<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>SB Nation Blog:  SouthernCub</title>
    <link>http://www.sbnation.com/users/SouthernCub</link>
    <description>SB Nation Blog: SouthernCub</description>
    <item>
      <title>Regarding the new Dempster plan...
</title>
      <link>http://www.bleedcubbieblue.com/2007/5/21/95915/3082</link>
      <author>SouthernCub</author>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 13:59:15 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;I'm wary of the talk of Dempster as a starter. &amp;nbsp;He has been just fine as a closer. &amp;nbsp;His work at the back of the pen has not been the reason we've struggled this year. &amp;nbsp;Furthermore, moving him to the rotation would in NO WAY be an improvement on the rotation. &amp;nbsp;Guzman has been solid as a starter 3.52 ERA. &amp;nbsp;That's better than anything Dempster ever did, and it's MUCH better than most of the work Dempster did as a starter. &amp;nbsp;I see no benefit in making a downgrade in the starting rotation to make a change at a position that has been solid for us this year. &amp;nbsp;I'm glad that either Lou figured that out or that he never really considered that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It appears that Guzman is the heir apparent. &amp;nbsp;If that's the case, I like the idea of easing Guzman in. &amp;nbsp;I especially like it considering that I think Dempster's as good as gone this winter as a free agent. &amp;nbsp;If Guzman is the pegged "closer of the future," then it's not a bad idea to have him start to get familiar with the role. &amp;nbsp;Perhaps have him be the 8th inning guy and occasional closer this year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The question I have is what they're going to ultimately do with Marmol. &amp;nbsp;Marmol doesn't have the control to be a reliever. &amp;nbsp;His stuff is electric, but he has to get better command. &amp;nbsp;I think he's better suited in the rotation. &amp;nbsp;If Guzman is the next closer, I really don't like the idea of having Marmol in "get out of jam" duty. &amp;nbsp;I can envision him walking in a few runs and adding fuel to the flames, rather than putting out a fire.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Compounding the question is the status of Zambrano. &amp;nbsp;It's looking less and less likely, with the lack of clarity in the ownership situation, that Zambrano will be back next year. &amp;nbsp;That leaves at least one hole in the rotation, and that's assuming that Lou will be comfortable with a rotation including 3 lefties. &amp;nbsp;Theoretically, we'd need one of Guzman or Marmol to step in as the 5th starter, because our right-handed starting pitching depth drops off to AA again after those two.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I really hope the team doesn't have visions of Prior stepping back in in 2008. &amp;nbsp;Meanwhile, what happened to Mateo?&lt;/p&gt;

      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
