-39) |
Pct | FG (40+) |
Pct |
| Brandon McManus | 6'3, 190 | Sr. | 50-50 | 14-17 | 82.4% | 2-5 | 40.0% |
| Returner | Pos. | Ht, Wt | 2012 Year |
Returns | Avg. | TD |
| Matt Brown | KR | 5'5, 170 | Sr. | 28 | 25.1 | 1 |
| Joe Jones | KR | 8 | 26.5 | 0 | ||
| Matt Brown | PR | 5'5, 170 | Sr. | 18 | 10.1 | 0 |
| Category | Rk |
| Special Teams F/+ | 5 |
| Net Punting | 14 |
| Net Kickoffs | 5 |
| Touchback Pct | 15 |
| Field Goal Pct | 45 |
| Kick Returns Avg | 7 |
| Punt Returns Avg | 22 |
---
Glossary
Adj. Line Yards: A line measure derived from the formula found here. The idea is to divvy credit for a given rush between both the runner and the blockers.
Adj. Pace: Part of the offensive footprint, this takes into account both the number of plays a team attempts and the type of play. Since passes, on average, take up less time (thanks to the fact that 30-50 percent of them are incomplete and stop the clock), pass-heavy offenses are prone to run more plays, therefore limiting the effectiveness of a general plays-per-game measure. Adj. Pace takes a team's run-pass ratio into account.
Adj. POE: An opponent-adjusted "Points Over Expected" measure for running backs that looks both at what a runner gained and what would have been expected given the opponents involved. For more information, start here.
Adj. Points: A look at how a team would have performed in a given week if playing a perfectly average team, with a somewhat average number of breaks and turnovers. The idea for the measure is simple: what if everybody in the country played exactly the same opponent every single week? Who would have done the best? It is an attempt to look at offensive and defensive consistency without getting sidetracked by easy or difficult schedules. And yes, with adjusted score you can allow a negative number of points. For more, start here.
Adj. Record: See Adj. Points.
Adj. Sack Rate: An opponent-adjusted measure of sack rates.
Adj. Score: See Adj. Points.
Adj. TO Margin: What a team's turnover margin would have been if they had recovered exactly 50 percent of all the fumbles that occurred in their games. If there is a huge difference between TO Margin and Adj. TO Margin (in other words, if fumbles, dropped interceptions, or other unlucky bounces were the main source of a good/bad TO margin), that suggests that a team's luck was particularly good or bad and might even out the next season.
Adj. Yards Per Target: A look at a receiver's total receiving yards divided by the number of times he was targeted. Slight adjustments are made for the percentage of times a receiver was targeted on standard ("%SD") and passing downs. Players targeted more on passing downs are likely to have a lower overall per-target average, since passing is more difficult on passing downs.
Bend-Don't-Break: Part of the defensive footprint, this is a comparison of a team's Def. Success Rate (efficiency) to its Def. PPP (explosiveness). The higher the number, the higher percentage of a team's overall S&P was made up by success rate, i.e. the more willing a team was to sacrifice efficiency to prevent big plays. (The lower the number, the more likely a team was to take aggressive risks.)
Covariance: Covariance is a statistical tool that provides a measure of the strength of the correlation between two or more sets of random variates. For these purposes, it is used to compare a team's performance (using opponent-adjusted Adj. Score) to the quality of the opponent at hand. Some teams play their best games against their worst opponents, and some teams do the opposite. This measure is used for both the offensive and defensive footprint. For more, go here.
Go After the Ball: Part of the defensive footprint, this looks at a team's forced fumbles, interceptions and passes broken up. In other words, it looks at their ability to go after the ball. The higher the number, the more they got their hands on the football.
Highlight Yards: The portion of a given run that is credit only to the running back; after a certain number of yards, the line has done its job, and most of the rest of the run will be determined by the running back himself. For more information, start here.
Need for Blitzes: Part of the defensive footprint, this compares a team's standard downs sack rate to its passing downs sack rate. The lower the number, the more they were able to generate pressure on standard downs, and the less need for blitzes.
Turnovers Luck: Presented in Points Per Game fashion, Turnovers Luck looks at the difference between a team's Turnover and Adj. TO Margins and, using the average point value of a turnover (~5.0 points), projects how many points a team gained or lost per game last season.
