<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>SB Nation User Blog:  Lyle</title>
    <link>http://www.sbnation.com/users/Lyle</link>
    <description>Posts made by Lyle on SB Nation</description>
    <item>
      <title>McCoven Poll on Renteria</title>
      <link>http://www.mccoveychronicles.com/2008/11/24/669627/mccoven-poll-on-renteria</link>
      <author>Lyle</author>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:34:33 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;Pretty simple, really.&amp;nbsp; In reading the fanpost on the apparent signing of SS Edgar Renteria, it seems there are different opinions about the wisdom of this move.&amp;nbsp; So let's have a poll to gauge the overall reaction.&amp;nbsp; I'm imagining three general outcomes: (1) It was a brilliant move, Renteria hit well and his defense were excellent whereas Furcal did an Andruw Jones; (2) it was a so-so move, with Renteria being league-averagish while Burriss languished on the bench, Furcal didn't set the world on fire, and we wonder how the lost draft pick turns out for the Tigers; or (3) it was yet another terrible FA signing by the youth-averse Sabean, who was eventually fired for his overspending ways and over-30 man-love.&lt;/p&gt;

  
  


 	&lt;fieldset class="poll-box"&gt;
  &lt;legend&gt;Poll&lt;/legend&gt; 
  &lt;h5 class="poll-title"&gt;How will we view this move in November, 2010?&lt;/h5&gt;
  
    
&lt;div id="poll_container_32179_76856889"&gt;
&lt;form action="/polls/vote/32179?container_id=poll_container_32179_76856889" method="post" onsubmit="new Ajax.Request('/polls/vote/32179?container_id=poll_container_32179_76856889', {asynchronous:true, evalScripts:true, parameters:Form.serialize(this)}); return false;"&gt;
&lt;ul class="poll-list clearfix"&gt;

    &lt;li class="clearfix"&gt;&lt;span class="radio"&gt;&lt;input id="poll_option_156474" name="poll_option" type="radio" value="156474" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
        &lt;label for="poll_option_156474"&gt;&lt;span class="option"&gt;1. After the two years, this will be viewed as an excellent signing; we'll have easily gotten our money's worth.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/label&gt;&lt;/li&gt;

    &lt;li class="clearfix"&gt;&lt;span class="radio"&gt;&lt;input id="poll_option_156475" name="poll_option" type="radio" value="156475" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
        &lt;label for="poll_option_156475"&gt;&lt;span class="option"&gt;After two years, we'll be pretty meh.  Renteria was okay, did better than Furcal, but wasn't anything special.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/label&gt;&lt;/li&gt;

    &lt;li class="clearfix"&gt;&lt;span class="radio"&gt;&lt;input id="poll_option_156476" name="poll_option" type="radio" value="156476" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
        &lt;label for="poll_option_156476"&gt;&lt;span class="option"&gt;After two years, we'll dislike this signing because it was another expensive stopgap move by the deposed Sabean that didn't work out; Renteria's stats fell off a cliff, while Burriss blossomed in the Twins organization.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/label&gt;&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p class="poll-vote-submit"&gt;&lt;input class="button" name="commit" type="submit" value="Vote!" /&gt; &amp;nbsp;  259 votes | &lt;a href="#" onclick="new Ajax.Request('/polls/results/32179?container_id=poll_container_32179_76856889', {asynchronous:true, evalScripts:true}); return false;"&gt;Results&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/form&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
  
&lt;/fieldset&gt;

