
pacstud
Nov 05, 2009 May 19, 2011 16 98
The Philosophy is Two Words.
a fan of
San Diego Padres
Los Angeles Lakers
San Diego Chargers
Nebraska Cornhuskers
UCLA Bruins
Los Angeles Kings
RSSUser Blog
Pacstud's O-Line Analysis: Titans
The Charger's eighth game was an enjoyable and challenging game to grade. The Chargers pass protection was humming and used almost nothing but six and five man protection schemes. Featuring a new twist on an old standard (Power F) Norv showed his creativity with "up the gut". The run game struggled early, but wore down the Titan defense and popped some big plays in the second half.
Marcus McNeill is renewed. His run blocking in this game was still slightly inconsistent, but when he hit...he HIT. Clearly, he has set out to show that his contract was justified. He has looked every bit the well-rounded franchise left tackle.
Kris Dielman had an interesting game. Unable to finish due to a reported stinger, he had at least a hat trick of absolutely crushing blocks. He also had numerous pancakes and excellent play in space. However, he did have more than one play where he just missed, usually coming off of double teams to get a LB. His replacement, Tyrone Green, did very well. He clearly has improved since his last understudy appearance in Seattle.
28 comments
|
1 recs |
Tweet
Pacstud's O-Line Analysis: Patriots
The good news: Grade wise the Charger’s O-Line enjoyed their best week of the season.
The bad news: There’s a whole mess of strings attached to that fact.
The Chargers again found themselves in a hole due to four first half turnovers, and despite a good showing from the defense found themselves down three scores. This led to an almost exclusive diet of passing from Norv. To counter this, New England went into a lot of dime and nickel prevent, often rushing only three defenders. With only a handful of blitzes to worry about, the O-line was able to protect play after play.
Amongst all this, there were legitimate concerns. Chiefly is the play of Louis Vasquez. While improving on last week’s sub-par performance, Vasquez did look better but is still struggling with many aspects of his game. His change of direction and acceleration still seem to be hampered by his injury. He was slow on his pulls and struggled in space. On a good note his pass pro looked much better than last week.
Marcus McNeill is still rusty. Though he probably grades out higher than last week, I thought he played slightly worse. He gave up some one on one pressures and was not solid at all in the run game. He did show many flashes of regaining form though, and one has to think that every week he should get better.
Nick Hardwick, Kris Dielman, and Jeromey Clary all had excellent games. Dielman by far was the O-Line POG, registering many big hits and pancakes. His double team work was good and his pass pro was the best I’ve seen in a long time. Clary had no major mistakes and played well throughout. During the 4th quarter comeback, he absolutely owned the right edge.
The breakdown this week is shy on notes, because there wasn’t much to note. Once the Pats got a big lead it was pretty boring stuff.
On one last happy note, we ran a draw play to Sproles which picked up six yards and converted a first down. Follow the link after the jump and enjoy.
4 comments
|
2 recs |
Tweet
Pacstud's O-Line Analysis: Rams
Another tough road loss makes analysis a lot less fun. As is always the case, we try to nitpick after the wins and look for silver linings after the loss. The silver I found won't make many happy.
Clary had a very good game. I said it. He gave up 1.5 sacks, had some other negative plays, but that's it. He also had a slew of big blocks and very good pass pro. I can't help but notice that his footwork has improved tremendously from last year. His last hurdle is to perfect consistency. He is playing well though, just still lapsing.
Vasquez definitely struggled. Also giving up 1.5 sacks (although one of those was strongly on Rivers as well) he missed more blocks than he would usually. This may have been expected being his first game back, but the line can't afford to have him play like this for too long.
Hardwick was very good, as he always is against 4-3 teams. One negative play early, and then consistency. His athleticism is apparent throughout, and other than a missed protection call, seemed to do his job well.
