Since the Cardinals have largely finalized their 2012 roster, I thought it might be a useful (and probably provocative) exercise to hypothesize what kind of WAR the players are likely to generate next year. I’m just spit-balling in a lot of cases, so I hope folks will feel free to argue, disagree and offer their feedback. For what it’s worth, I tried to be as objective and conservative with my numbers as possible.

Continue reading this post »

Ok, boys and girls.  I've been scanning the interwebs, and noticing a lot of angst regarding the recent Colby Rasmus trade.  In the interest of rational dialogue, I thought I'd post a brief explanation of why this trade makes some degree of sense and could work out.  Feel free to flame if you wish, but lets try to be civil, shall we?

Continue reading this post »

So we're a mere one month away, give or take, from the start of Spring Training, and the Pujols Doomsday Clock (PDC) continues to tick ominously in the background.  Both sides are tight-lipped, but I'd wager there is a lot of money and years on the table.  And I want Pujols to sign with the Redbirds.  I really, really, do.  But.  Let's just pretend for a moment that the Cardinals and Albert reach an impasse, and the club realizes its not going to work.  What represents "Plan B"?  I thought I'd throw the floor open for discussion on this.

Continue reading this post »

With the acquisition of Ryan Theriot, it appears that part one of the Mozeliak / LaRussa master plan for jettisoning Brendan Ryan is complete.  Personally, I think the Cardinals would be foolish to trade Boog.  But unless I miss my guess, Ryan is likely to be gone within the week.  This got me thinking about two general questions.

1) What is Brendan Ryan worth?

2) What might the Cardinals get in return for Boog?

Continue reading this post »

I know folks have talked briefly about Zack Cox and some of the other guys performing in the Arizona Fall League.  But it occurred to me that no one on this site had actually sat down and compiled the final numbers for our Birds.  So with that in mind, I wanted to do a quick summation of performances in the AFL this year.  I'll throw a few quick stats out there and limit the commentary.   Forgive the lack of fielding stats, but they just don't seem to be out there.  It is the Arizona league, after all.  Also, please excuse the small sample size.  It is what it is.

Continue reading this post »

Ok, my redbird brothers and sisters.  Since its the offseason and we're all beginning to speculate just what moves the team will make to get better next year, I thought I would float an idea that's been brewing in my mind.  While many have suggested trading a piece like Colby Rasmus (bad idea), I think the Cardinals have another player who could bring a LOT of value under the right circumstances.  I'm referring to The Luggage, Mr. Chris Carpenter.

Continue reading this post »

A friend and I are constantly arguing over whether Jim Edmonds, former Cardinal and Centerfielder extraordinaire, is deserving of a place in the Hall of Fame.  My friend argues (reasonably), that while his numbers were great, they simply weren’t good enough.  He didn’t have enough distinguishing peak years, and didn’t amass the necessary statistics to take the prize.  I remain unconvinced.  As such, I decided to put together a quick and dirty comparison of Edmonds against existing centerfielders in the Hall of Fame…

Continue reading this post »

While scanning some articles from the P-D recently, I came across a nice piece outlining the cost for each Cardinal in 2011.  While I already knew most of the information the article shared, it struck me just how many resources the Cardinals have that are cost controlled.  As such, I thought it would be worth laying out a simple list I've nicknamed "the 400K brigade".  These guys are all effectively costing the Redbirds the minimum salary requirement .  And in many cases, they are indispensible pieces for the club's success.  Consider...

Continue reading this post »

With the season drawing to a frustrating close, I think its time to turn to more esoteric and personal subjects. I know the community has discussed the man in great detail, but I wanted to put together a brief fanpost highlighting one of the Cardinals yeomen warriors, Mr. Jason Larue.

Continue reading this post »

With the signing deadline now past, I thought I would throw up a straight-forward post to discuss what the Cardinals now officially have cooking on the farm.  While we lost out on one potential prize with Austin Wilson, the Birds now have four really nice pieces that go right into the system.  Here's the Cardinals press release, and below I'll attach the main catches with a link to their scouting reports.

Continue reading this post »

I've been amazed by the offensive resurgence of young Mr. Brendan Ryan the past seven days.  I've got the numbers below, but this post is designed to answer the following question - When does Ryan's defense sufficiently offset his offense to stay a regular in the lineup.