      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Division races projection recap</title>
      <link>http://www.mccoveychronicles.com/2008/11/10/657779/division-races-projection</link>
      <author>Lyle</author>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:33:17 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;Back on March&amp;nbsp;26th, Grant proposed that we try to predict all six division races in baseball.&amp;nbsp; Forty-eight people made the attempt, possibly our highest response ever.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Grant promised a prize of $20 from Amazon.com, although I'll let our winner take that up with&amp;nbsp;Grant -&amp;nbsp;he claims to be "worth three figures," so good luck collecting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Grant proposed a five-point system; five points for the right team in the right finish, decreasing by one point for each place you're off.&amp;nbsp; Slightly complicated, but at least there were no superdelegates to confuse the matter.&amp;nbsp; So, for example, if you predicted the NLWest exactly right, you'd get 5 points for each position, 25 points total.&amp;nbsp; So there were a grand total of 150 points up for grabs.&amp;nbsp; There were two tiebreaker questions: (1) number of Giants wins, and (2) number of Velez starts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Before I reveal our top scorers, here's a look at some of the interesting results.&amp;nbsp; We did have a clear winner, so the tiebreakers weren't necessary.&amp;nbsp; But they were interesting when viewed as separate contests.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Giants wins&lt;/strong&gt;: Most of us were in the upper 60's and lower 70's, but only&amp;nbsp;two people got the exact total (72) correct: &lt;strong&gt;Kernbergmaradona &lt;/strong&gt;and&lt;strong&gt; satyricrash&lt;/strong&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Seven folks only missed by one, with &lt;strong&gt;Sky Kalkman&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;Goofus&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;Natto&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;Skaldheim&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;Poe&lt;/strong&gt;, and &lt;strong&gt;oldjacket &lt;/strong&gt;guessing 71 and &lt;strong&gt;mlb22&lt;/strong&gt; guessing 73.&amp;nbsp; Five others predicted 70, and one predicted 74.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Velez starts&lt;/strong&gt;: Guesses were pretty well all over the board, as you might imagine.&amp;nbsp; Lowest guess was Skaldheim's 3; highest was 150 by both Kitspool and wilriv. &amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;Poe&lt;/strong&gt; had the clearest vision here, accurately predicting 50.&amp;nbsp; Tying for second place were &lt;strong&gt;mlb22&lt;/strong&gt; at 46 and &lt;strong&gt;Sky Kalkman&lt;/strong&gt; at 54.&amp;nbsp; Next closest was Mr_M with 63.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some of the divisions were harder to predict than others, in particular the ALCentral.&amp;nbsp; Most of us got the last-place finishes of the Pirates and&amp;nbsp;Orioles.&amp;nbsp; We figured the Cubs and Brewers were the class of the NLCentral (although most had them swapped).&amp;nbsp; But the Tigers were the near-universal choice for first place; their last-place finish earned most of us only&amp;nbsp;1 point.&amp;nbsp; Conversely, the White Sox were picked as high as third by only&amp;nbsp;a few - most of us had them in last or next-to-last place.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the NLWest, the division we should know best, no one predicted the exact outcome.&amp;nbsp; Most of us had the Giants in last place; the Padres self-destruction took us by surprise.&amp;nbsp; And the Diamondbacks were the most-popular choice for first place.&amp;nbsp; Only eight of us foresaw the Dodgers winning the division: &lt;strong&gt;lyricalkiller, Victor Frankenstein, camwoody, Natto, Mr_M, W8ingForATitle, Lyle, and baetown&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some people did, however, get entire divisions correct: &lt;strong&gt;Victor Frankenstein&lt;/strong&gt; got the ALWest exact.&amp;nbsp; Plus, he had the most entertaining team names.&amp;nbsp; (Vic, there were two team in the NLEast I wasn't sure about, so I calculated your results both ways.)&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;Mr_M&lt;/strong&gt; got the NLCentral exact (a harder feat with six teams compared to Vic's four) and only missed the Giants/Pads in the NLWest.&amp;nbsp; And &lt;strong&gt;friar&lt;/strong&gt; got the ALEast perfect, correctly forecasting the Rays' success.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, without further ado, here are our top scorers:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;124 - &lt;strong&gt;Natto&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;120 - &lt;strong&gt;Mr_M, W8ingForATitle&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;119 - &lt;strong&gt;Grant, Skaldheim, Lyle, BaronVCE, Vic Frankenstein, Poe&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Most exact predictions:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15 - Natto&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12 - Mr_M&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11 - Victor Frankenstein, jcb9, Cookyman, Scottsdale&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10 - lyricalkiller, Kernbergmaradona, Sky Kalkman, Goofus&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And special mention to our lowest scorers:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;106 - mlb22&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;107 - oldjacket, satyricrash, NearestNorwich, friar; (satyricrash claimed to have just returned from the future - but apparently not one in this timeline).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;108 - i did my job, boonitez&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* * * * * &lt;strong&gt;CONGRATULATIONS, NATTO&lt;/strong&gt;! * * * * * * * * *&lt;/p&gt;