Dielman was very, very good. Yes, he gave up a sack. Yes, he had a negative play on the very first snap. Yes, there was a pull where I wanted some perfection, but.... The man played well. He had a ton of positive plays, a few jaw-clackers, and on one pull gets two pancakes with a single block! It's safe to say he's playing a lot better than last year. His double teams are looking very good as well. His main weakness continues to be zone blocking, and if I were to critique, I'd say it's his angles and zone paths causing the problem. This is either rooted in footwork or overthinking.
McNeill is back! And he looked good. Giving up 1 sack and beat a few other times on the pass rush...that wasn't the news. His run blocking looked good, period. He had major consistency issues, and did miss a few blocks. He was shed a bit too easily on the backside (a problem from last year as well) but had some drive blocks that looked VERY good. Welcome back big guy!
Hester continues to stake his claim as a legit FB in this league. His blocking is still not there yet, but is so much better than last year. The tight ends and receivers struggled. McMichael and Wilson did some very good things, but also left some plays on the field. The same thing can be said for the receiving corps.
Well, if you're still reading and gutsy enough to click the link and rewatch, you are a true fan and I hope you enjoy!
43 comments
|
1 recs |
Tweet
Pacstud's O-Line Analysis: Raiders
While this performance was certainly better than that in Seattle, the results were similar. Special Teams let downs and critical fumbles spelled disaster for the San Diego Chargers.
The pass protection was very good. However, one key 1st quarter sack given up by Dombrowski was not only in the red zone, but resulted in a strip and turnover. Dombrowski did not have a good game and may be feeling the pressure of McNeill on the sidelines. I still have high hopes for this kid's future as either a guard or a tackle, but he definitely needs more time on the vine to develop his consistency. Don't be fooled though, he has all the tools to be successful.
We ran more play action then we have all year, and it worked. While Dielman struggled with Seymour at times, it would be fair to say he handled Seymour as well as possible. So often the case, Dielman grades lower due to his extreme degree of difficulty. He is asked to pull, go one on one, get speedy linebackers and more...and he does so much more than any of our linemen. He definitely had some gaffes, but I thought played well.
Green was not great, but played his best game as a pro. You can take that for what it is worth. Clary was very solid and I did not notice him very often (which is good when grading offensive linemen). Hardwick was also good, as to be expected against an even front.
Follow the link after the jump for a complete analysis with a diagram breaking down the Iso play that scored Tolbert's touchdown!
29 comments
|
1 recs |
Tweet
Pacstud's O-Line Analysis: Cardinals
Games like this are really enjoyable to breakdown. The Chargers offensive line came out crisp and stayed that way until the game was out of reach. There were more pancakes than an IHOP menu and other than Dockett, the Arizona defenders were a non-issue.
Now, Dockett is a stud and there's no two ways about that. Clary got the bulk of Dockett duty and had some troubles, which would be expected. Green was made to look like a guy starting his first game ever by Dockett. However, the overall work by these two was good. Clary seemed to struggle more in the second half, but with a four touchdown lead a loss of focus could be the culprit.
Dielman and Hardwick were simply great. This is very good news for those (myself) who have grown concerned about Hardwick's performance when covered by a nose against 3-4 teams. He seems to be developing a very nice bag of tricks for dealing with solo blocks on a nose. Realize, a team who has a center that can handle a nose by himself in the run game is a dangerous team.
On to the boring stuff. Click on the link after the break and enjoy my blog!
7 comments
|
2 recs |
Tweet
Pacstud's O-Line Analysis: Seahawks
Unfortunately, the offensive line played their worst game of the season overall. Dombo showed us the inconsistency of a young player in giving up two sacks, numerous pressures, and struggled somewhat in the run game. He still was decent overall, but definitely his worst game this season. Green was very much in over his head, which is to be expected on emergency duty. Let's hope a full week of practice helps him. He did settle in and made some good plays as the game went on.
Clary was his usual reliable self. A mistake here or there, nothing too spectacular in the pass protection game, but very good overall. His inside game run blocking was especially effective.
The star of the game was Dielman. Without a doubt, I thought he played his best game in a very long time. He was pancaking, pulling, sealing, and his double teams with Hardwick were beautiful. Great job. Hardwick also played at a high level and made very few mistakes.
