<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>SB Nation User Blog:  jwhitettu</title>
    <link>http://www.sbnation.com/users/jwhitettu</link>
    <description>Posts made by jwhitettu on SB Nation</description>
    <item>
      <title>Gene Chizik to Auburn</title>
      <link>http://www.doubletnation.com/2008/12/13/691697/gene-chizik-to-auburn</link>
      <author>jwhitettu</author>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 22:03:28 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;h3&gt;&lt;a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=3767115"&gt;Gene Chizik to&amp;nbsp;Auburn&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;div class="description"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Interesting.  Thoughts?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Myers 'Ok' with 'losing' Leach.  (Reputable source)</title>
      <link>http://www.doubletnation.com/2008/12/5/682230/myers-ok-with-losing-leach</link>
      <author>jwhitettu</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 06:32:41 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;wtf?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NewsChannel 11 has obtained documents that show, as of April 2008, Texas Tech Athletic Director Gerald Myers seemed to be okay with losing Mike Leach as head coach.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Leach's agent tried to start negotiations in the spring.&amp;nbsp; But in an April 29th, 2008 e-mail, at 4 p.m., Myers wrote back to the agent saying that the athletic department's financial condition would not allow Leach to make more money. Myers writes, "We have reached the limits of what we can pay our coach and still maintain the rest of the department."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Myers complimented Leach as a fine coach and said it was perfectly logical for Leach to seek more money.&amp;nbsp; And then, "If better opportunities occur for him somewhere else we will fully understand."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Separately, NewsChannel 11 has obtained a July 2008 letter from the agent to Chancellor Kent Hance.&amp;nbsp;They are asking Hance to overrule Myers and come up with a better deal.&amp;nbsp; Recent public statements by Hance and Myers both seem to indicate the university is now willing to come up with a contract extension and higher salary.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Leach has a base salary of $300,000 per year, but he is also guaranteed outside income of $1.5 million.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NewsChannel 11 has attempted to contact Myers and other Texas Tech officials.&amp;nbsp; We will follow up if they choose to comment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://www.kcbd.com/Global/story.asp?S=9462407&amp;amp;nav=3w6y&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also.......DMN.......&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://collegesportsblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2008/12/documents-show-that-texas-tech-ad-myers.html&lt;/p&gt;

  
  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harrell thinks Crab and Leach are both gone....</title>
      <link>http://www.doubletnation.com/2008/12/4/682172/harrell-thinks-crab-and-le</link>
      <author>jwhitettu</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 04:53:59 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;h3&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/APStories/stories/D94S90NG1.html"&gt;Harrell thinks Crab and Leach are both&amp;nbsp;gone....&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;div class="description"&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More on Mike Leach....</title>
      <link>http://www.doubletnation.com/2008/12/4/679615/more-on-mike-leach</link>
      <author>jwhitettu</author>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:52:36 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;h3&gt;&lt;a href="http://texastech.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=884575"&gt;More on Mike&amp;nbsp;Leach....&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;div class="description"&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>He's leaving us.  </title>
      <link>http://www.doubletnation.com/2008/12/3/679327/he-s-leaving-us</link>
      <author>jwhitettu</author>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:19:30 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;He's not answering his phone, even when Myers calls....&amp;nbsp; He's interviewing....&amp;nbsp; (sigh) I never thought that I'd say this...&amp;nbsp; He's leaving.&amp;nbsp; When it happens, I'll be beset with dissapointment.&amp;nbsp; This sucks.&amp;nbsp; But yeah, it's a business.&amp;nbsp; For whatever naive reason, I just thought Leach would always stay at Tech because Tech and Leach are special together.&amp;nbsp; Tech is special.&amp;nbsp; In ways that only true Techsans know.&amp;nbsp; The same reason Spike stayed for so long.&amp;nbsp; If Mike leaves, I'll be crushed, because he still has so much to do!&amp;nbsp; However, he has a family to think about, and one can't blame him for that.&amp;nbsp; I just hate to think that this is the peak.&amp;nbsp; Thoughts Raiders?&lt;/p&gt;

