SB Nation User Blog: elijahdukes

About Halladay and Team Ownership...

elijahdukes — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 02:48:17 -0000

The prospect of picking up Halladay for only one "rental" season sounds unappealing, and most of his suitors are obviously going to attempt to sign him to some sort of meaningful extension. This would seem to not apply to the Rays, which according to DRB are looking at winning in 2010 with Doc in the rotation. We couldn't offer him a reasonable extension compared to what he could be making, as the saying goes, but what if we made an unprecedented offer of partial team ownership along with a fair (but team-friendly) salary? Doc lives in the TB area and he has made it clear that he prefers training in FL, so he probably likes to play in Florida. Team ownership would incentivize performance and make a big splash, not to mention that if Doc is successful over a 4 year period, for example, he would receive a sizeable return on investment - right now, attendance can pretty much only improve, and with Doc we'd be looking at a cost-controlled rotation of Halladay/Shields/Niemann/Price/Davis or Hellickson, with depth in the minors to spare. If Doc would agree to a 3-year + option extension for say, $35 million, plus some ownership, why not?

Trade Idea for the Offseason

elijahdukes — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 07:09:14 -0000

The Rays are running into the problem this offseason of an excess of (arguably) major-league caliber players. All the talk of Iwamura's option, our great infield depth (Brignac and Rodriguez), Desmond Jennings, and other such nonsense has the Rays in a unique position to perhaps deal some of its players/prospects. At the same time, we could still use a true 3+ WAR RF option, and I think I've found the perfect match: one of the league's most underrated players (and one of my favorite), Indians RF Shin-Soo Choo. This year he has been worth 4.3 WAR providing an excellent bat and league-average fielding. The Indians are undeniably rebuilding, and one of our pitching prospects (Wade Davis, Jeremy Hellickson, Jeff Niemann even, dare I say David Price?), Aki, and one of our position players/prospects may be enough to get the deal done. If we can deal CC for something big (a couple big time prospects, for example), we could seriously cut our payroll next year and provide a true Playoff-caliber team. I envision:

1B Pena
2B Zobrist/Aybar/Brignac
3B Longoria
SS Bartlett/Brignac
LF Deej
CF Beej
RF Choo Choo
C Hopefully somebody awesome and cheap we trade CC for
DH Pat Burrell I guess.

Imagine the haul we'll get for CC - we'll miss the defense, no doubt, but Deej figures to be a pretty good defensive LF and a great offensive LF, in the same vein of Carl. If we can net a ML ready catcher and a good SP prospect for Carl, I think we pull the trigger. We'll be looking at a great team next year and even without one of Davis, Hellickson, Price, and Niemann, I think our rotation and depth are pretty solid:

SP Shields
SP Garza
SP Price
SP Niemann
SP Hellickson

for example.

What are your thoughts?

Run Variance and the 2009 Rays First Half, Part 1

elijahdukes — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:15:44 -0000

One of the perplexing things about the first half of the 2009 season for the Rays has been the run differential, which is seemingly indicative of a great performance but not necessarily reflected in the W-L record for the Rays.

A potential source of the discrepancy between expected W-L and actual W-L is found in bad luck, which the Rays have been party to this year. This includes performance in close "1-run" games, high leverage situations ("runners in scoring position") and other such areas of chance.

Another source, however, may be found in the Rays run variance. The Rays have experienced the following:

Runs scored per game (standard deviation): 5.35 (3.56)
Runs allowed per game (standard deviation): 4.49 (2.84)

Runs scored per win (standard deviation): 7.40 (3.31)
Runs allowed per win (standard deviation): 2.84 (2.00)

Runs scored per loss (standard deviation): 2.95 (2.04)
Runs allowed per loss (standard deviation): 6.12 (2.82)

We have exhibited a pretty high level of variance in runs scored. In fact, the RS standard deviation represents more than 1/2 of the mean, which means that we'll observe rather useless results like: about 68% of the time, we score between 1.79 and 8.91 runs. Wow! So we're scoring between about 2 and 9 runs per game most of the time. Even if we try to squeeze the interval, it's very tough - the standard deviation (and therefore variance) in runs scored is ridiculously high, especially in our wins. So, that would help to explain some of the seeming discrepancy in our run differential.

