SBNation.com User Blog: dcrespo7

Wallace or Revis

dcrespo7 — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 21:11:00 -0000

Revis is all the rave right now. He's hot. Trending. With the style of defense Denver plays this would definetly increase the chances to the Super Bowl exponentially. However, there is one player that can definetly take Denver further after such a promising season filled with growth. I'm talking about Mike Wallace the dynamic WR that is a FA and unlikely to resign with the Steelers.

I know Revis would improve the defense and regardless what happens to Champ Bailey. Denver wasn't beat because they couldn't stop the run but because of key passes to extend drives. Sure those long passes don't help either but Revis would be the ideal talent to get more out of the defensive schemes come playoff time.

Mike Wallace would add a level of offensive terrorism. Whether Decker, Thomas or Wallace are in the slot this would be the ideal threat to the NFL pass defenses league wide. Provided Moreno and McGahee match their previous performances I can see this type of offense setting all sorts problems.

Now the way I see it Denver has a solid offense. The interior line can use some talent and upgrades in the depth department. RB is also a position of need simply because Moreno and McGahee style of running lead to injuries and its unpredictable to anticipate when either will get hurt. Most importantly, a RB that's capable of pass blocking is by far the more critical attribute as Manning does pass more frequently.

Denver's defense is the reason we were able to rip off such impressive feats such as an 11 game winning streak and shutting teams out during the second half of the games 80% of the time (I made that stat up by the way but wouldn't be surprised if it were in line or higher). Interior girth and athleticism would make the DL much more formidable and adding another passrusher, regardless if its a DT/DE would free up the Godly like talent that is Von Miller.

If money and draft picks are not an issue I'd go the route of Revis. Denver's offense will be that much more better next year now that Manning shook off the rust and got acquainted with his new home. Revis literally shuts down a WR. Whether we move Champ or keep him altogether is something that can be addressed at that time. Defense is where we make our bones and the draft is where we can address some moving parts.

So what do you say guys? Revis or Wallace?

Poll

Who do you make a push for?

Darrell Revis

49 votes

Mike Wallace

8 votes

Work the draft

63 votes

Heir Apparent to Champ Bailey

dcrespo7 — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 05:27:52 -0000

Its been 2 weeks since the Broncos were eliminated from the playoffs. Was it disappointing? Of course. Did we have a spectacular season? Don't know about most of you but I sure did have a great time watching this team grow together. Some of us are still bitter about the way we lost but life goes on and this is where I make an attempt at solidifying a position of need. I look to Champ Bailey and think its time to make that initial push to get younger, faster and downright better.

Champ Bailey has been a staple to this Broncos organization since the Washington trade involving Portis and Bailey. I'm convinced his time has come and to neglect a pressing need would be irresponsible. We have some young studs in Chris Harris, Rahim Moore, Quinton Carter (these two are Safeties but I mention them since there are whispers of Bailey making a move to S), and Tony Carter to name a few.

Denver fans. I have a solution. So the NYJ as of now are willing to trade Darrell Revis who's in his final year of his contract and he's also recovering from knee surgery. As of now DJ Williams is the perfect candidate to be shopped around for anything ranging from draft picks down to Revis. Sure Williams will be 30 and entering his 10th year in the league but this works.

1. Revis has in his contract language that prevents any team from applying the franchise tag. This is, as of now, a one year contract. This benefits the Broncos from a bargaining standpoint because Revis walks after the 2013 season. Whether Denver gives him an extension of 2 years or 5, this would be cheaper than waiting for him to hit Free Agency next year.

2. DJ Williams has become expendable thanks due to the magnificent play of Wesely Woodyard and Danny Trevathan. Same college. Same player. Explosive results. DJ on the other hand would be the ideal LB to team up w/David Harris and shore up that defense at an affordable contract (two years remaining but I could be wrong).

Now before I start getting feedback regarding Revis' attitude remember we had endured Tebow. We overcame DJ Williams' suspension while unearthing a gem in Trevathan. Denver had both Cutler AND Marshall and won. You see to me what makes Denver the ideal team for any free agent, or football player for that matter, the place to work is because its a top notch organization. We have top tier, quality coaches. Denver has a management that's committed to winning and fair (ask Tebow - he chose to go to the NYJ).

Here's a link and I hope Elway and team awesome run it through.

http://espn.go.com/new-york/nfl/story/_/id/8875093/darrelle-revis-new-york-jets-shopped-possible-trade-option-according-source

Here's a link and I hope Elway and team awesome run it through.

http://espn.go.com/new-york/nfl/story/_/id/8875093/darrelle-revis-new-york-jets-shopped-possible-trade-option-according-source

Congrats

dcrespo7 — Sun, 13 Jan 2013 01:45:47 -0000

I am a Bronco fan. I have underestimated this battle tested team. A playoff driven championship team. Ray Rice and company has been outstanding. Kruger will be giving me nightmares all season. This defense may have been old but today Denver got schooled. Today Flacco was a great QB making great plays. Resign him. Build around Flacco and Rice. This team is a great team and I'd be lucky to have a Denver team that could fight like that Raven team did today.

Beat New England.

Win the Super Bowl.

We were overrated.

No excuses.

Congrats to the Baltimore Ravens.

Beat New England.

Win the Super Bowl.

We were overrated.

No excuses.

Congrats to the Baltimore Ravens.

An Objective Attempt

dcrespo7 — Sat, 13 Oct 2012 05:36:29 -0000

Its been an exciting 2012 season so far although we're sitting at 2-3 and another prime time meeting against San Diego. Couldn't tell any of you when was the last time I was this excited about the Broncos. Well maybe 2007 or 2008 but we're exactly like that team. Learning to win ball games while the young talent develop and grow at the speed known as the NFL.

Now there are some points many MHR faithfuls point out and I try my best to see it from their point of view. However, there are some things I just don't get. Before I touch up on some of the points I'd like to make I want to ask: Do any of you still compete? I mean I do play QB at an adult flag football league but who am I kidding right? Screw that, even I can throw a WR open (I can't throw beyond 50 yards but trust me, no one is breaking the 5.0 40 yard dash).

We have a basic offense modelled after some high school plays, Madden, and West Coast Offense principles. We do ok considering my WRs are constantly hung over or still nursing some muscle pull. This year I managed to not break anyone's fingers. Well this is exactly what the Broncos are going through. Sorta but enough about me.

We have a new QB. In case any of you haven't noticed he took off for a year to hang out in Europe for some fancy surgery to further enhance is cognitive response speed along with his motor skills. Not exactly but I ask anyone who's played the game and took some time off to try jumping right back in. Let me know how easy it is. Manning is doing better than fine. Coaches are doing fine. We just need to do better at maintaining balance. That simple. Need proof? Look below

But after the Broncos opened the regular season by calling 27 run plays and 28 passes in the victory over the Steelers, they've diverted from their original plan. So far, the Broncos have called passes on 61.0 percent of their plays—and in their three losses, they have passed on 67.8 percent of their plays.

source:

http://aol.sportingnews.com/nfl/story/2012-10-11/denver-broncos-peyton-manning-week-nfl-stats-week-6-fantasy-football-qb

This is from sportingnews.com and calls out the overall offense deficiency as it pertains to the run game. I've been trying to say all along that we need to do better at running the ball. Controlling the LOS and TOP is a tremendous asset in winning football games. Maybe we need to let Moreno out of the doghouse and allow him to earn his way back into the team just release the guy. I'm a Jersey guy and Ball (from Teaneck NJ) and Moreno are Jersey boys but Moreno should be in there. So he fumbled once. At this point one should ask, what Bronco hasn't?

The Broncos' imbalance is a result of the deficits they've faced. In the past four games, Denver has been down by at least two scores more than half of the time—120:08 of a possible 240 minutes. Denver's proclivity for slow starts has forced the offense into pass-intensive, hurry-up mode and has often made Willis McGahee more of a pass catcher than a runner. That's not the best role for him, as evidenced by a crucial fourth-down drop at New England last Sunday that helped derail the Broncos’ attempt to overcome a 31-7 deficit.

Now the above makes me wonder how much of the TOP has to do with the degree we're passing ball versus the TO's we've had and how the teams chose a more conservative approach to a. play keep away from Manning and bleed the clock and b. control the pace of the game and TOP.

What does bother me is the point the author makes about McGahee being a pass catcher. I'd like that role more for Moreno who always ran hard. I'm not sold on Hillman quite yet and the signing of Holliday, which to me is a similar player as Hillman but with an emphasis on special teams, just adds to the doubt.

I expect the Broncos to continue improve because no two games has been a repeat of any previous game. Sure we have three losses and its well documented that all three were in the playoffs and current Super Bowl contenders. We have been able to stop teams and move the ball on those teams. Its just a matter of putting it all together. I know why Manning wants to throw the ball. He has something to prove but I get it. You're making a comeback but I have your back. Just like I have McCoy's and Fox's backs as well.

We're watching some good football people. Shall I remind you the embarrassing performances such as Miami and KC to name a few? Sometimes an upgrades requires a delay before its fully operational. I'm all in who else is with me?

But after the Broncos opened the regular season by calling 27 run plays and 28 passes in the victory over the Steelers, they've diverted from their original plan. So far, the Broncos have called passes on 61.0 percent of their plays—and in their three losses, they have passed on 67.8 percent of their plays.

source:

http://aol.sportingnews.com/nfl/story/2012-10-11/denver-broncos-peyton-manning-week-nfl-stats-week-6-fantasy-football-qb

The Broncos' imbalance is a result of the deficits they've faced. In the past four games, Denver has been down by at least two scores more than half of the time—120:08 of a possible 240 minutes. Denver's proclivity for slow starts has forced the offense into pass-intensive, hurry-up mode and has often made Willis McGahee more of a pass catcher than a runner. That's not the best role for him, as evidenced by a crucial fourth-down drop at New England last Sunday that helped derail the Broncos’ attempt to overcome a 31-7 deficit.

Denver 31 Pats 21

dcrespo7 — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 14:06:39 -0000

This is what I expect today. Balanced first down play calling. Aggressive play calling in second down via pass. Third down slightly favoring pass. 60% completion rate. Denver will press Brady especially in long downs and NE will likewise. The key for the Denver defense will be to hold the running game's duo threat at RB along with Gronk-style ball.

