<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>SB Nation User Blog:  jeager</title>
    <link>http://www.sbnation.com/users/jeager</link>
    <description>Posts made by jeager on SB Nation</description>
    <item>
      <title>DJ?
</title>
      <link>http://www.fieldgulls.com/2008/3/5/10153/14333</link>
      <author>jeager</author>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 15:15:03 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;Last I heard about Hackett, he wasn't getting much interest in free agency. &amp;nbsp;Is that just a natural progression with the upper-tier WRs (Stallworth et al.) being cleared off the boards before teams looking for help get to Hacks? &amp;nbsp;I guess I'm just being optimistic that maybe he's overvalued himself and the Hawks can end up with him for a reasonable price after all. &amp;nbsp;We need som WR help.&lt;/p&gt;



  

  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Interesting News Trib Article Re Hutch
</title>
      <link>http://www.fieldgulls.com/2008/1/11/94024/3076</link>
      <author>jeager</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:40:24 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;The question, essentially: would the team be better off if it had thrown lots of dough at Hutch, rather than spending on Julian Peterson, Burly, etc?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm pasting the URL for the story below. &amp;nbsp;Dunno if it'll link or not, as I'm not savvy about such things.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.thenewstribune.com/sports/seahawks/story/251698.html"&gt;http://www.thenewstribune.com/sports/seahawks/story/251698.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



  

  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Playoff scenarios
</title>
      <link>http://www.fieldgulls.com/2007/12/28/93524/113</link>
      <author>jeager</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 14:35:24 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;Does anyone have a good rundown of the Seahawks playoff opponent scenarios? &amp;nbsp;I guess it'll be the Skins or the Vikings. &amp;nbsp;Presumably, if one of those two teams wins and the other loses, the Hawks play the winner. &amp;nbsp;What if both win or both lose?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I looked on NFL.com, thinking they might have something. &amp;nbsp;Didn't find it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, any thoughts on who we'd rather play? &amp;nbsp;Portis and Peterson/Taylor/Hutch all scare me a bit. &amp;nbsp;The quarterbacks? &amp;nbsp;Not so much.&lt;/p&gt;



  

  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Which former Hawk would you want?
</title>
      <link>http://www.fieldgulls.com/2007/12/8/114925/054</link>
      <author>jeager</author>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 16:49:25 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;The post about old-school Seahawks unis made me think about the following question: which one former Seahawk would you choose to sub onto this team, replacing the current starter for the remainder of this season? &amp;nbsp;Assume the former Hawk would have the ability he had at his prime for the team.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hutch? &amp;nbsp;Would allow Sims to move to RG and Gray to do something else.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tez? &amp;nbsp;Brilliant, but not really a position of weakness for the current Hawks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Easley? &amp;nbsp;Brilliant and a position of weakness for Hawks. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sinclair? &amp;nbsp;Don't know that he's a marked improvement over either Tapp or Kerney.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boswo... &amp;nbsp;Nevermind.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Says something either about the talent level of the current team or the poor talent of prior Seahawks teams that I cannot think of many others I'd even consider.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



  

  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yelling at ESPN
</title>
      <link>http://www.fieldgulls.com/2007/11/13/83125/726</link>
      <author>jeager</author>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 13:31:25 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;Am I the only one who yelled at the TV last night, urging ESPN to stop talking to Drew Carey or Steve Young and just please show the game? &amp;nbsp;I know it was a blowout, but still. &amp;nbsp;ESPN's format is infuriating. &amp;nbsp;If I wanted interviews, I'd watch Charlie Rose. &amp;nbsp;Actually, I wouldn't, but I'd watch some different interview show.&lt;/p&gt;



  

  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Two football questions
</title>
      <link>http://www.fieldgulls.com/2007/11/9/10424/3061</link>
      <author>jeager</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:42:04 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;Unrelated, but I've been wondering about both:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li value="1"&gt;Who is Mike Holmgren talking to, er, screaming at on his headset? &amp;nbsp;It's my understanding that he sends the play in to Beck that way. &amp;nbsp;One can see MH holding the play card to his face when he is apparently doing that. &amp;nbsp;But then after a play screws up, see, e.g., all third-and-fourth-and-longs this season, he appears to continue to communicate with someone via the headset. &amp;nbsp;Is that Beck, or someone upstairs? &amp;nbsp;I understand this may not be knowable to mere citizens such as us.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li value="2"&gt;What is the purpose of the little elbow bands that football players wear all the time these days? &amp;nbsp;You know, the thin thingies that encircle the arm just above the elbow? &amp;nbsp;Seems like they are not well-positioned or designed to protect the elbows from turf burn, etc. &amp;nbsp;Yet many, many players wear them. &amp;nbsp;What's the deal?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;



  

  


      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
