SB Nation User Blog: CWSKeith

OT: ESPN Wins Premier League Rights

CWSKeith — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:16:00 -0000

OT: ESPN Wins Premier League Rights

Pretty big news... Setanta is in financial trouble (I'm fairly certain they completely missed making their last payment to the Premier League altogether) and their rights to air games were revoked. Kudos to ESPN for jumping on this.

Read a book, read a book, read a mother%*#&^$% book (or a blog, or some type of publication)

CWSKeith — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:06:50 -0000

This is probably somewhat overdue, seeing how much ass the music thread kicks (it really does -- if nothing else it gives me some stuff to dabble with in my free time). I know I'm always looking for good ("good" being, of course, an extremely subjective word, but I think most understand what I'm trying to get across) stuff to read, and I doubt that I'm the only one looking for new 'spots' to keep an eye on. The thing is, I want more... I've already articulated my frustration in not being able to find a music spot that really does what I want it to do (I really need to give AV Club more of a shot -- I liked one of the reviews I read there but haven't made a concerted effort to frequent it on a more-than-occasional basis).

But enough with my complaining -- I do have a somewhat decent amount of stuff that I do visit on a daily basis, namely:

Baseball Think Factory - besides this joint (SSS), BTF is my favorite baseball-discussion blog. It does a good job of keeping me up-to-date with the goings-on of other teams and the discussion is, for the most part, pretty high quality (relatively speaking -- of course there's bound to be some friction when you have so many people convening to discuss and analyze their favorite teams).

(I'll take this moment to note how much good baseball analysis there is on the internet -- we're very lucky in that regard. Although I don't make it a priority to see other websites besides BTF and SSS, there's so much good shit -- Baseball Prospectus, fangraphs, Baseball Analysts, Sabernomics and so much more.)

And onto other things:

Guardian.co.uk - my homepage. I like to have some idea about what the hell is going on, and the Guardian is pretty good for that.

Reason.com and 538 - for the time being these are my only two political spots. Has Nate put up a post (or several) yet about what direction he's going to take now that the election is over? I know he'll have an eye on the 2010 Senate seats but that can only provide so much content.

Beyond that I have some other stuff that I do occasionally visit but not on nearly the same basis as the above sites. I should actually add the wikipedia to the list -- I spend so much damn time there.

There's also some books that I am in the middle of (to different extents), including:

Crime and Punishment - my second read-through. I just find Raskolnikov to be such an interesting character.

The Baseball Economist - I'm proud to say that I'll be able to pass half of larry's test in a month or two. I've only started to open this one -- they got a neat little primer on regression analysis (nothing that I haven't already learned, but refreshers like the one Bradbury's got is nice) that I've read and that's it.

I'll also be opening "The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else" (Hernando de Soto) in short order. If I'm capable of getting through one of his books, I'll also be looking into some of Ludwig von Mises' stuff rather shortly. And -- for the lawyerly types around here, and anyone else who cares -- I was thinking of purchasing Richard Epstein's "Simple Rules for a Complex World". Any thoughts on that book or Epstein in particular?

I figure this place will be a link dump for online stuff and other musings. I think the only things we should try and restrict (as a group) is the political pissing match that could erupt (although the chances of that are probably very small, I think it's worth a mention).

Danks' Brothers Drop Boras

CWSKeith — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 21:00:48 -0000

Danks' Brothers Drop Boras

John and Jordan Danks have switched representatives, two sources confirmed.

You Know What? I'm Excited...

CWSKeith — Sat, 29 Mar 2008 18:01:30 -0000

This past week I've been thinking a lot about the start of this season. Up till about ten minutes ago, I have to admit that my thoughts were mostly on the gloomy side, stemming mainly from just a few 'decisions' that have irked the hell out of me (Fields/Crede and the Owens love-fest).

But as of about 1:00 p.m. on Saturday, a wave of anticipation has kind of, sort of hit me. Maybe I'm not a 'true baseball fan' (or whatever you want to call it) for it taking it this long to actually look forward to 2008. Nonetheless, I'm glad that 'giddiness' is back.

I'm excited for several reasons. I'm excited to see Alexei Ramirez play in games that mean something. I know I shouldn't take a whole lot from his numbers down in Arizona, but damn would I be fibbing if I said that his play down there doesn't have me on the 'can't wait to see him live' side. Mind you, I'm not going to let his play cloud my judgment --- I obviously don't expect him to hit .325/.360/.500 for the Sox -- but I have to say that his spring has given me a bit of optimism in hoping that he can become something better than an uber-version of Pablo Ozuna (i.e. good bench player but not someone you want starting for your ballclub). If he's even able to muster something like a .265/.300/.400 line, the Sox will have a helluva lot more flexibility. And if he -- by small chance -- comes close to touching his PECOTA projection (which I completely understand isn't a whole lot more than an educated guess) of .295/.342/.452... damn -- we'd have our SS of the future locked in at an awesome price. Not to mention the other string of effects it would have, such as flexibility in getting two draft picks for The OC as well as giving the Sox flexibility in not having to worry about SS for the next half-decade.

