Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Celtics Get Team Effort In Impressive Game 3 Win

Large

bdmac

Jul 26, 2009 Dec 28, 2010 24 66

rss icon RSSUser Blog

3 "different" trade ideas

1.http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=255y7cn (camby, bynum) lakers sure up their post d. we roll the dice on another big with bad knees. WIN WIN
2.http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=232pht4 (rudy, taj) What do the bulls think now?
3.http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=2fjogay (cha, por,phi) this is a 3 teamer with a lot of players. not sure who says no. with hawes seemingly being a cancer in philly-i think take the defense of pryz evens that out for their loss of williams

over 1 year ago Tiny bdmac 5 comments

Brandon's trade value &...

Forget the idea of whether or not you want to keep Brandon-just ride the hypothetical that he has to be traded. Lay out the best realistic trade. List why the blazers do it and why the other team or teams do it

over 1 year ago Tiny bdmac 8 comments

why not? we start lawson, roy, melo, LA, Oden-

matthews, camby, and bayless- then rookies

blazers and heat in the finals

almost 2 years ago Tiny bdmac 35 comments

Blazer's Edge Which of the 4 teams can make the best offer?

 


well...

Continue reading this post »

42 comments  | 

if i hear the word "vulcan" one more time...

Vulcan = too many chiefs, not enough indians by the by- shouldn't someone in the star trek camp sue paul allen for this

almost 2 years ago Tiny bdmac 15 comments

a couple of semi-realistic 2010 blazer line-ups

idea #1 The L.A. trade for favors and devin harris goes down and we use the MLE on luis scola (might be a stretch for him I know) PG Harris/dre SG roy/bayless/rudy/williams SF batum/babbit PF Scola/Favors C Oden/camby Idea #2 Chris Paul trade happens...then we need a SF Al harrington or Matt Barnes PG Chris Paul SG Roy/Rudy or williams SF Harrington or Barnes/Babbit PF LA/pendegraph? C Oden/Camby/Okafor Idea 3 just use the mle on JJ Reddick PG Dre/Reddick SG Roy/bayless/rudy/williams SF Batum/Babbit PF LA/Pendegraph C Oden/Camby/Pryz Thoughts?

almost 2 years ago Tiny bdmac 22 comments

let the trade scenarios commence

here's the pipe dream-sign and trade w/the raptors something to the effect of LA-rudy/martell then this is the 7 man rotation-how many games does this team win next year? Center: Oden PF: Bosh SF: batum sg: roy pg: miller 6th camby 7th bayless

about 2 years ago Tiny bdmac 58 comments

LA or david lee

i never stop thinking about this...we short changed lee last year after hedo....and if we offered lee the same contract we could have locked him up...then we could have traded LA for a decent PG...think about the ole hinrich scernarios...but anyway who wouldnt love to have david lee over LA...i dont care if lee doesnt play defense...at least he's a consistent rebounder and scorer...what does LA do consistently?

about 2 years ago Tiny bdmac 38 comments

assuming we still have the MLE...

who should we sign this summer? the following is a link to the upcoming "top 50" free agents http://nba.fanhouse.com/2010/04/06/top-50-2010-nba-free-agents/?ncid=txtlnkusspor00000002&xid=si_nba

about 2 years ago Tiny bdmac 53 comments

Blazer's Edge could 3 superstars on 1 team happen?

preface: something like this might already exist in here, but I'd like to start a section callled "beyond the blazers" where you just put BB before your post or shot. I love the blazers, but more so I love basketball. anyway on with the post...

 

i think it might be more of a possibility than it might seem from surface. The article in the link talks about how they might just do it for the dynasty or do it for the championships...historically this hasn't truly been @ the top of any player's priorities. The Elite guys want their max deals, no ifs, ands, or buts. Here's the thing that has the CHANCE to change the game this time. There are a few places where 3 of the elites could go and still make big salaries, because obviously bron bron wouldn't sign for the mid-level exception with the lakers to play with kobe and win 4 or 5 straight. So this unique circumstance of a few teams being able to offer 8 figures to 3 guys @ the same time matters. What could come into play for these guys is the idea that they could make themselves a 3 man package and in turn earn themselves a significant amount MORE in endorsements. If these guys all go to miami, or new york, or maybe even chicago...they could do it....imagine the money to be made for a team that could win 70 games/year for 4 or 5 years

here's the list of possibles for this summer- obviously kobe and dirk are extreme longshots to leave their teams-it could happen. and im a gambler

joe johnson
paul pierce (eto)
lebron
dirk (eto)
kobe (player)
rudy gay (restricted)
d wade (player)
david lee
amare (eto)
bosh (p)
boozer