Continue reading this post »

We've rounded the turn and our heading into the 2nd half of the season.  The races are all in question, and the Redbirds are duking it out with the Redlegs to see who takes the Central this year.  But I wanted to pause for a moment and look at some individual awards - specifically the Cy Young.  As 2009 proved (to the Cardinals disappointment), wins aren't everything.  But we've got enough good data right now to pick some front runners in the race, and ask ourselves this burning question: "Is this the year that Wainwright gets his Cy"?

Continue reading this post »

Greetings, brother bird-watchers.  As the All Star Game rapidly approaches, I've begun to wonder which player who is most deserving, but will get jilted by the fanbase this year.  I think most reasonable people would agree that the selection of players is largely a popularity contest.  But that said, the game does determine which league gets home-field advantage in the World Series.  For good or ill, that's a significant cookie to strive for.  So based on the latest vote counts, here are a few of my suggested candidates for getting screwed.  None of these individuals are in the Top 5 for their position (or Top 15 for OFs).  I'm going to focus on the National League (based on 15 June numbers), but feel free to offer your own suggestions and opinions...

BTW - Attached is a link to the current vote totals, for those who are interested.

Continue reading this post »

I suspect a number of you panicked when you saw that headline.  Allow me to reassure you, Jaime Garcia is (to my knowledge) still in the best of health, and planning on taking his next turn in the rotation.  However, I've begun to quietly wonder when the Cardinals might reduce his workload or perhaps cut short his season.

Continue reading this post »

Now that we have a decent chunk of the season out of the way, I thought I'd take a moment to compare and contrast two potential candidates for Rookie of the Year.  I'm not going to tell you who they are at first, but I suspect you'll quickly figure it out...

Continue reading this post »

This just in, hot off the presses.  Please check out the following link.  Apparently the Yankees and Cardinals have come to a deal, where the Redbirds send Daryl Jones to New York, for Pat Venditte, the wunderkind who throws both right and left handed.  We now officially have the world's first SWOOGY (switch throwing right AND left handed reliever).  Is everyone excited?

...

And yes, this is an April Fools Joke.  But imagine what Tony would DO with this guy...

In advance, I apologize to the moderators of the board.  Hopefully they will let this polite rant slide...

Normally, I'm content to read these boards and talk strictly about Cardinals baseball.  But I find myself repeatedly frustrated by the ramblings of a certain reporter for the P-D.  I am referring to everyone's favorite journalist, Mr. Bryan Burwell.  I believe everyone is entitled to their own opinion.  And I respect Mr. Burwell's right to express his thoughts.  If the Post Dispatch is willing to keep paying his salary, they must have some positive feedback from their readership.  And yet...

Continue reading this post »

Just caught the story on ESPN.  Looks like the Cardinals have locked up Skippy for the next two years, at what (I think) is a reasonable rate.  Any thoughts on this?  Frankly, I'm very satisfied.  It gives us some stability at a position that has become the "Defense Against the Dark Arts" in terms of longevity.  Deal is:

2010: $2M

2011: $2.75M

A few hundred K in incentives over this time period.

Thoughts?

As the Hot Stove season swings into high gear, and we continue the Holliday watch, I thought it might be interesting for the community to talk about a possible alternative - Mr. Adam Dunn.  I know he's been discussed (and dismissed) by some.  Joe Strauss suggests that the offense would be offset by gosh-awful butchery in the field.  But lets take a moment and consider the possibilities.

Continue reading this post »

I raised this issue several weeks ago, and things have gradually become more interesting.  Can Albert somehow find a way to grind out enough RBIs, HRs, and a high enough BA to win the ever-elusive triple crown?  We are definitely in the home stretch of the season, and I'm come to the conclusion it remains difficult but possible.  Consider Albert vs. the closest competition (as of 22 September):

RBI:
Pujols - 128
Fielder - 128
Howard - 123

A dead heat at the moment.  Albert has 11 games left, Prince 12.  Their competition strength is about equal too (though the Brewers do have to play the Phillies, and the Cardinals get the Reds).  And they do get to play each other.  I've got to think that the pitching staff and TLR would try to lock Fielder down if Albert is within sniffing distance of the Triple Crown.  SMALL EDGE TO PUJOLS.

HR:
Pujols - 47
Reynolds - 43
Howard - 41

Albert has the biggest edge here.  Reynolds could put on a surge, but I think with the number of games left, four home runs is a big gap to overcome.  Howard has the ability to stack home runs too (that's pretty much all he hits) but again, time is too short.  LARGE EDGE TO PUJOLS.

