<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>SB Nation User Blog:  calim</title>
    <link>http://www.sbnation.com/users/calim</link>
    <description>Posts made by calim on SB Nation</description>
    <item>
      <title>Ready to gas y'all up, aite?</title>
      <link>http://www.rockmnation.com/2009/9/23/1052725/ready-to-gas-yall-up-aite</link>
      <author>calim</author>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:21:46 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;h3 class="link-title"&gt;&lt;a href="http://pointplankn.com/"&gt;Ready to gas y'all up,&amp;nbsp;aite?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;div class="description"&gt;&lt;p&gt;The only thing better would be a kU helmet with sod on it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>O's get more pretty young things out of Bedard deal</title>
      <link>http://www.lookoutlanding.com/2009/7/30/969782/os-get-more-pretty-young-things</link>
      <author>calim</author>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:50:44 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;h3 class="link-title"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-dodgers-fyi31-2009jul31,0,5941922.story"&gt;O's get more pretty young things out of Bedard&amp;nbsp;deal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;div class="description"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Josh Bell and Steve Johnson go to Baltimore for GS52. Hard to say if Baltimore really made out with much here &#8212; both Bell and Johnson are ranked in LA's top 15 prospects, but their numbers (Bell has .295 wOBA at low A Lansing and Johnson a 4.63 tRA* at AA Chattanooga) aren't overly impressive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sunshine, lollipops and rainbows &#8212; REMIX</title>
      <link>http://www.lookoutlanding.com/2009/7/28/966919/sunshine-lollipops-and-rainbows</link>
      <author>calim</author>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:04:45 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;Sung to the tune of the Felix Day theme, I bring you the first-ever Trading Deadline song!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Defense, GMZ and young guns&lt;br /&gt;Players that are powerful is what we'll field when we're here next year&lt;br /&gt;Better than a lucky Washburn,&lt;br /&gt;When they're near the losing disappears, dear&lt;br /&gt;And I feel so fine just to know that they are mine&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This week is defense, GMZ and young guns&lt;br /&gt;That's how this refrain runs, so come on, join in everybody&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Defense, GMZ and young guns&lt;br /&gt;Players that are powerful will make it a good day&lt;br /&gt;When we trade veterans away&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Defense, GMZ and young guns&lt;br /&gt; Players that are powerful is what we'll field when we're here next year&lt;br /&gt; Better than a lucky Washburn,&lt;br /&gt; When they're near the losing disappears, dear&lt;br /&gt; And I feel so fine just to know that they are mine&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This week is defense, GMZ and young guns&lt;br /&gt; That's how this refrain runs, so come on, join in everybody&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Defense, GMZ and young guns&lt;br /&gt;Players that are powerful will make it a good day&lt;br /&gt;'Cause Z is smart&lt;br /&gt;'Cause Z is smart&lt;br /&gt;He don't care 'bout ERA!&lt;/p&gt;

  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Wilson, Sanchez reject Pirates offer</title>
      <link>http://www.lookoutlanding.com/2009/7/19/954976/wilson-sanchez-reject-pirates-offer</link>
      <author>calim</author>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 05:22:23 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;h3 class="link-title"&gt;&lt;a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=4339694"&gt;Wilson, Sanchez reject Pirates&amp;nbsp;offer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;div class="description"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Pittsburgh's offer apparently was so paltry that the players didn't even bother making a counter-offer. OK, GMZ, the iron is hot if you want to strike.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Royals expect skin depigmentation to help Betancourt</title>