Facts about NE: ranked 20th overall in the NFL in Defense and 1st overall in Offense.

Facts about Den: ranked 7th overall in the NFL in Defense and 12th overall in offense.

Den and NE are tied for 3rd down defensive completion at 41%.

Den is ranked 4th in 3rd completion with 46% and NE ranks at 12 with 42%.

In addition to these stats, those of you who may remember that I'm a fan who resides on the East Coast. Every Bronco game I have ever attended. Everyone. LOSS. Now I live four hours from Foxboro. I'm a Yankee fan. Think about that for a moment. I love my Broncos to the point that I have decided NOT to attend this game. I know the opportunity to watch two of the finest QBs to represent the game is not as important as a Broncos win. The temptation to drive into a hostile environment, where Red Sox and Pats alike cannot be messed with, will have to be reserved for another time.

Don't let me down Broncos! I really wanted to go to this game and the closest road trip would be Baltimore (I've been three times already-yea all losses) and then the hike to Cincy and Charlotte. So you homers please don't sell your seats unless I'm flying over : )

Facts about NE: ranked 20th overall in the NFL in Defense and 1st overall in Offense.

Facts about Den: ranked 7th overall in the NFL in Defense and 12th overall in offense.

Den and NE are tied for 3rd down defensive completion at 41%.

Den is ranked 4th in 3rd completion with 46% and NE ranks at 12 with 42%.

Is 2nd Round that important?

dcrespo7 — Mon, 09 Apr 2012 16:53:46 -0000

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/play-index/draft-finder.cgi?request=1&year_min=2008&year_max=2011&type=&round_min=1&round_max=30&slot_min=1&slot_max=500&league_id=&team_id=den&pos=ALL&college_id=all&conference=any&show=all

Wanted to look into the draft since 2008. This year is very critical because its the catalyst for all the change we as fans had to endure. What I find interesting is how we managed to have 6 first round selections in those four years. Of those six Ryan Clady has been very consistent and Demaryius Thomas, along with Von Miller, seem to have promise for great things. Whereas Ayers and Moreno seem to be more of role players limited to design and scheme. Another thing I noticed was how Tim Tebow and Robert Ayers did not lose extensive playing time due to serious injury.

2nd round to me is as important as a 1st rounder. These are athletes that usually fall into the top 60 to transition into the NFL.

2008 Eddie Royal WR (SD now)

2009 Alphonso Smith CB (traded 2010 first round for selection)

2009 Darcel McBeth CB

2009 Richard Quinn TE

2010 Zane Beadles OG

2011 Orlando Franklin OG

2011 Rahim Moore S

Now I sit here and I let those names roll around my head for a moment. Aside from Royal there was very little contribution in 2009 and 2010 seems to be an upgrade in the likes of 2011's Franklin (if we slide Franklin and let Harris play LT).

Its understandable not to miss on your first round but this year's different thanks to a new CBA. But the second round cannot be where any team should reach. This goes for 3rd round picks too. Maybe this is a lot of nonsense and players just need to play and coaches need to coach. Then I look at those names and I still think to myself: who could we have gotten? I'm sad to see Royal to go but we never utilized him and he was a trooper through and through. Quinn? Never got to know you. Smith? Well he does have 8 career interceptions and playing ball. Beadles, Franklin and Moore simply need to build onto their game and we'll revisit them at their three year mark.

2nd round to me is as important as a 1st rounder. These are athletes that usually fall into the top 60 to transition into the NFL.

2008 Eddie Royal WR (SD now)

2009 Alphonso Smith CB (traded 2010 first round for selection)

2009 Darcel McBeth CB

2009 Richard Quinn TE

2010 Zane Beadles OG

2011 Orlando Franklin OG

2011 Rahim Moore S

Spread-ing History

dcrespo7 — Thu, 16 Feb 2012 04:45:17 -0000

I am sure someone is working on a piece regarding the spread offense but I want to point out my inspiration regarding a not so new phenomenon - Spread Offense (http://www.milehighreport.com/2012/2/14/2799308/questions-about-the-spread-offense). Thanks to Scrappy, I decided to dig in a bit.

Now the first article I've linked in the article above covers a lot of basic terminology, concepts and philosophy while the second link enclosed 48 universities currently running some form of the spread offense.

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/columns/story?columnist=schlabach_mark&id=4340650

1958: High school coach Tiger Ellison conceives run 'n' shoot offense.

1962: Mouse Davis refines run 'n' shoot; 79-29 in 15 years coaching high school.

1984: USFL's Houston Gamblers, led by quarterback Jim Kelly and offensive coordinator Mouse Davis, set a pro football record with 618 points.

1989: Houston Cougars QB Andre Ware wins Heisman Trophy.

1990: Three NFL teams (Atlanta Falcons, Detroit Lions, Houston Oilers) operate run 'n' shoot.

2000: Paul Johnson wins his second FCS title with Georgia Southern.

2004: Nevada coach Chris Ault creates pistol offense.

2005: West Virginia wins Sugar Bowl 38-35 over Georgia in Atlanta.

2006: Hawaii QB Colt Brennan sets single-season record for touchdown passes with 58.

2008: Florida coach Urban Meyer guides Gators to second national title in three years.

Pretty intense the history associated with this offense but what stands out is the reference to Jim Kelly prior to joining the Bills and their miraculous run at four SB (a feat I consider incredible incredible). What I also find interesting is that there are two first round picks from the Meyer's school of QB in both Alex Smith of the 9ers and our very own, Tim Tebow (how about that exciting run against the Saints). After a long search Bowling Green's QB for 2001 and 2002 was Josh Harris (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josh_Harris_(American_football).

Now I had no idea where I was going with this but one thing was clear to me and that is a coach can win many college games. Produce a great amount of men ready to give back to communities throughout the US. The real challenge lies in the ability of those few who do make the NFL and transfer some of the success from college into the pros. You can't succeed without failure and that is the biggest compliment a competitor has to keep them grounded.

I hope this satisfies some of thirst for useless tidbits. Interesting how things will play out during free agency, the draft and then the many organized practice sessions.

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/columns/story?columnist=schlabach_mark&id=4340650

1958: High school coach Tiger Ellison conceives run 'n' shoot offense.

1962: Mouse Davis refines run 'n' shoot; 79-29 in 15 years coaching high school.

1984: USFL's Houston Gamblers, led by quarterback Jim Kelly and offensive coordinator Mouse Davis, set a pro football record with 618 points.

1989: Houston Cougars QB Andre Ware wins Heisman Trophy.

1990: Three NFL teams (Atlanta Falcons, Detroit Lions, Houston Oilers) operate run 'n' shoot.

2000: Paul Johnson wins his second FCS title with Georgia Southern.

2004: Nevada coach Chris Ault creates pistol offense.

2005: West Virginia wins Sugar Bowl 38-35 over Georgia in Atlanta.

2006: Hawaii QB Colt Brennan sets single-season record for touchdown passes with 58.

2008: Florida coach Urban Meyer guides Gators to second national title in three years.

I hope this satisfies some of thirst for useless tidbits. Interesting how things will play out during free agency, the draft and then the many organized practice sessions.

My Trip To Buffalo

dcrespo7 — Wed, 28 Dec 2011 01:28:57 -0000

First off let me say that the Buffalo game was an excellent experience. I know the Broncos were lit up but watching a game live is better than the television. Lets just say its an entirely different experience. Ralph Wilson Stadium and its fans are beyond words. It had a feel of college and with blue collar fans that resemble nothing of the Jets/Giants that I'm used to, I was in great company.

The game was blacked out due to 24k fans no longer looking to support their team since they're out of the playoffs. I understand. Drove 7 hours and was pleasantly surprised to have a nice, warm temperature of 28 degrees and no it was not that cold. My Elway vintage 7 and a sweat shirt and I was good. Best part? Guinness for $8.50 compared to that crap Bud at $8.75.

I shared some ribbing with some of the locals and had some great seats (thanks to my girlfriend who came up with the best Xmas gift ever). I have never seen Denver win a game that I have attended and my record stands now at 0-11 so its clearly on me.

Things I did notice during the game. We are not a very tough football team. Say what you will about those Bills but I saw first hand the power and finesse of those OL on the Bills side. I know Miller has an injured thumb that had surgery just three weeks ago so I'm not going touch on subjects such as toughness but Ayers, Bunkley, and Mays were often on the sidelines. Whether its fatigue or scheme its clear we need some talent that can stay on the field regardless of distance and down.

Favorite match up was Miller vs Pears. A 7th year player in the NFL I don't see how he could have been passed up for the likes of Foster or even Franklin but those are the breaks when you're breaking in different coaches. Good to see that Denver knows a thing or two about drafting OL. Whether we stick with them is another issue.

Points I'd like to make shall be made following the jump.

Tim Tebow showed me a few things following the Minnesota game. Unfortunately, he's hit his ceiling and I'll explain why. Lets look at Decker and his many drops. Tim struggles with his five foot box in the pocket. What I mean by five foot is that anywhere in his 360 degrees he doesn't have the experience or feel to slide within the pocket when faced with pressure. His footwork must improve over the course of the offseason for him to have a real future in the NFL.

He's putting an emphasis on completing passes whereas a month ago he'd run after his first read. This is an improvement and disproves any conspiracy theory that management wants Tim to fail. He's responding to the coaching and as a fan of both football and my Broncos, this makes me happy.

His reads are predicated to hot/first reads. An example is the interception thrown while targeting Royal. It was by far the best throw I had seen all day and though it was picked he made the decision and stuck with it. I see that as an improvement as well. Whether he develops in reading defenses and adjusting is a matter time and patiences from management.

There was a drop Decker had, where I could clearly see 20 yards in front of me, where Decker was open for about 4 seconds across the middle. The throw was late. What really stood out however was not the drop or how inaccurate or late the pass was but how Tim cannot seem to locate a WR dead center of the field. He seems to be a QB capable of only hitting seams and outside the hash marks/sidelines. This is what is limiting the play calling in my opinion and what some talking heads in the media proclaimed how Tebow's style doesn't help anyone improve on their craft. I'm hoping the offseason can remedy that situation.

