<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>SB Nation User Blog:  boilerdan</title>
    <link>http://www.sbnation.com/users/boilerdan</link>
    <description>Posts made by boilerdan on SB Nation</description>
    <item>
      <title>In praise of Emil Brown</title>
      <link>http://www.athleticsnation.com/2008/5/2/471621/in-praise-of-emil-brown</link>
      <author>boilerdan</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 15:16:07 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;I was an "early adopter" of Bill James and have always loved the quantitative side of the game.&amp;nbsp; I remember playing APBA baseball in the early 70's and calculating out OBP for players before drafting my teams - this was long before OBP was a reported stat.&amp;nbsp; I pay close attention to L/R splits and think that teams still don't do enough to leverage these data.&amp;nbsp; I also fully accept that "clutch" is largely chance and that over the length of a career a player's performance in clutch situations will likely match his overall stats pretty closely.&amp;nbsp; All of this is to say that I recognize that Emil Brown is not my type of player - I saw little reason for his acquisition and have felt since spring training that he should be a spot starter against lefties - period.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So I come today to praise Emil Brown.&amp;nbsp; I've decided to put aside the splits, ignore OBP, and purge "regression to the mean" and "small sample size" from my vocabulary for the time being.&amp;nbsp; Instead, I intend&amp;nbsp;to simply sit back as an A's fan and appreciate what this guy has done in the first month of the season and enjoy it as long as it lasts.&amp;nbsp; Because more than being a stats guy, I'm an A's fan who wants them to win, and Brown has done nothing but help them do that.&amp;nbsp; On top of that, he seems like a really decent and humble guy - despite my love of the numbers, I also like to like they guys on my team.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unrelated observations:&amp;nbsp; this team needs another infielder.&amp;nbsp; Crosby and Ellis need a day off and I'm not sure flipping around Murphy is enough, because you know that they're just going to pinch hit for him later in the game.&amp;nbsp; The A's had an unusually busy first month of the season and I think it's showing on those two guys.&amp;nbsp; Also, I'd lke to see Bowen get one start a week - there is no reason to grind Suzuki into the ground, and Bowen is a pretty productive backup.&amp;nbsp; Finally, I don't think this team can sustain Jack Cust in the OF for the full season.&amp;nbsp; This is why I really didn't understand the Thomas acquisition.&amp;nbsp; They pretty much have committed to have Cust "roam" the OF regularly, which scares me.&lt;/p&gt;

  
  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Important question for A's season!</title>
      <link>http://www.athleticsnation.com/2008/3/27/363170/important-question-for-a-s</link>
      <author>boilerdan</author>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:51:20 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;I see that the A's have scheduled 4 bobblehead days, but just two are named:&amp;nbsp; Buck and Suzuki.&amp;nbsp; So, who should be the next two bobbleheads for the 2008 season.&amp;nbsp; I was going to give my picks, but this is perfect poll fodder.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

  
  


 	&lt;fieldset class="poll-box"&gt;
  &lt;legend&gt;Poll&lt;/legend&gt; 
  &lt;h5 class="poll-title"&gt;Who should get the next bobblehead?&lt;/h5&gt;
  
    
&lt;div id="poll_container_13977_456491388" class="poll_container"&gt;
  
    &lt;div class="poll_option clearfix"&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_percentage" style="display:none"&gt;19%&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_result"&gt;
      &lt;h5&gt;Daric Barton&lt;/h5&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_bar"&gt;&lt;span class="vote_count"&gt;17&lt;/span&gt; votes&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
  
    &lt;div class="poll_option clearfix"&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_percentage" style="display:none"&gt;29%&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_result"&gt;
      &lt;h5&gt;Joe Blanton&lt;/h5&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_bar"&gt;&lt;span class="vote_count"&gt;26&lt;/span&gt; votes&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
  
    &lt;div class="poll_option clearfix"&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_percentage" style="display:none"&gt;28%&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_result"&gt;
      &lt;h5&gt;Jack Cust&lt;/h5&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_bar"&gt;&lt;span class="vote_count"&gt;25&lt;/span&gt; votes&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
  
    &lt;div class="poll_option clearfix"&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_percentage" style="display:none"&gt;14%&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_result"&gt;
      &lt;h5&gt;Justin Duchscherer&lt;/h5&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_bar"&gt;&lt;span class="vote_count"&gt;13&lt;/span&gt; votes&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
  
