
homerun13
Jul 01, 2008 Jun 02, 2012 3 317
RSSUser Blog
Mark Cuban and the Texas Rangers
If you didn't know, Mark Cuban has a really good Blog and he wrote about the bidding on the rangers if you are interested:
Obviously Mark Cuban is a really intelligent person and it's always intersting to read his opinion on various topics.
The National League Is Like AAAA
This thread (threat?) was inspired by a discussion on the gameday talk on sunday.
The general tone of the discussion was that the National League is way worse than the American League. Some of the comments that i can remember were (not word for word):
- The National League is like AAAA.
- Ryan Sweeny would hit 30 homeruns if he played in Arizona.
- Andre Ethier and Carlos Gonzalez only hit so well because they are in the National League.
- There are hundreds of players who were medicore in the American League and crushed the National League.
Challenged by a member to find one player from the National Leage that went to the American League and did well i started to look around but couldn't really find a good article about players who changed leagues and how well they did. There are articles about the American League is the better League of the both and I don't even argue that. The American League in general is better, but I don't think it's so good that every medicore player of the American League turns into Pujols just because he changes the leauge.
This is why i looked for some big name players who changed leagues and compared their statistics from before and after the change. Here are some i came up with.
|
JD Drew |
Age |
Games |
K/162 |
BB/162 |
HR/162 |
OPS |
|
|
2004 |
NL (AT) |
28 |
145 |
130 |
132 |
35 |
1005 |
|
2005 |
NL (LA) |
29 |
72 |
113 |
115 |
34 |
932 |
|
2006 |
NL (LA) |
30 |
146 |
118 |
99 |
22 |
891 |
|
2007 |
AL (BO) |
31 |
140 |
116 |
91 |
13 |
769 |
|
2008 |
AL (BO) |
32 |
109 |
119 |
117 |
28 |
927 |
|
2009 |
AL (BO) |
33 |
137 |
129 |
97 |
28 |
914 |
His production is a little bit down in the AL eventhough he had a good year in 2008. You probably could make a case that the AL was tougher from him.
|
Age |
Games |
K/162 |
BB/162 |
HR/162 |
OPS |
||
|
2004 |
NL (PH) |
30 |
159 |
118 |
129 |
41 |
972 |
|
2005 |
NL (PH) |
31 |
162 |
134 |
117 |
31 |
879 |
|
2006 |
NL (PH) |
32 |
98 |
142 |
150 |
33 |
864 |
|
2006 |
AL (NY) |
32 |
58 |
145 |
92 |
28 |
921 |
|
2007 |
AL (NY) |
33 |
158 |
118 |
86 |
26 |
814 |
|
2008 |
AL (NY) |
34 |
156 |
113 |
76 |
23 |
842 |
The midseason switch in 2006 was good for him, but afterwards his production dropped some. AL seemed tougher for him.
|
Age |
Games |
K/162 |
BB/162 |
HR/162 |
OPS |
||
|
2001 |
AL (TE) |
29 |
111 |
107 |
34 |
36 |
888 |
|
2002 |
AL (TE) |
30 |
108 |
107 |
38 |
29 |
895 |
|
2003 |
NL (FL) |
31 |
144 |
104 |
62 |
18 |
843 |
|
2004 |
AL (DE) |
32 |
135 |
109 |
49 |
23 |
893 |
He switched league for one season in 2003 and did actually worse in the NL.
|
Age |
Games |
K/162 |
BB/162 |
HR/162 |
OPS |
||
|
2006 |
AL (TE) |
26 |
162 |
128 |
89 |
33 |
885 |
|
2007 |
AL (TE) |
27 |
78 |
137 |
93 |
27 |
921 |
|
2007 |
NL (AT) |
27 |
54 |
138 |
81 |
51 |
1019 |
|
2008 |
NL (AT) |
28 |
103 |
110 |
102 |
31 |
902 |
|
2008 |
AL (LA) |
28 |
54 |
69 |
96 |
39 |
1081 |
|
2009 |
AL (NY) |
29 |
156 |
118 |
118 |
41 |
948 |
He only played a little bit in the NL. When he changed the league midseason in 2007 he rocked but the year after it was the other way around.