For the play by play breakdown, follow the link after the jump. I will continue to add diagrams and am very close to having a "number cruncher" on staff to give you stat geeks something to chew on. Enjoy!
13 comments
|
2 recs |
Tweet
Pacstud's O-Line Analysis: Jaguars
Some changes you will notice. First, I'm using a simple website to post my entire breakdown. As I try to get this out to as many people as possible, it is going to be much easier for me to just post a link, than to cut and paste the entire breakdown. Second, I am going to steadily add diagrams. I already have some up for the KC game, and will have the Jaguar's game diagrams up tomorrow. So after the jump, just click and go. Enjoy O-Line fans!
2010 Offensive Line Analysis and Grading
Chargers Regular Season Week 2
Opponent:
Date: September 19, 2010
Drive 1
1. 1-10; -26
Pro Twins Lt.
29 Toss
LT- 2 LG- 2 C- 2 RG- 2 RT- 2
Dombo has a nice kick out. Legs and Floyd both are unable to secure blocks and GMP. Dielman gets to the LB but has his legs taken out by Floyd after M80 misses the Will. We are using Outside Zone on this play, so a great chance to learn about that. The two combos are Dielman and Hardwick, Vasquez and Clary. The covered men (Dielman and Vasquez) execute a "rip and reach" to open up and turn the man covering them. After ripping, the reach the second level to block the LB. The uncovered men (Hardwick and Clary) execute a "pull/overtake". They take a small pull step, get on their partner’s hip, and overtake the turned man. Vasquez and Clary demonstrate this wonderfully in this instance.
2. 2-4; -32
Pro Twins Lt. Y-Open Weak
70 PA Pro Max
LT- 2 LG- 2 C- 2 RG- 2 RT- 2
X stunts on both sides, both handled well.
3 comments
|
1 recs |
Tweet
Pacstud's O-Line Analysis: Chiefs I
Chargers Regular Season Week 1
Opponent: Kansas City Chiefs
Date: September 13, 2010
Drive 1
1. 1-10; -28
Ace H-Flanker
25 Base (26 Power fake)
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
NEW PLAY: We block it almost exactly like 26 Power, with the guard pulling and everything. However, our C and RG double the NT, and as they work to the Will they try to seal to the right (if it were 26 Power they would seal to the left). The backside LT washes the 4i, ideally past the hole. On the right side, the RT has a solo assignment on the 5. The H takes the place of the FB and handles the Sam. If you are wondering why it’s not just 26 Power with a cutback, watch the backfield action.
On this first effort, the Will steps towards the double team (to scrape towards 26 Power) but reads the backfield action and stays home. Dombo gets a good down block and the C/RG double team gets movement. Good gain.
2. 2-6; -32
Pro Lt. Strong
727 PA Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Off of the 27 Power fake, I don’t know if the pulling RG or TDEK needs to pick up the DE (Dorsey) that Dombo chipped.
3. 3-6; -32
22 Gun Rt.
50 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Dombo gets away with a pretty savvy hold. Hali gets away with a penalty against Clary.
4. 1-10; -47
Blue Twins Lt.
61 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Very good protection, Dombo does very well.
5. 1-10; 42
Pro Wing Rt. Twins Lt. SB
26 Base
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
NEW PLAY: The double from Hardwick and Vasquez doesn’t get to the Will, but it doesn’t need to as the Will runs himself out of the play. Gates and Wilson both do well.
6. 2-3; 35
Pro Wing Rt.
24 Iso
LT-2; LG-1; C-2; RG-2; RT-1.5
Hester has a nice hit, but can’t stay on. His technique still looks better. Dielman can’t stay on. Clary gets squeezed into the hole.
7. 1-10; 31
Ace H-Flanker
70 Pro Gap
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Perfect gap protection.
8. 2-8; 29
Ace Up Tight
26 Power
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-1.5
Right before the snap, watch Gates point to the backside OLB, his assignment who he can’t get. Dielman pulls and makes a nice block. Clary gets rolled up. Unblocked backside GMP.
