SB Nation User Blog: Lyle

OT: What's your favorite Firefox theme?

Lyle — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:46:54 -0000

Sorry, no rosterbation here (Renteria for Morneau!). No, I just bought a new 27" iMac, and I've been using Firefox for the last several years. I'm looking to update the Firefox theme I use, and I thought you all would be an excellent source of suggestions.

My son recommended Pimpzilla; sight unseen, I'm guessing that wouldn't be my choice. Any ideas? I'm looking for something clean, fairly simple, not too small nor too large, with a bit of color. Wild and wacky, not so much. I did a quick Google search; the screen shot of Camifox looked good to me, but I'm sure there are lots of other good choices.

I don't suppose there's a Giants-related theme out there somewhere?

Poll: What should be done?

Lyle — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:05:44 -0000

What should the Giants do to maximize their potential this year? (moderators, feel free to delete if this is superfluous - I did a quick check, but I've been out of town for a week)

We seem to be at a crossroads. It seems that some want to make a big splash via a trade, some want a smaller trade, and some want to stand pat and let the season play out with the roster bascially as is. I can see some value to each position, so what say you McCoven?

Poll

What should Sabean do?

1. Trade for Matt Holliday (somehow keeping MadBum & Posey), then happily pay him $20mil per year for 3-4 years.

30 votes

2. Trade for Matt Holliday (same exceptions), then happily let him walk and take the draft pick(s).

24 votes

3. Trade for Roy Halladay, with no one off limits in return.

14 votes

4. Trade for Freddie Sanchez

136 votes

5. Make no trades - this is the same team as 3 weeks ago, and they'll rebound to win the Wild Card. In the playoffs, it's anybody's game.

60 votes

264 votes | Poll has closed

Ask BA: minor league strength

Lyle — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:35:55 -0000

Ask BA: minor league strength

Congratulations to Roger for getting a question answered by Ben Badler yesterday.

Rockies showcasing Atkins

Lyle — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:53:06 -0000

Rockies showcasing Atkins

The Denver Post says the Rockies will be showcasing Garret Atkins this week, in hopes of generating trade interest. So, simple question fellow McCovenitss: are we interested? What would be the relative advantages/disadvantages to adding him to the team? Who would you be willing to trade to get him? Perhaps more important, what do you think the Rockies are looking for in return (i.e., how highly do they regard him)?

Pablo seems pretty decent at 3B, and Atkins is struggling this year. Yet perhaps this is an opportunity to "buy low."

BA: early 2008 draft grades

Lyle — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:29:14 -0000

Here's the link, which I don't think is subscriber-only. Buster Posey comes in at a reasonable #5, and Brandon Crawford gets a gratifying #9. MCC crowd favorite Justin Smoak, although currently injured, comes in at #8 with the notation that, had he been playing all season, he'd probaby be higher on their list. Oh, and get this: he takes walks. He clearly wouldn't have fit in in our organization. I take no little pride in noting that my preference for our selection, Gordon Beckham, was listed as #1.

So, despite the fact that it's still pretty early to judge, are we McCovenites still happy with our selection of Gerald Posey? Any other thoughts about our 2008 draft?

Draft Musings

Lyle — Mon, 04 May 2009 13:18:59 -0000

As the June 9th draft approaches, some amateur players are beginning to establish themselves, either higher or lower. I noticed that Andy Seiler, on John Sickel's website, has a mock first round draft list, so I thought I'd mention it to get your reactions.

He assumes the following top picks:

Washington - Steven Strasburg

Seattle - Dustin Ackley

San Diego - Alex White

Pittsburgh - Grant Green

Baltimore - Aaron Crow

San Francisco - Tyler Matzek, LHP, Capistrano Valley HS(CA)

Of course, there's debate about who will be chosen above the Giant's slot, but just for fun let's assume Andy has the first five picks correctly predicted. The question for the McCoven is: If Strasburg, Ackley, White, Green, and Crow are off the board when it comes to the Giants' pick at #6, who do you prefer? (For those of you too lazy to click the link, he lists Zach Wheeler, Kyle Gibson, Donovan Tate, Rich Poythress, and Mike Leake as the next selections.)