I'm excited about Swisher. How can you not be? Swish isn't a superstar, but he's just about on that edge. My expectations are high -- he's moving to a much better park and he's 27 -- conditions seem perfect for Swisher to move into that 130-140 OPS+ area. He also an 'aesthetically pleasing' ballplayer.

I'm excited about Danks. He's the breakout candidate for many people here and for good reason -- he's got two great mentors immediately above him in Buehrle and Cooper, not to mention his own 'talent'. I don't think it's a stretch at all to say Danks will be in that league-average area (96-102 ERA+) at season's end.

I'm excited about Vazquez and Buehrle. Vazquez is an absolute bundle of joy too watch. To this day I don't like who we had to give up to get him, but identifying Vazquez (and then locking him up to a relatively cheap deal after a merely average season) as a guy to go after was a very intelligent move on our GM's part. Buehrle's always fun to watch -- the pace at which he pitches, his continual quest of beating his PECOTA projection... Plus, I'm kind of like JRE (or at least I think it was JRE who said this) -- there's something extra-special about rooting for guys who the Sox drafted and developed.

I'm excited about Quentin and Anderson. If Anderson can be 'happy' in his role, I think 4th OFer may suit him well -- he's a great defender at all three spots and he's probably around a .700 OPS OFer which is acceptable for a 4th OFer. And when Quentin gets healthy, I'm excited at the thought of seeing what his capabilities may be.

Lastly -- I'm sure there's more but I'll spare you guys, as this post isn't really a whole lot more than the "fanboy" side of me, something you could probably get by just scrolling through other random message boards (not from me, but from other people -- if that makes sense) -- I'm excited about the bullpen. Dotel's got nasty stuff (keep that arm healthy, Herm!); Jenks is becoming more of a pitcher rather than 100 MPH followed by a hook (not that that's not fun to watch, mind you, but I think his new way will prove a bit more effective). I'll also love watching our two situational guys, Logan and (hopefully) Wasserman. There's just something about being able to get out major league hitters throwing from a ridiculous angle that makes me giggle a bit.

NCAA Tourney Thread

CWSKeith — Mon, 17 Mar 2008 04:34:58 -0000

Marquette in five -- book it.

--------------

Surprise picks, anyone? Sleepers? Overrated teams?

Big Ten appears to rule the day when NCAA is discussed, so I'll share my brief thoughts on each team (keeping in mind that I probably haven't seen these guys as much as some of you guys have).

- Wisconsin - Oh boy... I might as well get it off my chest. I think they're terribly overrated. They deserve the seed they got, don't get me wrong -- they beat who was on their schedule and that win at Texas is great. They seem to play fantastic defense, too, but I dunno... freaking Marquette handled them at the Kohl Center, and we didn't beat anybody else on the road worth a damn in the Big East. I know Pomeroy loves them, but they love Marquette too (relatively speaking) -- I think it has Marquette at something like 12, and I can't say with a straight face that Marquette is the 12th best team in the country. The Big Ten just isn't very good, so I'm not sure how to judge them. A USC/Wisconsin second round match-up would certainly be an interesting game of two contrasting styles.

(And with that I await whatever comes my way -- much love, fellas!)

Indiana - I'm glad the committee gave them an eight. The committee seems to love how teams play down the stretch (as opposed to body of work) and they certainly applied that to Indiana -- they lost three of their last four and barely squeaked by Northwestern and Ohio State.

Purdue - Purdue is intriguing to me -- I'd say they have a good path ahead of them. They have IMO the weakest of the #3 seeds (probably debatable) as well as the weakest #2 seed in their bracket. I'm interested in seeing who will come out of that bottom half of the West bracket.

Michigan State - I don't have a whole lot to say about them. If they manage to win their first round game, I think Pitt will absolutely pummel them in round two.

As far as my Golden Eagles... I like the first round match-up. Kentucky turns the ball over approximately once every four possessions so that should play into Marquette's hands very nicely. Kentucky is without its best player, so it's really not a terrible draw.

The potential second round game -- if Marquette is lucky enough to get there -- versus Stanford sucks, but it's the NCAA tourney, so you're going to have to play (and beat) quality opponents. Stanford's guards seem rather weak, so Marquette's plan would have to be to pressure the hell out of them and hope to run-run-run the whole game. The Lopez brothers would almost assuredly combine for at least 40, though...

I don't care to speculate beyond that. I'm not kidding myself into thinking Marquette is any great shakes in this field of 65, but they should win against Kentucky. Crean hasn't done squat without Wade... it's time for Crean as well as 'The Big Three' to -- at the very least -- play more than one game in the tourney. If we play past the first weekend I will be satisfied.

