<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>SB Nation User Blog:  greenman</title>
    <link>http://www.sbnation.com/users/greenman</link>
    <description>Posts made by greenman on SB Nation</description>
    <item>
      <title>Crybaby Oklahoma gets wins back
</title>
      <link>http://www.burntorangenation.com/2008/2/23/32431/5529</link>
      <author>greenman</author>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 08:41:44 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;I guess whining does get you somewhere. The NCAA reinstated OU's 8 wins from the 2005 season that were taken away because of Bomar and the dealership scandal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=3258745&quot;&gt;http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/s...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



  &lt;p&gt;So after an appeals process, Oklahoma isn't going to be punished by the NCAA for their infractions. Sure, they had &quot;self-imposed&quot; punishments, but come on NCAA committee guys, are you seriously gonna fall for that? Seems like they got off real easy on this one.&lt;/p&gt;


  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Colorado problems
</title>
      <link>http://www.burntorangenation.com/2007/6/22/9624/98189</link>
      <author>greenman</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:28:20 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;Bad news for Colorado. The school reported to the NCAA that over the last six years a number of meals at the university were undercharged to student atheletes, totaling $61,700.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/2007-06-21-colorado-sanction_N.htm&quot;&gt;http://www.usatoday.com/sports/colle...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



  &lt;p&gt;This is considered a &quot;major&quot; infraction by the NCAA, and Colorado will be put on two years probabtion, fined a hundred grand, and lose one football scholarship the next three seasons. I kinda feel bad for Dan Hawkins now, seeing as how this was going on long before he arrived, and he most likely had no idea this was going on.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Those training table meals are quoted as $14-15 dollars as well, which is a lot for a student to be spending consistently on a meal. I think UT's was somewhere around $10. Is it really a &quot;major&quot; infraction to be undercharging the atheletes overpriced meals? Especially since the university was doing it &quot;inadvertantly&quot; (I guess that is kinda an ambiguous term) and they reported it to the NCAA themselves. I guess what I'm asking is, does the punishment fit the crime here, and how much will the program suffer? I'm not too well versed on NCAA infractions.&lt;/p&gt;


  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Logo Lawsuit Article
</title>
      <link>http://www.burntorangenation.com/2007/1/23/114128/850</link>
      <author>greenman</author>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:41:28 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;Houston Chronicle article about the recent lawsuit between UT and that a&amp;amp;m clothing store.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/chronicle/4491417.html&quot;&gt;http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/chronicle/4491417.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;noteworthy quote: &quot;Mike Huddleston, Texas A&amp;M's vice president for business development, said Texas A&amp;M would likely have taken similar action if it faced the same scenario as UT.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;I'm just surprised it took them so long,&quot; Huddleston said.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;so yeah, from a legal standpoint, it does seem justified, but so is Huddleston's surprise at the fact that it took so long to get it out there.&lt;/p&gt;



  

  


      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