So what do you all think? Matzek would certainly fit into the Bumgarner/Alderson mold, and we do seem to have a good history with that approach. Of course, there is the small matter of our ML offense needing help...

Merkin Valdez to have more surgery

Lyle — Tue, 30 Dec 2008 17:08:57 -0000

Merkin Valdez to have more surgery

Not sure if I'm doing this correctly, but I thought some of you would want to know this. This is Andy Baggarly's report, dated today, in Baseball America. It appears to be subscriber only; he says that Valdez had problems with his already surgically repaired right (throwing) elbow and came back to the US for a medical opinion, and the opinion is that Merkin needs more surgery.

I'm really disappointed for him, and for our bullpen next year.

Mods, please delete if there's already a raging discussion about this somewhere else - I looked but didn't find one.

McCoven Poll on Renteria

Lyle — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:34:33 -0000

Pretty simple, really. In reading the fanpost on the apparent signing of SS Edgar Renteria, it seems there are different opinions about the wisdom of this move. So let's have a poll to gauge the overall reaction. I'm imagining three general outcomes: (1) It was a brilliant move, Renteria hit well and his defense were excellent whereas Furcal did an Andruw Jones; (2) it was a so-so move, with Renteria being league-averagish while Burriss languished on the bench, Furcal didn't set the world on fire, and we wonder how the lost draft pick turns out for the Tigers; or (3) it was yet another terrible FA signing by the youth-averse Sabean, who was eventually fired for his overspending ways and over-30 man-love.

Poll

How will we view this move in November, 2010?

1. After the two years, this will be viewed as an excellent signing; we'll have easily gotten our money's worth.

31 votes

After two years, we'll be pretty meh. Renteria was okay, did better than Furcal, but wasn't anything special.

142 votes

After two years, we'll dislike this signing because it was another expensive stopgap move by the deposed Sabean that didn't work out; Renteria's stats fell off a cliff, while Burriss blossomed in the Twins organization.

86 votes

259 votes | Poll has closed

Division races projection recap

Lyle — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:33:17 -0000

Back on March 26th, Grant proposed that we try to predict all six division races in baseball. Forty-eight people made the attempt, possibly our highest response ever. Grant promised a prize of $20 from Amazon.com, although I'll let our winner take that up with Grant - he claims to be "worth three figures," so good luck collecting.

Grant proposed a five-point system; five points for the right team in the right finish, decreasing by one point for each place you're off. Slightly complicated, but at least there were no superdelegates to confuse the matter. So, for example, if you predicted the NLWest exactly right, you'd get 5 points for each position, 25 points total. So there were a grand total of 150 points up for grabs. There were two tiebreaker questions: (1) number of Giants wins, and (2) number of Velez starts.

Before I reveal our top scorers, here's a look at some of the interesting results. We did have a clear winner, so the tiebreakers weren't necessary. But they were interesting when viewed as separate contests.

Giants wins: Most of us were in the upper 60's and lower 70's, but only two people got the exact total (72) correct: Kernbergmaradona and satyricrash. Seven folks only missed by one, with Sky Kalkman, Goofus, Natto, Skaldheim, Poe, and oldjacket guessing 71 and mlb22 guessing 73. Five others predicted 70, and one predicted 74.

Velez starts: Guesses were pretty well all over the board, as you might imagine. Lowest guess was Skaldheim's 3; highest was 150 by both Kitspool and wilriv. Poe had the clearest vision here, accurately predicting 50. Tying for second place were mlb22 at 46 and Sky Kalkman at 54. Next closest was Mr_M with 63.

Some of the divisions were harder to predict than others, in particular the ALCentral. Most of us got the last-place finishes of the Pirates and Orioles. We figured the Cubs and Brewers were the class of the NLCentral (although most had them swapped). But the Tigers were the near-universal choice for first place; their last-place finish earned most of us only 1 point. Conversely, the White Sox were picked as high as third by only a few - most of us had them in last or next-to-last place.

In the NLWest, the division we should know best, no one predicted the exact outcome. Most of us had the Giants in last place; the Padres self-destruction took us by surprise. And the Diamondbacks were the most-popular choice for first place. Only eight of us foresaw the Dodgers winning the division: lyricalkiller, Victor Frankenstein, camwoody, Natto, Mr_M, W8ingForATitle, Lyle, and baetown.