Sox trade Gio Gonzalez, Fautino De Los Santos and Ryan Sweeney for Nick Swisher

CWSKeith — Thu, 03 Jan 2008 19:04:47 -0000

[whitesox.com]:

The Chicago White Sox have acquired switch-hitting outfielder Nick Swisher from the Oakland Athletics in exchange for three minor league players, pitcher Gio Gonzalez, pitcher Fautino De Los Santos and outfielder Ryan Sweeney. The trade was announced Thursday afternoon by Ken Williams, White Sox general manager and senior vice president.

Highway Robbery says wiz...

BTF Poster/Analyst...

CWSKeith — Sat, 10 Nov 2007 06:13:38 -0000

hired as a scout by the Diamondbacks. I'm sure by now most of you guys have heard of Carlos Gomez, the guy who had done provided a lot of quality analysis over the past year.

Congratulations to Carlos and kudos to Arizona for stepping up and hiring a guy who, in a short time, has taught me a lot about pitching. I wish him the best and hope that being a 'scout' is just the beginning.

Baseball Prospectus Will Never Get a Dime from Me

CWSKeith — Tue, 02 Oct 2007 01:20:02 -0000

http://www.baseballprospectus.com/unfiltered/?p=554

Will Carroll is an unprofessional dolt. Can we start compiling a list on everything he's gotten wrong? Or how they've fucked up the White Sox projections the past two seasons and only this year got it right?

Surprised nobody posted this. This, to me, is 'jackass-ery' at its finest.

Reinsdorf Comments on Payroll

CWSKeith — Sun, 09 Sep 2007 18:16:36 -0000

http://www.dailysouthtown.com/sports/548844,091SPT2.article

While it remains to be seen how active the front office will be in the free-agent market, Reinsdorf expects the payroll to remain comparable to that of this season.

"Oh, yeah," Reinsdorf said. "It might be more than that. That's a question I don't know the answer to right now, because we still have to do our budget for next year. We look at all of our income and all of our expenses, and whatever is left over is our payroll.

"The fans came out to support us, so we can afford it. I've always said that whatever money we have, we'll devote to building a winning team."

Just for you extreme pessimists out there, it looks like the Sox won't be dropping back in payroll even after the crappy season. Obviously the Sox are still going to have to unload one of Garland or Contreras (preferably both), but the money will be there to add someone.

I'm not saying, BTW, that one player (Rowand, Hunter, Jones) is going to fix the mess that the Sox are in, but I still believe it's the right move to go after Jones this winter. That's not to say the Sox should offer him C-Lee money, but you get my drift.

This quote seemed sort of odd, too:

Despite a $109.7 million payroll at the start of the season, the fourth-highest in the major leagues and the highest in team history, the South Siders owned the second-worst record overall going into Saturday's action.

The Sox aren't actually paying anywhere near that $109.7 number, are they? I thought what the Sox were paying was much closer to $95 million.

In any case, the Sox should have some flexibility this winter, which is good to know...

A Beautiful Day for a Baseball Game...

CWSKeith — Mon, 30 Jul 2007 06:05:37 -0000

maybe a little too beautiful for Scott Podsednik. Podsednik provided another adventurous moment in the outfield when he dropped a line-drive that would've ended the eighth inning. Toronto went on to plate four in the eighth for the 4-1 victory.

Interestingly enough, perhaps the fans have started turning on Podsednik a little bit (NOTE: I'm obviously not talking about a majority of the posters here.). When he came to bat in the bottom half of the eighth, a small but audible percentage -- I'm in a numbers mood, so I'll say 15% -- actually booed Podsednik.
Up until that eighth innng, this was a very enjoyable game from a baseball sense. Vazquez and Marcum were on their games, combining for 13 strikeouts and just seven hits allowed. And it's not like hitters were lacing the ball right at defenders -- there were very few hard hit balls in this game.
A small part of me thought Konerko had been traded today (I was at the game, if my earlier comments hadn't given that away). Apparently there was an article out a few days ago that said Konerko would sit for a few games in this series, but I didn't see it. And when I couldn't spot Konerko from section 115 anywhere on the bench, I figured I would see a message pop-up on the scoreboard that Konerko had been sent to Anahiem for Casey Kotchman, Ervin Santana and a prospect. Needless to say he wasn't traded, although his name has been thrown around in rumors over the past couple days.
From where I was sitting, I was impressed with Gavin Floyd's one inning of work. It looked like he had a really good breaking ball working -- not the curveball we've heard so much about, but a slider that was registering at 85 MPH. I will say I was a little dissappointed that he wasn't 'letting it loose' a bit more, only topping out at 91 MPH in his one inning of work, but hey -- I'm not going to be the one to nitpick a scoreless inning from the bullpen.