Ideally, we'd like to score as many runs as possible, but additionally, we'd like to be consistent - that is, we want to capture a reasonable 68% or 95% interval for our RS. For example, between a team that scores 4.5 RPG with a .5 SD and a team that scores 5.5 RPG with a 3.0 SD, which would you pick? Tricky question: The 68% interval (1 SD) for the first team captured 4.0 - 5.0 RPG, while the 68% interval for the second captures 2.5 - 8.5 RPG. Which is more valuable? More than likely the first, as teams are pretty close to "as likely to win" with 5 runs as they are with 8, but much disadvantaged when they score 2.5 or 3 runs as opposed to 4.

via i29.tinypic.com

In the next part, I will examine how the Rays stack up to the other teams in the major leagues in terms of run variance and try to reconcile our run differential with the results. After taking a preliminary look at the numbers, it appears that the Rays are by and far in the lead in terms of runs scored variance.

Kazmir Closing?

elijahdukes — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 04:15:53 -0000

Just want to know how you guys feel about the prospect of Kazmir in the pen as a closer or high-leverage type guy if he continues to struggle with injury/inefficiency/mechanics/crowd size/breaking pitches/location/umpires who call poor strike zones/too many Hot Cheese Fries the night before? Do you think it is possible that the Rays would consider a move to the pen for Kaz if he continues to simply struggle, or do you think they will move hiim to the DL? Do you think Kaz would even make sense in the pen, considering he is not generally good or on point in the 1st ever? Do you think Kaz smokes blunts or vaporizes or hits a Zong/Rowr or sticks to j's? WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN TO KAZMIR??? How would you feel about the Kaz-pen for the playoffs: Kazmir CL, Balfour SU, Howell SU, Nelson MR, Shouse LOOGY , Davis MR, and Sonnanstine (LR)? And the Kaz-less playoff rotation? Shields, Garza, Price, Niemann?'

btw before you all blast me: This is not my idea. I saw it on an MLBTR post and I was instantly intrigued. I know the whole "bullpen pitches way fewer innings so saves way total fewer runs compared to replacement" argument and that's obviously true - I'm suggesting that if Kaz continues to have control, efficiency, and other struggles as a starter. would a move to the pen help?

Just throwing it out there.

Can the Rays afford to keep BJ, David Price, et al?

elijahdukes — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 02:23:54 -0000

Arguably, the main reason that the Rays were able to contend in 2008 was the presence of acquired and drafted pre-arbitration talent. ALCS MVP? Matt Garza (2.9 wins). OBP leader? Bossman Junior (4.6 wins). Future ace? David Price (not that many wins in 2008 but he did save Game 7 of the ALCS, throw me a bone here). Innings eater? Andy Sonnanstine (3.6 wins). All of these players combined earned less than Carl Pavano in 2008, yet contributed almost 12 wins above replacement to the team. The problem is that many of these players will soon be due for arbitration, and barring any poor performances (another issue in itself), they will be due for some pretty big raises. BJ has already indicated his preference to go "year-to-year" in arbitration, seeking top dollar for his talents. Sonnanstine and Garza are both up for arbitration after this season and will certainly both look for significant raises. Friedman has indicated in his tenure his preference to sign these young stars to below-market, long-term deals that are generally seen as "Club Friendly" (see: Evan Longoria, Jamie Shields, Willy Aybar, Scott Kazmir) in order to control costs. The problem is that a player of Upton's caliber could command anywhere from $3 to $8+ million in his FIRST year of arbitration, and if BJ posts a 20/20 (or even 30/30) season with a 900+ OPS, he will look for Ryan Howard money.

I just don't see how the Rays will be able to afford Bossman, Garza, Sonnanstine, Price, and several others through the arbitration process. Philly saw a massive increase in payroll this offseason with few additions to the team thanks to the arbitration process, limiting their flexibility in free agency to the point that they couldn't cough up the change to sign an established set-up type like Will Ohman. I don't think Sternberg and company can afford such cost uncertainty, especially in this economic climate.

The Marlins faced similar issues after their WS wins and chose to deal with the issue by dealing away their arb-eligible stars for younger, cheaper talent. The question is the return - will front offices continue to pay big in prospects for arb-eligible guys who command higher, near market-value contracts? I don't think so, and the Rays may face a problem in this area.

To make it simple: trade value is a function of many things, but the four most important factors are cost, production, length of control, and need. Theoretically, at the moment of signing, a free agent carries "0" trade value if he signs with the highest-offering team because he is playing for what he is worth on the market. Conversely, young players signed to team-friendly contracts (Evan and James) are highly valuable because they produce, they are under control for a long time and below market value, and they are on the upswing of their careers.