  
  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cotton Bowl Rematch?</title>
      <link>http://www.doubletnation.com/2008/12/1/676972/cotton-bowl-rematch</link>
      <author>jwhitettu</author>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:27:13 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;I know somebody mentioned this once before.... but things are different now.&amp;nbsp; If Bama loses to Florida, does anyone know if they will drop to the Cotton Bowl?&amp;nbsp; The only reason I want to know is because I watched that game in '05, and have never been more pissed, or felt more robbed, for whatever reason than I was after that game.&amp;nbsp; Maybe it was the wobbly dead duck of a kick that the ghost of Bear Bryant willed over the crossbar.&amp;nbsp; Or was it the flat performance of our offense in that game?&amp;nbsp; Or was it the bad calls I remember?&amp;nbsp; Whatever, we lost.&amp;nbsp; I would love to redeem that loss.&amp;nbsp; Revenge is sweet.&amp;nbsp; Maybe we get some?&amp;nbsp; Anybody looked into this?&lt;/p&gt;

  
  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OU dominates the stats.  </title>
      <link>http://www.doubletnation.com/2008/11/30/676375/ou-dominates-the-stats</link>
      <author>jwhitettu</author>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 05:07:11 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;Here's how we all stack up against one another.&amp;nbsp; For what it's worth.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By the way, the BCS still sucks.&amp;nbsp; Let's dominate missy in the Cotton Bowl!&amp;nbsp; Go Tech.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oklahoma&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Points Scored: 100&lt;br /&gt;Points Against: 66&lt;br /&gt;Net Points: 34&lt;br /&gt;Total Yards: 1060&lt;br /&gt;Total Yards Against: 844&lt;br /&gt;Net Yards: 216&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Texas&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Points Scored: 78&lt;br /&gt;Points Against: 74&lt;br /&gt;Net Points: 4&lt;br /&gt;Total Yards: 812&lt;br /&gt;Total Yards Against: 1014&lt;br /&gt;Net Yards: -202&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Texas Tech&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Points Scored: 60&lt;br /&gt;Points Against: 98&lt;br /&gt;Net Points: -38&lt;br /&gt;Total Yards: 985&lt;br /&gt;Total Yards Against: 999&lt;br /&gt;Net Yards: -14&lt;/p&gt;

