July 4, 2009 by Zac Robinson, for MMAPayout.com

"It would seem that Zuffa, owner of the UFC, is in the middle of operation clampdown. I'm referring to the banning of numerous apparel companies (or charging them a fee of $100,000) and now the alleged threat regarding the Electronic Arts (EA) MMA game.

In most cases I'm a supporter of the UFC when it comes to business decisions. Even if I think they are harsh or delivered in a not so couth manner, they still seem to work and whether we like it or not, the running of a promotion is a business. It doesn't take a genius to see that the UFC has done a great deal for the sport and continues to do so.

Every now and then however, an issue arises that I just can't comprehend. The threat of banning fighters from the UFC for life if they sign on with EA's MMA game (a game that would compete against THQ's UFC Undisputed), even if they don't currently fight for the promotion, is simply outrageous and bordering on tyrannical. This is why I'm not completely convinced that we've heard both sides of the story, but just in case we have, here are my thoughts on how such a ban could actually damage the integrity of the sport, that is as long as the UFC continues with one of its other policies.

Read the rest at July 4, 2009 by Zac Robinson, for MMAPayout.com.