As the Hot Stove season swings into high gear, and we continue the Holliday watch, I thought it might be interesting for the community to talk about a possible alternative - Mr. Adam Dunn.  I know he's been discussed (and dismissed) by some.  Joe Strauss suggests that the offense would be offset by gosh-awful butchery in the field.  But lets take a moment and consider the possibilities.

Continue reading this post »

I raised this issue several weeks ago, and things have gradually become more interesting.  Can Albert somehow find a way to grind out enough RBIs, HRs, and a high enough BA to win the ever-elusive triple crown?  We are definitely in the home stretch of the season, and I'm come to the conclusion it remains difficult but possible.  Consider Albert vs. the closest competition (as of 22 September):

RBI:
Pujols - 128
Fielder - 128
Howard - 123

A dead heat at the moment.  Albert has 11 games left, Prince 12.  Their competition strength is about equal too (though the Brewers do have to play the Phillies, and the Cardinals get the Reds).  And they do get to play each other.  I've got to think that the pitching staff and TLR would try to lock Fielder down if Albert is within sniffing distance of the Triple Crown.  SMALL EDGE TO PUJOLS.

HR:
Pujols - 47
Reynolds - 43
Howard - 41

Albert has the biggest edge here.  Reynolds could put on a surge, but I think with the number of games left, four home runs is a big gap to overcome.  Howard has the ability to stack home runs too (that's pretty much all he hits) but again, time is too short.  LARGE EDGE TO PUJOLS.

BA:
Ramirez - .352
Pujols - .329
Sandoval - .323

Ah yes, easily the hardest of the three categories for Albert to beat.  Ramirez has been incredibly dominant all season, and that .352 average looks mighty shiny.  BUT, I am highly encouraged by developments in the past ten days.  If you look at Ramirez's stats, he has slid eight percentage points in that period, with only one multi-hit game to speak of.  Florida has 12 games left.  If he maintains that rate of slide, he could finish in the neighborhood of .344.  The question is, can Albert surge his way to that mark?  He has finished with seasonal averages above this mark twice already (.357 in 2008, .359 in 2003).  The trick is, it would take a pretty good clip to get there, my junior high math suggests that if he averages 4 plate appearances the rest of the way, then he needs 24 hits or a .545 average to overcome the deficit.  SMALL EDGE TO RAMIREZ

Bottom Line - can he do it?  My heart says yes, my head says no.  It would be outstanding to see a triple-crown winner, and Albert may someday still do it (I think his window could close though, within the next 3-5 years).  But it just won't be this year.  Nuts. 

I've been watching the standings the last few weeks, and begun to wonder if Albert really does have a shot at the triple crown.  Based on numbers as of 13 August, he seems to have a good / great chance at winning the HR and RBI races.  Reynolds is an unknown commodity who I believe will fade.  Fielder is a great hitter, but playing for a team that is rapidly slipping from the standings and will likely have diminishing production. 

Its the batting title that's elusive, and that's due to one man hitting for the Marlins.  Albert appears to have broken out of his mini-slump and is again dominating.  But Hanley Ramirez's numbers are SICK (not "ridiculous" - that title belongs to El Hombre).  Here's the skinny on their past ten games:

Pujols: 39 AB, 15 Hits, .385 AVG (4 BBs, 5 SOs)
Ramirez: 46 AB, 19 Hits, .413 AVG (1 BB, 7 SOs)

I'm ignoring the other hitting statistics - for the purposes of this discussion, they're irrelevant.  For my VEB bretheren, what do you think are the chances Albert overtakes Hanley?  Give me a % guesstimate. 

I'll start off with 35%.  I don't think Pujols cools off.  The problem is, Ramirez will stay north of .340 for the rest of the season.  That will (sadly) be just enough to win the batting title.

We're just a couple of weeks away from the MLB 2009 Draft, and I thought it might be interesting to have an open discussion about what the Cardinals might do.  Currently, they are slotted with the 19th pick in the draft.  I'm curious what the community thinnks the FO will do in terms of its selection.  Last year's selection (The Walrus) is thus far turning out to be a pretty smart move.  What is in store this year?

My quiet hope is that somehow, Aaron Crow slips to the Cardinals due to his contract shenanigans in 2008.  I doubt it will happen, but you never know.  We all remember (painfully) how low Porcello fell.

What do you folks think?  Any dark horse candidates? 

Just to shift gears away from all the talk about Skip, 2B, and defense, I thought I'd start a thread to discuss how well the St. Louis OFFENSE seems to be performing in the early portions of spring training.  I know this is the time of year when managers experiment, the games don't count and people are just stretching themselves out for the season.  But, consider this:

• In 12 Games, the Cardinals have scored 90 RUNS (7.5 per game)
• Virtually every starter is CRUSHING the ball
• Duncan, perhaps the biggest surprise is leading the team in homers
• Duncan is ALSO hitting at a .370 clip
• Schmuaker continues to hit .333 while learning a brand new position
• The most recent game (Marlins) gave us 8 runs, 14 hits

Now, I don't have the stats from the 2008 ST, but this has to represent a significant uptick in offensive production from what is normal.  Just comparing the Cardinals to the best teams in the league, the Cubs are averaging 5.3 runs, the Red Sox 6.1, the Rays 6.7, the Phillies 5.9...  Should we be encouraged by the hitting we are seeing at the plate?  Has the addition of such pieces as Greene, moving Skip to 2B, and other tweaks turned us into some sort of scoring juggernaut?