  
  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Graduation Rates....  WOW!</title>
      <link>http://www.doubletnation.com/2008/11/30/675795/the-graduation-rates-wow</link>
      <author>jwhitettu</author>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 15:51:54 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;That deal about graduation rates got me thinking....&amp;nbsp; where does Texas Tech stand?&amp;nbsp; And boy am I impressed.&amp;nbsp; Honor and Integrity.&amp;nbsp; Way to go Coaching staff!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Source:&amp;nbsp; FanBlogs.com&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Graduation Success Rate measures how many players earned a four-year degree within a six-year window, accounting for both transfers into the footabll program as well as transfers out of the football program.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So how do the BCS schools stack up against one another? I'm glad you asked.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;2008 NCAA Graduation Success Rate for BCS Football Programs&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. Notre Dame    94%&lt;br /&gt; 2. Stanford    93&lt;br /&gt; T3. BC    92&lt;br /&gt; T3. Duke    92    &lt;br /&gt; T3. Northwestern    92&lt;br /&gt; 6. Vanderbilt    91&lt;br /&gt; 7. Wake Forest    83&lt;br /&gt; 8. Texas Tech    79&lt;br /&gt; T9. Baylor    78&lt;br /&gt; T9. Nebraska    78&lt;br /&gt; T9. UNC    78&lt;br /&gt; T9. Penn State    78&lt;br /&gt; T13. UConn    77&lt;br /&gt; T13. Indiana    77&lt;br /&gt; T15. Colorado    75&lt;br /&gt; T15. Iowa    75&lt;br /&gt; T15. Syracuse    75&lt;br /&gt; T15. Virginia Tech    75&lt;br /&gt; 19. Cincinnati    73&lt;br /&gt; T20. Illinois    70&lt;br /&gt; T20. Michigan    70&lt;br /&gt; T20. Miami    70&lt;br /&gt; T20. Rutgers    70&lt;br /&gt; 24. Florida State    69&lt;br /&gt; T25. Clemson    68&lt;br /&gt; T25. Florida    68&lt;br /&gt; T25. Maryland    68&lt;br /&gt; T25. Wash State    68&lt;br /&gt; .........................................&lt;br /&gt; T29. Kansas State    67&lt;br /&gt; T29. Pitt    67&lt;br /&gt; 31. Virginia    66&lt;br /&gt; T32. South Carolina    65&lt;br /&gt; T32. Washington    65&lt;br /&gt; T34. Oregon State    64&lt;br /&gt; T34. Ole Miss    63&lt;br /&gt; T34. Miss State    63&lt;br /&gt; T34. Purdue    63&lt;br /&gt; T34. West Virginia    63&lt;br /&gt; T34. Wisconsin    63&lt;br /&gt; T40. Okla State    62&lt;br /&gt; T40. UCLA    62&lt;br /&gt; 42. Arizona State    60&lt;br /&gt; T43. N.C. State    59&lt;br /&gt; T43. Missouri    59&lt;br /&gt; 45. Louisville    58&lt;br /&gt; 46. Auburn    57&lt;br /&gt; T47. Kentucky    56&lt;br /&gt; T47. Texas A&amp;amp;M    56&lt;br /&gt; T47. South Florida    56&lt;br /&gt; T50. Alabama    55&lt;br /&gt; T50. Iowa State    55&lt;br /&gt; T52. LSU    54&lt;br /&gt; T52. Tennessee    54&lt;br /&gt; T52. USC    54&lt;br /&gt; T55. Cal    53&lt;br /&gt; T55. Oregon    53&lt;br /&gt; T55. Kansas    53&lt;br /&gt; 58. Ohio State    52&lt;br /&gt; T58. Arkansas    52&lt;br /&gt; T60. Minnesota    51&lt;br /&gt; T60. Michigan State    51&lt;br /&gt; 62. Texas    50&lt;br /&gt; T63. Georgia     48&lt;br /&gt; T63. Georgia Tech    48&lt;br /&gt; 65. Oklahoma    46&lt;br /&gt; 66. Arizona    41&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Be proud Red Raiders.&lt;/p&gt;

  
  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Game signs for Okie st.   ???</title>
      <link>http://www.doubletnation.com/2008/11/4/653659/game-signs-for-okie-st</link>
      <author>jwhitettu</author>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:38:37 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;I thought that the gameday sign ideas for Texas were brilliant, well, most of them anyway.&amp;nbsp; So, even though gameday is not coming, I thought we could still toss around game sign ideas.&amp;nbsp; Furthermore, no field storming at the game this week!!&amp;nbsp; Please!!&amp;nbsp; It would just be idiotic.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So I'll start -&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; You can't spell C_CK_ _CKER without OSU!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Over the line???&amp;nbsp; Aw screw it, it's funny.&amp;nbsp; Ideas Raiders?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I also liked:&amp;nbsp; Crabtree, he's not 40, but he's a man.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

  
  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Now that we have been there.....</title>
      <link>http://www.doubletnation.com/2008/11/3/652798/now-that-we-have-been-ther</link>
      <author>jwhitettu</author>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:08:45 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;Lets act like it.&amp;nbsp; Lets not storm the field if we beat OK state.&amp;nbsp; I agree.&amp;nbsp; I am so proud of the display this football team put on Saturday.&amp;nbsp; As alumni, I give thanks to the players and coaches who made it happen.&amp;nbsp; Now let's finish this thing!!!&amp;nbsp; Also, lets not trash talk the Horns.&amp;nbsp; Thay played a great game and deserve to not be kicked when they're down.&amp;nbsp; Wreck em!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We are not underdogs anymore.&lt;/p&gt;

  
  


      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