Yards Per Point: A measure long tracked by Phil Steele as a means of looking at teams that were a little too efficient or inefficient the previous season. A positive YPP Margin means a team's offense was less efficient than opponents' offenses, and to the extent that luck was involved, their luck might even out the next year.
Mizzou Links, 5-23-12
Joplin
A year ago this moment, we all became #JoplinStrong. Help join us rebuild as part of the #JoplinChallenge: on.mo.gov/IDLch7
— Mizzou Athletics (@mutigersdotcom) May 22, 2012
- Mizzou Network: Revisiting the One State, One Spirit Classic
- Buzzfeed: 60 Powerful Photos Of Joplin Rebuilding
- From The Day After The One State, One Spirit Classic
The Trib: A victory for Missouri
KC Star: Joplin turns to basketball for relief
PowerMizzou: A win all around
The Missourian: Sense of community defines One State, One Spirit Classic
ESPN.com: It's one State, one Spirit in Joplin
Mizzou Diamond Sports Links
- Elite
The Trib: MU softball among elite when it comes to advancing in NCAAs - Big 12 Baseball Tournament (And Other Big 12 Stuff)
The Trib: Ball in hands of ace as MU hits Bricktown
KC Star: KU, MU could meet up early in Big 12 baseball tournament
MUtigers.com: Five Tigers Honored By Big 12 Conference - MU In The Minors
SimmonsField.com: Former Tigers: Frey to Double-A; Fick to the opposing dugout
Mizzou Football Links
- Gabs
Draft Breakdown: Blaine Gabbert: What Can Be Done? (Part 1) - Because We Can't Get Enough Turf Updates...
We Are Mizzou: Turf Tear Up Timeline
Other Football Links
- Real Depth Vs. Fake Depth
Barking Carnival: Texas Longhorns Football: As Depthless As Matt Nordgren's Twitter Feed
Mizzou Basketball Links
- Big East-SEC Challenge
ESPN.com: Big East-SEC matchups
SEC
- No
Mr. SEC: Could TV Negotiations Drive SEC To 9-Game Football Schedule?
EXPANSIONAPALOOZA™ 2012
- This FSU-to-Big-12 Thing Is Going To Drag Out A While, Isn't It...
CBS Sports: Texas AD not for expanding, but admits courting Notre Dame
SB Nation: FSU, Clemson In Touch, But Texas Still Wants Notre Dame
Burnt Orange Nation: Dodds Talks Notre Dame, Need For Expansion
Tomahawk Nation: Podcast: Ingram Smith, Bud Elliott and Brian Ethridge Talk About FSU's Role In Conference Expansion
Other Mizzou Links
- Mizzou Wrestling
Mizzou Network: Kyle Bradley overcomes the odds - Mizzou Women's Basketball
MUtigers.com: Women's Basketball Adds Two Signees To 2012 Class
Other
- Rick Reilly Writes For Fifth Graders
Harvard College Sports Analysis: The Reading Level of Sports Writing - Gatti-Ward I
Grantland: On the 10-year anniversary of Gatti-Ward I, rewatching one of the greatest boxing matches of all time
Missouri had a spot in the premier football league in the land (and it's pretty good in some other sports too) that will have the equivalent of a license to print money when it renegotiates its television deal. It had a seat at the table if and when the music ever stopped. Guaranteed. No questions asked. Had they not taken it, the Tigers might have ended up in another seat at that same table. They may have ended up in a situation that was as good, or at least close. But they would not have ended up in a situation that was any better. And they may have found themselves in a spot far, far worse.
What Missouri lost in leaving the Big 12 was the chance to play Kansas and some history with Kansas State, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State and Iowa State. That's really it. Because even if the Big 12 rebuilds and is just as good as it was three years ago, it's not any better than the SEC. Big 12 teams won't make more money than Mizzou will in the SEC or be more visible on the national landscape. They might be equal (though I think that's arguable), but they will not be superior.
PowerMizzou's Gabe Dearmond, in a free column at PM. I didn't even realize "I bet Missouri is regretting their decision now!" was even a thing until this, but apparently it is.
Showing 1 - 30 of 5,337 Older
by 
















