
haverecords
Jul 05, 2008 Jun 01, 2012 18 2356
RSSUser Blog
In progress?
Thought I'd share a partially completed essayistic poem. Please forgive the inevitable pretension with any such thing.
Sound is important, but far less are meter and verse. As with all such things, I hope I haven't shot myself with the arrow into the wind, and been made fool by committing thought to word. It isn't finished, and I'm not sure I like it, but it is something enough to share.
10/21
the team that gets it.
And then doesn't.
But they do get you: this could be it
that WTF beyond the empirical--enigmatic, incomprehensible,
but radiant and very, real, magic.
'6damn2, 87, maybe '89, 199-damn 3, ^F@!UCK&*ING-game-six02 (add '03 on that, if you really need to count).
I could never be anything else; the colors imprint perception
itself; Memory made monad.
This year could be it. Maybe?
But I wonder; If such is what we are
what will be the team that does?
Is 'magic' simply sustained,
or must Torture itself be fought?
(and only from within)?
Torture is no marketing word;
Being a personification, a caption
from a great teacher. Minted,
this year; could this be it? Posey's recaptiulation?
Time. aeternitas temporis terminus
in habitus.
Nice Article on Cain and the Giants staff
I generally dislike Passan's articles, but this was nicely done, and worth checking out. Even nicer, it is about time Cain gets some national press.
For those of you worried about Bumgarner
from the BA prospect blog. A good reminder of why not to over react about the loss of velocity, while also retain concern about it.
Baggs strikes
I'm sure many of us have already seen this, but i'm just linking for those who haven't.
Bagg's imaginary conversation is pretty damn funny. enjoy.
And the Winner of the Crap Local Sports Article of the day is...
Mark Purdy of the merc.
First, he celebrates himself as a "one man non-clamorer" with regard to Manny in the offseason. Maybe only if he listens to Ralph and Damon Lame, but much of the internet community, and most of the Giants beat reporters were decidedly cool to the idea. Hmmm....a writer criticizing a player as being selfish while simultaneously exhibiting no little amount of hubris himself.....
And then, the logic is mostly crap. Manny's problem isn't so much being selfish as foolish. And then he goes on to provide an ignorantly speculative Intentional Fallacy in his second point (which still doesn't even make his point).
Thanks Mark Purdy. You could have written an interesting piece here on this great day of Dodger Failure. Instead, you provide a sterling example of one the reasons the newspapers are dying: for every good sports journalist (such as Baggs, Shulmann, Haft), there are those like you, an empty mouthpiece of whom a potential reader can ignore, and select any number of blogs, almost at random, that provide ten fold the insight you have.
Excellent Journal Entry by Broshuis
A very excellent entry in this generally excellent journal by Giants farmhand Garret Broshuis. He is currently in San Jose (after having been there a few years back), along with many of the Giants top prospects. Enjoy!
San Jose Giants at Stockton Ports, tonight.
The joint irritation of the Fox/Selig scam, and the giants's "offense", along with the chance to see some the little giants, has lead me to consider going to the game tonight. Late notice aside, Anyone else going, or thinking of doing so?
7:05 PM @ Banner Island Ballpark.
I may also go to one of the games next week, back at Muni in SJ. If anyone is going to any of those, let me know. I belive--though I could very well be wrong) that the last two against Lake Elsinore will be Alderson and Madbum starts.
Denker gone, WTF
I'm sure many of you have encountered this by now, but I've only seen Marcello's offhand mention of it, so far.
I just don't get it. It seems to me he would be worth a 40 man spot for next year: he's only 22, and it is possible (though not likely) that he might become half mediocre at defense. If not, they could always do this later. I'm not particularly high on Denker, but he isn't a throw away prospect, either. WTF.
I am now nervous about their middle infield plans, as they have also sent Ochoa packing. Not that I'll miss Ochoa much, but at least he can play both positions, and is not bocock bad at the plate. Does this mean they are trying to put Noonan on a rocket ship to the majors? Do they have strange FA machinations at SS (throwing the bank at oft injured furcal), having Burriss as backup SS and in the mix at 2b? Are we looking at Frandsen/Velez at 2b, and Burriss/ ?? at SS? And who on earth is going to be the backup SS, then? Dizzy as your rushed aaa/mlb 3B and 2B?
35 comments
|
3 recs |
Tweet
Draft Position Update (again)
Seattle 57 98 .368
Washington 58 98 .372
San Diego 61 95 .391
Pittsburgh 65 91 .417
.......................................
Baltimore 67 87 .435
Atlanta 69 87 .442
Kansas City 70 86 .449
San Francisco 70 86 .449
Colorado 71 85 .455
Detroit 71 83 .461
Cincinnati 72 83 .465
.........
