<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>SB Nation User Blog:  TheOptimist</title>
    <link>http://www.sbnation.com/users/TheOptimist</link>
    <description>Posts made by TheOptimist on SB Nation</description>
    <item>
      <title>Angels once again the 'luckiest' team in baseball</title>
      <link>http://www.halosheaven.com/2009/8/12/987366/angels-once-again-the-luckiest</link>
      <author>TheOptimist</author>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 01:37:44 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;I'm sure we all remember &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122238937105777409.html&quot;&gt;last year's articles&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;on the Halos amazing ability to defy statistical analysis&amp;nbsp;and post a record far in excess of their 'true' talent level.&amp;nbsp; We've had a&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.halosheaven.com/2009/7/26/963688/on-the-subject-of-luck&quot;&gt;few discussions&lt;/a&gt; just this year on the ways this is claimed to be the case, but until recently we'd actually been outmatched in terms of luck by teams like the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sbnation.com/mlb/teams/HOU&quot; class=&quot;sbn-auto-link&quot;&gt;Houston Astros&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sbnation.com/mlb/teams/SFG&quot; class=&quot;sbn-auto-link&quot;&gt;San Francisco Giants&lt;/a&gt; according to the number crunchers.&amp;nbsp; Well, no more.&amp;nbsp; Having just glanced at Baseball Prospectus' hilarious &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.baseballprospectus.com/statistics/standings.php&quot;&gt;'adjusted' standings&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;we are once again tops in the majors with 8.1 wins over where we should be if there were any sabermetrics justice in the universe.&amp;nbsp; So give yourselves a pat on the back, Halos, because apparently, you haven't earned it.&lt;/p&gt;
  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What was Texiera's actual impact?</title>
      <link>http://www.halosheaven.com/2009/3/26/811882/what-was-texiera-s-actual</link>
      <author>TheOptimist</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 01:16:10 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;OK, so there's been a LOT of rumblings here in the preseason about how the Angels are going to be worse than last year because we didn't replace Teixiera's production in the lineup.&amp;nbsp; I am finding it increasingly irritating; while I don't expect the Angels to win 100 games again, I think its silly to talk about having to replace the offensive production of a guy who was with us 1/3rd of the season.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lest we forget, the Angels were already on pace to win 100 games before Tex ever joined the team.&amp;nbsp; Our record before he ever took a swing in an Angels uniform was 66-40, well on pace to top 100.&amp;nbsp; Now, am I denying he helped us reach the coveted 100 game mark? Absolutely not, without his offense it is doubtful we make it.&amp;nbsp; However, it should be noted we DID NOT NEED his help to reach the playoffs.&amp;nbsp; Without him we likely win 93-95 games, face Tampa instead of Boston and still are 1 and done in the postseason.&amp;nbsp; In other words, losing Teixiera's offense costs us almost nothing.&amp;nbsp; When you factor in that Bobby Abreu is a better hitter than Garret Anderson, that Mike Napoli will likely get 400+ AB's this year, and that Kendry Morales is almost certainly Casey Kotchman's offensive equal or better at first, I'm not really seeing the cause for concern these guys keep talking about.&lt;/p&gt;

  
  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>John Lackey is seeking an extension.</title>
      <link>http://www.halosheaven.com/2009/3/20/805397/john-lackey-is-seeking-an</link>
      <author>TheOptimist</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 23:40:43 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://losangeles.angels.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20090320&amp;content_id=4039346&amp;vkey=news_ana&amp;fext=.jsp&amp;c_id=ana&quot;&gt;http://losangeles.angels.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20090320&amp;amp;content_id=4039346&amp;amp;vkey=news_ana&amp;amp;fext=.jsp&amp;amp;c_id=ana&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And thus far, the front office has seemed reluctant to give it to him.&amp;nbsp; Now, I like to think my general support for the front office is well known.&amp;nbsp; I've been willing to forgive some of their bad decisions and in the past their unwillingness to sign some of our franchise players has seemed like the smart move.&amp;nbsp; But there is a limit, and the buck stops here.&amp;nbsp; Our best, most consistent pitcher is ACTIVELY seeking an extension, and those guys are playing around?!&amp;nbsp; SIGN HIM ARTE!!!! This is not a hard decision.&amp;nbsp; Have Reagins get his **** together and GET A DEAL WORKED.&lt;/p&gt;

  
  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Vlad Guerrero wants to stick around. EXTEND HIM.</title>
      <link>http://www.halosheaven.com/2008/8/13/592631/vlad-guerrero-wants-to-sti</link>
      <author>TheOptimist</author>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 08:10:55 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;I know this might be a bit late, but I felt I had to comment on this.&amp;nbsp; With a hat tip to Rob at 6-4-2...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/sports/printedition/la-sp-shaikin10-2008aug10,0,3425244.story&quot;&gt;http://www.latimes.com/sports/printedition/la-sp-shaikin10-2008aug10,0,3425244.story&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So if this article can be believed, Vlad would like to stick around and end his career as an Angel. Now far be it from me to question Reagins and I know Arte says he wants to keep Vlad around, but...DEAR ****ING LORD SIGN HIM NOW. THIS IS NOT A HARD QUESTION.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Even at 75-80%, which is what he's been for&amp;nbsp;most of the year, he's still put up around an .830 OPS, which&amp;nbsp;we can certainly use.&amp;nbsp; More than that, he's been tearing it up since the break and I give it even money he'll finish the year with 30 or more&amp;nbsp;HR's, a .300+ avg, and a&amp;nbsp;.900+ OPS. In a year where for half the season he was struggling with a leg issue and poor luck.&amp;nbsp; If he wants to stay and he'll take a&amp;nbsp;discount to do it, FOR GOD'S SAKE&amp;nbsp;EXTEND HIM.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

  
  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Francisco Rodriguez for MVP?!</title>
      <link>http://www.halosheaven.com/2008/7/23/577918/francisco-rodriguez-for-mv</link>
      <author>TheOptimist</author>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 02:22:38 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;So I'm watching Baseball Tonight just for giggles and the Angels highlight comes up.&amp;nbsp; Garko's HR, Mathis' GS, last out for the save, cursory mention of good offensive afternoon for HK, CK, and Jeff while the boxscore is shown, etc.&amp;nbsp; Standard.&amp;nbsp; Then they do a segment called inside pitch&amp;nbsp; and bring on Peter Gammons.&amp;nbsp; Are you sitting down?&amp;nbsp; Not drinking anything? OK, PETER GAMMONS says K-Rod should get serious MVP consideration.&amp;nbsp; Read that sentence again after you've finished your mental spittake.&amp;nbsp; Then consider that he has a point.&amp;nbsp; In a year where nobody in the AL&amp;nbsp;has an OPS over 1.000 besides Milton Bradley, K-Rod is poised not just to break but to smash the single season saves record.&amp;nbsp; And when you consider how the Angels have won this year (consistently winning close contests, great record against tough opponents, pulling out the hard fought victories) I think the idea might have some merit.&amp;nbsp; I don't know if I'd give it to him, but Franky might be worth&amp;nbsp;a top 5 vote, atleast.&lt;/p&gt;

  
  


      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
