<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>SB Nation User Blog:  YeagerMeister</title>
    <link>http://www.sbnation.com/users/YeagerMeister</link>
    <description>Posts made by YeagerMeister on SB Nation</description>
    <item>
      <title>Tomko the Closer
</title>
      <link>http://www.truebluela.com/2006/8/4/15414/53859</link>
      <author>YeagerMeister</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 05:54:14 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;Bret Tomko says he's happy with his non-starter role in L.A., and his new aspiration is to &lt;a href=&quot;http://dailynews.com/dodgers/ci_4128962&quot;&gt;become a closer&lt;/a&gt;, according to the L.A. Daily News. &amp;nbsp;He's specifically saying he's not after Saito's job, necessarily... this is just his latest goal in life.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Couple things come to mind. &amp;nbsp;One being, well, why didn't the Giants think of that -- or just put him in the bullpen in some capacity, anyway. &amp;nbsp;I never saw him as much of a contributor over there. &amp;nbsp;He was more a plot device, something to add unnecessary suspense to those otherwise boring games against the (then sucky) Rockies or Nationals. &amp;nbsp;A long-winded way of saying I thought he wasn't very good, and the Giants' faith in him perplexed me (as did the Dodgers').&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Imagine if the Giants had him now ... he could be talking his closer talk at the same time as the self-immolation of Armando Blownitez (as the McCovey Chronicles folks have taken to calling him).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It all makes sense, though. &amp;nbsp;Based on flashes of brilliance with the Dodgers, and even with the Giants, Tomko can still pitch in some limited capacity. &amp;nbsp;With the superstition of The Closer well ensconsed in baseball mentality now, the ability to get through a lineup only once is no longer a handicap. &amp;nbsp;If Jason Isringhausen can keep his &quot;closer&quot; status while walking the bases loaded every other game, Tomko could certainly fill the role.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Besides -- if he's going to be on staff for another year, I'd rather see him pitch ONE inning per game than four or five. &amp;nbsp;I say give him a shot -- or trade him to someone nuts enough to.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



  

  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Repko chat
</title>
      <link>http://www.truebluela.com/2006/4/24/35950/6261</link>
      <author>YeagerMeister</author>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 07:59:49 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;The Dodgers' MLB.com site has put up a &lt;a href=&quot;http://losangeles.dodgers.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/news/article.jsp?ymd=20060418&amp;amp;content_id=1406530&amp;amp;vkey=news_la&amp;amp;fext=.jsp&amp;amp;c_id=la&quot;&gt;chat with Jason Repko&lt;/a&gt;. &amp;nbsp;Nice stuff -- mostly fluffy, but he gives a nice peek into the rookie/non-star point of view. &amp;nbsp;Seems like a well grounded guy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've become a big Repko fan, but .... how much of a future does he really have? &amp;nbsp;I'm seeing him as a fourth-outfielder-for-life type. &amp;nbsp;Although I guess one could argue he deserves a shot at more time in CF, considering how hot he was in April.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What do other folks think? &amp;nbsp;Do Repko's chances at starting get squashed once Jayson Werth comes back?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



  

  


      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
