My Criteria – Grades are based on performance relative to my expectations. A bad game by KLove is way better than anything Rashad McCants ever did (and I wrote that sentence before the game even started, sadly), but I’m grading them against what I feel is their normal impact on a game. Aside from that…no curve, no tolerance for being overly serious, and no mercy.

Also, I’m a fan of advanced stats, but I’m not really going to get into them for the purpose of this Report Card. It’s just not worth it in a one game sample. I’m going to treat this like a tenured public school teacher. I know the numbers are available and valuable, but I can’t be bothered to look them up, so I’m just gonna grade from the hip and run out the clock until my retirement.

Continue reading this post »

Normally don't engage in fake trade speculation, but it's kinda rare when you find a deal that works for all parties. I grew up in PHX and lived in 'Sota for a long time. I love both the Suns and the Wolves, and think there is a deal that helps both teams. Marcin Gortat and Jared Dudley for Derrick Williams and Michael Beasley,

The Wolves get a desperately needed 2 and 5. The Suns get a local hero ( who looks really freaking good so far, by the way) and a volume scorer they need. This has win / win written all over it. What does BSOS say?

There’s nothing funnier, or more disingenuous, than hearing a GM of any sports franchise spew that hilarious, timeless chestnut of draft philosophy, “We aren’t going to draft for need, we’ll take the best player available.”  What a load of BS!  Even though a privileged few of them (recently off titles or with stacked rosters) have actually meant it over the years, most of the time it’s nothing but subterfuge designed to disguise intentions and increase the chance the guy they want is going to be there. 

For all the chatter you hear about taking BPA, go back and look at any draft in any sport.  Teams almost always take a player that fits a position of need.  And why wouldn’t they?  Let’s face it, spending a high draft pick on a position you already have locked down for several years is really, really stupid.  And a waste of resources.  If you’re an NFL bottom feeder with an Adrian Peterson, would you really use an early 1st round pick on another RB if he’s BPA?  Well first, ask yourself this…

Is your name David Kahn?

Continue reading this post »

So, I've been playing a regular game lately with some guys from work, and they've been calling me "Timmy D."  Not sure if it's because I'm so damn smooth, or due to my painful lack of speed and athleticism.  Either way, I'm being compared to a future Hall of Famer, so I take it as a compliment.  And it got me thinking...

I'm 6' 5" and pretty much always the biggest guy on the court.  I know my role...blocked shots and rebounds, with a decent face up game from 10 feet and in.  I can hit that shot, or pump fake and put it on the floor.  If I ever take a perimeter jumper, I need to be slapped.  I can even drop a sweet, McHale-esque drop step on you from time to time.  The more I though about it, Tim Duncan is probably my exact NBA equivalent.  Except for free throws...I nail them at a much higher rate than Tim...that hack.  To be honest, I'm a less turnover-prone Darko...only right handed...and you know, kinda better.

So anyway, who's your equivalent?  I already have very specific ideas about some prominent CH'ers:

SnP: The undersized burly guy that does all the dirty work and can hit a J (Anthony Tolliver)

Poor Dick:  Totally soft, a spot up jump shooter, but a good one (Wes Johnson) ; )

Oceanary:  The coach on the floor, but a bit limited (Luke Ridnour)

ChuckD: Looks, acts, and talks like a player - Absolutely no game (Jonny Flynn)

Tim Allen: Bench-warming, optimistic teammate (Mark Madsen)

Apologies to those not mentioned.  Tell us who's game you mirror, or whose game you imagine other CH'ers have.  Doesn't have to be limited to the Wolves.  Very curious to hear people's opinions on this...should be fun.  And God knows we need something to talk about other than the team we follow.

Name That Coach

• Coveted assistant from a consistently successful program
• Inflexible offensive system that doesn't fit his personnel
• Poor game planning/inability to exploit opponents weaknesses
• Refusal to make adjustments
• Poor late game management
• Unearned sense of arrogance with the press
• Throws his players under the bus when things go bad

Am I talking about Kurt Rambis or Brad Childress?  And doesn't the fact that you don't know scare the crap out of you?