  
  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OT: Evan's Election Projection recap</title>
      <link>http://www.mccoveychronicles.com/2008/11/6/655091/ot-evan-s-election-project</link>
      <author>Lyle</author>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:43:47 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;Since thirteen of us were foolhardy enough to venture guesses on the election, I thought I'd do a recap for those interested (warning: no Trade Matt Cain content).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here are the numbers so far (MN Senate race will be a run-off, so we won't know those results for at least a couple of months, as I understand it):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Electoral Vote&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp; 364 - 174 (based on cnn website).&amp;nbsp; I'm giving Missouri to McCain and N. Carolina to Obama, based on their current leads in those states.&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;Idaho Nick&lt;/strong&gt; was our closest guesser at 360-178.&amp;nbsp; Second closest was &lt;strong&gt;jponry&lt;/strong&gt; with 374-164 - if Missouri were to go to Obama, she'd only be off by only one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Popular Vote&lt;/strong&gt;: 120,500,791.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Most of us&amp;nbsp;guessed higher, so &lt;strong&gt;Speedforthewin'&lt;/strong&gt;s 120,000,000 was easily the closest.&amp;nbsp; Second closest was &lt;strong&gt;oldjacket&lt;/strong&gt;'s 130,000,000.&amp;nbsp; postiveuphemism thought there would be more than 150 million votes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Popular vote percentage&lt;/strong&gt;: The latest numbers I have are &lt;strong&gt;53%&lt;/strong&gt; for Obama and &lt;strong&gt;46%&lt;/strong&gt; for McCain.&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;kennv&lt;/strong&gt; is our&amp;nbsp;winner at 52.5-46.5 - very impressive!&amp;nbsp; Second place is &lt;strong&gt;jponry&lt;/strong&gt; with 52-46, &lt;strong&gt;CB30&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;oldjacket&lt;/strong&gt; with 52-47, and &lt;strong&gt;Idaho Nick&lt;/strong&gt; with 53-47.&amp;nbsp; nvsfg thought Obama would win 56-44%.&amp;nbsp; On the other end of the spectrum, I predicted a much&amp;nbsp;narrower 48.8-46.9.&amp;nbsp; I know nothing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Senate&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp; Small problem here, as four races are officially undecided.&amp;nbsp; The CNN website indicates a 13,000-vote lead for the Democrat in Oregon; a 3,400-vote lead for the Republican in Alaska (newly-minted felon Ted Stevens); a 114,000-vote lead for the Republican Saxby Chambless in Georgia; and a statistical tie in Minnesota.&amp;nbsp; Georgia state law requires that the winning candidate must have 50% of the vote, minimum, or there must be a runoff - the vote now is precariously close to the magic 50% number, so there may or may not be a runoff.&amp;nbsp; I'm going to give Oregon to the Democrats, and Alaska and Georgia to the Republicans.&amp;nbsp; Minnesota will take months to decide, so I'm going to leave them out of the numbers here.&amp;nbsp; So for our purposes,&amp;nbsp;the result is &lt;strong&gt;56-41-2&lt;/strong&gt;.&amp;nbsp;So we a tie for winner here, with &lt;strong&gt;oldjacket&lt;/strong&gt; (56-42-2) and &lt;strong&gt;Evan&lt;/strong&gt; (57-41-2) the closest to the result.&amp;nbsp; Thus, oldjacket is pulling for the Republican in Minnesota, and Evan is pulling for the Democrat, Al Franken. positiveuphemism again had the highest Democratic guess at 60-40.&amp;nbsp; Neifichicken, on the other hand, predicted the Republicans would have the edge 51-47-2....or was that a typo, Neifi?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;House&lt;/strong&gt;: some races are apparently not yet decided. I didn't delve too deeply into this; CNN is reporting the results as 254-173 with eight races not decided.&amp;nbsp; I hate uncertainty, so I'll go with MSNBC's numbers (I'm assuming they've predicted the likeliest of outcomes), so&amp;nbsp;let's go with &lt;strong&gt;259-176&lt;/strong&gt;.&amp;nbsp; With that, &lt;strong&gt;kennv&lt;/strong&gt; is our closest prognosticator at 257-177. Second place goes to the math-challenged &lt;strong&gt;bgunn&lt;/strong&gt; with a 258-176. Third place goes to the equally math-challenged &lt;strong&gt;Lyle&lt;/strong&gt; at 257-177. Bgunn and I have clearly forgotten that 435 number from our Civics classes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;See, Evan, you did quite well.&amp;nbsp; As for me, I'll stick to baseball predictions, and guess nothing in 2012.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

  
  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Projection recap: Aaron Rowand</title>
      <link>http://www.mccoveychronicles.com/2008/10/22/640342/projection-recap-aaron-row</link>
      <author>Lyle</author>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:07:07 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;Last December's free agent signing of Aaron Rowand generated lots of &lt;a href="http://www.mccoveychronicles.com/2007/12/12/164639/53" target="_blank"&gt;comments&lt;/a&gt; by us Giants fans.&amp;nbsp; I think Ott summed it up best:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, which Rowand are we getting? The .270/.320/.420 from his worse years, or the .310/.370/.515 from last year? If the former, then yeah, this stinks. If the latter, I don't hate this move.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So let's see how our group wisdom turned out:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; AVG&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; OBP&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; SLG&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; HR&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rowand 2008:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; .271&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; .339&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; .410&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 13&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; McCoven:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; .286&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; .352&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; .462&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 18&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AVG:&amp;nbsp; The lowest guess was .263 by koel; the highest was .315 by antinous.&amp;nbsp; Our winner at .270, the second-lowest guess, was &lt;strong&gt;jasomack&lt;/strong&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Coming in second at .274 was groug.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OBP: We did better on this prediction.&amp;nbsp; Ever-optimistic antinous had the highest guess at .380; lowest guess was .330 by jasomack.&amp;nbsp; Tied as our winners were &lt;strong&gt;koel&lt;/strong&gt; (.338) and &lt;strong&gt;Dan from NM&lt;/strong&gt; (.340).&amp;nbsp; Jasomack's low guess was good for second place.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SLG: We apparently expected more from Aaron.&amp;nbsp; Antinous, consistent to a fault, predicted a high of .530;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Natto went with an even .500.&amp;nbsp; Most pessimistic prediction was .420 by our winner, &lt;strong&gt;jasomack&lt;/strong&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Second place, with the second-lowest guess, goes to Scottsdale.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HR: Most of us thought AT&amp;amp;T would depress Rowand's HR total.&amp;nbsp; Even so, antinous thought he'd be good for 25 jacks.&amp;nbsp; Viva Gigantes thought 24, and even sober-minded Evan guessed 23.&amp;nbsp; Scottsdale averred only 8 HRs.&amp;nbsp; Our tied winners, with guesses of 14, were &lt;strong&gt;Cookyman &lt;/strong&gt;and &lt;strong&gt;koel&lt;/strong&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Just behind was Drysdalecousin with 15, and groug had 16.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall, &lt;strong&gt;jasomack&lt;/strong&gt; won two of our four categories, and came in second in another.&amp;nbsp; And in the fourth category, HR, he would have been listed as tied behind groug.&amp;nbsp; Honorable mention to &lt;strong&gt;koel&lt;/strong&gt; for winning (in ties) two categories.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'll close with a quote from the projection&amp;nbsp;thread by &lt;strong&gt;kennv&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp; "Stupid Rowand. &amp;nbsp;Stupid Sabean. Stupid stupid stupid."&lt;/p&gt;