Play calling. The second quarter I believe is where Denver lost the game. Forget for a minute the defensive ranking of the Bills. Tebow is a QB who's limited. Forget the comeback wins or his record this season. They no longer matter because as fans we expect him to win now. No matter how ugly he performs and we have the Miami game to thank him for that. Tim has been given plays where he could be successful but he's learning to read up to three reads but that is still inconsistent and I'm ok with that. Six straight run plays are not ideal and does not bode well for a defense that has to turn around and stop a team from scoring. Those two missed FGs were clearly due to the sun by the way : )

Now I'm trying to write this piece because for the 7 hours on the driven back I thought of many ideas to share but I don't want to come off as an advocate of why Tebow can't play the position. I'm not sold on him but I believe he's earned 2012. What I'd like to see is more of him improving his game from a mental stand point. I don't care about books, late night talk shows or documentaries. I see that as a ploy to strike on why he's relevant now and what he's accomplished in college which is great for him, his family and the University of Florida. As a Bronco fan I cannot afford another year filled with speeches filled with faith induced hope or skill sets not developing because of whatever the trending rip happens to be.

Denver had some Plummer and pulled the plug prematurely for Cutler. I was very excited for number six but that McDaniels guy sure seems to a mistake wherever he goes. Orton has a chance to knock out the Broncos this weekend and that would speak volumes in terms of our inability to close out Decembers. That to me speaks louder than any coach speak, Tebow faith induced hope or classic pros such as Bailey. This culture of mediocrity has to change and believe it will. Regardless if we make the playoffs or not. Remember this is not a finished product nor next year will be but for the first time in a long time I'm excited with the direction we're going and for the first time I'm ok with that.

Ok, I give up.

dcrespo7 — Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:01:34 -0000

Seven games in (10 total) and I saw something in Tebow. His footwork was much improved. His throws were slightly crispier. I even saw him call out protection on that all out blitz where his wobbler hit Thomas' hands.

You see, I'm not big on Tebow. I saw a QB who was still playing the position as 80% of high school athletes are when they're learning the position. I'll throw a number out there and say 10% of colleges run an option heavy offense where the athleticism of the position because the X factor.

Its only in JV, some college programs and NFL practice squads where a player such as Tebow will be given an opportunity to learn and grow. Except this is the NFL. I realize that we may never see this type of scenario play out again and will explain why.

Everyone's job is tied to winning. Tebow seems to have that covered. However, its about building a team around a scheme. Well, 10 for 15 is a step in the right direction from an individual stand point and salute both the players and coaches for putting in the work honing in those skills and timing that's involved in the process. But how does Denver move forward?

I saw some good things. In fact, I was excited about the prospect of having Luck, Barkley or even Griffin III available come draft day. Its amazing how the team rallied around the concepts that rival NFL norm. Wouldn't it be great if we could go the distance and win it all? Then what?

Yesterday, this guy saw what everyone was clamoring about and I don't know if there are more like myself but crow sure sucks when you're that guy everyone points to and says "we told you so"!

Denial followed by Acceptance

dcrespo7 — Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:51:18 -0000

I've been in denial since that fateful day that had Tebow as a Bronco via 1st round 25th pick (at the expense of three draft picks being traded away). So allow me to express what my expectations are when I look at the quarterback position. You see, in High School the most athletic and talented gifted play positions that net the most touches. Whether its RB or QB (option), its how these HS coaches win the games that are important to them. Tebow broke Florida HS TD records as he was able to both pass and rush the ball.

College football isn't much different than high school in the sense that you want skilled players, or potentially capable of playing in a more team oriented scheme. Now I don't proclaim to be unbias here simply because I'm a UGA fan through and through (great win Saturday) but this spread scheme that Tebow played in for four years, along with the four years of high school has not prepared him to be the QB any team beyond those two levels needed him to be.

This current regime doesn't owe Tebow anything and he understands that better than anyone as McDaniels was the coach who's expertise (ironically the rookie of the year from the previous year is winless this year) were QBs drafted Tebow. What I am talking about is 8 years of starting football games as a QB. None of those fundamentals are visible. I'm done for the season and Sunday was an example of the entire team knowing how limited this QB is. Take Lloyd's exit and comments about Tebow as a small sample of how the team feels about the situation.

Denver won't be relevant for some years and for the first time in my life I am going to learn to live with that. Tebow isn't the answer. This coaching staff and executive management team are handcuffed because we as fans are in love with a player for the person he is and that has blinded such solid football knowledge.

For the record, I do coach at the junior level and a different sport. My goal is always to have my kids improve in their basics and incorporate the fundamentals necessary for success at the college level. To play beyond college really comes down to intangibles which I do cover because I understand my responsibility isn't just to win games but to cultivate a set of skills ranging from athletic ability, to concepts of team plays and finally mental toughness.

Tebow is a great person but I'm not interested in that. I need a QB that can play great. On a side note, I thought Newton was going to be a reach. I was wrong and if you look at this footwork, where his ball placement is allocated prior to throwing anyone could see how scary his future will be.

Football and its loyalties

dcrespo7 — Sun, 16 Oct 2011 20:35:56 -0000

So not only do I come to learn that Brandon Lloyd is on the trading block but as well as Eddie Royal. What I find interesting however is this, both were very underwhelming (Royal since his rookie campaign and Lloyd last year -his first real accomplishment the entire career).

What I find disappointing though is that it comes, or at least seems to me, at the heels of Tebow being named the starter. Now I don't know what to make of that but I recall thinking about how much we could have benefited if we traded Royal earlier in the year right before or during the draft. I'll explain.

Royal was very dynamic his rookie year as he was able to run out of all three WR spots but it was under the West Coast Offense scheme. The Monday night opener against the Raiders is still one of my favorite moments all time. After the changes in both Coaching and offensive philosophy, he's been insignificant and relegated to what seems to be Special Teams play.

To add to the WR logjam of underachievers, we have Brandon Lloyd who's come out of nowhere (stints in SF, WSH, CHI and now DEN) has 77 catches for 1448 yards and 11 TDs for a 18.8 average. Prior to Denver his best season was his third in SF where he had 48 catches for 733 yards and 5 TDs for a 15.3 average.

So when I read about draft pick grades and how the value of these two WR stack up, I would not give up no more than a 5th for either because the body of work is simply incomplete. From a fan's standpoint, I find it disappointing because the work put in to develop timing, trust and preferably a winning atmosphere.

So my real question is this: are we seeing the real voice behind the Tebow non-supporters while the entire fan base had to endure the ultimate depression under the Orton experience? You see we want to know what we have working here and when I read that these are trades requested by the two 'iconic' WRs (I jest of course) then where is the support for Tebow and his ability to have players rally around him coming from. Maybe its me but I think here in Denver, we have some real issues that the coaching staff and perhaps some classy professionals have been able to keep it under wraps.

In closing, I think we get to see some real young players with irreplaceable opportunity to show not only the coaches, the fans and their teammates what they're made of but themselves as well. Maybe we have another Marshall from a talent perspective or maybe a Victor Cruz but one thing's for sure, I'm all for quitters playing for someone else.

Leadership vs Masses

dcrespo7 — Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:29:20 -0000

I swear if I read, hear or see anything regarding Tim Tebow I'm going to punch my cat in the gut! I jest of course, I don't own a cat. I'm so past last year and excited about the additions on the defensive side of the ball. We're so much improved and we don't even have Ty Warren manning up the middle yet. We've upgraded the coaching staff and it showed last night with the performance of Miller, Moore and Decker.

I've noticed from some of the quotes of OUR players such as Lloyd, Bailey and even Weber (who's new to the NFL altogether). WE disgust our Broncos by our behavior! First game of the season, the month of September is usually the learning of cohesion and establishing concepts, philosophies and endure the occasional loss. Divisions are won in November and December. If Denver were to finish 2-2 in Sep., 2-2 in Oct., 3-1, 2-2 in Nov., and 4-0 in Dec. how silly would the masses feel? I don't have a crystal ball but its why we play the games.

Tebow has shown me a few things such as his ability to ride his celebrity status from his college greatness. Did any of you know he wrote a book? During the lockout I saw him in NYC modeling and marketing his book. Leadership? I'd find it incredible if Tebow stood up to the fans and simply say something in the lines of: "Though I appreciate (ppreciate as he'd say it) the support of Bronco fans, please support the Broncos. We're putting something special here and though I'm working hard this is still my team and like many great players before I have to learn and earn my way. Just know that I'm ready for my opportunity and help this team win games."

Come to think of it, he did something similar but it was at the University of Florida (I'm a Georgia fan-thanks McDaniels)

Maybe We're Not As Good

dcrespo7 — Wed, 14 Sep 2011 01:35:06 -0000

As I watched the first drive by both teams I did have one thought that was simply reinforced as the game went on. Maybe we're not as good as we'd like to think our team is. Our OL had very little push in the run game and that DL of the Raiders was simply overpowering. Our RB game was very similar to McDaniels regime and this is what I am not looking forward too.

Our WR corps was considered to be a strength coming into this season but to me, Lloyd isn't as dominating as I was led to believe. I understand he's an upgrade in the eyes of some when compared to Marshall except we don't have a threat in the middle of the field. If we can't dominate the center of the field with run or pass (and I believe the OL is weak outside of Clady) and this evident as our WRs seem to drop passes at ill opportune times.

I know we were gashed with runs but the reality was this. Our pass rush was increasingly fast getting a level forming and at times collapsing the "cup" of the pocket. Draws and screens really played into the strength of the Raiders while showcasing a possible achilles heel to what seems to be a much improved defense.

So what do I expect Denver to do different? Not much considering this was an old school smack in the mouth AFC West Rivalry. We're behind in the talent department for anyone to disagree with that I present to you this. We have wasted picks in two drafts alone and find our talent bare. With that I am elated to see the dividends by R. Moore and V. Miller. Another strong draft to catch up with some of the teams talented on both sides of line will allow us to catch up to the likes of the Raiders (that sentence was very difficult to type).

In closing, Tebow chants was simply embarrassing as I found myself at work today defending my Broncos (I live in NJ and attended that Jets game). I saw a better product and though our 3rd down percentage, penalties and time of possession did little to reinforce what I saw, Denver will have their ups and downs and its not simply on the shoulder of Orton but on that OL as well.

