<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>SB Nation User Blog:  Donner</title>
    <link>http://www.sbnation.comhttp://www.sbnation.com/users/Donner</link>
    <description>Posts made by Donner on SB Nation</description>
    <item>
      <title>Orlando Cabrera vs Scutaro
</title>
      <link>http://www.athleticsnation.com/2005/9/16/125115/719</link>
      <author>Donner</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 16:51:15 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;So, I tend to rip my Angels fan friend for the Angels signing Cabrera and letting Eckstein go. &amp;nbsp;An example of the Angels having more money than sense. He defends it with two points. &amp;nbsp;First, Eckstein probably would not have played as well in Anaheim as he is in St Louis. Second, Cabrera is better defensively. Both likely true, but I still think signing Cabrera was a mistake. But, I just noticed something...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are the Angels paying $6 million in 2005 for Marco Scutaro? &amp;nbsp;Offensively, their OBP and SLG are nearly identical. About the only difference is Carbrera is better defensively, although I don't have the stats to show it conclusively. &amp;nbsp;He does play more innings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Finally, they have him signed for 4 years $32 million. &amp;nbsp;And, it looks like a couple of decent guys in Salt Lake are now blocked.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, does anyone else think Caberera was not a smart signing by the Angels?&lt;/p&gt;



  

  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Great Kendall article at CC Times
</title>
      <link>http://www.athleticsnation.com/2005/8/1/16180/27110</link>
      <author>Donner</author>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 20:17:59 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;Hi all-&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Came across this article on the Contra Costa Times web site about Kendall. &amp;nbsp;I thought especially the out of state ANers may miss it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.contracostatimes.com/mld/cctimes/sports/baseball/mlb/oakland_athletics/12274415.htm&quot;&gt;http://www.contracostatimes.com/mld/cctimes/sports/baseball/mlb/oakland_athletics/12274415.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I always had the feeling he studied hard for each start. He hardly ever gets shaken off by this staff. &amp;nbsp;So, all they have to do is throw their pitches. &amp;nbsp;Kendall takes care fo the rest.&lt;/p&gt;



  

  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Admitting when I am wrong
</title>
      <link>http://www.athleticsnation.com/2005/7/24/195620/018</link>
      <author>Donner</author>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:56:20 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;Ok.. Maybe this isn't worth a diary.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In another diary I commented:&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;Let the Angels and Skanks beat on each other this weekend, and either gain a couple games on Anaheim or put two more teams behind us in the wild card.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would like to admit that I was wrong. &amp;nbsp;Instead of putting two teams behind us in the wild card race we put FOUR teams behind us (counting the Twins, which is technically a tie) since the start of this series.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, I apologize for bringing too much negativity to what is supposed to be an A's fan site.&lt;/p&gt;



  

  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Worst avg with RISP
</title>
      <link>http://www.athleticsnation.com/2005/4/27/124951/331</link>
      <author>Donner</author>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 16:49:51 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;So, I keep seeing comments (in regular media and here) that the A's have one of the worst batting averages with RISP this season. &amp;nbsp;It irritated me though because they have one of the worst batting averages period. It seemed like a non-meaningful thing to say. &amp;nbsp;So, I decided to see just how non-meaningful it was. &amp;nbsp;To bring the average with RISP to the same as their regular batting average would require a grand total of 3 more hits. Looking a OBP with RISP is actually slightly higher than the total average. &amp;nbsp;Therefore, I would argue the A's are performing exactly the same with RISP as otherwise, poorly.&lt;/p&gt;



  

  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Offense comments
</title>
      <link>http://www.athleticsnation.com/2005/4/12/111652/729</link>
      <author>Donner</author>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:16:52 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;First, Diary...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes, it is early, but...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OBP/SLG/BA&lt;br /&gt;
Kotsay .438/.483/.379&lt;br /&gt;
Ellis .467/.429/.429&lt;br /&gt;
Hatty .385/.500/.333&lt;br /&gt;
Scutaro .348/.350/.250&lt;br /&gt;
Chavez .355/.375/.208&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kotsay is a stud.&lt;br /&gt;
Ellis is making his comeback.&lt;br /&gt;
Hatteberg is showing why Spring Training doesn't mean that much.&lt;br /&gt;
Scutaro is proving he really did learn to take pitches in the off season.&lt;br /&gt;
Chavez isn't getting pitches to hit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Durazo has to start hitting again. &amp;nbsp;Make teams pay for putting Chavez on at a clip .150 higher than he is hitting.&lt;/p&gt;



  

  


      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