  
  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Projection recap: Eugenio Velez</title>
      <link>http://www.mccoveychronicles.com/2008/10/21/639597/projection-recap-eugenio-v</link>
      <author>Lyle</author>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:20:32 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mccoveychronicles.com/2008/10/20/638738/projection-recap-ray-durha" target="_blank"&gt;Here&lt;/a&gt; are the results of our March 25 community projections for Eugenio Velez (or, as some of the&amp;nbsp;McCoven&amp;nbsp;fondly refer&amp;nbsp;to him, Speedy McFuckup):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; AVG&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; OBP&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;SLG&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;HR&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3B&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; AB&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; SB&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; CS&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;E. Velez 2008:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; .262&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; .299&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; .382&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 275&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 15&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;6&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;McCoven:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; .267&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; .315&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; .398&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;4&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 8&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;344&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 33&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 8&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Only 13 stalwarts were brave enough to record their predictions for all to mock afterwards.&amp;nbsp; Overall, we did reasonably well.&amp;nbsp; We clearly thought Eugenio would get more at-bats, which partially explains our higher expectations for SB, CS, &amp;amp; HR.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AVG: Evan had the lowest guess of .247; foothillsfan guessed a high of .285 (note: if you just average their guesses, you get .266 - only .001 off Velez's actual stat).&amp;nbsp; We had three winners in this category, each missing only by .002: &lt;strong&gt;xanthan&lt;/strong&gt; &amp;amp; &lt;strong&gt;jasomack&lt;/strong&gt; with .260, and &lt;strong&gt;WilliamVanLandingham&lt;/strong&gt; with .264.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OBP: Getting on base would seem to be the foundation of Velez's worth to the team.&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;Jasomack&lt;/strong&gt; was exactly correct with his McCoven-low guess of .299, Eugenio's actual result.&amp;nbsp; Animal Mother came in second with .302.&amp;nbsp; foothillsfan was the most optimistic, predicting .350.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SLG: We expected more from Velez - guesses ranged from a low of .327 (rock n jock) to a high of .450 (foothillfans).&amp;nbsp; Most accurate was &lt;strong&gt;jasomack&lt;/strong&gt;, who was right on with .382. Animal Mother came in second at 3.75, and xanthan was third with .390.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HR: No one guessed as low as Velez actual result of one HR.&amp;nbsp; Lowest guesses, and our tied winners, were &lt;strong&gt;Lyle&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;xanthan&lt;/strong&gt; with predictions of 2.&amp;nbsp; WilliamVanL, rock n jock, and foothillsfan guessed 3.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Most optimistic were tedfordfan, joebirdie3, and jasomack&amp;nbsp;with predictions of 7 each.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3B: Velez spending half&amp;nbsp;his games in&amp;nbsp;spacious Mays Field&amp;nbsp;should equate to lots of triples, right?&amp;nbsp; Our guess of 8 was only one over Velez's actual total of 7.&amp;nbsp; Perfect&amp;nbsp;guesses were recorded by&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;xanthan&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;foothillsfan&lt;/strong&gt;. Grant was just behind with a 6, and Evan guessed 8.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AB: I thought the biggest question going into the season was just how many at-bats Eugenio would get on this team.&amp;nbsp; Lowest prediction here was 263 (rock n jock), and highest was Baron's 403.&amp;nbsp; Our winner was the 280 guessed by &lt;strong&gt;foothillsfan&lt;/strong&gt;. Second place was 263 by rock n jock.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SB: Having speed is one thing, but actually stealing bases is something else. We way over-estimated Velez's success here; the lowest guess, and therefore our winner, was 23 by some guy named&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;Grant&lt;/strong&gt;. Lyle and Animal Mother tied for second with 25 each.&amp;nbsp; Highest guess was 47 by both tedfordfan and BaronVCE.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CS: Strangely, we came pretty close on this one. No one guessed 6 exactly. Our winners were &lt;strong&gt;Lyle&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;xanthan&lt;/strong&gt;, and &lt;strong&gt;Dan from NM&lt;/strong&gt; with 5, and &lt;strong&gt;joebirdie&lt;/strong&gt; with 7.&amp;nbsp; Just behind were Grant, WilliamVanLandingham, and Animal Mother with 8.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall, it looks like &lt;strong&gt;xanthan&lt;/strong&gt; was the best prognosticator, winning four of the eight categories (AVG, HR, 3B, CS).&amp;nbsp; Special kudos to &lt;strong&gt;jasomack&lt;/strong&gt;, who was exactly correct on OBP and SLG, and tied for closest AVG.&amp;nbsp; Congratulations!&lt;/p&gt;