Excited About the Future

dcrespo7 — Wed, 10 Aug 2011 04:06:15 -0000

When Mike Shanahan was fired I felt very angry and then overwhelmed with concern. Sure Shanny had evolved into something more of a "my way coach" than 'the mastermind'. Two years seems like yesterday but I was really excited to see Denver line up one particular coach by the name of Spagnola. Sadly, we chose Josh 'Freaking' McDaniels. I was not pleased with this and to fast forward the stripping of a franchise I'll post the following names. Cutler. Scheffler. Hillis. Marshall. Nolan. Turner. Dennison.

As of now, we're in the market for a QB, TE, RB, and stabilizing our coaching staff. You see I'm a firm believer that it will always come down to coaching. So regardless how we feel about QB1 and QB2, the coaching staff have to believe that the best player to execute can be trusted. Freaking McDaniels tore up a reputable franchise in a matter of two years. I don't care what the Patriots did during their 19 and "NO" season. They lost in the Super Bowl and records are measured second behind Super Bowls. What a mistake.

Now I am not a Tebow fan but I get it. He has potential. As does every Bronco currently trying their hardest to make the 53 man roster plus the practice squad. Except I want players that can progress and in that process help others get better. Guess its why I really enjoyed Cutler's development but Shanny really handled the Plummer situation horribly and that's my point.

Many of us wanted Cutler over Plummer (who had over 60 wins) for his mobility and diversity (mobile/pocket passer) and we're doing it all over again. For once as fans we need to understand that EVERY team goes through their dark ages. Hopefully that has ended with the dismissal of Freaking McDaniels. Fox is a proven winner regardless what we read from his time in Carolina ( I live in NJ and he did great as DC for the Giants).

So for as long as I can remember, I am placing my trust once again on Elway and the people he's surrounded himself with and support the coaches as they mold a team with an identity built around the defense and a solid offense. Until then I hope as fans we can get over the yester-years and get through this together. I guess I have to start first...

The Calm Before The Storm

dcrespo7 — Tue, 18 Jan 2011 20:30:44 -0000

Shanahan fired. Cutler traded. Nolan defects. Turner and Dennison start new chapters outside Denver. Draft picks traded and traded again. Marshall, Hillis, Scheffler and CB Alphonso Smith are traded. Tebow drafted in exchange for three draft picks. Head coach starts losing games. Revolution? Revolt?

Where am I going with all this? We as Bronco fans have endured a lot. Sure we lost a few Super Bowls but those years were sprinkled with grit that at times would snowball into greatness. We've seen legends ride off into the sunset (Elway, Sharpe) and legends go before their time (Davis, Smith). You see, to me Denver has always been about offense. The ability to convert 3rd downs and against all odds, the occasional 4th. Since 2008, which seems an eternity, I'm excited about Denver football again.

HC Fox will do the little things to make Denver relevant again. Whether it shows in the win column or not is irrelevant to me. I may have not been a fan of Tebow (UGA fan) but I am still a Bronco fan. I tell anyone who'll listen, and occasionally treat me to a Guinness, that all he needs is time and reps. Sure you can throw me all the stats. Share with me the intangibles to winning both on and off the field. In the end, its all about reps. Tebow will be fine and I believe that simple because we have moved away from offensive minded genuises. We know who they are. They're the guys that get in their own way.

With the possible addition of Mora, Denver would have overhauled a coaching staff that was top heavy at teaching college kids than professionals. Is it a big deal? I can spit stats starting wins versus losses or yardage allowed or third down conversions or even turn over differential. It won't prove anything other than what we have now before us. Change. This was the direction we needed to maintain heading into 2009 but hey, you have to hit a few trees before you figure out its a forest!

Now I am not a big supporter of Mora from his time as the HC of Atlanta but he's got something we may have overlooked. Vick. Say what you will but to me these two QBs are very similar. Polarizing athletes that so happen to be lefty, scrambling types (Vick has evolved as a QB and credit Reid for that). I believe that though Mora was immature (on radio claiming that Washington University would be a dream job *smh) during his time, here's hoping second, or in his case third, chances are what the Broncos need. Not to win football games. Not to win championships. Its what we need to win the fans back.

Never have I seen so many Bronco fans turn against each other. I'm one of them. In fact I'm rooting for Cutler because I paid for that jersey and stuck with it. Will never get rid of it. Its a reminder that things happen beyond our control. Coaches have a responsibility to develop players and building trust. McDaniels had a lot of supporters but I believe they were more against the way Shanahan ran, or didn't run, things at Dove Valley.

My fellow Bronco fans, we're are going to be better. Defense has been our achilles heel since that AFC loss to the Steelers. We have a winning record against Seattle and would have bet everyone's unborn and my own that a third trophy was heading back to Dove Valley but it was not to be.

We have in place checks and balances. What a former HOF player can not be a personnel or executive? I present to you former TE Ozzie Newsome. Even if Elway becomes half of what Newsome is known for, Denver wins out big.

So whether we draft Peterson or Fairley I don't care. Whether Bailey signs an extension or Asom-whatever the vowels that follow that CB former known as a Raider- Denver is going to improve tremendously. So whether its in the wins or losses department, we all will be watching for the growth of Tebow and the showcase of Moreno (who was poorly utilized). A Denver 8-8 finish would be a great baseline to work with heading into 2012 but until then, lets resolve this Collective Bargaining Agreement mess and focus on football.

Go Broncos

The Blame Game

dcrespo7 — Wed, 03 Nov 2010 23:35:29 -0000

I am enjoying the blame game. Everyone is playing it. Shanny's fault. Cutler couldn't play nice. Marshall being Marshall. It goes on and on and we're all really trying to get a handle of our team. Its obvious we're on a decline dating back to a 2-8 finish in 2009 and a 2-6 start in 2010. So what are the real issues at hand? I mean it can't always come down to the players? Can it?

I look at Chicago and I laugh because that's a regime that will be turned upside down and so will Cutler's legacy. Those fans will look forward to a season filled w/hope considering who takes over. Depending on how that OL is addressed and who replaces Martz (that offense is not built for November-plus weather). Just poor calculated risks but hey we got a great deal!

Marshall may not be the headliner down in Miami but he's in a winning environment, back at his home state, and doing what he loves most which is playing football (we seem to have forgotten that his payday hasn't been an issue and there are more distractions at South Beach).

Alphonso Smith is doing great under Schwartz and always respected him as a DC during his time at Tennesee and believed he'd be the guy to turn that Detroit franchise around. May not look it in the standings but they've been very competitive and even beaten the Broncos a few seasons back (whether he was coaching is something I'm not aware of).

Peyton Hillis. They sure love him in Cleveland and what better athlete w/grit and pride to tote that rock in that rugged AFC North Division than he? He may not chug 100+ yards every contest but defenses will know they were in a fight as long as he runs the ball. Whether Holmgrem sticks w/Mangini and McCoy develops is another thing.

Here is a link to our current coaching staff: http://www.denverbroncos.com/team/football-operations.html (courtesy of NFL.com). Now most websites categorize the staff as "Coaches" but in Denver we're "Football Operations". Think some people just love titles so lets look into some of our staff.

Originally was going to copy paste a few of our staff to make a point but its underwhelming some of the actual body of work. Sure I'm not football head coach but for the last 15 years Denver was known for OL play and running the ball which all of a sudden is a mystery.

If I blame anyone its myself. I've grown churning out expectations of mediocrity and playoffs but we sure were competitve. Think I'd settle for that but I think success starts not just from the man up top but the people they surround themselves with. Just hate to think our team is being run like "The Office". Who really knows?

Teaching and Patience

dcrespo7 — Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:21:47 -0000

Teaching and patience doesn't always go hand in hand. Anyone who saw the Pittsburgh vs Denver matchup witnessed this very lesson. The beauty of athletics is that everyone wants to be part of something. The more success we have in our role, the more likely we are to witness success measured in winning. I'll do my best to explain after the jump.

Pittsburgh has the following QBs on their roster. Big Ben, Batch, Leftwich and Dixon. Ben is out for 6 weeks unless stated otherwise by the commish. The question for the Steelers is this: Who is going to drive the offense until then? Well, we'll leave that for the Steelers' faithful to discuss! What does impress me about that coaching staff and its management is that Dixon was afforded opportunity to showcase what he's been learning via training camp and apply it in the closest real world element. Against the more proven ones.

Well Denver is no different. We have Kyle Orton, off an additional year contract extension signing, showcasing how much along he's come after last year's learning of the offense. Then there is Brady Quinn, the highly acclaimed star from Notre Dame who's trying to do the same thing while juggling issues after his time in dysfunctional Cleveland. Lastly, we have Tim Tebow whom the fanbase have already adopted as the chosen one to lead our team to the promise land.

Two teams with separate coaching staff, management but driven by the goal to win a Super Bowl. After Shanahan's dismissal I was having a hard time with the transition. More than a year later I realize that a coaching staff surrounded by natural teachers of the game is exactly what the players needed, not the team.

Point 1. Orton is out for a play and Quinn comes in for relief. He gets sacked and booed. Orton hands down is the more polished passer and there is little Quinn can do to close that gap this year. His value however is measured in his years in this league. One can argue that Simms was heralded the same fortunately for all parties concerned, Brady will benefit by learning from natural teachers.

Point 2. Tebow looked good last night. Some may argue that the interception can be traced to his delivery or poor decision. What his teachers will cover will be more about what he saw and go from there. Tebow's offense in Florida has some similarities but anyone, myself included, to assume he's not changed certain habits are clearly not objective.

Denver has handpicked QBs that are very studious and more likely to put aside personal goals for bigger team aspirations. This speaks volumes because in Denver, we're going to find ourselves with athletes such as Woodyard, Cox, Ayers, Tebow, D. Thomas aka Bay Bay, and Syd finding opportunity for success rather than other players in the league. Don't believe? Take a drive out west and take a good look at the Cardinals.

Wisehut is taking a page out of Cleveland and shuffling QBs. Combine that with the coaching staff's determination to be the next Pittsburgh West and we'll see this is a team with an entirely separate philosophy behind their coaching/patience.

