<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>SB Nation User Blog:  ScottS</title>
    <link>http://www.sbnation.comhttp://www.sbnation.com/users/ScottS</link>
    <description>Posts made by ScottS on SB Nation</description>
    <item>
      <title>Article claiming 2006 Rose Bowl Not Greatest Ever</title>
      <link>http://www.burntorangenation.com/2008/9/24/620722/article-claiming-2006-rose</link>
      <author>ScottS</author>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 05:25:11 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;Found this article on Sports Illustrated's web site yesterday in the On Campus section.&amp;nbsp; I don't have a huge problem with the author saying the 2006 Rose Bowl is not the greatest game ever, as that is certainly a very subjective topic, but something about this article rubs me the wrong way.&amp;nbsp; Perhaps I am reading too much into the author's words.&amp;nbsp; Thought I would throw this out there for discussion.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/sioncampus/09/19/2006-rose-bowl-mythbusters/index.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;2006 Rose Bowl Not The Greatest Game Ever&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

  
  


      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