BA:
Ramirez - .352
Pujols - .329
Sandoval - .323

Ah yes, easily the hardest of the three categories for Albert to beat.  Ramirez has been incredibly dominant all season, and that .352 average looks mighty shiny.  BUT, I am highly encouraged by developments in the past ten days.  If you look at Ramirez's stats, he has slid eight percentage points in that period, with only one multi-hit game to speak of.  Florida has 12 games left.  If he maintains that rate of slide, he could finish in the neighborhood of .344.  The question is, can Albert surge his way to that mark?  He has finished with seasonal averages above this mark twice already (.357 in 2008, .359 in 2003).  The trick is, it would take a pretty good clip to get there, my junior high math suggests that if he averages 4 plate appearances the rest of the way, then he needs 24 hits or a .545 average to overcome the deficit.  SMALL EDGE TO RAMIREZ

Bottom Line - can he do it?  My heart says yes, my head says no.  It would be outstanding to see a triple-crown winner, and Albert may someday still do it (I think his window could close though, within the next 3-5 years).  But it just won't be this year.  Nuts. 

I've been watching the standings the last few weeks, and begun to wonder if Albert really does have a shot at the triple crown.  Based on numbers as of 13 August, he seems to have a good / great chance at winning the HR and RBI races.  Reynolds is an unknown commodity who I believe will fade.  Fielder is a great hitter, but playing for a team that is rapidly slipping from the standings and will likely have diminishing production. 

Its the batting title that's elusive, and that's due to one man hitting for the Marlins.  Albert appears to have broken out of his mini-slump and is again dominating.  But Hanley Ramirez's numbers are SICK (not "ridiculous" - that title belongs to El Hombre).  Here's the skinny on their past ten games:

Pujols: 39 AB, 15 Hits, .385 AVG (4 BBs, 5 SOs)
Ramirez: 46 AB, 19 Hits, .413 AVG (1 BB, 7 SOs)

I'm ignoring the other hitting statistics - for the purposes of this discussion, they're irrelevant.  For my VEB bretheren, what do you think are the chances Albert overtakes Hanley?  Give me a % guesstimate. 

I'll start off with 35%.  I don't think Pujols cools off.  The problem is, Ramirez will stay north of .340 for the rest of the season.  That will (sadly) be just enough to win the batting title.

We're just a couple of weeks away from the MLB 2009 Draft, and I thought it might be interesting to have an open discussion about what the Cardinals might do.  Currently, they are slotted with the 19th pick in the draft.  I'm curious what the community thinnks the FO will do in terms of its selection.  Last year's selection (The Walrus) is thus far turning out to be a pretty smart move.  What is in store this year?

My quiet hope is that somehow, Aaron Crow slips to the Cardinals due to his contract shenanigans in 2008.  I doubt it will happen, but you never know.  We all remember (painfully) how low Porcello fell.

What do you folks think?  Any dark horse candidates? 

Just to shift gears away from all the talk about Skip, 2B, and defense, I thought I'd start a thread to discuss how well the St. Louis OFFENSE seems to be performing in the early portions of spring training.  I know this is the time of year when managers experiment, the games don't count and people are just stretching themselves out for the season.  But, consider this:

• In 12 Games, the Cardinals have scored 90 RUNS (7.5 per game)
• Virtually every starter is CRUSHING the ball
• Duncan, perhaps the biggest surprise is leading the team in homers
• Duncan is ALSO hitting at a .370 clip
• Schmuaker continues to hit .333 while learning a brand new position
• The most recent game (Marlins) gave us 8 runs, 14 hits

Now, I don't have the stats from the 2008 ST, but this has to represent a significant uptick in offensive production from what is normal.  Just comparing the Cardinals to the best teams in the league, the Cubs are averaging 5.3 runs, the Red Sox 6.1, the Rays 6.7, the Phillies 5.9...  Should we be encouraged by the hitting we are seeing at the plate?  Has the addition of such pieces as Greene, moving Skip to 2B, and other tweaks turned us into some sort of scoring juggernaut?

A humble suggestion for my bretheren bird-lovers.  Adam Eaton was released by the Philadelphia Phillies from his contract.  The Cardinals appear to have a need for another starter in camp.  Why not sign the man?

I know that Eaton's numbers are nothing to be amazed by, but it seems to me that signing this gentleman for the league minimum and letting him try his hand in camp makes a world of sense, particularly since the Cards are short on pitching at the moment. 

For those interested, I've linked to both Eaton's career numbers on ESPN, as well as the news story that announces his departure.  Eaton was going to make $8M this year.  But it looks like the Phils are going to "eat" that cost.