      <link>http://www.royalsreview.com/2009/7/13/948244/royals-expect-skin-depigmentation</link>
      <author>calim</author>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:04:03 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;h3 class="link-title"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lookoutlanding.com/2009/7/13/948121/royals-expect-skin-depigmentation"&gt;Royals expect skin depigmentation to help&amp;nbsp;Betancourt&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;div class="description"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thought y'all might want to join in the laughs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Royals expect skin depigmentation to help Betancourt</title>
      <link>http://www.lookoutlanding.com/2009/7/13/948121/royals-expect-skin-depigmentation</link>
      <author>calim</author>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:18:19 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sbnation.com/mlb/teams/KAN" class="sbn-auto-link"&gt; &lt;/a&gt;SPRINGDALE, Ark. &amp;mdash;&lt;a href="http://www.sbnation.com/mlb/teams/KAN" class="sbn-auto-link"&gt; Kansas City Royals&lt;/a&gt; general manager Dayton Moore announced a program Monday that he thinks will help newly acquired shortstop Yuniesky Betancourt turn around his woeful work ethic and on-base percentage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Idea, Moore said, is to &lt;a href="http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=SS&amp;sid=milb&amp;t=p_pbp&amp;pid=435358" target="_blank"&gt;lighten Betancourt's skin&lt;/a&gt; so that he becomes "more of a hustler, a &lt;a href="http://www.sbnation.com/mlb/players/942/David_Eckstein" class="sbn-auto-link"&gt;David Eckstein&lt;/a&gt;-type guy." Moore said the organization subscribes to the theory that "white guys work harder" and that the depigmentation might even make Betancourt a more patient hitter at the plate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moore and the Royals have been roundly criticized by mainstream media and bloggers for trading for Betancourt, who was once touted as a great defensive shortstop with a useful bat but has deteriorated at age 27 into a one with the worst defensive ratings in the Major Leagues and an on-base percentage near .300, for two Class AA pitching prospects.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"We'll see what you nasty blog guys think of me now," Moore said. "This is a very scientific way to fix Yuni's perceived problems."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Betancourt underwent the procedure in Springdale, where he is rehabbing a hamstring injury with the Royals' Class AA affiliate, the Northwest Arkansas Naturals. He is expected to join the Royals after the All-Star Break.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"See?" Moore said, pointing to a couple of bloggers attending the press conference. "We didn't just trade for a Cuban nobody. We traded for a Cuban nobody, and we're going to make him a somebody."&lt;/p&gt;
  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>M's record when leading/trailing after each inning</title>
      <link>http://www.lookoutlanding.com/2009/6/23/921935/ms-record-when-leading-trailing</link>
      <author>calim</author>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:39:58 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;I've been doing this every night but don't really have time to do any bargain-basement analysis of the data, so I'm submitting this without comment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thru June 21&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Overall: 35-34&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Record by starter:&lt;br /&gt;Felix 10-5&lt;br /&gt;Bedard 6-5&lt;br /&gt;Silva 3-3&lt;br /&gt;Washburn 5-8&lt;br /&gt;RRS 1-0&lt;br /&gt;Jakabauskas 3-5&lt;br /&gt;Vargas 5-3&lt;br /&gt;Olson 2-3&lt;br /&gt;Morrow 0-2&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Record with lead&lt;br /&gt;After 1: 10-6&lt;br /&gt;After 2: 15-9&lt;br /&gt;After 3: 18-9&lt;br /&gt;After 4: 20-12&lt;br /&gt;After 5: 24-9&lt;br /&gt;After 6: 24-6&lt;br /&gt;After 7: 24-5&lt;br /&gt;After 8: 27-3&lt;br /&gt;After 