Oakland 74 81 .477
With 6-7 games to go for most teams, this is where everyone sits. I draw the line after Pitt, since it is highly unlikely SF would match Pitt's record. It is also highly unlikely that the Giants would match Oakland. Thus we are looking at a range between 5th and 11th.
Baltimore has been playing wretchedly, so the 5th spot also seems out of reach. With the Giants having played well lately, and Lincecum set to make two more starts, it seems likely the Giants will end up between 9 and 11.
Draft Position Update (so far)
I figured it was a good time to post an update of the current standings, as far as draft position goes. Keep in mind that Washington will will have the 9th pick, and it is entirely possible that Hosmer and Alvarez will be available for this draft, with the 3rd pick being Pitt, and the 4th being KC.
Washington 56 90 .384
San Diego 57 90 .388
Seattle 57 88 .393
Pittsburgh 60 86 .411
Kansas City 62 83 .428
Atlanta 65 82 .442
San Francisco 65 81 .445
Cincinnati 66 80 .452
Colorado 67 80 .456
Oakland 67 79 .459
Detroit 70 76 .479
The Giants would currently be 7th, but that could turn into 10th depending on the Hosmer and Alvarez situation. I'm hoping that the Giants end up with a top 5 pick, as it is some what frustrating to go through a season like this, and not get a top 5 pick, and the talent level (as far as we currently know it) isn't deep this year.
It seems that Was, SD, Sea, and Pitt will be battling for the top 4 (though KC could be a factor for the 4th). Atl or SF might 'overtake' KC for 5th, but that seems to be about as high as the Giants could end up--and they may well finish out of the top 10 altogether.
Sickels on Sandoval
Some of you have already seen it, some not. Worth checking out.
over 3 years ago
haverecords
1 comment
2 recs
Dominican Summer League
The DSL Giants have advanced to the DSL "la Gran Final' vs. the DSL Nationals, which commences tomorrow. The semi finals (Giants vs Mariners), seemed to be a best of 3 game series; does anyone know if the final is the same?
I do find it interesting that it is the Nationals who the Giants are facing, since the nationals (including Bowden and Rijo) are currently under federal investigation for 'skimming'--particularly in the Dominican.
I wish we could watch these games, if only to see if some of these players are at least half as interesting as their names.
Posey 3 for 3 with HR
yeah
1 2b, 1 3b, 1hr, 2bb, 3 rbi
Burriss and heavier bat
So far today, Burriss has turned in what may well be his best left handed at bats this year. With his run scoring liner (yes, a liner off his bat!), Krukow mentioned that not only have the giants been working with him on his swing, but he is now using a 'bigger' bat. By 'bigger' I assume they mean heavier, and if indeed that is the case I am happy to see it (and I know Sharksrog is too). Both of us--along with others--have advocated his using a heavy bat as they did earlier in baseball, as it would likely improve his line drive ability, and perhaps give something of a threat of an extra base hit. I'd like to find out how heavy a bat he is now using (perhaps we shall call for Baggs; in any case, a welcome direction
Lincecum X-Rays Negative
Baggarly at it again. Thankfully!
Baggarly farm report
Very, very interesting...
BA on Villalona
Nothing new, but a nice little article.
Villalona and 3B
This topic may have been discussed here before, but not recently, I believe.
I am wondering why the Giants, via Augusta, aren't playing Villalona at Third, instead of First.
Though he is certainly big, he seems to move very well (in terms of quickness) around First. He also seems to have a strong arm, though I don't know about accuracy. He made 18 errors at third in rookie ball last year, which is a high amount, but not necessarily indicative of an inability to play third, given his age.
Did any of you happen to watch him play third last year (or encounter credible reports from those who did)?
As we all know, the Giants have an organizational black hole at 3B. We at least have something at 1B, and could always convert Villalona later if needed.
The reports I've read on his play at 3B is that he is raw, but didn't address whether it is 'raw: forget about it' or 'raw: give it time'. Any thoughts?
Caveats + secondary thoughts:
The giants sort of have Gillaspie at 3b, but he hasn't signed yet (though likely will), and he seems a safe bet to be a Mueller type, there is no guarantee he will pan out as such. Plus, the move to 1B for Villalona occurred before the draft, so Gillaspie certainly wasn't a consideration.
I presume the Giants have given this some thought and decided against it, so perhaps he played poorly, but it just isn't clear that is so. I have also heard that they are open to playing him at 3B, and are not thinking he is set at 1B. Yet, if this is so, why not play him at 3B, as it is an organizational need and premium position. It might be because they want him to have experience at both, (moving him back to 3B after this year), so there is flexibility depending on how the next few drafts play out.
On another note:
He's had a nice July. I recently saw monthly splits, but can't seem to locate the information again. I believe he's .270 something for the month, and I suspect his SO have decreased, though they are still high.
Showing 1 - 18 of 18