I would like to see what you guys think will happen to the pre-arb and arb-eligible players: BJ, Garza, Sonnanstine, Price, Bartlett, etc. I, for one, do not think that the Rays will be willing to go year-to-year with high-production guys like BJ and (hopefully) Price. It's therefore my prediction that Sonnanstine will be traded after the end of this year (when he is up for arbitration) and replaced with Davis or Niemann in the rotation. Similarly, I think that BJ will eventually find himself in a new uniform in return for some good hitting prospects and depth in our system.

(By the way, I am still working on the discrete differential simulation project I was talking about earlier. I'm finishing the programming part of it, which I will probably end up posting here in about a couple of days, but I still need a little help with the data side. In particular, I need to be able to produce a "PA log" of the player, meaning all of his PA's from his very first appearance numbered and tied to a specific outcome - 1B, 2B, 3B, HR, BB, SOS, SOL, GO, FO, etc. I asked a little earlier about this and got some help but I'm still looking for a good source of downloadable player data that would include this type of information, specifically the SOS/SOL and GO/FO outcomes. A lot of the data sources only include "out" and "strikeout" as out types rather than breaking them down in this way, so that would be helpful if anyone can give me a link or a tip. Or, if you know of a good way to export game logs/download game logs, specifically in the PA-outcome format, please let me know.)

Projection system / Need some help!

elijahdukes — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:12:57 -0000

First, my help request: WHERE can i find data logs or game logs for players for the past few seasons? The simulation needs to know specific AB results, as in not just 24 HR and 110 RBI, but as in AB 145 was a strikeout looking. Let me know where I Can find this stuff.

Hey, so I am working on developing a simulation in C++ that will model a player (position or pitcher) season by AB in the following way:

Initial outcome space: (AB=0)

Determined by 1/4 weight to past 5 AB, 1/4 weight to first 10 AB last season, 1/2 weight to career line

Use outcome space to form initial outcome (random function with weights for all outcomes)

First step (AB=1)

d(outcome)/d(AB) = 1/4 * prob(past 5 outcomes, including AB=1 and four from the previous season) + 1/4 * prob(outcomes within +/- 10 AB of the same numbered AB last season) + 1/4 * prob(average of last two seasons) + 1/4 prob(career line)

Outcome space (AB=1)

add all the d/dAB's to the outcome probabilities. This should be approximately 0 for most outcomes, except for the outcome that just happened in AB=1. Note that d/dAB doesn't ever decrease for any outcome, but rather, simply increases for some outcomes more than others. This is what creates the secondary effects that make the simulation fun.

Second step (AB=2)

Determined by outcome space, probabilistically

d(outcome)/d(AB) changes in the same way, including AB=1 and AB=2

Iterate for as many AB's as you would like.

Do the same for pitchers, but obviously reverse the outcome space.

Obviously, the weights and choices of games are totally arbitrary at this point, but I'm going to develop it this way first in order to get some results and publish the program here in a day or two. If there are any experienced C++ guys or data miners, PLEASE let me know!!!!

Stephen Strasburg and Rookie Contracts

elijahdukes — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 03:13:57 -0000

Hey all,

First of all I was really thrilled by some of the responses to my last post about differential basbeall analysis. I am doing some of the math behind the project right now (I unfortunately had no takers in helping me on the stats/data mining side), and I am already seeing some very interesting results about the real, negative value of "ground ball" hitters as well as guys without patience. One of the interesting consequences of differentials is the existence of many secondary effects, and GB hitters as well as those who don't see too many pitches have a very real and negative type of secondary effect that I will be measuring. Hint: in this system, Bartlett is a very, very poor hitter for your team, not individually.

Second of all, I wanted to ask everyone's opinion about Stephen Strasburg, the rookie phenom who is apparently the next coming of everyone from Barry Sanders to Carey Price and everything in between. His agent, venerable Scott Boras, is reportedly seeking a $50 MM deal for Strasburg's rookie contract.

Strasburg is clearly the best available player in the draft. He throws in the high 90's, sometimes topping 100, doesn't walk many people, and seems to have at least three major-league quality pitches already. One scout (probably a cronie of Mr. Boras) has hyped that Strasburg is already a better pitcher than AJ Burnett, a claim I find pretty ridiculous given Strasburg's zero pro ball experience.