9: 31-0&lt;br /&gt;After 10: 2-0&lt;br /&gt;After 12: 1-0&lt;br /&gt;After 15: 1-0&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Record when tied&lt;br /&gt;After 1: 18-17&lt;br /&gt;After 2: 10-11&lt;br /&gt;After 3: 7-10&lt;br /&gt;After 4: 6-6&lt;br /&gt;After 5: 5-8&lt;br /&gt;After 6: 7-6&lt;br /&gt;After 7: 6-4&lt;br /&gt;After 8: 6-5&lt;br /&gt;After 9: 4-4&lt;br /&gt;After 10: 2-1&lt;br /&gt;After 11: 2-0&lt;br /&gt;After 12: 1-0&lt;br /&gt;After 13: 1-0&lt;br /&gt;After 14: 1-0&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Record when trailing&lt;br /&gt;After 1: 7-11&lt;br /&gt;After 2: 10-14&lt;br /&gt;After 3: 10-15&lt;br /&gt;After 4: 9-16&lt;br /&gt;After 5: 6-17&lt;br /&gt;After 6: 4-22&lt;br /&gt;After 7: 5-25&lt;br /&gt;After 8: 2-26&lt;br /&gt;After 9: 0-30&lt;br /&gt;After 10: 0-3&lt;br /&gt;After 11: 0-1&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How have the M's done when behind/ahead after each inning?, part deux</title>
      <link>http://www.lookoutlanding.com/2009/5/31/894796/how-have-the-ms-done-when-behind</link>
      <author>calim</author>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 05:54:57 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;A couple of weeks ago, I gave a rundown of the M's record with a lead/deficit after each inning.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those were much happier times. 15-10, coming off a 15-inning, heart-stopping victory over the A's &amp;mdash; probably the day, unfortunately, that will be considered the high point of the year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But this seems like as good a time as any to update the numbers, what with a couple of ninth-inning comebacks this weekend and a team that's somewhere in the neighborhood of .500 (though 25-26 would have sounded a lot better).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thru May 31&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Overall: 24-27&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Felix 7-4&lt;br /&gt;Bedard 4-5&lt;br /&gt;Silva 3-3&lt;br /&gt;Washburn 3-6&lt;br /&gt;RRS 1-0&lt;br /&gt;Jakabauskas 3-5&lt;br /&gt;Vargas 3-1&lt;br /&gt;Olson 0-3&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Lead&lt;br /&gt;After 1: 8-4&lt;br /&gt;After 2: 12-7&lt;br /&gt;After 3: 12-8&lt;br /&gt;After 4: 12-11&lt;br /&gt;After 5: 15-8&lt;br /&gt;After 6: 16-6&lt;br /&gt;After 7: 16-5&lt;br /&gt;After 8: 18-3&lt;br /&gt;After 9: 20-0&lt;br /&gt;After 10: 2-0&lt;br /&gt;After 12: 1-0&lt;br /&gt;After 15: 1-0&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Tied&lt;br /&gt;After 1: 11-14&lt;br /&gt;After 2: 6-9&lt;br /&gt;After 3: 4-8&lt;br /&gt;After 4: 5-3&lt;br /&gt;After 5: 4-4&lt;br /&gt;After 6: 5-3&lt;br /&gt;After 7: 4-2&lt;br /&gt;After 8: 4-3&lt;br /&gt;After 9: 4-2&lt;br /&gt;After 10: 2-1&lt;br /&gt;After 11: 2-0&lt;br /&gt;After 12: 1-0&lt;br /&gt;After 13: 1-0&lt;br /&gt;After 14: 1-0&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Trailing&lt;br /&gt;After 1: 5-9&lt;br /&gt;After 2: 6-11&lt;br /&gt;After 3: 8-11&lt;br /&gt;After 4: 7-13&lt;br /&gt;After 5: 5-15&lt;br /&gt;After 6: 3-18&lt;br /&gt;After 7: 4-20&lt;br /&gt;After 8: 2-21&lt;br /&gt;After 9: 0-25&lt;br /&gt;After 10: 0-1&lt;br /&gt;After 11: 0-1&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Does anybody else think a team should be better than 12-11 when leading after four? Especially one whose strength is run prevention? Not really proud about that 18-3 when leading after eight, either.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One other thing I've been tracking is the M's record with each starter on the hill. Before the season, my dream world was to have Felix and Bedard win ~75 percent of their starts and the other three-fifths of the rotation win ~50 percent. Both are obviously far-fetched, but if we did it, that'd be .600 baseball. And the M's did do it, through the first month or so of the season. That, along with about everything else, came crashing down with the whole lose-9-out-of-10 thing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here's where it's at now:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Felix 7-4&lt;br /&gt;Bedard 4-5&lt;br /&gt;Silva 3-3&lt;br /&gt;Washburn 3-6&lt;br /&gt;RRS 1-0&lt;br /&gt;Jakabauskas 3-5&lt;br /&gt;Vargas 3-1&lt;br /&gt;Olson 0-3&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That's 11-9 for Felix and Bedard (only 55 percent, mostly not their fault), and 13-18 for everyone else (.419), also not even close to a high benchmark. Obviously bullpen and sample-size issues make this almost irrelevant, but like all the above info, it's compiled just for fun.&lt;/p&gt;

  