I want to start this post with an apology.  A couple of weeks ago, I proposed doing a full-on 6 Sigma analysis of the Timberwolves to Canis Hoopus, and promised to get going on it right away.  As it turns out, making promises like that at the end of the year is a REALLY, REALLY stupid idea.  Between traveling, hosting guests, shopping, shoveling snow, and various other holiday craziness, my personal time has been basically zero.  Work is just as bad as we’re trying to wrap up a bunch of initiatives before the New Year hits.  Not to make excuses, but it was really crappy timing on my part…sorry about that to everyone that voted to go forward.

I still think it’s worth doing, and I definitely plan on diving in sometime in January.  In the meantime though, there are a few exercises we can do now that will lay the groundwork for the overall project, while also being fun and interesting in their own right.  At some point, I’m sure we’ll end up doing a formal root cause analysis of what makes the Wolves defective, and we’ll have to take a look at the players.  What I’d like to accomplish in this post is to understand how we, as a Canis Hoopus community, view and evaluate our players in an objective fashion.  What are the things we as a group find important when forming our opinions about players?  In order to accomplish this, let’s create a “Heat Map” that charts our collective opinion regarding each player’s effectiveness.

Continue reading this post »

Hello fellow CH'ers.  How's everyone enjoying the season so far?  I know we only have four wins.  And I know we've had some ugly losses.  But for the first time in a long time, I have a strangely optimistic feeling.  Not exactly sure why I feel that way.  Maybe it's just common when you have a lot of roster turnover, and the garbage you don't know seems better than the garbage you had.  Maybe it's my "lemonade out of lemons" nature.  Or maybe it's the sense that, for all of the losing so far, it seems like we might finally have the makings of an identity on this team.

Continue reading this post »

It’s been about 24 hours since the NBA draft came to an end.  Amazing what that amount of time can do for your perspective.  Heated reactions dissolve and rational ideas emerge.  Frightening changes can miraculously be seen instead as areas of opportunity.  Hell, you pretty much go through the “stages of grief” at hyperspeed – go to bed in denial and anger, wake up to acceptance.  I don’t know if it’s our subconscious mind balancing things for us, or something more mystical, but I always seem to wake up with a better perspective on things than I had the previous day.

Continue reading this post »

I know there’s been a lot of discussion here about Wes Johnson lately, but I didn’t really see an appropriate thread to post this question.  So here it is.  Where did all this positive talk about Wes come from?  Is it Wolves FO BS?  Is it draft posturing?  Have his workouts been amazing?

I mean…I’m really confused.  Two months ago, Wes Johnson was the booby prize in the NBA draft.  He was a one-dimensional spot-up shooter.  Not to mention a poor defender in Syracuse’s NBA unfriendly zone (see Jonny Flynn).  Now, I’m reading about him going as high as #3. That he’s a  “potential 10-time All-Star.”  That he has “elite athleticism,” “great handle,” and is a “great defender.”

Holy crap, things are not matching up here and cognitive dissonance abounds.  I watched Wes about 10 times last year, and he NEVER made a good impression on me.  He basically hung out at the 3 point line, never put the ball on the floor, and was extremely lazy on his zone wing rotations.  But apparently Jim Boeheim teaches his kids how to kiss an NBA GM’s ass.

If we take Wes Johnson with pick# 4, I truly think I’m done with the Wolves.   My only request after this little diatribe is that if you want to call me an ignorant a-hole, please explain why…

Cheers -

- We're going to win this division handily

- I think I know why Orlando Hudson is always looking for a job in Spring Training.  I've never used the word "airhead" for a baseball player before, but it might apply

- Kevin Slowey will emerge as the Pseudo-Ace of our staff this year, and elicit the term “Greg Maddux-Lite” or “Better Brad Radke” several times.   Secondary prediction: I will be the one saying most of these things.