So before I, or anyone for that matter, attempt to blow up what we're putting together just remember it could be worse. Teaching trumps coaching everytime because patience is the virtue to separate those who are ready for opportunity from those are grateful for opportunity.

Tim Tebow?

dcrespo7 — Fri, 23 Apr 2010 02:16:17 -0000

The ransom we paid to trade back into the first round for Tim Tebow makes very little to no sense to me. Why trade for Quinn? Seattle gets Earl Thomas S w/OUR 14th pick while we wait and see if Alphonso Smith develops in his second year. Now we have 4 QBs on our roster and gave up 3 picks to get Tebow.

What turned out to be a good start in the draft, I'm left puzzled and angry. Holes left to fill? ILB, S, C, G, RB and TE. Thomas was a great pick, Tebow was simply a reach and now hate the idea that our coach has a man-crush on Tebow.

Demarius Thomas

dcrespo7 — Fri, 23 Apr 2010 01:46:45 -0000

I love this draft. Was disappointed to see McClain go at 8 to the Raiders (great pick and believe Davis DIDN'T make this happen). Was pleased w/the SF trade as we were still able to acquire 1 additional pick and then another 3 picks after going down from 13 to 24. Don't know exactly what we gave up to trade w/the Patriots but this selection is great for Denver.

Teams of note that may have improved greatly: San Fransisco and Seattle. Cleveland's selection of Joe Haden was solid as well. Too bad we have to wait until tomorrow for additional coverage of the draft but maybe Denver trades back into the 1st round or stay put. Who knows but I am very excited!

Cutler Haters

dcrespo7 — Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:01:35 -0000

Here is something I came across from a Bear fan. I wanted to share it w/the community because it shed some facts I wasn't aware of. I know Cutler is old news. As well as Marshall. But what I'm about to link is very disturbing because we have a lot of changes heading into year 2 of the McDaniels Era. I don't want to panic but WHAT ARE WE DOING!? *Attempt at Sarcasm*

This little rant was on April 15th well after the 2009 Season had been completed.

Dear Cutler haters,

ACTUAL TALENT, PHYSICAL GIFTS ASIDE, PROVEN TRACK RECORD OF OFFENSIVE SUCCESS & NECK BEARDS ASIDE... I CAN'T BELIEVE THAT SOME OF YOU WOULD RATHER HAVE ORTON AT THE HELM OF THE Bears.

So, FEAST ON THESE STATS...

If nothing else, you can clearly see that despite Cutler's faults this year, neck beard was equally unimpressive, especially down the stretch:

1. Orton threw for 12 TD and 11 INT in the last 10 games for Denver. Cutler threw 11TDS to 3INTS over his LAST 3...

2. Orton won 2 of the last 10 games. Cutler WON 3 of the last 5 (lost to GB & Bal, who are much better than us right now)

3. Orton's the 3rd QB in history to not get his team to the playoffs after a 6-0 start.

4. Orton is the first QB in Bronco history to lose every home game against its division rivals.

5. Orton lost the final 4 games of the season (KC, WASH, OAK, SD).

6. Orton lost the final game to KC 44 to 24 at home.

7. Orton lost the 14th game of the season to Oak 20-19 at home.

8. Orton couldn’t win more games than the 2008 team, led by Cutler, with better/ healthier talent around him.

9. The Orton led offense scored a 100 less offensive points than the Denver QB did in 2008, led by Cutler.

10. Orton turned the 2nd overall ranked offense into the 15th overall middle of the road offense.

11. Orton also was lucky enough to have the 7th overall defense and still couldn’t win more than 8 games.

12. Orton was lucky enough to have Marshall 100% healthy/ insuspended for 16 games.

13. Orton also didn't have to watch Marshall fumble the ball 9 times like he did in 2008.

14. Orton got to watch his kicker made 18/19 FG over the last 10 games, while only producing 3 TD's.

15. Orton led his team to 20 points or less in 9 out of 16 games? Two of which he had freak 50 & 90 yard TD's in the last minute of regulation.

16. Orton lost 3 games to sub 500 teams down the stretch? Washington, KC and Oak.

17. Orton threw for 280 yards or more with a very talented offense surrounding him just twice.

18 Orton couldn’t win games at home as it was promised his winning ways would do.

19. Orton produced more 3 and outs by the 10th game of the season than the 2008 Broncos had all season long.

Make sure you caught that part about Denver scoring 100 less offensive points than the 2008 team did with more talent. How sad is that?

With an offense with an extra year of experience under its belt, its best weapon having played a full season with a tear in his hip finally being healthy and playing out of his mind & A SUSPECT AFC WEST schedule. Orton still couldn't get it done. Considering all the miracle passes and all the miracle catches his WR made for him, he still found a way to become the 3rd QB in history to miss the playoffs after his team started 6-0. IMPRESSIVE!

Now going into his 8th year, he shouldn't be classified as a "has been", he falls under the catagory of "never was". Once the Bears get healthy, get some new coaches & add some TALENT at WR, we'll be right back in the playoff mix.

2010 and Beyond

dcrespo7 — Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:59:17 -0000

Brandon Marshall is traded after signing his 1st round tender that pays a little more than $2million. Signs w/Miami a 4 year deal at $47million, $24 guaranteed. In 2011 that is. What are we seeing? A 4 year deal for the Miami Dolphins but a great idea for other franchises to consider. But what about the CBA? Fans have access to information, if they are interested enough. In other words, I don't have enough fingers to count how many members in MHR that can pop up facts regarding contracts for every player in the league. However, this is a hurdle yet to be overcome by both the Players Union and NFL Owners.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/ross_tucker/04/14/rookie.wage.scale/index.html

This link above is a great example of one means of closing the gap in contract negotiations among rookies. Rookies in the top 10 come to mind in fact. Imagine Denver, picking at 11 this year, wanting to move up to say 5 w/the Redskins to draft a QB. Well we have a 43 and a 45 and an extra 2nd next year. Lets say the player of interest is ABC and he's definitely a McDaniels type of player that will turn things around in a hurry.

Well Ross Tucker proposal makes a lot of sense in terms of what he talks about shortening contract lengths to two years w/an option for a third year. So the ABC player's slot would once again have the value of the pick in itself and giving back control to teams actually looking to get the most value of any deal and picks in question all in the pursuit to improve their football team with out the worry money.

Money. The root of all evil. These kids love football. If they could replace money with the adoring fans cheers, marketing opportunities, and a social status very few get to enjoy, they'd jump on it faster than Jerry Jones on an oil puddle stained in his image.

So what happens after 2010? We all talk about which player isn't worth this much versus that player who made that much but isn't that for a team to decide? I mean is Holmes going to be utilized the same way as Marshall or vice versa? Who knows but I believe the model presented in the link would greatly curtail some of the demands we're seeing today in a world where a WR who averages in a span of three years: 100 catches, 7 TDs, 63 first down grabs can make $10million plus meanwhile Wes Welker is making significantly less for doing the exact same thing but from a slot position.

Now before we go into the styles of the player and how the dynamics vary shouldn't that matter to the style of system a player would fit into? I mean Tebow is a great story no question but don't look further than Alex Smith, Meyer's first prodigy who has been in the NFL now for a good hot minute. That system doesn't exist in the NFL anymore (run n shoot comes to mind) but its great at the college level and more importantly it provides more WRs ready to jump into the NFL. If more teams adopt this scheme does this mean that WR price tags will drop off now that RBs can be found in any round? Probably not but the idea of bringing a rookie for two years w/a third option at a more discounted contract would be a great means of having the parity before free agency became the circus it is today.

In closing I think this year is crucial if the NFLPU and NFL Owners can't find a middle ground. If there is one common gripe between the two sides its the pay rookies make drafted that high. Agents won't like it one bit but can you imagine the process in NFL development? Won't have to keep a player around long waiting for that green light to go off. I'm for the 2yr option for 3rd as a model and think it would help curtail many finances that are issues today and bring true value to the NFL draft and not some TMZ popularity contest. Maybe this approach could carry over in MLB but I'm not holding my breath and besides 162 games is one long season that starts as early as February and ends as late as November (weather permitting).

Side note, great win last night by as they win in the bottom of the 10th agianst the Mets. I'm a Yankee fan so a Mets loss is equal to a Yankee win (when they don't win of course).

2009 Denver and the skeletons in the closet

dcrespo7 — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:34:20 -0000

How about those Raiders? Came into Denver knowing that their strength was to run the ball and to run the ball often. Russell may have bought himself a little time but that team seems to have two quality QBs in Gradowski and Frye. One can say its not saying much but Gradowski was 2-1 and had Frye not gotten injured would have probably won his first start. That is as far as I'll go in congratulating the Oakland Raiders.

I understand that Mike Shanahan wasn't getting it done both in December and in the offseason which led to some frustrating Decembers. What I am most disappointed with is the inability to convert 3rd downs. The defense has done tremendously well and if there were ever a unit that can win "most improved " award it would be these guys.

McDaniels reminds me of Brian Billick. An offensive mind that set records in Minnesota with Randall Cunningham then Duante Culpepper and the likes of Robert Smith, Cris Carter and Randy Moss. However, once he got to Baltimore in his first HC position, offense was the least of his forte. Dilfer. Boller. Redman. Those were the QBs that came and went as a defense rose to great heights and carried the team to where it is today.

The thinking heading into the season was simple. Allow McDaniel an entire season and access his body of work. With two games remaining I have a few things that jump out at me. Tony Carter made a few plays in his first action in a live NFL game. More plays than I remember Alphonso Smith (a pick I am for) making at this point in the season.

Chris Baker has been inactive for another week. The one position, player who needs time in happens to be Baker. Would he have been able to contribute in containing the run? I think so. I've yet to see the same Denver defense that excelled at rushing the passer and maintaining discipline.

Its December. The season is one long grind that can wear the best of men. For once, I'd like to see a hero among men rise to the occasion.

Monday Menu

dcrespo7 — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:24:25 -0000

First off, I'm highly disappointed at the New York Giants. Being from New Jersey and having the Chargers violate the same biosphere I reside in, I figure I'd root for the G-Men. Well, anytime the Giants lose I normally feel great to begin with simply because its a team that's highly overrated. Great job on the Chargers for overcoming a 38 minute time of possession and two turnover performance by Rivers.

