<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>SB Nation User Blog:  islandbruin</title>
    <link>http://www.sbnation.com/users/islandbruin</link>
    <description>Posts made by islandbruin on SB Nation</description>
    <item>
      <title>Women's Gymnastics
</title>
      <link>http://www.bruinsnation.com/2008/4/13/02555/2054</link>
      <author>islandbruin</author>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 04:25:55 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;Per the official website&lt;/p&gt;



  &lt;p&gt;UCLA finished 2nd in the Southeast Regionals on Saturday, which means they will be headed to the Nationals later this month.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This sounds like a real accomplishment for a young team who fought off injuries.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hopefully, those with more insight could provide more particulars. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Go Bruins !!&lt;/p&gt;


  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lopez Twins Turn Pro
</title>
      <link>http://www.bruinsnation.com/2008/4/1/05331/50634</link>
      <author>islandbruin</author>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 04:53:31 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;This is probably no surprise, but the Lopez twins, per AP, have decided to turn pro. &amp;nbsp;They, per their mother (again per AP), intend to hire agents so there is no turning back.&lt;/p&gt;



  &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;It will be interesting to see what Ryan Anderson does post-Braun.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Seems like the league style may move away from the dominant inside game so ably displayed this year at UCLA and Stanford.&lt;/p&gt;


  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gymnastics
</title>
      <link>http://www.bruinsnation.com/2008/3/3/204452/0925</link>
      <author>islandbruin</author>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 01:44:52 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;Anybody with info on the gymnastics team?&lt;/p&gt;



  &lt;p&gt;Our gymnastics team, which was the dominant program in the country in the early 90's, seems to be down somewhat this year. &amp;nbsp;Still ranked #9 in the country, but that is a slip from prior years. &amp;nbsp;I was hoping that somebody with some knowledge could advise whether this is a one-time blip, or whether there has been some fundamental change either at UCLA or at other schools which would mean this dip is likely to continue. &amp;nbsp;Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;


  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Letter to AD and Chancellor
</title>
      <link>http://www.bruinsnation.com/2007/12/18/214247/84</link>
      <author>islandbruin</author>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 02:42:47 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;Letter which was sent requesting (politely as possible) that DG stick to the standards which he initially set out at the beginning of this search&lt;/p&gt;



  &lt;p&gt;Here is what I sent- &amp;nbsp;it is certainly not as eloquent as others which I have seen on this site, but hopefully, it will add to the total picture of concern- &amp;nbsp;this was sent to DG with a copy to Chancellor&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am sure that you are hearing from all sides with respect to the open football head coaching position. &amp;nbsp;You (DG) yourself have stated the goal (in your December 13 press release) as finding "the best head football coach for our program". &amp;nbsp;This could be interpreted as a different standard than the press conference on December 3, in which you stated that "a prerequisite that's pretty important...would be head coaching experience". &amp;nbsp;There should be no inconsistency in these statements, but it appears from media reports that prior head coaching experience may have moved down the list in terms of importance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The December 13 press release could be viewed as endorsing candidate X, who is the best coach of those who have been looked at in a narrow spectrum (current member of UCLA coaching staff, former member of staff from cross-town rival, etc), rather than the best coach after an extensive review of coaches with relevant head coaching experience. &amp;nbsp;We certainly should not get too anxious based on rumors in the media, but these rumors must have some initial source within the Morgan Center. &amp;nbsp;As such, they are disquieting.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I graduated from UCLA in 1971. &amp;nbsp;I never saw a Rose Bowl game during those four years, but that was in the context of winner take all, with the conference champion playing on January 1 and everybody else staying home. &amp;nbsp;Tommy Prothro's teams were competitive, and fun to watch.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;These adjectives can not be applied to the teams during the last five years. &amp;nbsp;It is hard to see how we would not suffer again for another five years if the same search criteria from 2002 (give an unproven candidate a chance) were to be applied now. &amp;nbsp;DeWayne Walker has no head coaching experience, and his defense, although an improvement over his predecessor, still had some very embarassing meltdowns during the past two years. &amp;nbsp;Norm Chow has been a career assistant coach. &amp;nbsp;If he was truly qualified to be a head coach, somebody else would have snatched him up at some point in the last two decades. &amp;nbsp;He sounds like a retread at best. &amp;nbsp;On the theory that two wrongs don't make a right, hiring Chow with a precondition that he keep Walker would not remedy the faults which each candidate in isolation presents.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hopefully, this message is completely beside the point because you have not relaxed your goal to find a coach with head coaching experience, who will indeed be the best head football coach for our program. &amp;nbsp;If, however, the bar is lowered so that we can define "best" as whomever is selected regardless of experience, then I will have to reconsider my level of commitment to our institution.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Raleigh Klein&lt;br /&gt;
Class of 1971&lt;br /&gt;
Chancellors' Associate&lt;/p&gt;


  


      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