- Our starting rotation will be much better than expected due to natural improvement through experience, and regression to the mean (except for Blackburn…man that cat is consistent)

- JJ Hardy has been an extremely streaky player in his career.  Don't get carried away with a good month or two.  And BTW, he usually takes his bad bat into the field when he slumps.

- Justin Morneau will hit at least 40 this year…he got rid of his bad at-bats in Spring Training.

- Jason Kubel really shouldn't play against lefties (cue a stat that proves I'm wrong, but God he looks bad)

- The Tigers are our only competition this year.  We got into Ozzie & Kenny's head so bad that they actually destroyed their fairly successful existing roster.  They traded for suck-tastic Juan Pierre in a hilariously misguided attempt to play "Twins Baseball," and thus reinforced that they have no concept of what "Twins Baseball" is all about.

- Delmon Young's approach is as bad as ever, yet he is seeing excellent early results this year.  I will bet my first child that by the end of the season, he is the same terrible 2-way player we have seen over the last 2 seasons.  That being said...I have no children, so it's not exactly a gamble on my part

What say you, my fellow Twins fans?  What are your bold predictions for this year?

So much for a Timberwolves “off night.”  When you’re this non-competitive, and have major chips invested in the draft, certain college basketball evenings become more engaging than when we send our starting 5 out for an exercise in (mostly) futility.  Tonight was a prime example with the Ohio State@Purdue and Kentucky@Florida doubleheader on ESPN.  They could have called it “Who Wants to be an NBA Lottery Team?”  Or perhaps the more caustic “Drool over Evan Turner and John Wall, you sucky NBA losers.”

Continue reading this post »

I put up a Fanpost recently talking about the unwinnable, dogmatic arguments that we sometimes get into here at Hoopus.  I was in no way discouraging these conversations from happening, because in my opinion, they can be entertaining and illuminating as hell.  However, I did ask that we keep them, for the most part, out of game threads.  Fifty back and forths between two people on a topic no one else gives a damn about kind of detracts from the overall game discussion.  Side conversations and Fanposts are great venues for such  matters though, and esteemed Hoopus member Dropstep came up with a great idea:

THUNDERDOME

Continue reading this post »

To start, I just want to say how much I enjoy Canis Hoopus.  Our team has, historically, been one of the doormats in the NBA during it’s existence.  We’ve endured lots of losing, a sustained stretch of semi-respectability under Flip, one shot at glory with KG/Sam/Feed My Family, and then…well…rebuilding.  Endless, endless rebuilding.

It takes a lot to be a fan of a team like this.  And that statement has never been more true than it is now.  That’s why a site like this is so valuable.  It’s a rallying point for those of us that feel so passionately about the team, not to mention a rare place for intelligent conversation.  There’s precious few left of us these days, so having a place to meet is both unexpected and appreciated.  We’re like Fight Club.  We have an insane need to get together and do what we do…and we REALLY shouldn’t admit it to outsiders.   

Continue reading this post »

So.  We're about three games into the NBA Pre-Season...and each of us has probably only seen about one game...if that.  Despite what we all know is a proper sample size, it's never too early to start the hysterical evaluation process on our favorite NBA team.  Below the jump is my take on this year's Wolves squad...so far.

Continue reading this post »

As a person who earned a Bachelor’s of Science for studying Speech Communication, I’ve always  found myself more fascinated by the way things are reported than the actual events themselves.  SnP, who is clearly trained in the dark arts of PR, Branding, and Communication, gave us an excellent post about the power of narratives.  How they take hold, last, and continue to survive…even in the face of massive amounts of evidence to the contrary. 

