<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>SB Nation User Blog:  mills423</title>
    <link>http://www.sbnation.com/users/mills423</link>
    <description>Posts made by mills423 on SB Nation</description>
    <item>
      <title>Jackson is not the answer.......</title>
      <link>http://www.dailynorseman.com/2009/1/7/711479/jackson-is-not-the-answer</link>
      <author>mills423</author>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:37:28 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;Here's my wish list for 2009.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

  &lt;p&gt;Reading the various posts regarding the changes that&amp;nbsp;the Vikes needed&amp;nbsp;I wanted to throw in my 2 cents.&amp;nbsp; We may as well get over the fact that we are not going to get a change in coaching and for what it's worth I don't think we need to.&amp;nbsp; Bevell is not the best &quot;O&quot; coordinator in the league and we know that, but a good quarterback can make an average coach look like a genius (see Mike Smith, John Harbaugh, Tony Sparano).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jackson simply doesn't have the tools to play the position.&amp;nbsp; I think he has some of the physical tools but I don't think the coaching staff has confidence in opening the playbook for him as evidenced by his interceptions on Sunday.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;There are obvious situations where Jackson needs to audible out of&amp;nbsp;a play and doesn't.&amp;nbsp; Most offensive coordinators give the quarterback 2 plays.&amp;nbsp; One to call in the huddle and a&amp;nbsp;second in the event he sees something in the defense (blitz, coverage,&amp;nbsp;personnel)&amp;nbsp; that he can audible to.&amp;nbsp; This rarely if ever happens.&amp;nbsp; Jackson&amp;nbsp;may be a good quarterback eventually but can we wait 2 more years.&amp;nbsp; Will Peterson and the rest of the defense wait that long before they want to leave.&amp;nbsp;Had he played the entire year we would have been a 4-12 team with the best running back in the game and a top 10 defense.&amp;nbsp; Unacceptable.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here's an option that I want to throw out there.&amp;nbsp;(not that it's going to happen but I wouldn't mind it)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Seattle is in the midst of a coaching change with many needs and not enough draft picks to cover all of those needs.&amp;nbsp; We are quarterback away from being a legitimate contender (we have some minor needs but not as blaring as quarterback).&amp;nbsp; Although the front office for Seattle and Minnesota are not the most cordial, this deal would make sense.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We trade our first (23rd) and a bundle a couple of other picks whether it's this year or next to Seattle for Hasselbeck.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;We assume his contract which isn't up until 2010 which helps Seattle's salary cap.&amp;nbsp;Mora is going to want his own guy and is going to need rebuild through the draft.&amp;nbsp; Seattle has a ton of need positions (LB, CB, OL, DL, RB) and will need the draft picks while lower their salary cap situation to pick up free agents in 2010.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hasselbeck brings what we need most.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;A legitimate NFL quarterback with a good arm and a great running game to compliment his strongest asset which is to sell the play action and the ability to read defenses and he's familiar with the WC offense.&amp;nbsp; We go into next season with Berrian, Rice, Allison, which is an upgrade from what he had in Seattle plus AP and Chester.&amp;nbsp; Sign Birk, find an upgrade at RT through the draft.&amp;nbsp; Move Tyrell Johnson into starting&amp;nbsp;slot SS and M. Williams at FS.&amp;nbsp; EJ Henderson is back from his injury with Leber and Greenway at LB.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just my opinion.&amp;nbsp; Probably wishful thinking but...........what do we really have to lose&lt;/p&gt;
  


      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