  
  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Projection recap: Ray Durham</title>
      <link>http://www.mccoveychronicles.com/2008/10/20/638738/projection-recap-ray-durha</link>
      <author>Lyle</author>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:07:15 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;Here's the &lt;a href="http://www.mccoveychronicles.com/2008/3/14/269628/community-projection-ray-d" target="_blank"&gt;link&lt;/a&gt; to the community projection for RayRay.&amp;nbsp; As a group, we mostly &amp;nbsp;underestimated Mr. Durham.&amp;nbsp; To wit:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;AVG.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; OBP&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;SLG&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; HR&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;AB&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Ray Durham 2008:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; .289&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; .380&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; .432&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 6&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 370&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;McCoven prediction:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; .266&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; .335&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; .407&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 12&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 412&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AVG&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp; There wasn't a wide range of expectation;&amp;nbsp; Evan predicted .298, and ChrisHero predicted .214, but they were our clear outliers.&amp;nbsp; Our winner is &lt;strong&gt;NeifiChicken&lt;/strong&gt; with .288.&amp;nbsp; Moggeee came in second with .292, and The Gene Hackman was third with .285.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;OBP&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;ChrisHero was the pessimist here with a .309; top optimist was moggeee with .372.&amp;nbsp; Given Ray actually posted a .380, &lt;strong&gt;moggeee&lt;/strong&gt; is our clear winner.&amp;nbsp; tedfordfan was second closest at .366.&amp;nbsp; Tobias was third with .363.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SLG&lt;/strong&gt;: Tobias (.465) and walrusman (.463) were the high guesses.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Lowest guesses were by Lyle(.367), Animal Mother (.368), and groug (.369).&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The closest prediction was .425 by a&lt;strong&gt;llfrank&lt;/strong&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Second place&amp;nbsp;ended in a tie between Evan (.444) and scotterduder (.420).&amp;nbsp; Just behind in fourth place was the optimistic NeifiChicken's .445.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;HR&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp; Our group wisdom foresaw 11.85 HRs from Ray, not the 6 he actually hit.&amp;nbsp; This can be explained by whatever moggeee was smoking just prior to predicting a McCoven-high 30 homers for Durham.&amp;nbsp; Lowest guess was 4 by groug.&amp;nbsp; The winner with an exact prediction of 6 was &lt;strong&gt;scottsdale&lt;/strong&gt;.&amp;nbsp; stutteringjohntamargo came in tied for second with 5, as did ChrisHero with 7.&amp;nbsp; Tied for fourth were groug(4) and Animal Mother(8).&amp;nbsp; Poe predicted 9, and six of us predicted 10.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AB&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp; We predicted 412 ABs, but Durham only managed 370.&amp;nbsp; Lowest guess was groug's 318 (seeing a trend here), and highest guess was moggeee's 546(see above).&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;Poe&lt;/strong&gt; was our winner with a prediction of 365.&amp;nbsp; Scotterduder came in second with 400, and imovermyhead was next closest at 338.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The highlights were the comments about how Ray's season would go.&amp;nbsp; Grant thought no one would want Ray at the trading deadline.&amp;nbsp; Cynema the Band accurately foresaw that someone would want Ray as a pinch-hitter coming off the bench, but thought Sabean would either hang on to Ray for his "leadership" or trade him for "someone like Livan Hernandez and a PTBNL."&amp;nbsp; Kitspool jokingly suggested Ray would be traded for Jeff Kent at the deadline.&amp;nbsp; I thought he'd hit well enough in the first half to be an attractive trade target, but then get injured and end that possibility.&amp;nbsp; The Gene Hackman accurately predicted "a trade to a contender" and thought Ray would "contribute in a big way" to that contender's playoff run.&amp;nbsp; WilliamVanLandingham foresaw a brilliant first half, followed by a season-ending hamstring injury, leading Sabean to look at the first half numbers and sign Durham to a 3yr/7million contract.&amp;nbsp; Scotterduder figured there would eventually be a Durham injury, imagining a 3-way collision with Rowan and Frandsen as a result of too much hustle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It's hard to choose an overall winner.&amp;nbsp; I'd lean toward &lt;strong&gt;Poe&lt;/strong&gt;, but I'd like to hear others' opinions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

  
  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Projection recap: Matt Cain</title>
      <link>http://www.mccoveychronicles.com/2008/10/17/637029/projection-recap-matt-cain</link>
      <author>Lyle</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:15:40 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