The Cubs are still “lovable losers,” even though they’ve won the NL Central more than anyone else this decade with a huge budget.  Brett Favre is still an “old school warrior” despite his girlish, diva actions of the last several years.  And the Minnesota Timberwolves are a dysfunctional franchise that can’t do anything right.  Doesn’t matter if any of these things are actually still true…the story template is in the computer, and god forbid a “journalist” actually re-writes a franchise narrative, or does any new research.

More about the ridiculous "I've already determined David Kahn is a terrible GM in 3 months" myth after the jump...

Continue reading this post »

Since the day after the draft, I’ve been contending that we will never see Ricky Rubio play in a Minnesota Timberwolves uniform.  From the way he’s answered questions (saying he wants to play in the NBA while expressly avoiding saying he wants to play in Minnesota, repeatedly stating the T’Wolves hold his rights “for now,” etc…), to the words of his father, to the reported actions of his agent Dan Fegan (working on trade possibilities basically the moment after we took him)…it just seems very clear he doesn’t want to be here.  And if he really doesn’t want to come here, in the end, there’s nothing we can do to make him.

It’s too bad…he’s a perfect fit for a young, building team.  He’s the quintessential unselfish, “he makes everyone around him better” guy that could be great on the court AND could actually help attract other top notch players because they know he lives to get them the ball.  He’d be a rock star here, and maybe…just maybe…Kahn can eventually sell him on this.  It’s also possible that all this posturing is just to gain leverage against his Spanish team when it comes time to settling his buyout, and it would have happened no matter who took him.  I tend to think not, simply because he went out of his way to praise OKC and Sacramento before the draft.  If all this hemming and hawing is really just a cleverly orchestrated ruse by Fegan, then having Ricky speak glowingly about other cities a few days ago seems a like a bit of a faux pas.

Continue reading this post »

OK.  I started writing a post to respond to the David Kahn hiring.  After a while, the post basically grew to the length of War & Peace.  Instead of crushing an existing post, I thought a new Fan Shot would be more appropriate.  Against all of my better judgment, I am astonishigly not horrified by the Kahn hiring.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!KAHN!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sorry, I had to do that at least once…

While I hate that we are in the position we are in, I always love transitional franchise moments like this.  These are the rare times when a professional sports organization actually gives you a small window into it’s soul.  During the status quo, all you ever get is the following:

·         Coach A is doing a great job (Coach A gets fired 2 weeks later)

·         Our GM has us in a good position for the future (translation: we’re 12-42, we’ve been in the Lottery for 12 consecutive years, and we have cap space no decent free agent would ever consider)

·         We have a good, young, developing nucleus of players (which means our players haven’t performed or developed, so we’ll refer to them as “young” and “developing” instead of saying they suck)

Hiring a new GM or Coach is the only time we get some “true”  insight into the organizational opinion.  They try to sell us so hard on the fact that “New Hire A” is the second coming of Jesus, they inevitably end up giving us the definitive post-mortem indictment on the previous regime.  The choice itself also is usually an indication of what the owner felt was wrong.  The new people hired are usually a fascinating psychological profile simply based on the way they present themselves.  I checked out a transcript from the Kahn presser today, and here’s what I’m extrapolating:

1 - Papa Glen in his opening remarks: “I think that this is really an important step in our future at a time when we're growing our team, developing a plan for the future and to bring the right person on at the right time was a very important decision for us and I'm pleased with the decision that we made

-My take: “Growing as a team”…”Developing a plan for the future?”   I thought we were developing our team for the future since we traded KG two years ago?  Tells me what he thinks of the progress of McHale’s development plan.  Funny thing is, I feel McHale’s last couple years have been competent.  It’s the 10 before that where we got screwed.

2 - David Kahn in his opening remarks: “I had ownership of some D-League teams and it was last summer when we sold our Tulsa team to Oklahoma City I began to consider to come back in this type of vain.  I've been around the NBA my whole adult life, 24 years either in it or in the periphery of it.”

