SB Nation User Blog: TheBigLeBowker

I know Charlie don't surf, but Barry?

TheBigLeBowker — Sun, 10 Aug 2008 06:13:14 -0000

A topic that, as far as I know, which isn't much obviously, raised some interest last year while Zito was 'struggling' heh heh heh...clear the throat. Are the SF brass allowing Barry Zito to surf again? Byrnes is on the D.L., and I'm sure a lot of you are hoping that Zito has the same fate, so is Barry allowed to surf?

Short of allowing that SOB to take his pilgrimage to Mecca, do any of you know if the G-Men have allowed Barry any slack in his extrahippicular activities to allow him to surf again.?

I just saw shark week on Discoverey, and now I know Great Whites in the Pacific northwest will breach waters for a tasty meal, but I still pose the question...

Due to the fact that we have a total loss (Farmers Insurance confirmed) on our hands, will we allow this hippie every freedom he can have in the hopes that Jaws can free us from this contract? Is there a shark clause that I am unaware of?

What we have here, is FAILure to communicate

TheBigLeBowker — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 02:36:40 -0000

Aside from the fact that my Enggrish is sup-par, I still have questions. Obviously, I ain't doned learnded those fancy composition skills y'all have. No less, this is America, morons tend to make up the general population, and welcome me as I have finally arrived as prey to this intellectual cavalry. From Marsellus Wallace's briefcase, to the Holy Grail, and just a little north to those damn parrots in North Beach, I have to ask, What is it? Where is it? How did it get there? Bowker, Burriss, Matos, Romo, and than where does it all go? Who is to say that any of these guys will ever become a star, and how likely is it? Other than Lincecum, Cain, Sanchez, is it not worth trading any of these rookies for a guy with decent potential? I do believe we have a lot of chips (combined ) that could bring us a true 3-hitter with tremendous upside, based on who we trade with. I know teams like the Rays, Nats aren't going to trade youth, but if it is a youth package in return, any chance?

Is there a better way to Wynn?

TheBigLeBowker — Tue, 08 Jul 2008 03:46:04 -0000

I must say, as a longtime reader of McCovey Chronicles, I feel it is my time. I have feared the reckless actions of the sharks that surround this cove, but I will trust my faith, and leave myself to be eaten by the predators that circle in the depths, (positiveeuphemism smells blood). Rand Wynn is the only true scenario where the boys stand to gain anything in return. As much as I believe Durham's shiny skills at the plate will allow those to poke and prod, I believe Wynn is the only option we have. He has shown terrific skill in the outfield in his entire career (How often do you curse Wynn for a shitty read, or positioning), as well he has been the only 1-2 guy, other than Durham, to grace the lineup for what seems like an eternity. I know I will be torn apart at the suggestion of this, but what's to say we can't get a couple of lower level guys (Rays) for a guy like Randy. Can any playoff-bound team not use a guy like Randy? Please teach me more about this baseball thing, if anyone asks, I was returning video tapes.