  &lt;p&gt;We got 32 different predictors when Grant kicked off the Matt Cain projection thread on March 17th.&amp;nbsp; Here's Matt's actual 2008 stats, vs. our community projection:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;ERA&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; IP&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; K&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; BB&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; W&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;L&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; HRA&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Matt Cain 2008:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3.76&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 217.2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 186&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 91&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 8&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 14&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 19&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; McCoven:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;3.50&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 200.0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;182&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 69.5&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 11.2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 11.8&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 16.8&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Individual categories:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ERA&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp; Collectively, we thought Matt would do slightly better than he actually did.&amp;nbsp; Guesses ranged from a low of 2.81(JRPhillips) to a high of 5.56(zenbitz).&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;Scottsdale&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;sharksrog&lt;/strong&gt; tie for&amp;nbsp;the prize with a prediction of 3.75, just edging out&amp;nbsp;Poe and Lyle with guesses of 3.78 each.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;IP&lt;/strong&gt;: We underestimated Matt's innings by 17 2/3. Zenbitz, clearly not feeling the love, predicted a low of 40 innings - he predicted Matt's season would end June 1st; highest guesses, and therefore the tying winners (by one-third of an inning), were &lt;strong&gt;jponry&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;scotterduder&lt;/strong&gt; with 220.&amp;nbsp; Barely losing out&amp;nbsp;was&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;cain1stballothof&lt;/strong&gt; with 215.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;K&lt;/strong&gt;: This was our best group effort, missing by only four strikeouts. Yay, us!&amp;nbsp; Guessed ranged from 36(zenbitz, naturally) to 218(jponry). Lowest non-zenbitz guess was Poe's 162. &lt;strong&gt;I did my job&lt;/strong&gt; did, in fact, do his job and accurately predicted 186! Just behind were nostocksjustbonds, redseal, and Scottsdale with 185, and cain1stballothof with 187.&amp;nbsp; Takimoto and howtheyscored&amp;nbsp;came&amp;nbsp;close with&amp;nbsp;184, and I was within hailing distance at 189.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;BB&lt;/strong&gt;: We were a bit optimistic on this one. The highest guess, 88 by &lt;strong&gt;Takimoto&lt;/strong&gt;, came the closest.&amp;nbsp; Next highest was 83 by i did my job.&amp;nbsp; Lowest was 30 by zenbitz (he of the shortened Cain season).&amp;nbsp; Lowest non-zenbitz guess was 45 by JRPhillips.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;WINS&lt;/strong&gt;: We predicted an 11-12 season for Cain (11.2 and 11.8, more specifically), so we were slightly optimistic. Highest guess was 16 by cain1stballothof, appropriately enough; zenbitz foresaw only 1 win in Matt's 8-week season.&amp;nbsp; JRPhillips, despite predicting&amp;nbsp;an excellent 190 strikeouts and 45 walks, thought Matt's record would only be 3-18!&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;Groug&lt;/strong&gt; was the winner with a pefect prediction of 8.&amp;nbsp; SLOisLonely... predicted 9.&amp;nbsp; Evan, jponry, and Natto guessed 10, and Takimoto guessed 6.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LOSSES&lt;/strong&gt;: We only envisioned 11.8 losses, rather than 14.&amp;nbsp; Highest loss guesses were 21 each by i did my job and Takimoto.&amp;nbsp; Lowest guess was zenbitz's 3 (see disclaimer); lowest guess otherwise was 7 by thedomster, WilliamVanLandingham, and Cainer.&amp;nbsp; A perfect 14 was predicted by the pride of BC, &lt;strong&gt;jponry&lt;/strong&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Close, but no cigar, were SLOisLonely and sharksrog with 15; nostocksjustbonds, tedfordfan, nvsfg, and scotterduder had 13.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;HRA&lt;/strong&gt;: We underestimated this as well.&amp;nbsp; Smallest non-zenbitz prediction was 7 by Takimoto, thedomster, &amp;amp; WilliamVanLandingham.&amp;nbsp; Highest was 22 by Evan and tedfordfan, followed by 21 from sharksrog, nostocksjustbonds, &amp;amp; Kitspool.&amp;nbsp; Four baseball experts emerged from this group, with pefect guesses of 19: &lt;strong&gt;groug&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;WilliamVanLandingham&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;scotterduder&lt;/strong&gt;, and &lt;strong&gt;SLOisLonely&lt;/strong&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Close behind were Scottsdale, nvsfg, and Little Napolean with 18, and out machine&amp;nbsp;&amp;amp; Natto with 20.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall, it's hard to&amp;nbsp;identify who won.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;I thought that whoever came closest in the category we did worst in should be a leading candidate, and that's Takimoto's prediction of 88 walks (91 actual).&amp;nbsp; And he(she?) did well with IP 184(186) and Wins 6(8).&amp;nbsp; But Losses 21(14) and HRA 7(19) weren't too close.&amp;nbsp; Here are my top candidates - who wants to plead their case?&amp;nbsp; If I had to pick, I'd say &lt;strong&gt;groug&lt;/strong&gt; was the winner; he got the HRA and Wins exactly, missed the Losses by 1, underguessed the Walks like most of us, and was reasonably close in ERA and IP.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;ERA&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; IP&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; K&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; BB&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; W&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;L&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; HRA&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Matt Cain 2008:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3.76&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 217.2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 186&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 91&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 8&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 14&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 19&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;groug:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3.51&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 206&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 194&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 77&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 8&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;15&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 19&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sharksrog:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3.75&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 210&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 165&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 75&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 12&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 15&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 21&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;nostocks:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3.81&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 203&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 185&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 83&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 11&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;13&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 21&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scottsdale:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;3.75&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;203&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 185&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 75&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 14&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 18&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;tedfordfan:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3.88&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 211&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 176&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 72&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 13&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 13&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 22&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Poe:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3.78&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 188&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 162&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 65&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 12&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 17&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;out machine:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3.68&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 212&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 198&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 70&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 12&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 12&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 20&lt;/p&gt;
  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Projection recap: Barry Zito</title>
      <link>http://www.mccoveychronicles.com/2008/10/15/635456/projection-recap-barry-zit</link>
      <author>Lyle</author>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:18:23 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