-My take: As someone that has interviewed people, I find they usually try to establish their bona fides in areas where they are weakest.  It’s fascinating really.  They want you to know their weaknesses are OK rather than selling you on how powerful their strengths are, which I find baffling.  Kahn is clearly trying to address being out of the game for so long in his opening statement, which tells me that he is worried about that.

3 - Kahn is asked: What's Kevin McHale's status with you?  DK: "I had the over-under on that question at seven seconds, so you just got the under.  Thank you, you owe me Glen.”

-My take: Hilarious!  Everything I’ve read indicated Kahn was a soulless, dick of a boss to work for.  This comment alone indicates he at least has a sense of humor.  IMHO, a self-deprecating sense of humor indicates you are free thinker and comfortable with uncertainty and criticism…big plusses!

4 - Kahn is asked: Do you consider yourself a personnel guy or a finance guy?"  DK: "It's impossible to bifurcate those in today's NBA, you've got to have both.”

-My take: Anyone that can accurately use the term “bifurcate” in an NBA prress conference is clearly bright.  I fancy myself as a bit of a grammar “richard” that enjoys using big words to get people thinking.  People that possess this skill are rarely fake intellegentsia (see how I did that just now?), and most often are better at what they do than others.

5- DK: “There's a tendency in our league to think that there's only one way to do things.”

-My take: I love hearing this.  Every organization I have ever worked for was inherently resistant to change because it makes things difficult bureaucratically.  Having an open mind to doing things in a new way is welcome.  I should point out, this comment was made in the context of keeping McHale as coach.  Kahn seems comfortable going into the draft without a coach, if necessary.  I am fine with this because I think we should choose a coach based on our talent and how we want to play.  Very few coaches are capable of adjusting to their rosters these days.

6 - Papa Glen gets grilled about rejection:  

GT: Let me say it to you this way now, that is false. I don't know how stronger to say that. That is just inaccurate, false, I know those statements did not come from those candidates, because it was never talked about, and I know it didn't come from anyone who did the interviews, so I don't know where that came from. I can tell you that David responding here is what every candidate was told, basically I'll say it in smaller words: that if you're coming here, you want success. If you want success, you're going to have to have control over your own future.

-My take: WHAT???  Seriously, what did you just say?  I was with you through  the 2nd sentence…after that, it turned into pure gibberish.  Are you going senile?

A few other thoughts:

-Glen’s  diatribe on the hiring process was pathetic.  He was clearly trying to save face for himself, and failed miserably.  Note to Papa Glen: if you don’t want people to think you got rejected by multiple people, don’t make it Point# 1 in your Presser.  I took Public/Presentational Speaking about 10 years ago in college, and starting your pitch on what it’s NOT about is the dumbest thing you can do.

-Even in print only, Glen came across as addled and irascible.  Dude, you are trying to convince anyone you can that your team is worth spending $$$ on…don’t be a bitter dick in high visibility situations like this.

Bottom Line:

David Kahn strikes me as guy with a really unimpressive resume, but he killed at the interview.  Personally, in a general business sense, I put a lot more stock in an interview anyway.  In my experience, the resume gives you 1/3 of the hiring picture (does he claim he can do the job?), and the interview gives you the other 2/3 (Is the resume total bullshit? AND How would he fit into our culture?).   Every job I’ve ever gotten was the result of a good interview and an “embellished” resume.  So far DK’s words are all spot on (which is a revelation to this team), we’ll see if his actions follow.  I’m way less depressed now than I was 2 days ago, and I’m giving him the benefit of the doubt for now…

A previous post arguing that Derrek Lee was not declining was a poor example of statistical analysis...