The Nationals, thanks to winning fewer than 60 games last season, have the distinct advantage of picking first this year, and Strasburg should be a no-brainer. Except the kid (Boras) wants a $50 MM deal with a $10 MM signing bonus included. This is more money than we committed to Pat Burrell, a proven (if defensively inept) major league hitter who is expected to provide an impact bat to the offense. Washington really has its hands tied here: the financial committment to Strasburg, however large it may be, will probably tie its hands over the next few seasons. Who's to say Strasburg doesn't crash and burn at the major league level, or at least not produce up to expectations for a season or two. For $50 MM, you can get three years of Derek Lowe consistency or two years of the best right-handed hitter in baseball. For $50 MM, you should be getting a sure thing. And, financially-strapped, small-market teams (which are more likely to receive high draft picks due to smaller budgets) are now being put in a position where they may not be able to select the best overall available player because the player is willing to sit out.

Don't get me wrong here - I'm a big believer in the free market, and I think that the draft may not really even be the best or most fair way to get rookie players to teams. I'm totally against a salary cap in baseball (or any organized sport) and I like to see market-setting behavior from teams such as the Yankees and Dodgers, who basically determine player prices after acquiring top-line talent. The problem is, without any way of controlling rookie salary demands, struggling organizations such as Washington will not be able to select the best overall player, and if they choose to do so, they risk not being able to sign him to an earthly deal. This is a problem going on in many sports, including the NFL.

The NHL caps rookie contracts. I don't think this is the right approach. But, players who declare for the draft should be signable at a modest rate, no matter what kind of potential or current skills the players may possess. If the player is truly spectacular, he will make money through the arbitration process in as soon as two years. He could be commanding Ryan Howard money if he is successful, and then the Nationals will be even more strapped for cash. At least if he is signed, however, he is tradeable, and they can move him before arbitration kicks in.

What should baseball do? Here's my suggestion: Create an "opt-in" system. What mean by this is that baseball should force rookies to declare whether or not they will go to and agree by an arbitration hearing should they not sign a contract with a willing team. If the player opts in, he and/or the team can request arbitration, and the two parties must agree to abide and sign by the arbitor's decision. If a player opts in, he is eligible for arbitration as a "Super Two."

If the player chooses not to opt-in, he can still declare for the draft but his status will be noted as such and he will not be eligible for arbitration until after his third year, no matter how he performs the first three.

I don't know if the players' union will go for this (most likely not) but it could easily be tied into other changes in the arbitration and compensation system that make equal or better concessions for veteran players and other such nonsense. The point is that by forcing an arbitration hearing, the team knows that cost control won't be so much of an issue (it will be hard for any agent, including Boras himself, to convince an arbitor that his rookie should receive a $50 MM deal before ever playing a single day in the majors).

That's just my two cents. Let me know what your suggestions are!

Differential Baseball Analysis

elijahdukes — Thu, 19 Mar 2009 02:20:00 -0000

So I'm probably not running across anything too groundbreaking right here, but I think I'll give it a whirl none the less: baseball is a game that lends itself to statistical analysis, and rightfully so - the large game/PA sample size leads to statistically relevant, significant, and noticable differences between players at every position. The problem with traditional baseball statistics, however, is consistency: a team may get "hot" at the right or wrong times, hit like crazy and pitch lights out, and all of the sudden seemingly collapse at the end of the season or during a long losing streak. Losing, hitting, and hitless streaks are quite statistically improbable. For example, consider a .300 hitter going on a 10 AB hitless streak - the probability of that event is 0.700^10, which is about 2.8%. This happens quite frequently in baseball, seemingly more often than the numbers would seem to suggest.

That is because of a simple principle: prior performance is the best indicator of future success. This seems to be true in both the short and long runs, and how you can you deny the logic? A pitcher who has performed well recently will probably continue to perform well, and a pitcher who has given up home runs, walks, and hits like nobody's business will probably continue to do so. At the same time, some hitters are rather "streaky" (or are considered that way, at least) and tend to hit better in one portion of the season, hit at a high clip for short periods of time, or reach hitless streaks that make Andruw Jones and Jason Varitek cry. In economics, we say "averages are better than extremes," and so if starters A and B pitch to the tune of a 3.75 ERA, the one who is more consistent should be considered the better starter. That is, if starter A gives up 1-2 runs per start but never blows up, whereas starter B may pitch lights out but also gets nerve-rattled about 10 starts a year, you have two players with contrasting values. In economic terms, in terms of cost control, and in most cases in baseball, starter A is more valuable than starter B because he is more consistent and has less variation in earned runs per inning pitched.