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3940074
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/profile?playerId=4392

PS - Is it just me, or does this make anyone else feel better about the Cardinals soaking up Kennedy's $4M contract?...

PPS - Yeah, maybe this belongs in the hot stove, but I can't help myself.  They're playing some real honest-to-goodness baseball in Florida right now.  Woot!

As the winter begins to wind down and a few superstars continue to wait for the right deal to open up (Ramirez anyone?), I started thinking about the motivational power of revenge.  If you're a premiere player in the major leagues, and you are overlooked by your old club (along with many others), how much motivation does that provide you to accept a lowball offer, come back with another outfit, and stuff your old teammates?

The best potential examples of this phenomenon could be Manny Ramirez and Ben Sheets.  Both are perceived as monster talents.  And yet, both could be forced to accept humbling, ridiculously low offers just to continue playing. 

I have two questions for the Cardinal community.  First, do players suck up low offers in order to shove it in their former team's faces?  Would Manny take a low offer from a team like the Giants (say, 1-year $10M) just to beat mercilessly on the Dodgers for a year?  Would Ben Sheets take an offer from say... the Cardinals... for 1-year at $5M to face his former mates six or seven times throughout the season and pay back the lack of contract love?

Second question, is there any historical evidence of players who have walked this line?  In other words, are there any players out there who decided that heck, the money was less important for one year or so, if it gave them a chance to maul the people who scorned them? 

Just curious what everyone thinks.  I don't think that Man-Ram or Sheets will find their way to the Cardinals in the end.  But I do wonder if they will come back with something to prove and a desire to beat their previous club.

I'm sure many will come across this article from regular Internet surfing, but Jerry Crasnick with ESPN provides a VERY nice write-up and summation of the Cardinals offseason situations in his latest column.

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/hotstove08/columns/story?columnist=crasnick_jerry&id=3846058

I also noted with some interest that "Viva El Birdos" was directly cited as a source of "constructive criticism".  Kudos to the site managers for getting the attention of the national media guys.

On top of it all, Crasnick offers a very fair (IMO) overview of how Mozeliak has operated in this offseason.  We might be frustrated by the pace of decisions, and players that "got away", but Mo's deliberate, reasoned attack to player development and growth is a major positive. 

Any thoughts on all this?

Greetings, Bronx Bombers.  I'm actually a St. Louis Cardinals fan, but thought I'd drop over to your website to pose a question.

Watching the Hot Stove, there seems to be a lot of discussion on the vivaelbirdos page about possible deals for Phil Hughes.  Some have suggested that a deal involving Hughes and the Cardinals Rick Ankiel would make a lot of sense for both clubs.  The Yankees are interested in upgrading power and defense in the outfield.  The Cardinals have a surplus of outfielders, and need to shore up pitching.

I apologize if this belongs in your "Hot Stove" thread, but I thought I would find out what the other potential partner in a deal thinks.  Does Yankee nation see any value in this type of a trade? 

PS - I've attached Ankiel's vitals in case anyone wants to scan through them.  For those who haven't seen him, his power is very good, health is about average, and his defense is in the plus range (with a cannon for an arm).
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/profile?playerId=4159

I almost feel guilty typing that subject line.  But after a recent story on ESPN, I couldn't help but wonder.  If it were under VERY controlled circumstances, would bringing Barry Bonds to St. Louis now make sense?

Before you begin throwing much-deserved rocks at me, consider the following arguments:
- He would help raise attendance in a potentially sluggish economy
- He could be used exclusively as a pinch hitter
- He has (historically) insane statistics.  His OPS is career-wise higher than Alberts
- He REALLY wants to play, and thus could come very cheap with the right offer
- He gives Tony that (occasional) big bat to sit behind Albert, doesn't he?

Imagine the following scenario.  John Mozeliak and Tony Larussa contact Barry and express their interest.  Barry gets a one-year, $3M contract.  He only pinch-hits (and fields in a dire emergency).  He undergoes regular drug testing and doesn't raise a peep in legal circles.  And he doesn't bring ANY of his entourage to games.

Albert welcomes him to the team and lays down the riot act as well.  Keep your nose clean, you're living on borrowed time, welcome to the club, etc. 

Go ahead.  Tell me I'm insane.  Tell me Bonds is washed up.  Tell me he would be a distraction.  But consider this.  Barry's CAREER OPS was 1.051.  In his last season (2007) he drew 132 walks, clobbered 28 home runs, and managed to terrify the opposition.  Isn't that worth a small risk?  At the very least, no one would accuse the Cardinals of playing the offseason too conservatively...