Now I'll be in Applebee's tonight in Clifton, NJ. I'll be having a steak, or two, with shrimp. At this time, Denver should be winning 3-0. After a much needed sack to shake off the Baltimore Beatdown of a week ago, I'll be having a Guinness as I rant off to the band wagon hopping Steeler fans that Denver wasn't supposed to win more than 3-5 games this season let alone any opinion about life for that matter.

What I am concerned about is the passing game. With half the season worth of Bronco offense/defense, its really going to come down to players making plays when their numbers are called. Whether it'd be Royal on a fly route or Marshall doing a skinny post, am I alone when I say "can Orton stretch the field or is McDaniels holding him back w/play calls"?

I'd like to see a little more of Baker in the middle but Fields has been a tremendous addition. How does Law pan out w/so much time off and away from football? How will certain packages designed for him not backfire if Steelers catch that very package and go no huddle?

This game only disturbs me for one reason and one reason only. If Denver performs poorly my choice of Guinness shifts towards Jameson, Tequila and maybe a few Irish Car Bombs to get the vital nutrients in phytochemicals (to ward off cancer), Bailey's (dairy, vital for calcium) and I'd most likely would have to trek home a very embarrassing 20 minute commute ala walking.

In the end, I expect a 24-10 win. Big Ben has shown improvements in his game this year. Tonight's game will be one that will surely send him back to film study. I for one don't like losing at home, even at 2000 plus miles away from Denver!

To the MHR community, Go Broncos!

15-1 baby

Comeback wins

dcrespo7 — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:02:02 -0000

I was reading some throw down on Sports Illustrated and found a link that really caught my attention. I used to record statistics for my university's women's volleyball team (why women don't wear spandex more often is beyond me). We had an athlete that simply was unstoppable but many schools and conference officials started to send their own stat people to ensure the integrity of the sport was being neglected.

What I learned in the next two months of having a complete stranger standing over me was that even when the rules are clear, it comes down to interpretation of any said rule. Sadly, I had to explain that discretion is normally offset if you eliminate all biases and follow the flow of any sport and record information for what it is.

This led me to the comeback victory list.

QB                      Reported Actual
John Elway              47         34
Brett Favre               42 27
Dan Marino              37       36
Peyton Manning       37         28
Drew Bledsoe          32     24
Joe Montana            31         31
Johnny Unitas          31 34
Tom Brady                28         20
Roger Staubach       23         15
Ben Roethlisberger 19 15
Chad Pennington        7          7
Jay Cutler                   7 5

This is a list compiling comeback victories. Please take note that each team constitutes this stat differently and for that reason alone I think it's not as important versus passer rating, touchdowns/interceptions and 3rd down %. I'm sure this varies from fan to fan as well.

It led me to ask a simple question, why hasn't the NFL adopted a Standard Order Procedure? I know sacks were recorded later down the line but I think the fans are owed that. Personally I'd love for Elway to be the comeback king but in the end of the day, its about the integrity of the sport, right? We can't be picky, we have the drive against Cleveland. Drive II against Houston. We have Rod Smith's 44 yarder against the Redskins. Shouldn't the list also be extended to kickers as well?

Anyway, something I felt compelled to share w/my community of football loving junkies that can never get enough. I like how Unitas and Montana were very solid at their position in an era where defenses were very physical and stating that really does it no justice (Leonard Marshall really laid the entire lumber industry on Montana in that one playoff game).

Here is the link for those interested in adding a more detailed take.

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/blog/?p=3401

Broncos vs Cowboys (Pretender Bowl?)

dcrespo7 — Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:45:02 -0000

I've given up on the MSM for any real insight for this matchup and won't expect anything unbiased or relatively researched until Sunday's pregame panel of "journalists". Since most hypothesis require some facts, just look below the jump as I try and argue why a victory is in order come Sunday.

*Listening to "Where's Your Head At" by Basement Jaxx

Cowboys	Average Team Rankings	Broncos
10.9	Total Offense	10.6
17.5	Total Defense	8.7
16.8	Passing Offense	15.9
23.2	Passing Defense	3.8
2.5	Rushing Offense	6.5
18.3	Rushing Defense	5.7
13.7	Receiving Offense	16.0
20.2	Receiving Defense	2.2
13.3	Punting	21.5
11.8	Return	17.8
15.5	Kicking	16.3

The above is separate yet combined average of stats through week 3. A more detailed version are as follows below. Though Dallas has avg 28 points a game to Denver's 20, I'd like to point out that a 34-21 game against a horrible TB team is just about equal to Denver's game vs Cleveland's 27-6 beat down w/the exception of defensive play (as Dallas has been consistent in scoring, Den has been consistent keeping teams from scoring). The shootout w/NYG 33-31 loss is on par to Den's win over Cincy 12-6 (again both teams playing to their strengths - Dal's O and Den's D). Both teams won their week 3 match ups but when we look at Dallas, this is a team that is deep w/talent and expectations to challenge the NFC's elite for the SB whereas Denver is entering their portion of the schedule that is to truly challenge what we're trying to put together.

Denver's defense is what will separate the two teams. Until last night, Dallas had not caused any turnovers or gotten sacks of the QB. Though the Dallas offense has tremendous receiving talent from TE Witten and the ever dangerous Williams and company, the real advantage is the play of QB. Romo has been reckless, and unlucky, throwing the ball resulting in interceptions and this Denver defense is composed of discipline and ballhawking skills all across the depth chart. The exact opposite can be said for Orton as he has played mistake free football after almost losing the game at Cincy by taking an ill advised sack resulting in a punt rather than a FG.

When I look at the Dallas OL and compare to Den's front 7, I don't see a group that's focused or consistent and this is where the game will be won. The only way to offset Denver's greatest asset is to control the ball w/runs inside and the occasional play action pass. This bodes well for Denver as well because Dallas hasn't been able to commit to one aspect of their offense, until last night against a run defense depleted w/injuries in Carolina, and tend to pass more often when they're behind or a team is more physical defensively.

So what if the game comes down to if Dallas plays mistake free football? Both teams are converting 3rd down plays at a rate of 41% which is very impressive (more so w/Denver considering the offense is still under construction) but defensively Dallas allows 33% conversion to Denver's 28%. Considering the way Den's defense crowds the ball and the decision making of Romo, this would be where Denver could either pull away or lose if the game is close. Dallas has no premiere pass rusher, regardless what the MSM like to suggest otherwise, and believe Den's OL will again control the LoS.

The real test will come down to coaching and I think I can speak for most fans that follow the NFL in general, McDaniels has a clear edge over Phillips. Though Dallas should win this game due to their key positions talent, its safe to say that all across that Denver sideline, coaches will be making adjustments to exploit both our opposition's weakness and to correct our own.

Denver 24 Dallas 13.

Total Offense	Cowboys		Broncos
	Stat	Rk	Stat	Rk
Points/Game	28.7	5	20.7	14
Total Yds/Game	429.7	3	374.3	9
Giveaways	4	14	2	2
Total 1st Downs	65	4	56	15
3rd Down Efficiency	41.2%	18	41.0%	14
4th Down Efficiency	0%	29	33.3%	20
Total TDs	9	3	6	15
Scoring Efficiency	42.4%	6	40.6%	7
3 and Out Drives	4	1	7	10
Penalties	17	11	16	5
Penalty Yds	171	26	119	6
Avg Total Off. Rank	10.9		10.6

Total Defense	Cowboys		Broncos
	Stat	Rk	Stat	Rk
Opp. Points/Game	20.3	17	5.3	1
Opp. Total Yds/Game	382.7	26	214.7	1
Takeaways	3	23	8	4
Opp. Total 1st Downs	60	19	36	1
Opp. 3rd Down Efficiency	33.3%	7	28.2%	4
Opp. 4th Down Efficiency	66.7%	12	50.0%	13
Opp. Total TDs	6	15	1	1
Opp. Scoring Efficiency	29.4%	9	12.1%	1
Opp. 3 and Out Drives	10	12	8	17
Opp. Penalties	14	27	14	28
Opp. Penalty Yds	120	26	123	25
Avg Total Def. Rank	17.5		8.7

Passing Offense	Cowboys		Broncos
	Stat	Rk	Stat	Rk
Total Attempts	89	27	88	28
Total Completions	51	27	49	30
Completion Pct.	57.3	23	55.7	26
Passing Yds/Game	236.0	14	215.7	15
Yds/Attempts	7.96	5	7.35	8
Passing TDs	4	14	3	20
INTs Thrown	3	18	0	1
QB Rating	85.2	18	91.2	11
Passing 1st Downs	29	23	30	22
Sacks Allowed	3	6	3	7
Sacks Yds Allowed	27	10	16	7
Avg Passing Off. Rank	16.8		15.9

Passing Defense	Cowboys		Broncos
	Stat	Rk	Stat	Rk
Opp. Total Attempts	113	27	85	3
Opp. Total Completions	72	27	51	4
Opp. Completion Pct.	63.7	27	60.0	11
Opp. Passing Yds/Game	268.0	27	136.3	2
Opp. Yds/Attempts	7.12	21	4.81	3
Opp. Passing TDs	4	16	0	1
Interceptions	2	18	5	5
Opp. QB Rating	90.1	20	50.6	3
Opp. Passing 1st Downs	38	21	25	2
Sacks	3	25	10	2
Sacks Yds	22	26	60	6
Avg Passing Def. Rank	23.2		3.8

Rushing Offense	Cowboys		Broncos
	Stat	Rk	Stat	Rk
Total Attempts	85	9	102	3
Rushing Yds/Game	193.7	1	158.7	4
Yds/Carry	6.8	1	4.7	8
Rushing TDs	5	2	3	8
Rushing 1st Downs	31	1	21	7
Rushing Fumbles	0	1	1	9
Avg Rushing Off. Rank	2.5		6.5

Rushing Defense	Cowboys		Broncos
	Stat	Rk	Stat	Rk
Opp. Total Attempts	73	12	71	10
Opp. Rushing Yds/Game	114.7	17	78.3	7
Opp. Yds/Carry	4.7	26	3.3	7
Opp. Rushing TDs	2	16	1	4
Opp. Rushing 1st Downs	18	19	9	5
Opp. Rushing Fumbles	1	20	4	1
Avg Rushing Def. Rank	18.3		5.7