    &lt;div class="poll_option clearfix"&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_percentage" style="display:none"&gt;0%&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_result"&gt;
      &lt;h5&gt;Dana Eveland&lt;/h5&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_bar"&gt;&lt;span class="vote_count"&gt;0&lt;/span&gt; votes&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
  
    &lt;div class="poll_option clearfix"&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_percentage" style="display:none"&gt;0%&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_result"&gt;
      &lt;h5&gt;Chad Gaudin&lt;/h5&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_bar"&gt;&lt;span class="vote_count"&gt;0&lt;/span&gt; votes&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
  
    &lt;div class="poll_option clearfix"&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_percentage" style="display:none"&gt;3%&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_result"&gt;
      &lt;h5&gt;Jack Hanrahan/Hannahan&lt;/h5&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_bar"&gt;&lt;span class="vote_count"&gt;3&lt;/span&gt; votes&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
  
    &lt;div class="poll_option clearfix"&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_percentage" style="display:none"&gt;2%&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_result"&gt;
      &lt;h5&gt;A rookie not yet on the roster&lt;/h5&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_bar"&gt;&lt;span class="vote_count"&gt;2&lt;/span&gt; votes&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
  
    &lt;div class="poll_option clearfix"&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_percentage" style="display:none"&gt;1%&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_result"&gt;
      &lt;h5&gt;A Sweeney&lt;/h5&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_bar"&gt;&lt;span class="vote_count"&gt;1&lt;/span&gt; votes&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
  
    &lt;div class="poll_option clearfix"&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_percentage" style="display:none"&gt;0%&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_result"&gt;
      &lt;h5&gt;A Brown&lt;/h5&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_bar"&gt;&lt;span class="vote_count"&gt;0&lt;/span&gt; votes&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
  
    &lt;div class="poll_option clearfix"&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_percentage" style="display:none"&gt;0%&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_result"&gt;
      &lt;h5&gt;Field (Foulke, Embree, Casilla, Murphy, Denorfia, etc.)&lt;/h5&gt;
      &lt;div class="poll_option_bar"&gt;&lt;span class="vote_count"&gt;0&lt;/span&gt; votes&lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
  
  &lt;p class="poll-total-votes"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;87&lt;/strong&gt; votes
      
    | &lt;span class="poll-has-closed"&gt;Poll has closed&lt;/span&gt;
  
  &lt;/p&gt;  
&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;script&gt;

  FastInit.addOnLoad(function(){
    new SBN.Poll('poll_container_13977_456491388').animateResults({renderImmediately:true});
  });

&lt;/script&gt;

  
&lt;/fieldset&gt;

      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What about Bobby?
</title>
      <link>http://www.athleticsnation.com/2007/7/5/13531/63469</link>
      <author>boilerdan</author>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 17:26:36 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;Apparently Bobby Kielty is ready to go - what to do now?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/player_main.aspx?sport=MLB&amp;amp;amp;amp;id=3176"&gt;http://www.rotoworld.com/content/pla...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



  &lt;p&gt;I know we all get frustrated when Kielty is left in the game against a righty and turns into ... well, Kendall. &amp;nbsp;But when a lefty is pitching, Bobby Kielty becomes an .890 OPS player (David Wright, Alfonso Soriano territory). &amp;nbsp;Can this offense afford to cast off that kind of production, especially when they are a lefty heavy lineup? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There's no problem at the moment - when Kielty is ready for the majors, send out Dee Brown. &amp;nbsp;But what happens when Buck comes back? &amp;nbsp;Do they go back to just one backup IF? &amp;nbsp;And who loses ABs to get Kielty into the lineup? &amp;nbsp;Things would be easier if Stewart or Buck could play CF or Kielty could play 1st. &amp;nbsp;Or maybe they just need to decide that a guy who can only play 1 out of 5 games is not worth keeping on the roster.&lt;/p&gt;


  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What happened to Geren's plan?
</title>
      <link>http://www.athleticsnation.com/2007/5/10/95017/9450</link>
      <author>boilerdan</author>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 13:51:01 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;Geren was going to mix things up and keep guys on the bench fresh and guys in the lineup rested. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;



  &lt;p&gt;So far in May, Melhuse has 4 AB's, Walker has 2, and Scutaro hasn't played. &amp;nbsp;I'd like to see Scutaro rotate through the infield over the course of a week, giving everyone a rest. &amp;nbsp;Walker could be a valuable PH, but it would be nice for him to get some regular AB's. &amp;nbsp;And no need to explain why Melhuse should see more time (despite Kendall's three dribbling singles yesterday).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DiNardo has looked good in limited action - how about an inning for him here or there (granted, the A's don't seem to play many games that are out of hand)?&lt;/p&gt;


