<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>SB Nation User Blog:  EricV</title>
    <link>http://www.sbnation.com/users/EricV</link>
    <description>Posts made by EricV on SB Nation</description>
    <item>
      <title>Malkin suspension rescinded</title>
      <link>http://www.wingingitinmotown.com/2009/5/31/894733/malkin-suspension-rescinded</link>
      <author>EricV</author>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 03:59:28 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


Well &lt;a href="http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=424480"&gt;that was fast&lt;/a&gt;....&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;National Hockey League Executive Vice President and Director of Hockey Operations Colin Campbell issued the following statement regarding the instigator penalty assessed to Pittsburgh's Evgeni Malkin at 19:41 of the third period of tonight&#8217;s Game 2 of the Stanley Cup Final:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

Rule 47.22 states: "A player who is deemed to be the instigator of an altercation in the final five minutes or at any time in overtime shall be suspended for one game, pending a review of the incident.  The director of hockey operations will review every such incident and may rescind the suspension based on a number of criteria. The criteria for the review shall include, but not be limited to, the score, previous incidents, etc..." &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

Following that review, Campbell said: "None of the criteria in this rule applied in this situation. Suspensions are applied under this rule when a team attempts to send a message in the last five minutes by having a player instigate a fight.  A suspension could also be applied when a player seeks retribution for a prior incident.  Neither was the case here and therefore the one game suspension is rescinded."&lt;/blockquote&gt;

  
  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The solution for the Lions in my opinion is Michael Vick. Why Vick?

    * Rest assured the Lions...</title>
      <link>http://www.prideofdetroit.com/2009/4/16/840539/the-solution-for-the-lions-in-my</link>
      <author>EricV</author>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:22:47 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;The solution for the Lions in my opinion is Michael Vick. Why Vick?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;    * Rest assured the Lions would have one of the top three running games in the NFL next season with Vick under center.
&lt;br /&gt;    * Vick would help the defense because of ball control and his unusual propensity to keep the chains moving.
&lt;br /&gt;    * Most importantly for the Lions, Vick is "recession-proof" &#8212; he would sell out Ford Field.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
  
&lt;div class="source"&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.nfl.com/2009/04/15/dukes-solution-for-lions-is-vick/"&gt;NFL Network Blogs: Jamie Dukes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mitchell Report
</title>
      <link>http://www.blessyouboys.com/2007/12/13/143728/17</link>
      <author>EricV</author>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:37:28 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="http://i.l.cnn.net/cnn/2007/images/12/13/mitchell.report.pdf"&gt;Mitchell Report&lt;/a&gt; is out. Scanning for Tigers players I ran across &lt;a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/players/5126"&gt;Rondell White&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/players/7384"&gt;Nook Logan&lt;/a&gt;. Clearly Nook didn't get the same stuff that Bonds got... Also Mark Carreon, Hal Morris, Phil Hiatt, and Fernando Vina.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Page 111&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;At the end of the 2004 season, a clubhouse employee was cleaning out the Detroit&lt;br /&gt;
Tigers locker room when he found a black toiletry kit that was locked. He and another Tigers&lt;br /&gt;
employee opened the bag and found unused syringes and vials that they determined were&lt;br /&gt;
anabolic steroids. They did not report the incident. The employee said that he could not&lt;br /&gt;
remember who the bag belonged to.&lt;/blockquote&gt;



  

  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Shopping the #2 pick
</title>
      <link>http://www.prideofdetroit.com/2007/3/20/104356/734</link>
      <author>EricV</author>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:43:56 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;The Denver Post is reporting that &lt;a href="http://www.denverpost.com/ci_5457658?source=rss"&gt;the Lions are shopping the #2 pick&lt;/a&gt;. Denver reportedly wouldn't give up the Lion's asking price of "multiple draft picks that included Denver's No. 21 selection". As I'm one of the large plurality advocating the Lions trade down I'm happy to hear it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Yes, the Lions have held preliminary discussions with the Broncos regarding the No. 2 pick during the past month, NFL sources confirmed.
&lt;p&gt;But Broncos fans shouldn't get their hopes up.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;According to sources, the Lions asked for multiple draft picks that included Denver's No. 21 selection. The Broncos considered the asking price far too high, and trade discussions have ceased.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;


  

  


      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
