<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>SB Nation User Blog:  Michael Scott</title>
    <link>http://www.sbnation.comhttp://www.sbnation.com/users/Michael%20Scott</link>
    <description>Posts made by Michael Scott on SB Nation</description>
    <item>
      <title>Impact of Coverage LBs On A Defense?</title>
      <link>http://www.fieldgulls.com/2009/6/21/920281/impact-of-coverage-lbs-on-a-defense</link>
      <author>Michael Scott</author>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 16:50:06 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;I have been watching NFLN's Top Ten LBs and Top Ten defenses this weekend. There seems to be a common theme among the two. Teams that have great coverage LBs seem to have great defenses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Granted there are other factors that go into making a great defense. I also concede that you can't just throw three coverage LBs back there and win a Super Bowl. But I wonder if fan and media nations love for the Dick Butkus style of play has contributed to the common thought that great (non-pass rushing) LBs don't impact success as much as other positions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I take a look at the best defenses, both of all-time and recent history, and they all seem to have a guy or two that can take away 1/4 of the underneath zones while not being a negative against the run.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Am I using bad logic here? Or will &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/players/71283/Aaron_Curry&quot; class=&quot;sbn-auto-link&quot;&gt;Aaron Curry&lt;/a&gt; (if he is as good as we hope/think) make the rest of our pass defense look significantly better?&lt;/p&gt;

  


      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
