Commented Actually, Prentice was the fans' choice on Royals ownership...how'd it happen? on Royals Review - 11/05/09 3:44 PM EST (1 reply)

Commented I still don't understand the Betancourt criticism on Winter League Updates #2 on Royals Review - 10/28/09 7:22 AM EDT (2 replies)

Voted for Horrible. Absoluetely Horrible. Hardy!? Parra!? Gamel?! and who the hell is Salome?!?11 on Royals Review - 10/25/09 8:03 AM EDT

Commented The interesting thing about the Saberhagen trade on An Offseason Process I Could Trust on Royals Review - 10/20/09 7:59 AM EDT

Commented Have you forgotten TPJ? on An Offseason Process I Could Trust on Royals Review - 10/20/09 7:58 AM EDT (2 replies)

Commented I wouldn't mind Bradley on the Royals. on An Offseason Process I Could Trust on Royals Review - 10/19/09 7:46 AM EDT (1 reply)

Commented At least the Royals didn't give up anything for Betancourt on An Offseason Process I Could Trust on Royals Review - 10/19/09 7:44 AM EDT (3 replies)

Commented Sounds like the SS version of Buck on An Offseason Process I Could Trust on Royals Review - 10/17/09 4:24 PM EDT (2 replies)

Commented Going young doesn't work. on Insane Trade Ideas Involving Jose Guillen on Royals Review - 10/15/09 12:00 AM EDT

Commented I thought the whole point of the trade on Kansas City's Dayton Moore and Trey Hillman Need to Stop Lecturing, Start Bringing In... on Royals Review - 10/13/09 4:30 PM EDT (1 reply)

Commented I'll go on a limb and say on Kansas City's Dayton Moore and Trey Hillman Need to Stop Lecturing, Start Bringing In... on Royals Review - 10/13/09 7:23 AM EDT (2 replies)

Commented In fairness about the Angels on The Best Fans In Baseball Left Early Tonight on Royals Review - 10/12/09 8:06 AM EDT

Commented +1 on the Cardinals on The Best Fans In Baseball Left Early Tonight on Royals Review - 10/12/09 8:05 AM EDT

Commented I fully support the Cortes-for-Betancourt trade on Kansas City's Dayton Moore and Trey Hillman Need to Stop Lecturing, Start Bringing In... on Royals Review - 10/12/09 8:03 AM EDT (1 reply)