Receiving Offense	Cowboys		Broncos
	Stat	Rk	Stat	Rk
Receptions	51	27	49	30
Receiving Yds/Game	245.0	14	221.0	17
Yds/Reception	14.4	3	13.5	5
Receiving TDs	4	14	3	20
Receiving 1st Downs	29	23	30	22
Receiving Fumbles	0	1	0	2
Avg Receiving Off. Rank	13.7		16.0

Receiving Defense	Cowboys		Broncos
	Stat	Rk	Stat	Rk
Opp. Receptions	72	27	51	4
Opp. Receiving Yds/Game	275.3	26	156.3	2
Opp. Yds/Receptions	11.5	20	9.2	1
Opp. Receiving TDs	4	16	0	1
Opp. Receiving 1st Downs	38	21	25	2
Opp. Receiving Fumbles	1	11	2	3
Avg Receiving Def. Rank	20.2		2.2

Punting Stats	Cowboys		Broncos
	Stat	Rk	Stat	Rk
Punts	13	18	12	20
Punting Yds	601	17	530	21
Punting Average	46.2	10	44.2	20
Inside 20	8	2	4	16
Touchbacks	1	16	1	17
Blocked	0	7	0	8
Net Punting Average	40.8	10	35.8	27
Avg Punting Stats Rank	13.3		21.5

Return Stats	Cowboys		Broncos
	Stat	Rk	Stat	Rk
Kick Returns	11	13	5	32
Kick Return Yds	256	18	88	32
Kick Returns for TD	0	8	0	9
Punt Returns	7	14	8	10
Punt Return Yds	65	12	48	17
Punt Returns for TD	0	6	0	7
Avg Returns Stats Rank	11.8		17.8

Kicking Stats	Cowboys		Broncos
	Stat	Rk	Stat	Rk
Extra Points Made	9	5	5	22
Extra Points Pct.	9/9 100.0	5	5/5 100.0	22
Field Goals Made	5	11	7	4
Field Goal Pct.	5/6, 83.3	13	7/9, 77.8	4
FG 1-19	1/1, 100.0	1	0/0, 0	9
FG 20-29	2/2, 100.0	10	3/3, 100.0	6
FG 30-39	0/0, 0	28	1/3, 33.3	23
FG 40-49	1/2, 0	18	2/2, 0	5
FG 50+	1/1, 100.0	2	1/1, 100.0	3
Avg Kicking Stats Rank	15.5		16.3

RE: In the Ball Park

dcrespo7 — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:10:14 -0000

It can also be found in the comment section of the original post but decided to create a fanpost. What I was wondering was this, how is it Denver's accomplishments this early in the season is discredited whereas as teams such as the Chargers (ravaged by injury and hand picked to represent the AFC in the SB), Pittsburgh (defending SB Champs), Saints (scoring machine), Colts (veteran playoff team), Giants (veteran playoff team), and New England (veteran playoff team) seem to get a pass on their QBs passing prowess?

I guess the NFL is desperate for new heroes as the shadows of time hover P. Manning and T. Brady. The league has also made passing the ball so much easier so to compare achievements to past accomplishments just 8 years ago is slightly unfair. MSM understands that winning starts a the QB position and after the jump I include a response w/a little more detail regarding the running production of the six teams mentioned above and how Denver stacks against the vanity picks this early in the season.

Please note that you will not find any defensive stats or rankings as CBS.com was interested in a poll of the following QBs Brees, Rivers, Big Ben (easier to spell), E. Manning, P. Manning, and Brady. So enjoy the stats below and what the following teams have accomplished this early in the season. If anything, I think its an early indication of what teams worked on during the preseason and how well its worked.

********************************************************************************

Even more interesting are the following QBs are tops in League Passing Yards:
1 P. Rivers SD 688
2. D. Brees NO 669
3. P. Manning IND 604
4. T. Brady NE 594
5. E. Manning NYG 586
6. B. Roethlisberger Pit 584

Not to cut corners I’ll also include the running game’s production.
SD 44 carries 130 yds 65 avg 3 ypc 2 TD Rank-30th
NO 64 carries 290 yds 145 avg 4.5 ypc 2 TD Rank-8th
IND 42 carries 132 yds 66 avg 3.1 ypc 2 TD Rank-29th
NE 43 carries 156 yds 78 avg 3.6 ypc 1 TD Rank- 26th
NYG 57 carries 200 yds 100 avg 3.5 ypc NO TD Rank-22nd
PITT 45 carries 141 yds 70.5 avg 3.1 ypc 1 TD Rank-28th

The one team that stands out are the Saints but also the Giants as the only two teams to have broken 57 attempts. I excluded the top rushers simply because different teams utilize their personnel for their runs and I’m certain that a few QB scrambles add to the totals. On a side note, I expect the Colts rushing game to have better numbers as the season progress simply because their Monday showdown against Miami, the Colts only had the ball for 15 minutes to the Dolphins 45.

To see Denver’s run production in the top 12 (57 attempts 261yards 130.5 avg 4.6 ypc 2 TD) is clear that coaching have no intention of converting into a scheme that incorporates short passes to replace the run (Moreno looked good w/over 90 yds of total offense week 2).

What good would this be if I didn’t include overall statistics of the offense right?
Team YDS YPG PTS PTS/GM (Yards are total of pass and run)
(1) Saints 936 468.0 93 46.5
(5) Chargers 791 395.5 50 25.0
(6) Giants 778 389.0 56 28.0
(9) Patriots 740 370.0 34 17.0
(12) Colts 721 360.5 41 20.5
(16) Steelers 665 332.5 27 13.5

Giants and Saints are two of the teams w/a minimum of 57 rushing attempts from the list of top 6 passing yardage according to the poll. W/out considering defense performance, I’d say these two teams may be fighting for that SB slot to represent the NFC.

Now what good what I be not to include:
(8) Broncos 751total yards 375.5 ypg 39 TPS 19.5 PPG

This is w/a passing offense ironing out a few kinks and will only get better. Personally, I rather have Orton and the Broncos under the radar. We’ve had enough national media attention for one year.

********************************************************************************

Now what good what I be not to include:
(8) Broncos 751total yards 375.5 ypg 39 TPS 19.5 PPG

MSM for what it's worth

dcrespo7 — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:30:32 -0000

Mike Shanahan fired. Jay Cutler traded. Brandon Marshall requests trade. Knownshon Moreno still holding out. These were just the many story lines coming out of Denver. What did it mean? Well the truth is, nothing. These are events that happened but by no means did it effect the current regime's staff in their operations. What does concern me however is the amount of coverage Denver received during compared to what national coverage was before those Super Bowl wins, 4th quarter comebacks and the pursuit for 2000 yds.

For the record, I reside in the NFC East's backyard of New Jersey (the metropolitan tri-state that includes NY and Conn.). Denver is by no means the NYG or NYJ. The Rockies are nothing like the Yankees or, thankfully, the Mets. What makes this corner of this country interesting is the amount of media required anything from professional sports to a group that enjoys bird watching.

What has disappointed me over the years, especially the new generation of journalism, is the sudden shift in paradigm. Before my time, the news was factual w/o bias or political sway. We all know that slogan, "knowledge is power" and the NFL has mastered "misinformation" better than the Cold War Operatives (especially during the draft). Now w/the internet and everyone misunderstanding the responsibilities of free speech, anyone can discuss anything. Whether its biased research to support or destroy credibility, establish facts for the common good, or good old fashioned gossip. My friends, I present to you the age of gossip.

Whether its Twitter, blogs, or just drunken spewing of opinion no one pays attention anymore. We only care about what interests us (sorta like that film "The Thawed"). You see, no one loves our Broncos like us Bronco fans. We have grown attached to mini celebrities and lost our way. You see Denver has gone through a tremendous transformation and though we're currently 2-0, MSM only sees us for what they do know. We know the stats regarding this team after John Elway had retired. That is the standard. At least until Bowlen did the unthinkable.

Please understand that two weeks into the season is nothing in comparison to what lays ahead but I agree, where are the pats on our backs? Where is that "wow, they did turn it around"? MSM doesn't owe the city of Denver or its fan anything because the media has always taken ordinary athletes and made them into something bigger. In a matter of media nanoseconds (much faster than anything the science community can calculate), they also tear down the very ordinary athletes into something far less ordinary. Almost shameful to consider our equal as human beings.

Maybe that last paragraph is a bit extreme and dramatic but that is my point. Whether its FOX Sports, ESPN, SI.COM, or any other channel responsible for our news, there main concern is to report the news that provides the most shock. We all know how boring reporting the news are if there is no controversy and w/that I accept all that is right and wrong w/MSM and the relationship w/the Broncos.

So this week we'll see our first divisional matchup against our hated Raiders. We've been following our team and the crew on this website have given me insight 250 yrs worth of Guinness would never enlighten me. The Claytons (who I do respect) and Dukes of the world are a necessary evil because everyone needs to be motivated. Whether its by the coaches, fan base or the media. It just so happens Denver has the trifecta and it won't end this year. That bar is awfully high people, don't forget it that w/greatness comes great responsibility and patience.

For the record, 24-10 Denver!

1st of Four Quarters

dcrespo7 — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:55:38 -0000

Just like a football game, I see the season in 4 Quarters. The first quarter usually has a team trying to establish themselves w/o showing too much to gauge the defense. The second quarter we have an idea what we do well and exploit what has not been working for the defense. Halftime is where the adjustments are made. Whether its lack of focus in penalty department or dropped passes, adjustments are made that either put players in position to be successful or put the team in a position continue developing. 3rd quarter is where the adjustments are paying dividends and adding to what has been working from the first two quarters. 4th quarter aka the grind. Its here where we learn about our football team. Do we have the mettle to fight for a first down, add to the lead or pull as last drive victory. To me, the season isn't any different and normally reserve my thoughts in that manner and I'll do my best to explain after the jump.