They were grouping certain years of stats together in a way that supported their argument, which is a pretty disingenuous thing to do.  Saying DLee of 2001-2004 is equal to DLee of 2006-2008 might be statistically true, but it masks the historical trending.  Here is what DLee has done since 2001 whenever he has played a full year:

BA/OBP/SLG/OPS/OPS+

2001: .282/.346/.474/.820/112

2002: .270/.378/.494/.872/131

2003: .271/.379/.508/.888/131

2004: .278/.356/.504/.860/117

2005: .335/.418/.662/.1080/174

2006: Played 50 games / wrist injury

2007: .317/.400/.513/.913/131

2008: .291/.361/.462/.823/110

I'm not even including his horrendous numbers from this year.  Look at those year over year numbers and it's pretty clear what's happening with DLee.  He was an ascending player until 2005.  There was a hiccup in 2004, where he got traded to the Cubs, had to deal with playing in cold weather, and was booed and subjected to "HEE SOP CHOI" chants for two months.  Whether or not you believe this year’s stats are trend or mirage, since 2005 he has clearly been in statistical decline.

I'd also like to take this opportunity to point out one thing that drives me nuts.  Every time someone states an opinion that another person doesn't like, the aggrieved person hysterically demands that you "prove it statistically."  Guess what stats geeks?  Baseball is not 100% defined through statistics.  Looking at a boxscore will never tell you the same thing that watching a game does.  In my opinion, scouting with your eyes will tell you half the story, numbers will tell you the other half.  Anyone that relies too heavily on one approach or the other is a fool. 

As someone that's been involved in baseball for my entire life, I can tell you this from a scouting perspective:  Derrek Lee's bat speed is gone.  He can't hit the high inside fastball, he can't protect the outside corner, and he's starting his swing early to get his cheat on which is leaving him susceptible to the low and away outside pitch.  Even when he connects, he is now showing warning track power...the last true sign that the bat speed is gone for an aging vet.  Add this to the statistical evidence I’ve already given, and I think we can safely say that it’s time to gracefully show Derrek the door.

I truly hope no one here gets me wrong…I love Derrek Lee's defense, and appreciate his faithful service to the club for the last 6 years.  Unfortunately, a big market team with a $140 mil payroll and World Series aspirations can't afford a .280 hitter with 13 HR and 80 RBI that is a good guy at 1B.  And they especially can't continue to bat him 3rd.

OK.  It's midnight on Friday, and I have been overdosing on conference tournaments for the last two days.  I probably reek of BO, my wife hates me, and I think I might have wizzed myself at some point during last night's 6 OT UCONN-Syracuse game.  All that being said, I am convinced that I've had a basketball epiphany, and can see a path forward for our beloved Pups.  Here it is for beter or worse...

Every good NBA team needs to have 6-7 well-rounded players that can score, play some D, and have a specific specialty (low post scoring, man to man D, 3 point shooting, etc...).  Good teams start these players, then bring in specialists to give them a rest and impact the particular game based on what's going on.  We basically have a team of one-dimensional specialist players, which is why we stink and have no ability to absorb injuries.  For your consideration, here are the people in our rotation.  I'm not even going to bother discussing throwaways like Mark Madsen, Bobby Brown, Shelden Williams, Jason Collins, and Kevin Ollie.

Bassy - Pace-pushing PG.  Plays no D, no outside shot, and not a particularly effective executor of a half court offense 

Corey Brewer - Plays D.  Can't shoot, can't create, and general basketball IQ is questionable.

Brian Cardinal - The fact he's not in the "throwaway" section is amazing.  Love the effort and energy, but he's in there to goon it up.  There's value in that, but again, a 1 dimensional player.

Rodney Carney - Great fast breaker.  Not much else.  Gets hot from 3 occasionally.  Very good at pressuring his man, very bad at letting said man blow by him and score.

Randy Foye - A scorer...nothing more.  And a passive one at best.  Ben Gordon type, except less explosive.  Nothing more than a good 6th man that could bring scoring off the bench.  Poor defender.

Al Jefferson - Great low post scorer.  Doesn't play D, block out, or provide much help D.  Love him, but way too 1 dimensional.

Craig Smith - Poor man's Corliss Williamson.  Good choice in limited matchups, but an erratic that's a complete defensive liability.

