<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>SB Nation User Blog:  chemistrymajor</title>
    <link>http://www.sbnation.com/users/chemistrymajor</link>
    <description>Posts made by chemistrymajor on SB Nation</description>
    <item>
      <title>LaFrentz will be traded to Memphis</title>
      <link>http://www.blazersedge.com/2008/12/4/679501/lafrentz-will-be-traded-to</link>
      <author>chemistrymajor</author>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 09:05:21 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;Why?&amp;nbsp; Money.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Memphis is 8.5 mil under the cap, Portland is over.&amp;nbsp; How much over depends on the Francis buy-out, but its probably between 9 and 10 mil.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Insurance will cover 80% of LaFrentz's salary.&amp;nbsp; However, does not affect the luxury tax Portland will owe unless&amp;nbsp;they trade LaFrentz without returning equal salary.&amp;nbsp; If Memphis takes on 8.5 mil in salary from Portland, our luxury tax will be reduced by 8.5 mil.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now you're saying, but Paul Allen is our owner.&amp;nbsp; He doesn't care about money.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;I disagree.&amp;nbsp; If&amp;nbsp;Paul&amp;nbsp;Allen&amp;nbsp;can save 8.5 mil, he's going to save 8.5 mil -- as long as it does not hurt the Blazers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, here's the deal.&amp;nbsp; We'd like to trade LaFrentz to Memphis straight up for a 2nd round pick or whatever as long as matching a salary does not come back.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now you're saying; but LaFrentz makes 12.8 mil, not 8.5 mil.&amp;nbsp;But you're forgetting that the season has already started.&amp;nbsp; If LaFrentz is traded 1/3 of the way through the season, his impact on each team's salary is about 8.3 mil.&amp;nbsp; Portland saves that much in luxury tax and Memphis only pays 20% of 8.3 mil.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Next question: Why would Memphis do us this 2 mil favor.&amp;nbsp; Answer: They won't unless we throw in a player they like.&amp;nbsp; That's the rub.&amp;nbsp; What player on Portland's roster is expendable and would satisfy a Memphis need.&amp;nbsp; I don't know, but I could see them liking Outlaw and Rodriquez for Conley-- maybe that's where the rumors come from.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would offer them Frye and Rodriquez for Lowry.&amp;nbsp; Why?&amp;nbsp; I'm a Bayless fan and I suspect he's ready to play.&amp;nbsp; Lowry is probably a better player than Conley today, but with a lower ceiling.&amp;nbsp; Memphis is going nowhere, so Rodriquez's high ceiling is preferable to Lowry's career back-up ceiling.&amp;nbsp; Conley IMO is no better than Rodriquez.&amp;nbsp; He is a high risk, high reward player who will be unhappy sitting behind Blake and Bayless.&amp;nbsp; On the other hand, Lowry IMO is a very solid back-up and a great insurance policy if Bayless is not ready.&amp;nbsp; AND he plays defense.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Memphis ends up with two point guards with starting potential instead of just one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now I know that adding players creates&amp;nbsp;a greater salary difference.&amp;nbsp; Since Memphis can only take on an additional 8.5 mil in salary, this can be made up in one of two ways:&amp;nbsp; Either wait further into the season when the impact&amp;nbsp;on the salary cap&amp;nbsp;will be less, or add another player or two -- like Warrick or Crittenton --&amp;nbsp; or both.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If they's take Diogu instead of Frye, I like that deal better.&amp;nbsp; If they don't want to trade point guards, that's also better --&amp;nbsp;even if it means that Bayless has to wait longer to play.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The point is that LaFrentz to Memphis makes too much sense not to happen as long as Memphis is reasonable about what they get out of the deal.&amp;nbsp; Heck, maybe they take LaFrentz plus 3 mil cash for a 2nd round pick.&amp;nbsp; Who knows.&amp;nbsp; But there's a deal here to be made.&lt;/p&gt;

  
  


      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
