<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>SB Nation User Blog:  homerun13</title>
    <link>http://www.sbnation.comhttp://www.sbnation.com/users/homerun13</link>
    <description>Posts made by homerun13 on SB Nation</description>
    <item>
      <title>Rule Question</title>
      <link>http://www.athleticsnation.com/2008/8/19/597389/rule-question</link>
      <author>homerun13</author>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 06:17:49 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;This is maybe not the best first post, since it doesn't even concern the Athletics, but it might be interesting for some of you anyway.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I switched in on the Yankees game on Saturday against the Royals and something funny happend in the 4th inning (If you have MLB.com maybe you can go and have a look).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Damon is on first and Jeter is hitting. Damon steals second and is safe. The umpires have a short discussion send Damon back to first because of interfirience.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So far so good, the only thing, Jeter is not out. The showed the reply and Jeter was not actually in the way. He swung and stayed in the batters-box crouching down. The catcher however touches Jeter after he threw the ball.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I never heard of this ruling and it seems wrong to me.&amp;nbsp;Either it is interfierence or it is not. This is like a middle thing, sending the runner back and letting the hitter continue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Royals manager came out and the umps explained it for a couple of seconds and that was that. No big discussions, nothing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are there any rule gurus here that know what was going on here?&lt;/p&gt;

  
  


      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