|
Age |
Games |
K/162 |
BB/162 |
HR/162 |
OPS |
||
|
2005 |
NL (FL) |
22 |
158 |
128 |
66 |
34 |
946 |
|
2006 |
NL (FL) |
23 |
158 |
111 |
88 |
27 |
998 |
|
2007 |
NL (FL) |
24 |
157 |
131 |
82 |
35 |
966 |
|
2008 |
AL (DE) |
25 |
160 |
128 |
57 |
37 |
886 |
|
2009 |
AL (DE) |
26 |
160 |
108 |
69 |
34 |
943 |
Did a little bit better in the NL maybe, but was totally fine in 2009. He hit more HR in the AL.
|
Age |
Games |
K/162 |
BB/162 |
HR/162 |
OPS |
||
|
2006 |
NL (PIT) |
27 |
159 |
159 |
104 |
36 |
928 |
|
2007 |
NL (PIT) |
28 |
145 |
158 |
66 |
23 |
745 |
|
2008 |
NL (PIT) |
29 |
108 |
129 |
89 |
33 |
894 |
|
2008 |
AL (BO) |
29 |
49 |
169 |
73 |
30 |
897 |
|
2009 |
AL (BO) |
30 |
151 |
174 |
101 |
39 |
921 |
No indication that he had a harder time in the AL here.
|
Age |
Games |
K/162 |
BB/162 |
HR/162 |
OPS |
||
|
2006 |
NL (CO) |
26 |
155 |
115 |
49 |
36 |
973 |
|
2007 |
NL (CO) |
27 |
158 |
129 |
65 |
37 |
1012 |
|
2008 |
NL (CO) |
28 |
139 |
121 |
86 |
29 |
947 |
|
2009 |
AL (OA) |
29 |
93 |
101 |
80 |
19 |
832 |
|
2009 |
NL (STL) |
29 |
63 |
111 |
67 |
33 |
1023 |
Did clearly better in the NL.
|
Age |
Games |
K/162 |
BB/162 |
HR/162 |
OPS |
||
|
2006 |
AL (BO) |
34 |
130 |
127 |
125 |
44 |
1058 |
|
2007 |
AL (BO) |
35 |
133 |
112 |
86 |
24 |
881 |
|
2008 |
AL (BO) |
36 |
100 |
139 |
84 |
32 |
927 |
|
2008 |
NL (LA) |
36 |
53 |
107 |
107 |
52 |
1232 |
|
2009 |
NL (LA) |
37 |
104 |
126 |
111 |
30 |
949 |
Obviously he did well when he changed leagues in 2008 and was good in 2009 too. Of course he did well in Boston as well. Tough to say because of age and all if the league change benefited him.
|
Age |
Games |
K/162 |
BB/162 |
HR/162 |
OPS |
||
|
2006 |
AL (SE) |
34 |
159 |
117 |
66 |
34 |
869 |
|
2007 |
AL (SE) |
35 |
149 |
105 |
58 |
23 |
831 |
|
2008 |
AL (SE) |
36 |
162 |
110 |
64 |
23 |
837 |
|
2009 |
NL (PH) |
37 |
134 |
144 |
68 |
41 |
899 |
This is a case where i can see the league changing argument making sense. He did very good in 2009.
|
Carlos Lee |
Age |
Games |
K/162 |
BB/162 |
HR/162 |
OPS |
|
|
2002 |
AL (CH) |
26 |
140 |
84 |
87 |
30 |
843 |
|
2003 |
AL (CH) |
27 |
158 |
93 |
38 |
32 |
830 |
|
2004 |
AL (CH) |
28 |
153 |
91 |
57 |
33 |
891 |
|
2005 |
NL (MIL) |
29 |
162 |
87 |
57 |
35 |
811 |
|
2006 |
NL (MIL) |
30 |
102 |
62 |
60 |
44 |
896 |
|
2006 |
AL (TE) |
30 |
59 |
71 |
137 |
25 |
894 |
|
2007 |
NL (HO) |
31 |
162 |
63 |
53 |
32 |
882 |
|
2008 |
NL (HO) |
32 |
115 |
69 |
52 |
39 |
937 |
Interesting case because he changed leagues more than once. Homeruns are a little bit up in the NL, but otherwise pretty similar. Walked a ton in 2006 in the AL.
let's look at some pitchers.