I'd say there's 3 levels here and to guarantee a championship you'd need @ least 1 guy from the top level and not have your 2 other guys be in the 3rd level, but otherwise you're golden (golden = min. 4 championships no matter if your other starting 2 are darko and kwame brown) The following are my borderline arbitrary levels

 

level 1 bron,wade

level 2 kobe (level 2 just because of the miles on his legs),bosh,dirk

level 3 joe johnson, amare, boozer, david lee, rudy gay, paul pierce

 

I'm just thinking, bron and wade are businessmen-I'm sure they see this angle- which would be the ONLY reason it could be a possibility.  The egos though....the egos could end something great before it has a chance to exist. 

happy thursday basketball fans

33 comments  | 

keeping andre

okay during the first part of the year...I was on board with the idea of trading andre...it wasn't working...now it is...he's by far the best pg on our team...bayless isn't there yet...blake is hot garbage except for every 5th game when he decides to hit shots...over the last 8 games miller has averaged 19 points and 7 assists...that's good enough for me...

over 2 years ago Tiny bdmac 33 comments 1 recs

in an espn interview talking about trades in general...the interviewer said "david lee for travis outlaw" pritch said "it's a nice thought..."

run with it blazeredgers

espn interview

http://espn.go.com/nba/?topId=4582802

over 2 years ago Tiny bdmac 10 comments

what if?

what if we made ourselves a player in this summers F.A. market? We could trade pryz and andre for exprings/draft picks whatever...if we did that for just the 2 of them we'd have about 15 million for this summer...(ya know depending where the cap falls) there's plenty of guys bellow the marquees that would help and might be worth it..some possibilities-david lee, joe johnson, paul pierce, luis scola, (restricted) rudy gay, (restricted) al harrington. I understand those guys are all over the place as far as talent goes. I do think every one of them COULD be a good fit. think of it this way would you trade joel and dre for gay or joe johnson. (couldn't joe johnson and brandon be on the floor @ the same time) imagine this- bayless, roy, (joe johnson or R.Gay), L.A. greg... just thoughts...fuel for the trade rumor fire

over 2 years ago Tiny bdmac 1 comment

what's the over/under

on pendegraph's boards against the warriors

over 2 years ago Tiny bdmac 4 comments

Blazer's Edge assuming no trades go down. the 2010-2011 blazers are in trouble

We could have a disaster on our hands. If we thought the chemistry on this team was bad at the beginning of this year-It's going to be a meltdown next year. Lets paint a little picture about what could be...there's 48 minutes in a game...next year where do these minutes go? I elaborate on these things a little too much below...but the general idea is this...picture the first 15 games this year and the mess that was the minutes...now throw in the fact that batum was out and that we didn't really know how to use bayless...

Guard-48x2 min (96)

Roy-He's getting paid max $. He's the best player on the team. He's getting at least 36-38 min a night

Rudy- Rudy is a tricky one (honestly with the coming of age of bayless- it pains me to say this- he might be one of the ones that will end up getting traded...but we're assuming no trades) I see him as a ticking bomb on this team...the minutes could be so few for him next year...i see him becoming really unhappy if his minutes are @ 15-17/game...I'd say to keep him on the level he's going to need 25-27 min./game

Bayless-Jbay and Rudy might just have to battle to the death for minutes...maybe rock paper scissors...Rudy is the smarter player as of now...he gets a lot of steals and he's better from long range...this being said-Bayless is the one we want on the court between the 2 of them...he has the potential to be the best player on this team...(I can already hear you guys-would it make you feel better if I said 1a?) Bayless has to get at least 25-27 min./game

miller- Miller doesn't seem to care about his minutes...i think he's happy he got the money he got. and he has a slight  interest in winning a championship...I could see him actually becoming the glue that would hold this whole mess together...he might work well in the 15-17 min/ game role (as an aside-do we really want to pay $7 mil./year for a 17 min. a game guy?)

blake-if blake doesn't get traded-I have no idea what happens to him in the offseason...If he doesn't move it means that nate and kp love him more than we ever thought...so that would have to mean they try to re-sign him right?  I'm not even going to imagine that's a possibility...I'm going to say he's off the team next season

patty mills-at this point he's the ultimate wild card...he looked incredible against team usa...good shooter...good scorer...don't know about his passing ability...but if he's plays for us like he did for the aussie's...he's going to need minutes...he'd be the starting pg no questions if he played the same...If he's only 80 percent of what he was for them he would have to get 15 min/ game

FORWARD (96)

Lamarcus-I'm not totally sold on lamarcus...he's got to average 10 boards a game...don't really need to elaborate-portland loves him...kp loves him...nate loves him...he'll be getting the same as brandon...about 35-38/game

 

Batum-He's had glimpses of greatness...he plays hard...he plays smart...he's getting more aggressive and finding his own shot a little more...He needs at least  23-25 min/game

Travis-Another Nate crush...I'm sure he'll be resigned if not traded...assuming he does--22-24 min/game

 

Pendergraph-playing strong, but he's too much of a "we'll see" at this point...he'd have to get at least 8-10/game if he keeps it up

Martell-He's getting his shot right now...He's great in 5 minute stretches and then he disappears...and then he'll make a dunk or a great hustle play here and there...he'll need to become more consistent with these things to keep his min. next year...if he's more consistent he should get 17-19 min.