Well Rounded Players

Ryan Gomes - A perfect 6th man on  a good team.  Good inside or outside.  Can go left or right.  Plays a little D.

Kevin Love - Great rebounder, good passer, great help defender, big inside & outside offensive upside.

Mike Miller - It pains me to say this, but Mike Miller is a hell of a player.  That's why I'm so pissed that he self-limits his game.  If he just shot more, he could be one of the best swing men in the league.  Unfortunately, he is hell-bent on being the next Magic Johnson when the the next Ray Allen would be more appropriate.

Long story short, we have way too many 1 dimensional players on this team.  There's only 1 position where it's OK to be that way - Center.  A true defensive Center would be welcome, and allow Al and Kevin to play in their natural position.  We need a better PG, SG, and C if we are ever going to move forward.  That's why this is my dream draft:

1st pick (top 4) - Hasheem Thabeet - I have been a huge Thabeet detractor for a long time, but after seeing him lately, I'm willing to go with him.  He should get better and better, and we desperately need someone to protect the paint.

Next pick (mid first round) - Ty Lawson - Great floor general that we need, excellent defender to help shore up our laughable perimeter D, and his outside shot has noticeably improved this year.  I feel very strongly that he is this year's Deron Williams.

We take the other 2 1st round picks (and an expiring contract) and get Caron Butler from Washington to be our 2 guard.  Not only do we get a great player, but his nickname is TUFF JUICE...I love it.

So we start next year with this lineup:

PG: Ty Lawson, SG: Tuff Juice, SF: MIke Miller, PF: Big Al, C: Thabeet

Now that's a lineup that can score, and actually stop people.  Then, here is our bench:

PG: Bassy, SG: Foye, SF: Gomes, PF: Love, C: Collins / Random Free Agent

Then we have our specialists:

Corey Brewer is our D specialist, Rhino as the new Gary Trent.

So...let me get this straight.

Jon Gruden has won a Super Bowl.

Mike Shanahan has won two Super Bowls.

Bill Cowher has won a Super Bowl.

They're all avaliable, and in "F YOU former franchise" mode, so they want to kick some ass.  But we're gonna stick with Chili?  I think I want to vomit. 

This is like a porn star walking up to you and asking if she can "practice" on you, but we're gonna say "No I'm married to a frigid, asexual control freak...I'm good."

PLEASE ZYGI...DITCH THE FAKER FOR A REAL COACH!!!

As I was analyzing and thinking about this week’s matchup with Houston, I realized something. In many ways, the Houston Texans are us. And we are the Houston Texans.

Except for the weird fascination with longhorn cattle…. Not sure I understand what’s up with that. As any Minnesotan can tell you, anything with a set of horns that long should have a blonde lady named Helga attached to them. Anything else is just craziness.

Cultural issues notwithstanding, let’s examine our similarities:

We both have Quarterback problems

We both have flawed, yet talented defenses

We both have highly touted Offensive Coordinators as Head Coaches

We would both be ecstatic if we could trade said crappy Head Coaches for each other

In the midst of disappointing seasons, fans of both teams can take hope in one fact:

You will make the playoffs this year

OR

You will miss the playoffs this year and the coach you love to hate will be terminated with extreme prejudice at the end of the year

Personally, I prefer winning. On the back of our last game against the Bears, I can no longer say Brad Childress is a completely incompetent clown. He worked his way all the way up to mediocre by opening up the playbook and…GASP…throwing on first down!!! Of course, Childress himself once said “About the worst thing you can be called is mediocre” so take my “compliment” for what it is.

One thing I have learned in the last three years of the Childress regime is that past performance is NOT indicative of future results. There have been many times when I thought we turned a corner, only to come out and lay an egg the next week…i.e last year’s Redskins game. I’m giving you one more chance Brad, which is about 10 more chances than anyone else around here has given you. DON’T SCREW IT UP!

VIKES 31

HOUSTON 17

SKOL Vikings, let’s win this game!!!!