|
Age |
IP |
BB9 |
K9 |
HR9 |
ERA |
||
|
2005 |
AL (MI) |
26 |
231.2 |
1.7 |
9.2 |
0.9 |
2.87 |
|
2006 |
AL (MI) |
27 |
233.2 |
1.8 |
9.4 |
0.9 |
2.77 |
|
2007 |
AL (MI) |
28 |
219.0 |
2.1 |
9.7 |
1.4 |
3.33 |
|
2008 |
NL (NY) |
29 |
234.1 |
2.4 |
7.9 |
0.9 |
2.53 |
|
2009 |
NL (NY) |
30 |
166.2 |
2.5 |
7.9 |
1.1 |
3.13 |
Very strange that his strikeouts actually went down in the NL. It should be higher with the league change, players facing him for the first time and especially facing a pitcher in the line-up. His number defenitely don't show that the NL is "easier".
|
Age |
IP |
BB9 |
K9 |
HR9 |
ERA |
||
|
2004 |
AL (OA) |
26 |
213.0 |
3.4 |
6.9 |
1.2 |
4.48 |
|
2005 |
AL (OA) |
27 |
228.1 |
3.5 |
6.7 |
1.0 |
3.86 |
|
2006 |
AL (OA) |
28 |
221.0 |
4.0 |
6.1 |
1.1 |
3.83 |
|
2007 |
NL (SF) |
29 |
196.2 |
3.8 |
6.0 |
1.1 |
4.53 |
|
2008 |
NL (SF) |
30 |
180.0 |
5.1 |
6.0 |
0.8 |
5.15 |
|
2009 |
NL (SF) |
31 |
192.0 |
3.8 |
7.2 |
1.0 |
4.03 |
Doesn't look like the NL is easier for him.
|
Age |
IP |
BB9 |
K9 |
HR9 |
ERA |
||
|
2005 |
AL (OA) |
24 |
217.0 |
2.2 |
6.8 |
1.1 |
3.73 |
|
2006 |
AL (OA) |
25 |
223.0 |
1.8 |
7.1 |
1.3 |
4.12 |
|
2007 |
AL (OA) |
26 |
222.2 |
2.2 |
7.8 |
1.0 |
3.07 |
|
2008 |
NL (ARI) |
27 |
216.0 |
1.7 |
8.6 |
0.8 |
3.33 |
|
2009 |
NL (ARI) |
28 |
229.1 |
1.5 |
8.8 |
1.1 |
3.14 |
His numbers are a little bit better in the NL it seams. But nothing drastic.
|
Age |
IP |
BB9 |
K9 |
HR9 |
ERA |
||
|
2003 |
NL (MO) |
26 |
230.2 |
2.2 |
9.4 |
1.1 |
3.24 |
|
2004 |
AL (NY) |
27 |
198.0 |
2.7 |
6.8 |
1.5 |
4.91 |
|
2005 |
NL (ARI) |
28 |
215.2 |
1.9 |
8.0 |
1.5 |
4.42 |
|
2006 |
AL (CH) |
29 |
202.2 |
2.5 |
8.2 |
1.0 |
4.84 |
|
2007 |
AL (CH) |
30 |
216.2 |
2.1 |
8.8 |
1.2 |
3.74 |
|
2008 |
AL (CH) |
31 |
208.1 |
2.6 |
8.6 |
1.1 |
4.67 |
|
2009 |
NL (ATL) |
32 |
219.1 |
1.8 |
9.8 |
0.8 |
2.87 |
An other good case because he changed leagues a couple of times. In 2005 the change didn't seem to have an effect but last year in atlanta he was very good in the NL.
So, this are just some players I found. For Ibanez the change really seemed to have a great affect but for most of the other players the change didn't seem really that big. Nothing that indicates that the NL is a AAAA league.
What do you guys think? Would be interested if you know any players where it was really the case of medicority in the AL and stardome in the NL.
Rule Question
This is maybe not the best first post, since it doesn't even concern the Athletics, but it might be interesting for some of you anyway.
I switched in on the Yankees game on Saturday against the Royals and something funny happend in the 4th inning (If you have MLB.com maybe you can go and have a look).
Damon is on first and Jeter is hitting. Damon steals second and is safe. The umpires have a short discussion send Damon back to first because of interfirience.
So far so good, the only thing, Jeter is not out. The showed the reply and Jeter was not actually in the way. He swung and stayed in the batters-box crouching down. The catcher however touches Jeter after he threw the ball.
I never heard of this ruling and it seems wrong to me. Either it is interfierence or it is not. This is like a middle thing, sending the runner back and letting the hitter continue.
The Royals manager came out and the umps explained it for a couple of seconds and that was that. No big discussions, nothing.
Are there any rule gurus here that know what was going on here?
Showing 1 - 3 of 3