So, going along with this general principle, what if we considered inter-seasonal statistical progressions and regressions using differential equations? In other words, what if we try to describe or predict the team runs scored / runs allowed in a particular outing strictly based on prior performance over the past three, four, or five outings as well as their general running seasonal averages? Would the result be useful and insightful, or a wasted exercise in mathematics? If we know that the Rays will be a "Summer" team and the Sox will be a "September" team in advance, because the pitchers and hitters seem to trend that way?

I think it would be really interesting to see this worked out and played out mathematically. It would be a tough differential system to figure, especially since there are so many players and it is difficult to verify with any kind of certainty which data should be ignored and which data should be examined. In the end, however, we should use prior game performance (again, in the small but statistically significant range) to see how streaks, consistency, and prior performance affect the standings and the statistics.

I am a math and economics major, if you can't tell, and I am willing to do all of the math behind this project. I'm sure it has been done before in some incarnation and it will be an exercise for math students in the future, but if you are a data miner and interested in working on an alternative analysis and getting your name out there, let me know and I will hook it up. Also, please give me any thoughts on this approach.

Pitching, Trade Value and BJ Upton

elijahdukes — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:28:17 -0000

Well, a lot of the posts and comments in the next couple of days are going to focus on the likes of Jeff Niemann and Jason Hammel, two Rays organization RHP who are out of options. Niemann has not had much time in the majors whereas Hammel has served time as both a starter and as a reliever, mediocre at best in both cases. We do have a jogjam at SP, but that doesn't mean we have to trade away either of those two guys for chump change. Hammel is a serviceble #5 type who will give you GB outs and an acceptable number of strikesouts at about 4.8-5.0 FIP. Niemann, on the other hand, is a projectible righty who has seen success, albeit not wild success, in all levels of the minor leagues. You have to be a little bit excited about Niemann, watching him throw from such a great arm slot and at that height. I believe he has #3 - #4 starter potential in the major leagues, and I think his upside is deecentl. Either way, we shouldn't have to DFA these guys, and really, everybody in baseball knows this. So, why trade away a valuable part of your farm system for a Jason Hammel type when you know he's going on waivers anyway?

This is a real problem for the Rays and one that they will need to find a creative way to solve. One way is to keep Hammel and Niemann on the 25-man roster, which is certainly a possibility given that David Price still has tons of options and only a few starts above the AAA level. In a good case scenario, Hammel works as a servicible reliever and Niemann gets to start from the #5 spot. Perhaps Joe will switch it around and spot-start Hammel for Niemann if necessary. I think this good-case scenario sees Hammel working around a 4.2 FIP clip in 23 innings and Niemann working around a 4.0 FIP clip over, say, 77 innings. If David Price is ready, by that time we will either have an injury on our own staff (cough Garza cough) and we very well may need the services of Price anyway. If Price strugles in AAA, we could see Davis or Talbot get a shot as well. But, even if we are lucky and healthy, somebody else in baseball will finally break down from roids or Cialis and the result will be a need for a good SP who is proven, young, strikes people out - Oh wait, maybe that will be Jeff Niemann! With his slider and his frame, you have to like his chances as a good starter in the majors. Hammel could also be trade bait - I don't think he mentally understands the game well enough to ever succeed in any role.. He is a thrower, not a pitcher.

But, let's say (and God forbid this happens) that Niemann absolutely dominates and the rest of the rotation is solid. Now, we have a great trade chip (and believe me, Niemann has the stuff to get lucky and go on a 5 game, 2 ER or less streak because he can bring it) and you know some idiot GM is going to overvalue Niemann and trade for him. Then we can pick up an offensive piece that we need, such as a true long-term solution at RF, C (I'm not a Navi fan), 1B after Pena, SS, or maybe some low-level prospects. EIther way, we'll get some value for a guy who really didn't have enough innings to prove himself.

Finally, the worst-case scenario:: Hammel and/or NIemann blow. This is possible and with Hammel it may be probable. Hammel is a bit too hittable for the major leagues and Niemann can get ahead of himself on the mound sometimes, so they dould hvae poor years. So what? We trade them for nothing, use them as mop-up guys, or DFA them - chances are that if Hammel was DFA'ed at that point, nobody would pick him uo, Niemann, on the other hand, would be history.

