Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: My First Fight: Diego Sanchez

Engineerface

bushe

Mar 19, 2008 Feb 15, 2012 6 1123

rss icon RSSUser Blog

Lone Star Ball Short grass infield - statistical relevance

A while ago I promised to do some number crunching on whether the short grass in the Ranger's infield has an effect on the number of errors and other types of hits given up in the ballpark.  Here are my results:

 

Team & Location Balls in Play Grounders Outs Balls Through Infield Infield Hits Fielding Errors
Rangers in Arlington 2328 922 669 183 49 17
Rangers Elsewhere 2359 953 699 165 63 18
Opponents in Arlington 2526 1004 720 193 54 28
Opponents Elsewhere 2413 1053 754 192 73 25

 

Team & Location GB% Out% for GBs IFH% F% GB to OF%
Rangers in Arlington 39.604811 72.55965 5.31 0.975218659 19.84816
Rangers Elsewhere 40.3984739 73.34732 6.61 0.974895397 17.31375
Opponents in Arlington 39.746635 71.71315 5.38 0.962566845 19.22311
Opponents Elsewhere 43.6386241 71.60494 6.93 0.967907574 18.23362

To sum it up it doesn't appear that there is much effect if any on fielding percentage and it looks like the fast turf actually cuts back infield hits.  It does this by noticably increasing the percentage of grounders that get to the outfield.  At home the rangers were a full 2.5% more likely to get a grounder through the infield, while the opponents only increased by 1%.

We already knew this but this chart also further reinforces just how bad the infield defense was this past year as the Out% when the Rangers were hitting is much higher than when they weren't.

Some caveats - There are 6-10 or so grounders that aren't accounted for in each group, dunno but if anyone really wants to know I can try to look.

All thanks to retrosheet.org fantastic site.

3 comments  |  1 recs | 

Lone Star Ball 25 under 25

There has been a lot of talk about who the rangers top prospects are and I thought it would be interesting to do a value rating of the top young players who are under control of the rangers.  This is where I currently see their value to the rangers going forward presented with their clock to FA and this years stats.

 

Continue reading this post »

35 comments  |  6 recs | 

Lone Star Ball Rangers farm #4

Jim Callis posted in his chat http://proxy.espn.go.com/chat/chatESPN?event_id=18658
That these are top 5 for this year:
1 Tampa Bay Devil Rays
2 Boston Red Sox
3 Cincinnati Reds
4 Texas Rangers
5 New York Yankees

exciting.   Seems like to me that the red sox are a little too high but I'd say that order independent those are probably the top 5 farms.

Sure does suck to see the red sox and yankees on there.

19 comments  | 

Lone Star Ball Mike Young hits too many line drives

I was looking over hardball times' story about Jose Reyes' ground ball tendencies http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/should-jose-reyes-hit-more-groundballs /] or lack there of and hit the link at the bottom to League Leaders for fewest infield flies.  A stat with Mike Young as the leader.  So I opened his page and looked at his BIP stats.

Year    LD%     GB%    IF/F    HR/F
2004    24.8%    37.4%    N/A    8.6%   
2005    25.5%    45.3%    10.1%    12.7%
2006    24.9%    48.1%    3.7%    7.9%
2007    27.2%    48.4%    1.5%    6.8%

So his line drives were up, ground balls were similar and infield flies and homers were down.  I'm not sure what really explains this but its almost as if he wasn't trying to hit home runs because he wasn't trying to get under the ball hence his outrageously low IF/F number

6 comments  | 

Lone Star Ball 2005 Draft -College Catchers

In 2005 there were 5 college catchers taken in the top 100 picks this is their yearly stats

player-team(pick#)
lvl G/2B/HR/BA/OBP/SLG

Jeff Clement-SEA(3)
AAA 107/30/18/263/358/494

Nick Hundley-SDP(76)
AA 84/19/18/252/339/495

Brett Hayes-FLA(79)
HA 17/3/1/338/413/462
AA 61/15/3/257/302/361
total 78/18/4/275/328/383

Chris Robinson-CHC(90)
AA 79/13/1/254/303/316

Taylor Teagarden-TEX(99)
HA 81/25/20/315/448/606
AA 14/3/2/404/463/596
total 95/28/22/327/450/605

Sure makes Tea look good doesn't it?

11 comments  |