Cunningham-not really getting minutes NOW...there's no way he plays more than 20 minutes TOTAL next year...

 

CENTER (48)

Greg-Well who knows really...if he can keep those knees working...We will want him on the floor as much as possible...He would be on the same level as LA and broy if he could take it...best case scenario 30-32 min/game

Joel - He'll play when Greg doesn't. At the least I think it's pretty safe to say these 3 guys will play all the center minutes.

Juwan-I see him coming back to play the same role next year...if he keeps up his play this year we might have to find a few minutes a game for him...

(To throw another element into our chemistry project...Victor Claver is playing really well in Europe this year...We could stash him for one more year...but if he's playing well....why would we not  bring him over?) 

 

This all adds up to about 290 minutes out of 240 possible. Something has to give. Just imagine the tweets.

63 comments  | 

here's another one...

i know some of you will be pissed that i didn't put this in the trade drawer...but what about Troy Murphy...he rebounds...pretty good 3 point shooter...and just a good scorer...i think if we gave the pacers miller and outlaw they'd do it...

over 2 years ago Tiny bdmac 14 comments

I really like where we're at. (maybe)

Okay, so we've lost Greg. This was a huge loss, no doubt about that. This being said, I'm excited about the position this puts us in. The blazers were underdogs last year-they thrived. We're an EXTREME sad tale now. We're a bigger underdog than rocky vs. Drago. With batum, trout, the rookies, rudy's nagging injuries, LA's nagging injuries, and now Greg. Also our owner and assistant coach have huge medical problems...We're pathetic. Now, this will either lead us to a pit of despair or to greatness. Think about this- Bayless has looked fantastic in spurts. Dante looks as if he can be a terrific role player. Rudy, if he can stay healthy, has the ability to get all the minutes he can handle. Now, before we give up on these guys and trade them- We can actually play them and figure out what we have. There's no pressure on the Blazers now. With Greg's injury, our unrealistic expectations finally can come back to the ground. Our shitty situation and drama now has the potential to end. The team HAS to come together. Guys HAVE to step up. It's strange, but in a way our season just got a whole lot more exciting.

over 2 years ago Tiny bdmac 1 comment

Say we Trade miller-Who would help the team most?

This rumor is flying around. The one that sends miller packing. What trade for miller WOULD make the most sense for the blazers AND the other team. I see 2 BIG MAYBES - a trade for battier or a combo of miller and someone for caron butler. Any other ideas?

over 2 years ago Tiny bdmac 23 comments

David Lee

i would trade lamarcus in a heartbeat for this guy. we should've signed him when we had the chance

over 2 years ago Tiny bdmac 18 comments

trade ideas...

some specific trade ideas...some are a stretch...but interesting (all the salaries do work) 1. lamarcus and joel for bosh 2. Joel and Rudy for Scola, carl landry, and throw in 3. Joel and Blake for Kaman 4. Blake and Rudy for Marc Gasol and Sam young 5. Rudy Bayless and Blake for Kevin Love, Corey Brewer, and Ellington 6. Bayless and Rudy for Joakim Noah and Taj Gibson the next 2 are dreams bayless and rudy for brandon jennings and jodie meeks Lamarcus Blake and Trout for Bron Bron

over 2 years ago Tiny bdmac 14 comments 1 recs

Trade Rudy and Bayless to Memphis for Rudy Gay and Sam Young. Here's the way I see it. Nate doesn't want to play Bayless anyway...so we're not really losing much there...and so it basically makes it a straight up trade for the rudys...So our starting line-up becomes (unless nate screws it up) andre, brandon, rudy gay, lamarcus, oden. does that become the best starting 5 in the NBA...it's pretty close

over 2 years ago Tiny bdmac 11 comments

Nic, Rudy, Greg, Martell, Bayless

who has the best year? which have breakout years?

over 2 years ago Tiny bdmac 18 comments

Thoughts about RUDY

I'm curious what everyone thinks about Rudy's ceiling. I think he has the POTENTIAL to be a Manu. Thoughts?

almost 3 years ago Tiny bdmac 17 comments 2 recs