  &lt;p&gt;Grant tested the wisdom of crowds last March 11th when he invited us to predict Barry Zito's performance in 2008. Hard to believe, but he exceeded only one of our expectations - treating us much like he did Brian Sabean last year.&amp;nbsp; To wit:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; IP&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;ERA&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; K&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;BB&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;HR&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Barry Zito 2008:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 180&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 5.15&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 120&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 102&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;16&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;McCoven prediction:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 202.2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 4.42&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 129&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 88&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 24&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IP(180): predictions ranged from 174(wcw) to 220(Cainer).&amp;nbsp; Closest was &lt;strong&gt;kingofthacove&lt;/strong&gt; with 178.2, followed by &lt;strong&gt;Lyle&lt;/strong&gt; with 183 and &lt;strong&gt;wcw&lt;/strong&gt; with 174.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ERA(5.15): The most optimistic guess was 3.68(giantsin2067), the most pessimistic was 6.15(kingofthacove). Congrats to &lt;strong&gt;Cookyman &lt;/strong&gt;with a prescient 5.21 prediction (one of only two guesses above Barry's actual ERA).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;K's(120): Cainer was the most bullish on Zito overall, with a high prediction here of 170 K's. kingofthacove was the most bearish overall, and he had the low prediction of 74. Genius points go to the pre-wedding &lt;strong&gt;xanthan&lt;/strong&gt; who accurately predicted 120!&amp;nbsp; This was the best prediction of the McCoven - &lt;strong&gt;Grant &lt;/strong&gt;guessed 121, &lt;strong&gt;groug&lt;/strong&gt; 118, &lt;strong&gt;GobearsGogiants&lt;/strong&gt; 122.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BB's(102): Mea culpa -&amp;nbsp;I pretty much screwed up our group wisdom on this one, predicting a ridiculous low 68 (to be fair, I was expecting 3-4 weeks on the DL for the Albatross). Cookyman had the highest guess of 110 (and tied for&amp;nbsp;fourth closest).&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;Howtheyscored&lt;/strong&gt; takes the prize with a guess of 103. Also close: &lt;strong&gt;giantsin2067&lt;/strong&gt;(99), &lt;strong&gt;raisingcain&lt;/strong&gt; (96), and &lt;strong&gt;juanboy&lt;/strong&gt; (94) and &lt;strong&gt;Cookyman&lt;/strong&gt; (110).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HRA(16): Here's the only category Barry did better in than our projection (24). Lowest guess was Grant's 15; highest guess was Cookyman's 35. &lt;strong&gt;Lyle &lt;/strong&gt;got it right with 16 (remember, I thought he'd miss 4-6 starts). &lt;strong&gt;Grant&lt;/strong&gt; with 15 and &lt;strong&gt;Scottsdale&lt;/strong&gt; with 18 were also very close.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall: It depends on how you might weight the categories. &lt;strong&gt;Grant &lt;/strong&gt;only missed the K's by one and the HRA by one, but was way off on ERA (3.87).&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;Lyle &lt;/strong&gt;got the HRA correct, missed the IP by three, but way underguessed the BB (68). It's just my eyeball guess here, but I'd say best overall&amp;nbsp;prediction goes to &lt;strong&gt;Cookyman&lt;/strong&gt;, who was wildly high on HRA but very close everywhere else:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IP: Zito 180, Cookyman 190&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ERA: Zito 5.15, Cookyman 5.21&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;K: Zito 120, Cookyman 112&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BB: Zito 102, Cookyman 110&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HRA: Zito 16, Cookyman 35!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Congratulations &lt;strong&gt;Cookyman&lt;/strong&gt; - you win a free pass to xanthan's Stats Lair and 100 McCovey Bucks, redeemable at fine stores everywhere.&lt;/p&gt;
  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Projection recap: Brian Wilson</title>
      <link>http://www.mccoveychronicles.com/2008/10/9/631569/projection-recap-brian-wil</link>
      <author>Lyle</author>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:17:10 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;Brian's actual 2008 stats:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ERA: 4.62&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;IP: 62.1 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;K: 67&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;BB: 28&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;HRA: 7 &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Saves: 41&lt;/p&gt;