  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bud Selig is a liar and/or an idiot
</title>
      <link>http://www.athleticsnation.com/2007/3/6/102837/2596</link>
      <author>boilerdan</author>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:39:12 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;So Bud thinks those of us who protest the exclusive deal with DirecTV are "ridiculous".&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.tvpredictions.com/bud030407.htm"&gt;http://www.tvpredictions.com/bud0304...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



  &lt;p&gt;Among his arguments is that there are hundreds of games on TBS, WGN, ESPN, and Fox. &amp;nbsp;But how does that help me if I'm not a Braves, Cubs, White Sox, or Yankees/Red Sox fans (since that's basically who you see on ESPN and Fox)?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He also cites a report that "only 5,000" fans who currently get MLB Extra Innings will be excluded within the new deal. &amp;nbsp;This is horsecrap. &amp;nbsp;What he's saying is that the many other thousands of fans who have been getting EI on cable can switch to satellite. &amp;nbsp;This is true, but he's a cynical pig with zero interest in fans for implying that it's not a significant investment to do so, and impractical for many of us.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would have more respect for Selig if he came out and said "this is a great financial deal for MLB and it will drive customers to our MLB.tv product which is more lucrative for us." &amp;nbsp;Instead he tries to portray it as being in some way good for the fans. &amp;nbsp;Fewer games, less access, less exposure, more cost for fans. &amp;nbsp;There's nothing in it for us.&lt;/p&gt;


  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fans recognize A's defense?
</title>
      <link>http://www.athleticsnation.com/2006/11/1/13959/6768</link>
      <author>boilerdan</author>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 18:09:59 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;Ellis and Chavez lead fan voting for Gold Gloves on ESPN.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://proxy.espn.go.com/chat/sportsnation/ballot?event_id=2561"&gt;http://proxy.espn.go.com/chat/sportsnation/ballot?event_id=2561&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not surprising about Chavez, as his reputation is well-established. &amp;nbsp;And although the 2B voting is close, it is interesting that Ellis is getting some props nationally, especially since he missed the ALCS.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kotsay is toward the bottom of the OFs. &amp;nbsp;No other A's listed.&lt;/p&gt;



  

  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sportswriters and broadcasters suck
</title>
      <link>http://www.athleticsnation.com/2006/8/31/95112/1279</link>
      <author>boilerdan</author>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 13:51:12 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;Sportwriters and broadcasters are like cattle being led to slaughter - they just follow the the sound of the bell. &amp;nbsp;Once an idea catches hold - eg., "how are the A's doing it with their offense?" - you'll see the same story written by local writers, discussed ad nauseum on telecasts, and written up by national columnists. &amp;nbsp;There is a short story in today's USA Today about how the A's and Padres are winning with pitching and defense. &amp;nbsp;As with every other story of this nature, they cite the season totals and point out that the A's are lowest in batting average, slugging, etc. &amp;nbsp;But what they fail to mention is that before the break the A's were basically a .500 team that was struggling. &amp;nbsp;Since the break, they have an outstanding record and the offense has picked up considerably, as noted on the MLB website today:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"The offense came into Wednesday's game batting .274 after the break and averaging 5.2 runs per game."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;God forbid that a writer should dig into the data for just a moment. &amp;nbsp;They might see that Thomas, Bradley, Kotsay, Payton, Ellis and Scutaro all have OPS's above .800 since the break, or that they have 5 players over .300 BA (and Bradley just below). &amp;nbsp;Or perhaps they would notice that the A's are 6th in the AL in scoring post-break (just two runs behind #4).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And not to ignore the much despised Run Differential. &amp;nbsp;Here are the post-break RD number and W/L differential for each team. &amp;nbsp;Notice the pattern:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;RD &amp;nbsp;W/L&lt;br /&gt;
Oak &amp;nbsp; +51 &amp;nbsp;+19&lt;br /&gt;
Min &amp;nbsp; +49 &amp;nbsp;+13&lt;br /&gt;
NYY &amp;nbsp; +37 &amp;nbsp;+11&lt;br /&gt;
LAA &amp;nbsp; +24 &amp;nbsp;+8&lt;br /&gt;
CLE &amp;nbsp; +19 &amp;nbsp;+1&lt;br /&gt;
TX &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;+11 &amp;nbsp; 0&lt;br /&gt;
Det &amp;nbsp; +4 &amp;nbsp; +3&lt;br /&gt;
CHI &amp;nbsp; -4 &amp;nbsp; -2&lt;br /&gt;
Tor &amp;nbsp; -16 &amp;nbsp;-5&lt;br /&gt;
Bal &amp;nbsp; -25 &amp;nbsp;-4&lt;br /&gt;
Sea &amp;nbsp; -32 &amp;nbsp;-4&lt;br /&gt;
KC &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;-57 &amp;nbsp;-11&lt;br /&gt;
Bos &amp;nbsp; -59 &amp;nbsp;-11&lt;br /&gt;
TB &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;-61 &amp;nbsp;-4&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'm not arguing that the A's have a great offense, but for the past 8 weeks, they've been productive, with contributions up and down the lineup (Chavez being essentially the only exception). &amp;nbsp;Writers and broadcasters need to get their heads out, but I'm not couting on it.&lt;/p&gt;



