In lieu of trying to find good in blowout after blowout, I thought I might put together a reasonable trade for the Timberwolves to even things out.  Below is a Sacramento/Memphis/Minnesota trade.

Continue reading this post »

Mason won't return to Thunder

 

Continue reading this post »

I figured while we're all waiting for some news or another to break on Rubio, we might as well engage in our favorite pastime, speculation about possible trades.  Last week, Chad Ford mentioned in a chat that the Kings are also big fans of Johnny Flynn.  Based on that, here a Minnesota/Sacramento/Utah trade I came up with:

Continue reading this post »

First, in what is an utter non-shock, the players are already walking back their unconditional support of McHale:

"We have to put Mac out of our heads right now," Jefferson said. "I talked to some of the guys today. In a way, we're glad it's over with."

I'm sure will see more quotes like this soon.

Also, for those of you with ESPN Insider, there's a story about the Spurs' drafting abilities that relies heavily on quotes from Kahn.  They're very effusive; hopefully he'll use them as a guidepost for making a front office.

Considering the doldrums the Wolves are in right now, and how we can't do anything but wait for a the draft to come around, I figured we should play a game of Build A Better Timberwolves.  Here's how it works:  go onto ESPN's website and hit up the trade machine.  Then, try and work the best trades you can, as judged by the increase in wins per game that pops up at the successful trade screen.  Don't worry about having a full roster (if there are 5 guys left, that's fine), but the one rule is that you have to be able to field a reasonable team (so a Duncan/Jefferson/Garnett/Howard/Oden lineup won't cut it).  Then save the trade, and post it here so we can join in the fun.  My first attempt is after the jump

 

Continue reading this post »

First, the more I look at the draft, the less I like the Wolves choices with their first pick.  If they stay at the 5 they're in a complete and utter crapshoot.  With that in mind, I would like to discuss Tyreke Evans.  First, I think people should stop by Draft Express and compare Tyreke Evans and Derrick Rose.  They're very comprable players, right down to their listed strengths and weaknesses.  In fact, the only areas of noticable difference are:  1) Rose has better assist numbers than Evans.  That's pretty straight-forward though I'd note that Evans didn't play PG for the half (except for that half-season, Evans has always played PG, so the learning curve isn't as steep as, say, Randy Foye's);  2) Evans has much better steal and rebound numbers, and seems like a noticably better defender; and 3) Evans has SG height and length.

Now, think for a moment what the Wolves would be like if they had someone who could, potentially, be a stronger defender at the 1 and the 2.  Now, add him in with Brewer, so that Brewer guards the best shooters while Evans guards the PG and helps Foye (or hopefully Josh Childress, but probably Randy Foye) with Foye.  Doesn't that solve a lot of the perimeter defensive problems?  Wouldn't that give them a lot of flexibility on floor, and the chance to actually push advantageous matchups in the backcourt?  Hell, is it possible that Jefferson and Love would look a bit less foolish guarding the pivot if the perimeter didn't leak like a sieve?  Finally, I would like to point out that Evans' increase in production occurred when he took over at point.  Also, that's when Memphis went on it's strong end of year win-streak leading into the tournament.

As for DeMar DeRozan, take a look at Draft Express' best and worst case scenarios.  Make sure you have a garbage basket handy in case you feel ill.

Finally, I was wondering if someone could put John Bryant into the Hoopus score system and report the results?  I realize he comes out of a weaker conference, but looking at his numbers and size, I have to think he has second-round steal potential possibility.

Following up on a mentioned trade in the Phoenix thread, doesn't it make a ton of sense for the Timberwolves to trade for Tyson Chandler?  You get excellent young interior D with a price tag that doesn't preclude moving him if it becomes a necessity.  For the Hornets, it reduces their price tag quite considerably, and if I was the Wolves I would definitely throw in a pick of two to grease the wheels.  Allow me to offer something on behalf of the Wolves

To Minnesota:

• Tyson Chandler
• Ryan Bowen

To New Orleans:

• Jason Collins
• Calvin Booth
• Rashad McCants
• Boston's 1st round pick
• The best of the 3 second rounders we have this year

He's why the Wolves do it:  Tyson Chandler.  He's had injuries this year, but if comes back next season ready to go, the Wolves have an amazing 3-man front court in place for the next 5-7 years.  This lets you focus on finding a 3 and a point to fill out the team.

Here's why New Orleans does it:  It saves money this year, and wipes out the rest of Chandler's contract.  It nets you a look at McCants, a first rounder, a not bad second rounder, and some bodies for the front (if you're trading Chandler, you obviously want quantity over quality in the front).It also costs less this season, doesn't cost anything after that unless you want it to (except the first), and guarantees the Chandler won't haunt you in the playoffs this year.  If that's not enough, the Wolves should be able to swap in the Utah pick for the Boston one.

