John Bowker is a rightfield prospect for the Giants who put up a .255/.300/.408 line in 326 at bats in the majors last year as a 24 year old rookie.  Those numbers aren't terribly impressive, but they're not bad at all for a rookie who wasn't a highly touted prospect.  The giants let him start this year in the minors, and he's clobbered the life out of the ball

In AAA this season, Bowker is hitting .345/.446/.609, showing considerably better patience at the plate than last year, whether at the ML level or at AAA.  He has a 53/52 BB/K ratio, 38.7% XBH%, 15.7% BB rate, and even throws in some steals, albeit it at only a 67% pace (10 steals to 5 CS)

The giants are one of the worst teams in the majors for production out of their LF, RF, and 1st base positions.  Bowker is tearing the cover off the ball.  How long does it take for Bowker to come back to the majors, and once he does, how will he hit?  Can someone who saw him play in the majors last season comment on what his weaknesses were?

(side note, I don't know a thing about his defense.  The steals makes me think he is at minimum a decent athlete with pretty good range, but that's just a guess)

I'd like to have a discussion with everyone about what a prospect list ACTUALLY means to you, and what priorities you look at when you rank players.  This may seem like a very silly question, but I think it is what ultimately drives a lot of the discussion on the community prospect rankings, whether people are aware of it or not.

To me, my prospect ranking list basically says "If I had to place money on the combination of risk and value for these players, this is what order that risk/value combination would look like"

In other words, I look at it like any investment

I made an analogy over the weekend to JP Morgan or any other investing firm, and the more I think about it, the more it holds true.  Imagine if JP Morgan were go come out and upgrade a bunch of Penny stocks as "must buys" with the idea that there is much more to gain from these Penny stocks than there is from blue chippers, whose value may be constant but they are likely not going to explode

Sometimes I feel like our prospect lists are putting Penny stocks at the top to see which one will explode, knowing that for each one that does there are 7 or 8 that will implode.  If we do it with prospects, we can always say "See!  I told you (XYZ rookie league player with 30 Ab's but huge tools) would be awesome!".  But if we did it this way with our money, we would never say "Phew, I lost 70% of my portfolio's value, but at least I got that Joe and Bill's automotive right on the dot!"

So what is a prospect list for you?  Trying to find the guys with the highest reward?  A combination of risk and reward?  

This topic has been on my mind for a while, so I decided to throw it out to the community in hopes of generating some discussion

Continue reading this post »

This time last year, there was a large group of people who thought Adam Lind was an A- prospect, based mostly on his performance in the minors in 2006, where he hit 330/394/556 between AA and AAA

This year in the majors, however, he hit 238/278/400, looking completely over-matched for most of the season

Despite his low batting average and very low Walk Rate, he still hit for a very nice amount of power (11 HR in 89 games) with an IsoPower of .162, which isn't too bad for a rook

So what can we expect from Lind moving forward?  Was this a bump in the road, or was his high K rate catching up to him?  Is next year a breakout year for Mr Lind?

Hey guys, I'm sorry for doing this, but there's a trade proposal that I'm waivering on and I want the board's opinion.  

I've been offered Travis Snider in return for Mike Pelfrey and Wladimir Balentien.  I have really good pitching depth and probably wouldn't use Pelfrey.  

I'm not sure if I believe in Balentien's season, since it kind of came out of nowhere.  

Snider is a potential stud, and I'm strongly considering pulling the trigger, even knowing he's a teenager below AA

BTW, this is a points league, not a roto league.  

Thanks in advance

Jed Lowrie is a SS prospect for the Red Sox, drafted in the supplemental round in 2005 out of Stanford.  Lowrie dropped in the MLB draft, having a "disappointing" .317 / .416 /.594 (1.010 OPS) junior season following up his 1.239 OPS sophomore season at Stanford

After being drafted, Lowrie hit a respectable .328 / .429 / .448 in 2005 in 201 AB for The Lowell Spinners in Low A.  

In 2006, Lowrie had a pretty bad ankle injury, missed 5 weeks, came back in time to play 97 games, but slumped badly after his injury.  It was obvious his ankle injury bothered him all year.  In August, he put up a .327 / .380 / .529 line to finish up the season, making fans (like me) optimistic)

2007 was a big year for Lowrie, starting in AA Portland.  His first month was terrible, but he went on a recent hot streak and his current line for the 2007 season stands at .293 / .432 / .463, with a 40/30 BB/K ratio

Some things obviously stand out, like his fantastic plate discipline (.140 IsoOBP) and a very very good BB/K ratio.  He doesn't have a lot of HR power, but has plenty of gap power.  