Now, what about Price? Yes, I've met the guy in person, and I'll just say that if you know what 420 means then he's chill as fuck. But anyway, he told me that he didn't expect to make it out of camp this year no matter what, that Andrew Friedman explained to him that "even though you are clearly the be option at the 5 to win games now, you are not the best option there to win the most total games for us in the next six years." In other words, it hurts the team and Price when they lose trade value just because guys happen to be out of options. Price also does need work on his changeup; I've seen it in person, it is an elite-lvel high-school quality pitch. It will be crushed by the Pujols and the Ramirezes of the world.

Finally, here's my rant about trade value. People always pose stupid ass questions on ESPN like "Would you trade Albert Pujols for ARod?" or "Would you rather have Evan Longoria or Chipper Jones?" that in terms of actual baseball business have no meanings. Let me give everybody here who doesn't know (or maybe isn't clear) an idea of what trade value is:

Trade Value = Projected value wins (in dollars) over time of control - Cost over entire time of control.

For example, A-Rod has very limited trade value. Many (including myself) would say that A-Rod has a negative trade value, and that is because the market for players and the value of wins is declining as the economy tanks. So, if you thought that a win was worth, say, $8 million dollars, you may pay A-Rod $300 million over 10 yearsif you expect to break even at 37.5 wins, or a 3.75 win-per-year clip, which is reasonable but certainly not earth-shattering. On the other hand, given all of the negative publicity on the A-Rod divorce, contract, steroids, Jeter, etc., his trade value is actually most likely NEGATIVE right now. Think of it as an investment. Maybe you bought Microsoft when it was worth $100 a share, then it dips to $75 a share. Either way, it's YOUR liability and thus nobody really wants A-Rod at that rate and for that period of time.

On the other hand, players who are still in pre-arbitration years are pretty valuable considering you can basically dictate their salaries to them like Mousillini to the Italians for the first three (or ocasionally, two) years of their MLB existance. So, these players have EXTREMELY HIGH VALUE

BJ Upton is soon going to be arbitration eligible and he is already indicating a preference for "year-to-year" negotiations. How will the Rays ownership afford the enormous price tag placed on him by the same committee that gave a poor defensive first baseman who struck out 200 times multiple seasons $8 million in his first year of arb? Point is, if BJ has the 300/400/550 season with 30+ SB that we all know he is perfectly capable of doing, we're looking at a guy who may want $10 M in first year arb! Let's not even talk about 2nd and 3rd arb, because that's just nasty.

So, if he has that monster season, look for the Rays to trade him after the season. I know, I love BJ and he is a great asset to this team, but he's pricey! He would command an enormous return in ML-ready talent and good lower level prospects to refill the Rays depleted system for 2012 and beyond, which is lacking that kind of hitting talent that a good system desperately needs. If we continue winning, our free agent spending and trade moves will become even more relveant as our draft position gets worse and worse. Let's say we get Taylor Teagarden, plus tons of good lower level prospects and/or Ian Kinsler, from the Texas Rangers for BJ. Here, we have a guy who will probably not have as great of numbers as from last year, but is a clear and present danger at the plate compared to our current catcher, We upgrade at a premium position this way but we do lose a + center fielder. Luckily, there are many great defensive fielders out there who can't hit and will play for the league minimum. Oh yeah! Navarro, right? What about him? We trade him away for help at short. My proposal: Navarro and Jake McGee for Troy Tut.

Thoughts?

WBC Live Game Day Thread

elijahdukes — Sat, 07 Mar 2009 11:27:32 -0000

Hey, so I was hoping there would be some people here watching the WBC, which I have found to be very entertaining so far. I know Korea is down pretty badly right now, 8-2, but their hitters seem to all have great fundamental approaches and some of them really do have the size and bat speed to make it in the majors. They have some SERIOUS pop too. Even though he gave up 8 ERs in 1l.1 IP, I was still impressed with the Korean lefty starter, who seemed to have pretty good stuff but suffered through some of the worst game calling I have ever seen by a catcher. I think Korea has the type of hitting (and on-base ) skills necessary to move on deep into the tourney. Of course, you have to like Japan here, because their team is stacked with great players such as Ichiro, Aki, Dice-K, Yu Darvish, and all the rest of them. It will be interesting to see how the rest of the game goes...