  

  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Playoff roster
</title>
      <link>http://www.athleticsnation.com/2006/8/22/164833/525</link>
      <author>boilerdan</author>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:48:33 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;Who would you want on the playoff roster, if the baseball gods were so kind as to allow the A's to make the playoffs? &amp;nbsp;I hope to see some moves by Aug. 31 to account for the 4-man rotation in the playoffs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here's what I'd like to see:&lt;br /&gt;
Kendall, Melhuse&lt;br /&gt;
Swisher, DJ&lt;br /&gt;
Ellis, Scutaro, Crosby, Chavez, Perez&lt;br /&gt;
Payton, Kielty, Kotsay, Bradley&lt;br /&gt;
Thomas&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Zito, Haren, Loaiza, Blanton&lt;br /&gt;
Street, Duke, Calero, Gaudin, Kennedy, Halsey, Harden&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This basically trades out Saarloos for DJ, gives you two lefties in the pen, and assumes that Harden can play a significant role.&lt;/p&gt;



  

  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Recall DJ NOW!
</title>
      <link>http://www.athleticsnation.com/2006/8/1/62545/22190</link>
      <author>boilerdan</author>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 10:25:45 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;Great win last night, but this offense still needs more pop. &amp;nbsp;The answer is just a few miles away in Sacramento. &amp;nbsp;Time to recall DJ. &amp;nbsp;He continues to hit like crazy. &amp;nbsp;This is not a AAAA player. &amp;nbsp;He was a RoY candidate last year until he slumped late in the season. &amp;nbsp;He's legit. &amp;nbsp;Crazy to keep throwing Swisher out there every night - he hit .188 in July after hitting .204 in June. &amp;nbsp;Time to say it - the emperor has no clothes. &amp;nbsp;At least in June he kept his OBA decent, but in July it was .310. &amp;nbsp;This is not an offense that can continue sustaining this kind of production, at least not when there are options. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;



  

  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Opening day lineup
</title>
      <link>http://www.athleticsnation.com/2006/3/30/105824/992</link>
      <author>boilerdan</author>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 15:58:24 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;From today's Chronicle:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Twice in the past three days -- both times Thomas has played -- Macha has used what looks like a good bet for Opening Night (Swisher and Payton in, Johnson out), though he would not confirm that."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/chronicle/archive/2006/03/29/SPGTRHVPTQ1.DTL"&gt;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/chronicle/archive/2006/03/29/SPGTRHVPTQ1.DTL&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This makes no sense to me. &amp;nbsp;If this is Macha's approach it's going to be a frustrating season. &amp;nbsp;It's a rote L-R move that isn't supported by past performance. &amp;nbsp;Last season's OPS versus lefties:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Johnson .799&lt;br /&gt;
Payton &amp;nbsp;.738&lt;br /&gt;
Swisher .635&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I could buy an argument for starting Swisher over Payton to give a young guy a chance to demonstrate that he's improved his approach from the right side. &amp;nbsp;But it would be absurd to sit Johnson just because he's left-handed. &amp;nbsp;He has a chance to be a 25 HR/100 RBI guy with a nice OBP, but they seem intent on not handing him an everyday job.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If they really want the best lineup against a lefty, they should go with Kielty, Kotsay, and Bradley in the OF, Johnson at 1B and Thomas as DH. &amp;nbsp;But I'm OK with either Swisher or Payton in LF - just don't sit Johnson!&lt;/p&gt;



  

  


      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