To finish, I'll add that I think this necessitates the Wolves trading off Mike Miller and Craig Smith for expiring contracts.  If they did that, then they'd have around $10 million in cap room this offseason, enough to bring in a solid 3 (*coughcoughJoshChildresscoughcough*).  In this situation, the Wolves just need to start praying that Rubio or Curry falls into their lap.  If it does, they're set.  If not, then they just need an upgrade at point and they're ready to roll.

What says the rest of Hoopus?

With the trade deadline approaching, I figure it would behoove us to look at moves the Wolves could conceivably make in order to improve this team.  Now, the caveat with these is that I don't think the Wolves should necessarily look at something for this season.  It would take a rather larger miracle for the Wolves to make the postseason, and they'd probably get waxed in the first round anyway.  But they could make some moves to get things set for the next seaon.

Continue reading this post »

Like a disturbance in the Force, I can sense the number Minnesota Flagellants about to explode.  So I thought I'd do a little to quell fears about the Wolves.  Now, when I was watching the Wolves get slaughtered by the Kings tonight, I realized something about them:  they're not doing that badly on offense.  Now at first that seems laughable, but hear me out.  They're above average at offensive rebounding (thanks to Kevin Love), above average on turnovers, and to the low end of middle of the pack on free throws per shot attempt (but that's the least important of the four factors, honestly).  So what's the problem? They can't shoot.  Right now the Wolves have an efg% of 45.5% good for dead last in the league.  And while that's before tonights laffer was added in, they were right at that mark for the night (Saccy shot 56.% efg tonight, which would put them tops in the league if they kept it up all season).  Right now the the league average is 49.2% efg.  Currently the Wolves have 4 players (Mike Miller, Craig Smith, Al Jefferson, and Ryan Gomes) who are shooting at or above that mark.  And that sad part of that is that it's not even close.  The worst of the four is Jefferson, who had a 48.9% mark prior to the Kings game, and probably put himself at or above average with his 11-20 night.  But the next BEST player is Randy Foye.  He's shooting 42.7% right now.  That's pretty disgusting.  Right now there are two other teams with so few average shooters.  The first is Chicago, which mitigates that situation by having their four good shooters take all the shots.  Second is Oklahoma.  Does anyone want to be compared with Oklahoma right now?  I thought not.
So why is this DON'T PANIC and not WE'RE DOOOOOOOOOOMED?  Because there are three and a half forces in play here.  The first is seasonal progression.  In the NBA, teams tend to shoot better as the season goes along.  So it wouldn't be shocking to see an increase in shooting effectiveness over the course of the season. The second is that the two worst offenders, Randy Foye and Rashad McCants, should be a lot better.  McCants was second best efg% player last year on the team (third if you count Mike Miller's season in Memphis), while Foye was just under average.  Their shooting woes are compounded by the fact that get the most touches on the team, behind Jefferson.  And while I don't expect them to have an average year, if they could get it together for the last two-thirds of the season, things will look a lot better in a hurry.  Now the three and a half is this a bit complicated.  First is a basketball stats rule.  It's called the Fluke Rule, and is one of John Hollinger's pet studies (incidentally, if you care about basketball at all you should go over and read Hollinger's stuff at Four Letter.  It's behind their pay wall, but his content alone is worth it).  There are several part to the rule, but one is relevant to our purpose.  It is this:  that a large, sudden dip (or spike) in a player's fg% that can't be explained by injury is almost certainly an abberration, and will correct itself the next year.  Which is a fancy way of saying that even if things don't turn around this year, they will next season (long parenthetical:  remember that no one expected this Wolves team to contend, or even make the playoffs this season.  And things like this happen.  Sometimes teams that are supposed to win 55 games win 45, and 45ers win 35.  And sometimes 30 win teams are on pace to win 15.  In the NBA, so it goes. End parentheses).  Now here's the half point comes in.  The Wolves are currently 4% behind the league average.  The last time a team came in worse than 3.3% behind was the 2002-2003 Nuggets.  The season after that, the Nuggets won 27 more games (from 17 to 44) and made the playoffs.  So there's always hope.  And this season was built on the hope the future.  It's still there, and that's a better reason than you need to not panic.

*Effective Field Goal Percentage, which is (2P + (3P *1.5))/FGA.

Over the past couple of weeks, Wolves fans have been hoping, not without cause, that the team would make a trade.  Specifically mentioned was getting one of Memphis' gazillion point guards, or pulling a heist and taking off with Gerald Wallace.  After the last 24 hours, both of those plans seem to be irrelevant.  With the Augustin and Richardson trades, it appears like these teams no long have need for the Wolves.

Personally, I'm wondering if all the FO turmoil knocked the Wolves out  of these discussions at a critical time.  Now, this isn't to suggest that the Wolves shouldn't have dumped McHale, but it would have been nice to have have Augustin or Wallace and a new GM.

What do you say?