<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>SB Nation User Blog:  gmhyman</title>
    <link>http://www.sbnation.comhttp://www.sbnation.com/users/gmhyman</link>
    <description>Posts made by gmhyman on SB Nation</description>
    <item>
      <title>A's injuries
</title>
      <link>http://www.athleticsnation.com/2007/9/9/10462/07146</link>
      <author>gmhyman</author>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 14:54:07 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;For several years now, the A's have had more then their share of injuries - bad luck or bad practices?&lt;/p&gt;



  &lt;p&gt;We keep hearing (and believing) that the A's massive amount of injuries this year, and to a lesser degree the injuries in the previous years, are just &quot;bad luck&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Well, it sure looks to me like something else is wrong. &amp;nbsp;Rich Harden has never been right. &amp;nbsp;It turns out Eric Chavez has had a bad shoulder for 10 years! &amp;nbsp;Bobby Crosby never seems to get better. &amp;nbsp;Clearly some things work - Shannon Stewart and Frank Thomas had reps as &quot;brittle&quot; players, but, in fact, were clearly healthier here than in their previous stops.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But it's time to think about A's medical practices - just who are the team doctors, who does their conditioning planing, how the training staff works with the team, etc. &amp;nbsp;For me, the revelation that the home grown &quot;big hope&quot; - Chavez - hasn't really been right in 10 years was the last straw. &amp;nbsp;Note that his surgery was done by the Angels' team doctor, not the A's.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Billy Beane may be a genius at the &quot;value proposition&quot; - finding the undervalued player/skills, but he doesn't seem to value medical side. &amp;nbsp;Maybe the best place to spend more money would not be a right handed power hitter, which the A's obviously need, but better conditioning, injury diagnosis and treatment.&lt;/p&gt;


  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A modest proposal
</title>
      <link>http://www.athleticsnation.com/2006/11/9/235616/811</link>
      <author>gmhyman</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 04:56:16 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;What if the Raiders get kicked out of Oakland (OK, move to a great new stadium in say, Vacaville), and the A's get a new place?&lt;/p&gt;



  &lt;p&gt;Today's trend is that baseball teams, i.e. those that play essentially every day, 81 home games, play in urban areas, preferably downtown, and football teams who play 8 (actually 10 including exhibitions) home games play in the 'burbs. &amp;nbsp;See: Washington Redskins in Landover MD, NY Giants/Jets in Joisey, New England (nee Boston) Patriots in some goshawful suburb who's name I forget, etc. etc. &amp;nbsp;The only downtown football team is the Steelers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But - Baseball is a city game - St. Louis, SF Giants,&lt;br /&gt;
Red Sox, both Chicago teams, etc., etc. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So - why not move the Raiders to some 'burb - say Pleasonton (on the CC fairgrounds site) or Vacaville, or Fremont or just about anyplace else, build a nice football only 60k seat stadium, and tear down the colliseum and build a 35k or so baseball only park there - Good parking, good BART, etc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If need be, work out a deal so the A's share AT&amp;amp;T park for a year or 2 - the Yankees played in Shea while the Stadium got it's 70's rebuild (which, IMHO, ruined the place). &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This makes much more sense than either trying to share the colliseum - I think it's the last place that even tries to be both a football and baseball park, and much more sense than Fremont where they'll be 5+ miles from transit, with no parking.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kielty to Sac
</title>
      <link>http://www.athleticsnation.com/2006/4/2/191434/7122</link>
      <author>gmhyman</author>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 23:14:34 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;Bobby Kielty optioned to Sacramento.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A's optioned Bobby Kielty to the RiverCats so they could have a 12th pitcher in case of doubleheaders this week due to rainouts. &amp;nbsp;How can he still have options???&lt;/p&gt;



  &lt;p&gt;Bobby Kielty to the RiverCats??? &amp;nbsp;There's something wierd here. &amp;nbsp;As I understand it, once you're on the 40 man roster anywhere for 3 years, you're &quot;out of options&quot;, well at least as long as the 3 years start with your 4th year in pro ball, or something like that. &amp;nbsp;Best I can figure, Bobby K's been on a 40 man roster at least 5 years, possibly 6, and was in the minors for 3 year - either way, he's long since &quot;out of options&quot; so how can he be sent down.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not that I disagree with the choice - with the number of outfielders the A's have, he wasn't going to play much in the first few weeks anyway, and it's almost a certainty that opening night will be rained out - weather.com says the thunderstorms start at just about first pitch!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


  


      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
