Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Hornets Win NBA Draft Lottery, Will Pick No. 1

Large

Invictus13

Dec 26, 2009 Jun 01, 2012 14 4926

rss icon RSSUser Blog

It looks like FSU's first Sand Volleyball season has been successful, and the Noles will play in the first Sand Volleyball National Championship next week: a four team tournament.

Looks like we are undefeated (13-0), and have the #1 ranked team (? article mentions this, but I haven't found any rankings yet), and our five positions are a combined 62-3 on the courts (#s 3 and 5 are both 13-0). Seems Pepperdine is the primary competition (11-0, 47-8).

Hopefully FSU brings home the first NCAA championship in Sand Volleyball!

about 1 month ago Tiny Invictus13 10 comments

Athlon's had that debated ranking of ACC coaches a while back, and now they've ranked all the coaches in the nation. Any observations, complaints, or jokes?

about 1 month ago Tiny Invictus13 66 comments

ESPN has a story up that talks about FSU's own version of the United Nations. It mainly focuses on Daniel Glauser and Menelik Watson, but right now one of the main photos on ESPN's CFB homepage is of Bjoern Werner.

Nothing big and new, but it's always nice to see good things about FSU on the national sites.

2 months ago Tiny Invictus13 8 comments

According to the AP, Mark Richt has agreed to a five-year extension (through the 2016 season).

I know there is a prevalent thought here at TN that this is a good thing for Florida State. So, cheers?

3 months ago Tiny Invictus13 4 comments

Rivals compiled a list of the "Unlucky Thirteen" recruiting classes, and FSU dominates the list:

2. Florida State, 2004
3. Florida State, 2006
5. Florida State, 2005

In 2006 alone, 5/6 Rivals Top 100 players who signed with FSU ended their careers at other places.In 2005, 2/3 5-star signees washed out. In 2004, five 4-stars left early.

It is sad to read through the player lists and see so many names that make you think, "Oh, yeah - THAT guy" or, worse, "Who?"

3 months ago Tiny Invictus13 22 comments

The Sporting News is reporting that a BCS official says that a "playoff" (in one form or another) "gets done." Apparently, "at least 60 different options" will be explored in a series of meetings this year.

5 months ago Tiny Invictus13 35 comments

The Pac 12 already plays a 9-game conference schedule, and the Big 10 is moving in that direction (starts in 2017) - now each team will play a 10th BCS team every year (not to mention that some of those teams play Notre Dame annually).

So... is this "not so smart" scheduling, or do Jim Delany and Larry Scott know something most of us don't?

5 months ago Tiny Invictus13 9 comments

Looks like Dave Hart is heading to the University of Tennessee "as its new vice chancellor and athletic director."

9 months ago Tiny Invictus13 1 comment

Apparently "multiple conferences" have shown interest in OU, and they'll be discussing their options in the near future. Any thoughts on what they'll do?

9 months ago Tiny Invictus13 19 comments

Noticed this on SI (Banks). Here's an excerpt:

"With McNabb in house, who knows how long it'll take for the Vikings to fully launch their Christian Ponder era, but the rookie quarterback from Florida State has made a favorable early impression on almost everyone around here. He certainly looks, acts and sounds like a franchise quarterback, and Frazier told me he believes having those traits is an important component of the leadership half of the job. Now if the kid can play, the Vikings will really have something special on their hands. It's too early to know that at the NFL level, but people who have watched him in Minnesota so far say Ponder 'gets it,' and will do the work necessary to give himself the best possible chance to succeed."

10 months ago Tiny Invictus13 7 comments

SI's Mandel fields a question about second-year coaches winning national championships... and Jimbo Fisher is this year's only legit contender among second-year coaches, he says.

11 months ago Tiny Invictus13 15 comments

Tomahawk Nation The Firewater Saloon III

*PLEASE DO NOT RECOMMEND THIS FANPOST

With the clamor of shattering beer bottles and the drunken shouts of soon-to-be-peeved patrons, the third thread of the Firewater Saloon is now open. So, while I may remain named Invictus, it seems that I will eventually cave to peer pressure. (Please don't start encouraging me to take up any unhealthy habits or participating in illegal and highly dangerous activities...)

As before, here are some Firewater Saloon guidelines. Some of your options may have changed, so please read all sentences carefully.

A) Come here to hang out. Chat about things that would unnecessarily clog other threads. Sure, there's that Off-Topic Discussion place, too, but that seems to be for FSU related questions/topics not covered elsewhere. Consider this your any-topic-goes thread of choice. Well, within reason. We can't card patrons at the CyberEntrance, you know.

2) You are encouraged to mingle with the other patrons. Don't be a wallflower and merely read the posts - interact, make friends, start bar fights in your mind and then relate the story (we could all use a laugh). 

D) Remember to take you vitamins. We need healthy (and living) readers so TN can continue to get hits during the off-season. Keep TN thriving! 

Omega) Therapy sessions only cost 4¢ per word. Just don't take any of my advice, as it might be detrimental to your mental state.

Magenta) Is it any surprise the Pack is winning? After all, "Blessed are the cheesemakers."

47 comments  | 

uf Prez J. Bernard Machen thinks that "grayshirting" is morally "reprehensible." Any thoughts/comments about uf as an institution worthy of leading a moral revolution in college sports? (Given the audience, is that a loaded question or what?)

over 1 year ago Tiny Invictus13 51 comments

Tomahawk Nation Proposal for NCAA infractions/punishments

I've said it before - I think the concept of vacating wins is stupid. The NCAA's system of punishment leaves much to be desired, and I have a proposal that will allow more fitting punishments to be meted out. 

For programs that have infractions, scholarship reductions are warranted. But for personal offenses (e.g., cheating on exams, contact with an agent, etc.), it's not fair to punish the coaches, players, and fans who had nothing to do with the situation - particularly when the actual perpetrators often get away with little or no punishment. Forfeits, or the currently popular vacating of wins, should be reserved for situations where coaches knowingly used ineligible players. However, if a coach is unaware of an infraction, how can s/he be expected to sit the "ineligible" player? It makes no sense.

Instead, let's put the punishment more fully on the perpetrators. Suspensions work to a point, but what about infractions uncovered after a player leaves campus? Those players are rarely affected by their misdeeds. Therefore, I propose that the NCAA allow athletic scholarships to be reclassified as scholarship/loans. As long as athletes fulfill certain criteria/conditions, the educational funding awarded for their athletic participation is classified as a scholarship. If, however, athletes fail to meet the outlined conditions, their funding reverts to a student loan. All the laws applicable to student loans and their collections would then apply to some or all of the funds the athlete received. This would hold the athletes personally responsible for their own actions.

Say an athlete graduates, and it is later discovered that s/he cheated on an exam (or committed some other infraction that would affect eligibility) at the start of his/her junior year. Instead of the team "vacating" any wins in which this athlete participated, the athlete's funding in his/her junior AND senior seasons would revert to student loan status (i.e., for the period during which s/he was ineligible). The university would likely still receive a scholarship reduction, but the largest consequences for this athlete's actions would fall mostly on him/her. 

The conditions would need to be carefully expressed, of course - transferring, leaving school early, etc. should not cause the funding to revert to loan status. But, actions that currently cause programs to be put on probation should initiate the reclassification. Let's punish the perpetrators, and not the universities that have given them the opportunity to receive a college education. 

I am still formulating this idea, so suggestions and feedback would be appreciated.

7 comments  |