His defense, while not his strong suit, is enough to play SS at the major league level, though it will likely be average at best.  

So my question to the board is, what kind of prospect is Lowrie?  Was 2006 an abberation and the result of his ankle injury, or is he simply not good enough to make it in the majors?  Where does he rank among SS prospects, considering his success in AA, plate discipline, ability to stay at SS, and strong college pedigree?

I think it would be really great if there were some way to keep a history of all the Crystal balls, Prospect Retros, Community Projections, Prospect Smackdowns, and all of the other features on the site (ahem cheesecake ahem)

If there was a link right above the list of diaries that would take you to a list of all of the features you've done, I think it would add a lot to the site, give us a chance to go back and read them, rather than wonder if you've ever done a prospect Retro on Eric Milton and search the entire site for him.  

Just a suggestion, I think it would be easy to do and beneficial.

I hate myself for doing this, but I need help on a potential trade.  Someone wants Matt Garza from me, and is willing to give me Lind or Loney.  If it was loney, it would be straight up.  If it was Lind, he would want something else (probably someone like Truinfel, jesus Montero, Angel Beltre, or Elvis Andrus.  

The thing about this league is that we need to fill 5 outfield spots and there are 16 teams (you do the Math)

I have Hermida, Delmon Young, Markakis, Milledge, Butler, and Carlos Gonzalez as my outfielders, and the following pitchers (1475 IP limit):

Felix, Hamels, Garz, Hirsh, Broxton, Zumaya, Pelfrey, Liriano, Scott Baker, Betances, Andrew miller, Troy Patton, Michael Bowden, Brandon Erbe, Delois Guerra, Cesar Carrillo and Jon Lester

I'm tempted to, just because of my pitching depth and the tremendous value of outfielders in this league.  WHat does everyone here think?  I appreciate the help in advance

With so many smart baseball people on this site, with so many fantasy players on this site, doesn't it seem like our very own dynasty league should have formed by now?  I think it would be a fun (and challenging) thing to do.  

I know I wouldn't want to be comissioner cuz I don't have the time, but would someone want to run this?  I mean, you can imagine the trash talking between Josh and Crimson extend to another theater?  I think it would be high comedy.  

Anyways, just a thought.  

The below Longoria / Brignac diary got me thinking about my dynasty league situation, and I need some different perspectives on which direction I should go in for our amateur draft.  I know, fantasy questions are the devil, etc, blah blah.  Hopefully this turns into a real baseball conversation that has some fantasy implications.  

First the details on the league: 16 teams, 40-man rosters, points based system which is slightly tilted towards a SABR-metric stance (in other words, walks are worth more than typical small-world points, saves are devalued, etc)

I have the first two picks in our upcoming amateur draft, and I'm trying to decide who to pick.  I've narrowed it down to these three players, but I don't know which ones to pick: Andrew Miller, Clayton Kershaw, and Evan Longoria.  This is where I need everyone's help.  

My pitching depth took some hits recently.  I traded elbert and Humberto Sanchez for Liriano about 10 hours before Liriano hurt his elbow.  That was great.  I traded Buchholz in a deal for Billy Butler, and lost Jon Lester to cancer (speedy returns and good wishes).  My current pitching staff (minors included) is as follows:

Felix, Hamels, Garza, Hirsh, Broxton, Zumaya, Pelfrey, Liriano, Scott Baker, Jon Lester, Troy Patton, Michael Bowden, Brandon Erbe, Deolis Guerra, Cesar Carrillo

I currently don't have any major league 3rd basemen, but I have Braun in the minors.  Longoria might move to second, but I'm all set in MI and 2nd with Weeks, Drew, and Tulowitski.  

So here's the question, first two picks, anyone in the draft available, in my situation, who do you grab?  I'm worried about my pitching depth, but Braun is the only third baseman I have (other than  Angel Villalona).  Does your answer change if I acquire Edwin Encarnacion for my second round pick?

Sorry for the long / fantasy post, but I'm having trouble coming to a conclusion.  Thanks in advance.