  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tigers win crazy one, take two of three from kU</title>
      <link>http://www.rockmnation.com/2009/5/10/871347/tigers-win-crazy-one-take-two-of</link>
      <author>calim</author>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 22:19:49 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;h3 class="link-title"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mutigers.com/sports/m-basebl/recaps/051009aaa.html"&gt;Tigers win crazy one, take two of three from&amp;nbsp;kU&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;div class="description"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Had 6-1 lead, let kU pull within 9-7. Led 12-7, let kU score five in the ninth after a grand slam. But Ryan Ampleman's one-out homer in the bottom of the ninth gives Mizzou a 13-12 win, a series win against the chickenhawks, the 30th win of the year and a 16-11 Big 12 record.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How have the M's done when behind/ahead after each inning?</title>
      <link>http://www.lookoutlanding.com/2009/5/4/864097/how-have-the-ms-done-when-behind</link>
      <author>calim</author>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 06:52:12 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;So, with too much time on my hands on a Sunday night (I get three-day weekends every so often followed or preceded by just a Sunday off) and still buzzing from the high of this afternoon's game, I put together a little info on the Mariners have fared when ahead, behind or tied after each inning. Essentially useless, especially with a small sample size, but still fun to look at.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall: 15-10&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When the M's are:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Leading&lt;br /&gt;After 1: 6-1&lt;br /&gt;After 2: 9-2&lt;br /&gt;After 3: 8-2&lt;br /&gt;After 4: 9-4&lt;br /&gt;After 5: 12-4&lt;br /&gt;After 6: 11-1&lt;br /&gt;After 7: 11-2&lt;br /&gt;After 8: 12-1&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Tied&lt;br /&gt;After 1: 6-7&lt;br /&gt;After 2: 2-3&lt;br /&gt;After 3: 2-4&lt;br /&gt;After 4: 2-1&lt;br /&gt;After 5: 1-1&lt;br /&gt;After 6: 2-2&lt;br /&gt;After 7: 2-0&lt;br /&gt;After 8: 2-1&lt;br /&gt;After 9: 2-0&lt;br /&gt;After 10: 1-0&lt;br /&gt;After 11: 1-0&lt;br /&gt;After 12: 1-0&lt;br /&gt;After 13: 1-0&lt;br /&gt;After 14: 1-0&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Trailing&lt;br /&gt;After 1: 3-2&lt;br /&gt;After 2: 4-5&lt;br /&gt;After 3: 5-4&lt;br /&gt;After 4: 4-5&lt;br /&gt;After 5: 2-5&lt;br /&gt;After 6: 2-7&lt;br /&gt;After 7: 2-8&lt;br /&gt;After 8: 1-8&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Besides the obvious (wonder when the trailing-after-8 win was), here are a few highlights:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;mdash; Game 7 (Bedard beats Outman 1-0 in Oakland) was the first time a game was still tied after second inning. In the first six, there had been scoring in one of the first two innings.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &amp;mdash; The Mariners had the lead after four innings in each of their first three losses. Conversely, they won the first two times they trailed after 4.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &amp;mdash; One old adage that rings true: Score first. Seattle is 6-1 when leading after one, 9-2 after two Then again, it's 3-2 when trailing after one.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &amp;mdash; In fact, the M's have been doing OK playing from behind early in games, but the winning percentage drops off dramatically if they're trailing after 5 and even more so after 6. Random but fun.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;mdash; I'm going to try to update this every few weeks as I have time.&lt;/p&gt;

  
  


      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
