<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>SB Nation User Blog:  lightbulb</title>
    <link>http://www.sbnation.com/users/lightbulb</link>
    <description>Posts made by lightbulb on SB Nation</description>
    <item>
      <title>Bill James Bullish on Braden Looper
</title>
      <link>http://www.vivaelbirdos.com/2007/12/26/174157/17</link>
      <author>lightbulb</author>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 22:41:57 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;I was clicking around on the &lt;a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/winss.aspx?team=Cardinals"&gt;Cards' fangraphs page&lt;/a&gt; to see Bill James' 2008 projections, and &lt;a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=526&amp;amp;position=P"&gt;Braden Looper's caught my eye&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For reference, Looper in 2007 (IP / ERA / WHIP / K/BB ratio / K/9 ratio):&lt;br /&gt;
175/4.94/1.34/1.71/4.47&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bill James Projection fo Braden Looper 2008 (IP / ERA / WHIP / K/BB ratio / K/9 ratio): 183/3.98/1.36/1.75/5.07&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For reference, here are the 2008 projections from ZIPS and CHONE (this is VEB after all...no way one data point would suffice!).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stats - IP /ERA /WHIP/K_BB/K_9&lt;br /&gt;
James - 183/3.98/1.36/1.75/5.07&lt;br /&gt;
Chone - 136/4.30/1.40/1.64/4.76&lt;br /&gt;
Zips &amp;nbsp;- 160/4.84/1.42/1.54/4.67&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So Bill James is the optimist in the group, projecting Looper to be a full run better than last year. Zips is most pessimisitc, while Chone is right in the middle except on innings pitched.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So..why is Mr. James so optimistic? &amp;nbsp;No doubt that Looper's sinker helped out his GB/FB ratio in 2007, and I suppose that must be playing into the 2008 calculation. But still, a full run lower ERA than 2007? And a healthy increase in the K/9 ratio (13%)? &amp;nbsp;I find it hard to believe that James's projection would entertain intagibles such as "experience as a starter", but who knows.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Chone and Zips projections seem a little more plausible to me, but hey, I'll happily take James's suggestions. &amp;nbsp;Any thoughts as to why Bill James sees Braden Looper as having such a solid 2008?&lt;/p&gt;



  

  


      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
