bushe
Mar 19, 2008 Feb 15, 2012 6 1123
RSSUser Blog
Sporle MLB Inner Circle Hall of Famers
Thought you guys might like this one.
Short grass infield - statistical relevance
A while ago I promised to do some number crunching on whether the short grass in the Ranger's infield has an effect on the number of errors and other types of hits given up in the ballpark. Here are my results:
| Team & Location | Balls in Play | Grounders | Outs | Balls Through Infield | Infield Hits | Fielding Errors |
| Rangers in Arlington | 2328 | 922 | 669 | 183 | 49 | 17 |
| Rangers Elsewhere | 2359 | 953 | 699 | 165 | 63 | 18 |
| Opponents in Arlington | 2526 | 1004 | 720 | 193 | 54 | 28 |
| Opponents Elsewhere | 2413 | 1053 | 754 | 192 | 73 | 25 |
| Team & Location | GB% | Out% for GBs | IFH% | F% | GB to OF% |
| Rangers in Arlington | 39.604811 | 72.55965 | 5.31 | 0.975218659 | 19.84816 |
| Rangers Elsewhere | 40.3984739 | 73.34732 | 6.61 | 0.974895397 | 17.31375 |
| Opponents in Arlington | 39.746635 | 71.71315 | 5.38 | 0.962566845 | 19.22311 |
| Opponents Elsewhere | 43.6386241 | 71.60494 | 6.93 | 0.967907574 | 18.23362 |
To sum it up it doesn't appear that there is much effect if any on fielding percentage and it looks like the fast turf actually cuts back infield hits. It does this by noticably increasing the percentage of grounders that get to the outfield. At home the rangers were a full 2.5% more likely to get a grounder through the infield, while the opponents only increased by 1%.
We already knew this but this chart also further reinforces just how bad the infield defense was this past year as the Out% when the Rangers were hitting is much higher than when they weren't.
Some caveats - There are 6-10 or so grounders that aren't accounted for in each group, dunno but if anyone really wants to know I can try to look.
All thanks to retrosheet.org fantastic site.
3 comments
|
1 recs |
Tweet
25 under 25
There has been a lot of talk about who the rangers top prospects are and I thought it would be interesting to do a value rating of the top young players who are under control of the rangers. This is where I currently see their value to the rangers going forward presented with their clock to FA and this years stats.
35 comments
|
6 recs |
Tweet
Rangers farm #4
Jim Callis posted in his chat http://proxy.espn.go.com/chat/chatESPN?event_id=18658
That these are top 5 for this year:
1 Tampa Bay Devil Rays
2 Boston Red Sox
3 Cincinnati Reds
4 Texas Rangers
5 New York Yankees
exciting. Seems like to me that the red sox are a little too high but I'd say that order independent those are probably the top 5 farms.
Sure does suck to see the red sox and yankees on there.
Mike Young hits too many line drives
I was looking over hardball times' story about Jose Reyes' ground ball tendencies http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/should-jose-reyes-hit-more-groundballs /] or lack there of and hit the link at the bottom to League Leaders for fewest infield flies. A stat with Mike Young as the leader. So I opened his page and looked at his BIP stats.
Year LD% GB% IF/F HR/F
2004 24.8% 37.4% N/A 8.6%
2005 25.5% 45.3% 10.1% 12.7%
2006 24.9% 48.1% 3.7% 7.9%
2007 27.2% 48.4% 1.5% 6.8%
So his line drives were up, ground balls were similar and infield flies and homers were down. I'm not sure what really explains this but its almost as if he wasn't trying to hit home runs because he wasn't trying to get under the ball hence his outrageously low IF/F number
2005 Draft -College Catchers
In 2005 there were 5 college catchers taken in the top 100 picks this is their yearly stats
player-team(pick#)
lvl G/2B/HR/BA/OBP/SLG
Jeff Clement-SEA(3)
AAA 107/30/18/263/358/494
Nick Hundley-SDP(76)
AA 84/19/18/252/339/495
Brett Hayes-FLA(79)
HA 17/3/1/338/413/462
AA 61/15/3/257/302/361
total 78/18/4/275/328/383
Chris Robinson-CHC(90)
AA 79/13/1/254/303/316
Taylor Teagarden-TEX(99)
HA 81/25/20/315/448/606
AA 14/3/2/404/463/596
total 95/28/22/327/450/605
Sure makes Tea look good doesn't it?
Showing 1 - 6 of 6