The NFL season to me are 4 quarters of a 16 games schedule (17 weeks w/a bye). The first 4 games of the season is the first quarter. Its here where we start to learn how to play winning football. Find our strengths and build from that while working on weaknesses so that it doesn't become a bigger issue. If Denver can manage a 4-0 start, good times indeed.
wk 1: Cincy 12-7 WIN
wk 2: Cleveland 27-6 WIN
wk 3: Oakland (Strength: Run Game and Pass Defense -- Weakness: Inconsistent QB Play and Run Defense)
wk 4: Dallas (Strength: Balanced Offense and Pass Rush -- Weakness: QB protection and Pass Defense)

The 2nd quarter is where every team will have enough film to game plan effectively. We'll know what our strengths are after a month of competition as will the entire NFL. Factor in the injuries and we'll be able to see the true value of our depth. This is where teams start to establish their identity w/in their division and maybe pull away early if health and execution fall together.

wk 5: Patriots (Strength: Balanced Offense and Special Teams -- Weakness: OL play and LB depth)
wk 6: Chargers (Strength: Passing Offense and Special Teams -- Weakness: Running game and Pass Defense)
wk 7: Bye (Retired for John Elway and Round of Guinness for the faithful Orange and Blue)
wk 8: Ravens (Strength: Balanced Offense and Run Defense -- Weakness: Special Teams and Pass Defense)
wk 9: Steelers (Strength: Passing Offense and Blitz -- Weakness: Running game and Pass Defense)

The 3rd quarter are where the challenges present themselves for every team. Its at this point where the identity of a team is well understood. Preparation is monumental as every player will have a larger role as playoffs are just a month away. Injuries, game plan, and scheme will start to become consistent (an example would be that our starting RB will have 20 touches and 85+ yds, QB will throw 20-25 passes). The consistency to do the things well and often while minimizing the weaknesses that are crucial at this point into the season as the games are few and invaluable.

wk 10: Redskins (Strength: Running Game and Run Defense -- Weakness: Inconsistent offense and Pass Defense)
wk 11: Chargers (as above)
wk 12: Giants (Strength: Running game and Pass rush -- Weakness: Passing game and Pass defense)
wk 13: Chiefs (Strength: Passing game and Rush defense -- Weakness: OL depth/play and Pass defense)

The 4th quarter. Just like a real game, either you're in it to win it or just waiting for 00:00. The season is no different. You're playoff opportunity is either right in front of you or thoughts of draft position start to fill the fan base. Not going to the playoffs? As I spoke about the 2 quarter, you still want to maintain that sense of identity and this falls squarely on the coaching staff. To build for the following game (or in this analogy of mine, next season) you must continue to compete but in the end its about continuity.

wk 14: Colts (Strength: QB and Pass Defense -- Weakness: Run game and Run defense)
wk 15: Raiders (as above)
wk 16: Eagles (Strength: QB and Run Defense -- Weakness: Run game and Pass Defense)
wk 17: Chiefs (as above)

Now I added what I feel are the strengths and weakness of our competition this season as of week 2. Please take note that w/in every quarter health, player development, scheme and execution will either improve or take a dip as two teams normally attempt to impose their will, their identity. As of right now, our strength is the OL play and Rush defense and our weakness QB/WR play and Special Teams.

By no means am I discrediting what has been accomplished (I can imagine a few readers running off and assuming I'm spitting in the kool aid) just that in our first quarter of season play, we're still figuring out our offense while getting healthy at the QB position. Combine the talent of WR and the learning curve between the two positions and we'll find a drop off what most fans have grown accustomed to in the past regarding QB and WR.

The rush defense of Denver hasn't been challenged consistently but that Cincy game was definitely a tell tale sign of what to expect if teams such as Dallas, Redskins, Ravens, Steelers, Giants and Raiders commit to the run to offset our strengths.

Again, Denver has been doing great and will only get better while absorbing a few steps backs in areas they're normally consistent. I hope my view of how I perceive the season enlightens a few while calming the "sky is falling" group.

Marshall's Worth

dcrespo7 — Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:19:48 -0000

First let me state how I love this website. Regardless if I agree or disagree with some of the posts, I have an arena where I can share insight, ideas and discuss Bronco football. With all that being said, I like to share my opinion on Brandon Marshall's worth.

His body of work in his three years as a Bronco.

Season	Team			Receiving					Rushing					Fumbles
Season	Team	G	GS	Rec	Yds	Avg	Lng	TD	Att	Yds	Avg	Lng	TD	FUM	Lost
2008	Denver Broncos	15	15	104	1,265	12.2	47	6	2	-4	-2.0	7	0	4	3
2007	Denver Broncos	16	16	102	1,325	13.0	68T	7	5	57	11.4	24	0	3	1
2006	Denver Broncos	15	1	20	309	15.5	71T	2	2	12	6.0	6	0	1	0
TOTAL				226	2,899	12.8	71	15	9	65	7.2	24	0	8	4

Very impressive indeed but I find a few things troubling. Now in an interview from a few months back, Marshall had admitted that he had issues staying focused during the course of last year. This was tough for me to understand let alone comprehend because he was playing in his third season meanwhile rookie Eddie Royal fooled the entire NFL as he performed beyond all expectations. I bring this up because I don't believe Marshall will be successful in just any scheme (not sure what system was run in Central Florida where he played).

In order for Denver to truly get full value for Marshall, he'd best be suited to stay within a West Coast Offensive scheme where only the terminology and minor details will be required of him while the fundamentals are still in place. This excludes the Giants, Jets and Titans as potential trade partners. I think teams such as the Eagles (don't need WR), Texans (no need), Packers (no need) and Vikings (no need-unless Farve needs) would be ideal locations.

Brandon Marshall's stats could be better in my honest opinion. CBs figured out a habitual pattern from Marshall, normally after a catch he takes a step back as if he's anticipating the CB to over pursue. What defenses started to do was simply wait for this signature move and then converge. I don't know about the rest of the community here but if you catch 100+ passes I'd expect 10+ touchdowns. I like to think that for every ten passes caught one should result in a touchdown.

Now what is Marshall's worth? First player that comes to mind is Roy Williams of the Dallas Cowboys who has caught a total of 281 passes and 30 touchdowns (1td per 10 catch formula). I don't think both players are similar in performance or style but what Dallas paid Detroit for Williams' service are what interest me.

The proposal. This year's 1st and 3rd and next year's 3rd. The second 3rd can go up to a 2nd round selection in the event Marshall leads the team/league (can be negotiated between clubs) in yardage/reception/touchdowns or all. If Brandon Marshall leads the team to either a Super Bowl or selected as NFL MvP, it would then change to a 1st rounder selection. This is clearly a means of ensuring Marshall what Denver's evaluation would be of his talent combined with his potential given his short body of work in the NFL. I also think its fair to say that if the deal falls apart, the agent will know that it was a fair approach on Denver's side to accommodate Marshall's attempt at a trade.

In closing I'm disappointed in Brandon's approach heading into this off season after Shanahan was replaced by McDaniels and Jay Cutler traded back in June 2nd. I understand that management will employ an atmosphere, culture of selfless athletes striving for greatness through healthy, tough competition. Marshall is not prepared for this regime or the expectations that most on the team have already committed too. I also like to thank Bena's article for the inspiration to share this opinion. I for one believe, if not know, that Marshall had quit on Denver it just wasn't apparent to all because of the trial looming.

Has Brandon Marshall quit on the Broncos?

His body of work in his three years as a Bronco.

Season	Team			Receiving					Rushing					Fumbles
Season	Team	G	GS	Rec	Yds	Avg	Lng	TD	Att	Yds	Avg	Lng	TD	FUM	Lost
2008	Denver Broncos	15	15	104	1,265	12.2	47	6	2	-4	-2.0	7	0	4	3
2007	Denver Broncos	16	16	102	1,325	13.0	68T	7	5	57	11.4	24	0	3	1
2006	Denver Broncos	15	1	20	309	15.5	71T	2	2	12	6.0	6	0	1	0
TOTAL				226	2,899	12.8	71	15	9	65	7.2	24	0	8	4

Has Brandon Marshall quit on the Broncos?

Poll

Can Brandon Marshall be as productive outside of the West Coast Offense?

A. Yes, 80+ catches 8-12 touchdowns.

36 votes

B. No, 65+ catches 4-8 touchdowns.

30 votes

Opinion followed in comments.

1 votes

67 votes | Poll has closed

Get to Know Orton

dcrespo7 — Fri, 07 Aug 2009 12:24:11 -0000

I wanted to do something to showcase who Kyle Orton is outside the usual public relations remarks whenever asked about football related issues. You know them well, "how do you feel about your performance today" or "now that you're in Denver, how are the fans". Well, my Itunes has Denver's season from 2006-2008 and enjoyed watching the team's highlights. To my disappointment, it was moreso the Jay Cutler show. Then I started to think, Kyle Orton has to have his own clip of plays made so I search youtube!

To my disappointment not much for Orton but here is an interview w/Orton and it gives me an insight of the person he is. Resourceful. Conservative. Big fan of the Beatles. Explains the purpose of his "neck beard". Enjoy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXTNeqVvFKw&feature=related

SBNation.com User Blog: dcrespo7

Wallace or Revis

Who do you make a push for?

Darrell Revis

Mike Wallace

Work the draft

Other - Post Below

Heir Apparent to Champ Bailey

Congrats

An Objective Attempt

Denver 31 Pats 21

Is 2nd Round that important?

Spread-ing History

My Trip To Buffalo

Ok, I give up.

Denial followed by Acceptance

Football and its loyalties

Leadership vs Masses

Maybe We're Not As Good

Excited About the Future

The Calm Before The Storm

The Blame Game

Teaching and Patience

Tim Tebow?

Demarius Thomas

Cutler Haters

2010 and Beyond

2009 Denver and the skeletons in the closet

Monday Menu

Comeback wins

Broncos vs Cowboys (Pretender Bowl?)

RE: In the Ball Park

MSM for what it's worth

1st of Four Quarters

Marshall's Worth

Has Brandon Marshall quit on the Broncos?

Has Brandon Marshall quit on the Broncos?

Can Brandon Marshall be as productive outside of the West Coast Offense?

A. Yes, 80+ catches 8-12 touchdowns.

B. No, 65+ catches 4-8 touchdowns.

Opinion followed in comments.

Get to Know Orton