A humble suggestion for my bretheren bird-lovers.  Adam Eaton was released by the Philadelphia Phillies from his contract.  The Cardinals appear to have a need for another starter in camp.  Why not sign the man?

I know that Eaton's numbers are nothing to be amazed by, but it seems to me that signing this gentleman for the league minimum and letting him try his hand in camp makes a world of sense, particularly since the Cards are short on pitching at the moment. 

For those interested, I've linked to both Eaton's career numbers on ESPN, as well as the news story that announces his departure.  Eaton was going to make $8M this year.  But it looks like the Phils are going to "eat" that cost.

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3940074
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/profile?playerId=4392

PS - Is it just me, or does this make anyone else feel better about the Cardinals soaking up Kennedy's $4M contract?...

PPS - Yeah, maybe this belongs in the hot stove, but I can't help myself.  They're playing some real honest-to-goodness baseball in Florida right now.  Woot!

As the winter begins to wind down and a few superstars continue to wait for the right deal to open up (Ramirez anyone?), I started thinking about the motivational power of revenge.  If you're a premiere player in the major leagues, and you are overlooked by your old club (along with many others), how much motivation does that provide you to accept a lowball offer, come back with another outfit, and stuff your old teammates?

The best potential examples of this phenomenon could be Manny Ramirez and Ben Sheets.  Both are perceived as monster talents.  And yet, both could be forced to accept humbling, ridiculously low offers just to continue playing. 

I have two questions for the Cardinal community.  First, do players suck up low offers in order to shove it in their former team's faces?  Would Manny take a low offer from a team like the Giants (say, 1-year $10M) just to beat mercilessly on the Dodgers for a year?  Would Ben Sheets take an offer from say... the Cardinals... for 1-year at $5M to face his former mates six or seven times throughout the season and pay back the lack of contract love?

Second question, is there any historical evidence of players who have walked this line?  In other words, are there any players out there who decided that heck, the money was less important for one year or so, if it gave them a chance to maul the people who scorned them? 

Just curious what everyone thinks.  I don't think that Man-Ram or Sheets will find their way to the Cardinals in the end.  But I do wonder if they will come back with something to prove and a desire to beat their previous club.

I'm sure many will come across this article from regular Internet surfing, but Jerry Crasnick with ESPN provides a VERY nice write-up and summation of the Cardinals offseason situations in his latest column.

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/hotstove08/columns/story?columnist=crasnick_jerry&id=3846058

I also noted with some interest that "Viva El Birdos" was directly cited as a source of "constructive criticism".  Kudos to the site managers for getting the attention of the national media guys.

On top of it all, Crasnick offers a very fair (IMO) overview of how Mozeliak has operated in this offseason.  We might be frustrated by the pace of decisions, and players that "got away", but Mo's deliberate, reasoned attack to player development and growth is a major positive. 

Any thoughts on all this?

Greetings, Bronx Bombers.  I'm actually a St. Louis Cardinals fan, but thought I'd drop over to your website to pose a question.

Watching the Hot Stove, there seems to be a lot of discussion on the vivaelbirdos page about possible deals for Phil Hughes.  Some have suggested that a deal involving Hughes and the Cardinals Rick Ankiel would make a lot of sense for both clubs.  The Yankees are interested in upgrading power and defense in the outfield.  The Cardinals have a surplus of outfielders, and need to shore up pitching.

I apologize if this belongs in your "Hot Stove" thread, but I thought I would find out what the other potential partner in a deal thinks.  Does Yankee nation see any value in this type of a trade? 

PS - I've attached Ankiel's vitals in case anyone wants to scan through them.  For those who haven't seen him, his power is very good, health is about average, and his defense is in the plus range (with a cannon for an arm).
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/profile?playerId=4159

I almost feel guilty typing that subject line.  But after a recent story on ESPN, I couldn't help but wonder.  If it were under VERY controlled circumstances, would bringing Barry Bonds to St. Louis now make sense?

Before you begin throwing much-deserved rocks at me, consider the following arguments:
- He would help raise attendance in a potentially sluggish economy
- He could be used exclusively as a pinch hitter
- He has (historically) insane statistics.  His OPS is career-wise higher than Alberts
- He REALLY wants to play, and thus could come very cheap with the right offer
- He gives Tony that (occasional) big bat to sit behind Albert, doesn't he?

Imagine the following scenario.  John Mozeliak and Tony Larussa contact Barry and express their interest.  Barry gets a one-year, $3M contract.  He only pinch-hits (and fields in a dire emergency).  He undergoes regular drug testing and doesn't raise a peep in legal circles.  And he doesn't bring ANY of his entourage to games.

Albert welcomes him to the team and lays down the riot act as well.  Keep your nose clean, you're living on borrowed time, welcome to the club, etc. 

Go ahead.  Tell me I'm insane.  Tell me Bonds is washed up.  Tell me he would be a distraction.  But consider this.  Barry's CAREER OPS was 1.051.  In his last season (2007) he drew 132 walks, clobbered 28 home runs, and managed to terrify the opposition.  Isn't that worth a small risk?  At the very least, no one would accuse the Cardinals of playing the offseason too conservatively...

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3804098