  &lt;p&gt;On March 19, Grant asked us for predictions about Brian Wilson's 2008 season. I thought I'd see how we did.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Twenty-one McCovenites gave their predictions; our average prediction was as follows (with Wilson's actual stats in bold):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ERA: 2.90&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;4.62&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IP:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 67.1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;62.1&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;K:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 65&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;67&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BB:&amp;nbsp; 28&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;28&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Saves:&amp;nbsp; 35&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;41&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Other than ERA, I'd say Brian slightly outperformed our expectations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Individually, we all guessed much lower on Wilson's ERA; &lt;strong&gt;xanthan&lt;/strong&gt; came the closest with his prediction of 3.70, followed by &lt;strong&gt;jasomack&lt;/strong&gt; with 3.65.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Innings pitched guesses ranged from 45 (EliminateMe) to 78 (jasomack), with &lt;strong&gt;rock n jock&lt;/strong&gt; correctly predicting 62.1.&amp;nbsp; Honorable mention goes to &lt;strong&gt;Grant &lt;/strong&gt;and&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;Scottsdale&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;with 62 each, and g&lt;strong&gt;roug&lt;/strong&gt; with 63.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Strikeouts ranged from 83 (daveinexile) to 45 (EliminateMe), with &lt;strong&gt;BaronVonCurrentEvents&lt;/strong&gt; correctly foreseeing 67.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Walk predictions went from a low of 15 (JRPhillips) to a high of 83 (daveinexile). Our only exact prognosticator was &lt;strong&gt;redseal&lt;/strong&gt; with 28 - although note that we all averaged a correct guess of 28. &lt;strong&gt;Grant,&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Little Napolean&lt;/strong&gt;, and &lt;strong&gt;rock n jock&lt;/strong&gt; all guessed 29.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Home runs allowed varied from a low of 1 (zenbitz) to a high of 8 (daveinexile, EliminateMe, rock n jock).&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;Scottsdale&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;NeifiChicken&lt;/strong&gt; both correctly guessed 7.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not everyone guessed a save chances total, so I'll list only guesses for actual saves; they ranged from a low of 6 (JRPhillips, who didn't think this team would have many save opportunities) to a high of 70 (zenbitz, possibly with tongue firming planted in typing finger??).&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;Baron&lt;/strong&gt;'s 40 and &lt;strong&gt;Lyle&lt;/strong&gt;'s 42 came closest to the actual total of 41.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall, just eyeballing the guesses, I'd say that &lt;strong&gt;Baron&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;Lyle&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;redseal&lt;/strong&gt;, and &lt;strong&gt;rock n jock&lt;/strong&gt; came the closest overall.&amp;nbsp; Again, we all widely underestimated the ERA.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please feel free to brag away!&amp;nbsp; If anyone finds this at all interesting, let me know - maybe I'll do some more of these as we count down the long, dark days until we hear those four magical words: "Pitchers and catchers report."&lt;/p&gt;
  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pablo Sandoval article</title>
      <link>http://www.mccoveychronicles.com/2008/7/16/572654/pablo-sandoval-article</link>
      <author>Lyle</author>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:53:55 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


  Yesterday's Norwich Bulletin had an &lt;a href="http://www.norwichbulletin.com/sports/pros/x2050098569/Defenders-Notebook-Jovial-Sandoval-a-plus-to-team" target="new"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; about our favorite catcher now living in the state of Connecticut.

Besides hitting .381 over his last 10 games, his teammates seem to think he brings an infectious attitude to the team. One quote in particular caught my attention:

&lt;blockquote&gt;His teammates marvel at his enthusiasm and jovial nature. Manager Bien Figueroa calls him a leader who has been the biggest reason for Connecticut&#8217;s rise into playoff contention.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I know many of you eschew clubhouse dynamics, but I thought some of you Pablito fans might enjoy the article. I think the Giants could use a leader like Sandoval.

  


 	&lt;fieldset class="poll-box"&gt;
  &lt;legend&gt;Poll&lt;/legend&gt; 
  &lt;h5 class="poll-title"&gt;Is Pablo the next great Giants' leader?&lt;/h5&gt;
  
    
&lt;div id="poll_container_27609_629964727" class="poll_container"&gt;
  
    &lt;div class="poll_option clearfix"&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_percentage" style="display:none"&gt;27%&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_result"&gt;
      &lt;h5&gt;A. Yes, Pablo will lead the 2013 Giants to the World Series!&lt;/h5&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_bar"&gt;&lt;span class="vote_count"&gt;27&lt;/span&gt; votes&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
  
    &lt;div class="poll_option clearfix"&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_percentage" style="display:none"&gt;18%&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_result"&gt;
      &lt;h5&gt;B. Having Posey(hopefully) and Villalona at C and 1B leaves no place for Pablo in the future.&lt;/h5&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_bar"&gt;&lt;span class="vote_count"&gt;18&lt;/span&gt; votes&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
  
    &lt;div class="poll_option clearfix"&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_percentage" style="display:none"&gt;6%&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_result"&gt;
      &lt;h5&gt;C. "Leadership" is overrated.&lt;/h5&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_bar"&gt;&lt;span class="vote_count"&gt;6&lt;/span&gt; votes&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
  
    &lt;div class="poll_option clearfix"&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_percentage" style="display:none"&gt;47%&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_result"&gt;
      &lt;h5&gt;D. I always vote in polls, even useless ones like this.&lt;/h5&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_bar"&gt;&lt;span class="vote_count"&gt;47&lt;/span&gt; votes&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
  
  &lt;p class="poll-total-votes"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;98&lt;/strong&gt; votes
      
    | &lt;span class="poll-has-closed"&gt;Poll has closed&lt;/span&gt;
  
  &lt;/p&gt;  
&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;script&gt;

  FastInit.addOnLoad(function(){
    new SBN.Poll('poll_container_27609_629964727').animateResults({renderImmediately:true});
  });

&lt;/script&gt;

  
&lt;/fieldset&gt;

      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