Some people did, however, get entire divisions correct: Victor Frankenstein got the ALWest exact. Plus, he had the most entertaining team names. (Vic, there were two team in the NLEast I wasn't sure about, so I calculated your results both ways.) Mr_M got the NLCentral exact (a harder feat with six teams compared to Vic's four) and only missed the Giants/Pads in the NLWest. And friar got the ALEast perfect, correctly forecasting the Rays' success.

So, without further ado, here are our top scorers:

124 - Natto

120 - Mr_M, W8ingForATitle

119 - Grant, Skaldheim, Lyle, BaronVCE, Vic Frankenstein, Poe

Most exact predictions:

15 - Natto

12 - Mr_M

11 - Victor Frankenstein, jcb9, Cookyman, Scottsdale

10 - lyricalkiller, Kernbergmaradona, Sky Kalkman, Goofus

And special mention to our lowest scorers:

106 - mlb22

107 - oldjacket, satyricrash, NearestNorwich, friar; (satyricrash claimed to have just returned from the future - but apparently not one in this timeline).

108 - i did my job, boonitez

* * * * * CONGRATULATIONS, NATTO! * * * * * * * * *

OT: Evan's Election Projection recap

Lyle — Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:43:47 -0000

Since thirteen of us were foolhardy enough to venture guesses on the election, I thought I'd do a recap for those interested (warning: no Trade Matt Cain content).

Here are the numbers so far (MN Senate race will be a run-off, so we won't know those results for at least a couple of months, as I understand it):

Electoral Vote: 364 - 174 (based on cnn website). I'm giving Missouri to McCain and N. Carolina to Obama, based on their current leads in those states. Idaho Nick was our closest guesser at 360-178. Second closest was jponry with 374-164 - if Missouri were to go to Obama, she'd only be off by only one.

Popular Vote: 120,500,791. Most of us guessed higher, so Speedforthewin's 120,000,000 was easily the closest. Second closest was oldjacket's 130,000,000. postiveuphemism thought there would be more than 150 million votes.

Popular vote percentage: The latest numbers I have are 53% for Obama and 46% for McCain. kennv is our winner at 52.5-46.5 - very impressive! Second place is jponry with 52-46, CB30 and oldjacket with 52-47, and Idaho Nick with 53-47. nvsfg thought Obama would win 56-44%. On the other end of the spectrum, I predicted a much narrower 48.8-46.9. I know nothing.

Senate: Small problem here, as four races are officially undecided. The CNN website indicates a 13,000-vote lead for the Democrat in Oregon; a 3,400-vote lead for the Republican in Alaska (newly-minted felon Ted Stevens); a 114,000-vote lead for the Republican Saxby Chambless in Georgia; and a statistical tie in Minnesota. Georgia state law requires that the winning candidate must have 50% of the vote, minimum, or there must be a runoff - the vote now is precariously close to the magic 50% number, so there may or may not be a runoff. I'm going to give Oregon to the Democrats, and Alaska and Georgia to the Republicans. Minnesota will take months to decide, so I'm going to leave them out of the numbers here. So for our purposes, the result is 56-41-2. So we a tie for winner here, with oldjacket (56-42-2) and Evan (57-41-2) the closest to the result. Thus, oldjacket is pulling for the Republican in Minnesota, and Evan is pulling for the Democrat, Al Franken. positiveuphemism again had the highest Democratic guess at 60-40. Neifichicken, on the other hand, predicted the Republicans would have the edge 51-47-2....or was that a typo, Neifi?

House: some races are apparently not yet decided. I didn't delve too deeply into this; CNN is reporting the results as 254-173 with eight races not decided. I hate uncertainty, so I'll go with MSNBC's numbers (I'm assuming they've predicted the likeliest of outcomes), so let's go with 259-176. With that, kennv is our closest prognosticator at 257-177. Second place goes to the math-challenged bgunn with a 258-176. Third place goes to the equally math-challenged Lyle at 257-177. Bgunn and I have clearly forgotten that 435 number from our Civics classes.

See, Evan, you did quite well. As for me, I'll stick to baseball predictions, and guess nothing in 2012.