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3804098

Since we are all playing the hot stove waiting game, I thought I'd throw out a distraction to help us pass the time. 

I think most reasonable people would argue that the best way to build your club (and the most cost effective) is by drafting the right talent.  By signing productive players out of college and high school, you can lock in a cheap source of labor that allows you to make trades, sign key free agents, and overall achieve higher measures of success than the clubs that draft foolishly. 

I then became curious - what MLB club has been the most successful at drafting talent?  Admittedly, this is a subjective game.  You can weigh talent in a variety of ways.  What I chose to do was look at teams that drafted players in the first round over a ten-year period (2007-1998).  I chose to skip last year's draft, as its probably too early to tell how good the talent is in that group.  You can view different draft years at the attached URL:

http://www.mymlbdraft.com/MLB-Mock-Draft-2009

Based on a very unscientific scan of the drafts, I would argue the Phillies have been the best at gauging that first-round talent.  Observe their results below:

2007: No Pick
2006: Kyle Drabek (18)
2005: No Pick
2004: Gregory Golson (21)
2003: No Pick
2002: Cole Hamels (17)
2001: Gavin Floyd (4)
2000: Chase Utley (15)
1999: Brett Myers (12)
1998: Pat Burrell (1)

I'm not penalizing them for their rounds with no picks.  But the fact is in a ten-year period, they pulled in their ace (Hamels), a premier 2B (Utley) and a great OF (Burrell).  The others you might argue have been less successful, but Myers has proven a useful innings eater and Gavin Floyd (though now with the White Sox) is proving to be a terrific young pitcher.

So what do you folks think?  Care to play "Best Eye for Talent"?  ;-)

It is becoming increasingly apparent that GM John Mozeliak is evaluating moving one of the Cardinals outfielders to upgrade our talent at other positions (e.g. 2B, SS, RP).  And while several names are currently circulating, its beginning to sound like there may be two unofficial finalists.  Specifically, Rick Ankiel and Ryan Ludwick.

With this in mind, I thought I would lay all the key facts on the table and ask the Cardinals faithful who it makes more sense to trade.  First, a quick stat comparison:

2008 Batting Statistics
Rick Ankiel - .264 AVG, .337 OBP, .506 SLG, 25 HR, 71 RBI
Ryan Ludwick - .299 AVG, .375 OBP, .591 SLG, 37 HR, 113 RBI

From a batter's perspective, Ludwick clearly leads Ankiel in most offensive categories.  Admittedly, Luddy has a few blemishes (he strikes out a bit more than Ank), but the power and overall numbers seem to compensate.

2008 Fielding Statistics
Rick Ankiel - 248 TC, 236 PO, 4 A, 8 E, .880 ZR (while in LF)
Ryan Ludwick - 308 TC, 293 PO, 12 A, 3 E, .878 ZR (while in RF)

I was a bit surprised by some of these numbers, as I've always thought of Rick as the better fielder, but the figures suggest that Ryan compares very favorably (admittedly, he's playing right field - an easier position)

Intangibles
-Ankiel costs $900K and has one year left on his contract
-Ludwick costs $411K and has three years at a cost controlled level
-Ankiel has a longer history with the Cards 6 years vs. Ludwick's 2
-Ludwick has struggled with injuries more than Rick (at least until 2008)
-Ankiel's arm is unquestionably stronger than Ludwick's
-Ankiel has more flexibility in terms of position (LF and CF)

The Verdict
I hate to trade either of them.  HOWEVER.  If Mozeliak does decide to pull the trigger, Ankiel seems to make better sense.  Yes, he does give the Cardinals more flexibility in terms of skillsets, and probably is the safer option of the two to continue producing power.  But in the final year of his contract, he will extract heavy costs from the club in the future. 

I don't believe the Cards should mortgage the future for one shot next year.  Ludwick gives them (hopefully) three good years of very high production.  Ankiel's fielding and power are largely replaced by Rasmus and/or Mather. 

In the end, it may come down to who has what the Cardinals want.  If we find ourselves talking with a team like the Yankees, where money is little object, Ankiel is the more logical alternative.  If its a lower budget club like the Rays, Rockies, or Marlins, then Ludwick is the more appropriate fit.

I don't know what Mo will do.  But I have to believe that one of these guys will not be wearing the birds on the bat next year.  What do you folks think?