9. 3-13; 34
31 Gun Rt.
60 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-1.5; RT-2
Left side to center does very well. Clary does very well. Vasquez is a tad slow on his switch of Hali.
Drive 2
10. 1-10; -40
Pro Rt. Strong
70 Pro Max
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Easy Protection.
11. 2-10; -40
Y-Trips Bunch Rt. Open Lt. SB
26 Base
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-1; RT-2
NEW PLAY: Vasquez can’t reach the scraping LB, who eventually makes the play after a long gain.
12. 3-2; 48
Y-Trips Bunch Lt. Gun Rt. H-On
70 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Very good all around.
13. 1-10; 45
Ace H-Flanker
29 Toss Stretch
LT-2; LG-1; C-1; RG-2; RT-2
The double from Dielman and Hardwick gets split, as Hardwick can’t stay on and Dielman leaves too soon and GMP.
14. 2-8; 43
Blue Twins Rt.
60 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Hester makes a nice blitz pick up. Well blocked.
15. 3-4; 39
Blue Twins Rt.
60 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Very good from Dombo.
16. 1-G; 5
Pro Rt. Y-Up
70 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
81 gets away with a nice hold, Rivers has all day to throw.
17. 2-G; 5
Pro Wing Rt.
24 Base (25 Iso fake)
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-1.5; RT-.5
NEW PLAY: We run Iso to the left side with the design to hit right side under the Y block and outside the RT’s seal. Clary can’t get Jackson sealed and Vasquez gets to the Mike but can’t stay on all the way.
18. 3-G; 3
22 Gun Lt.
61 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Very good protection, again. Touchdown.
Drive 3
19. 1-10; -20
Y-Trips Rt. H-Wing Open Lt. SB
26 Base
LT-2; LG-1; C-2; RG-1; RT-2
Dielman gets shed. Vasquez can’t come off and get the LB. The KC D-line is holding, and holding well. With the new Umpire position, this will only get worse.
20. 2-8; -22
Blue Twins Lt.
61 Pro
LT-2; LG-1; C-1; RG-2; RT-2
Dielman gets blown back. This leads to Hardwick tripping over the right leg of Dielman. Sproles was WAO.
21. 3-19; -11
22 SB (under center)
20 Draw
LT-.5; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Dombo gets shed and his GMP. Hardwick gets held badly.
Drive 4
22. 1-10; -25
Pro Wing Rt.
26 Base (25 Iso fake)
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-1
Vasquez does extremely well on this play. Clary gets his block sealed, but gives up separation and his GMP.
23. 2-7; -28
Pro Twins Lt.
FB Screen Lt.
LT-2; LG-1; C-1; RG-2; RT-2
Dielman has a good release, but can’t reach DJ and his GMP. Hardwick has a slow release and also can’t reach anyone. Was DJ his man? It looks like possibly Dielman tried to pick him up as "first to show", even though he may not have been his assignment.
24. 3-4; -31
13 Gun Lt.
61 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-0; RG-2; RT-2
Harwick gets beat.
Drive 5
25. 1-10; -13
Pro Wing Rt. Strong
24 Iso
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Very well blocked. Vasquez’s GMP, but he blocked him 10 yards downfield.
Drive 6
26. 1-10; -22
Pro Wing Rt. Strong
LT-2; LG-1; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
24 Iso
Norv does something cool here (I think) and comes right back to the same play TDEK fumbled on. Dielman gets shed and his GMP. Hardwick does very well. Wilson can’t stay on the Mike and his GMP.
27. 2-8; -24
Pro Rt. Weak Y-Up
RB Screen Lt.
LT-2; LG-1; C-1; RG-1.5; RT-2
Dielman and Hardwick both have poor releases, while Vasquez doesn’t release at all? Rivers makes a horrible throw on top of all that.
28. 3-8; -24
Blue Twins Lt.
61 Pro
LT-1; LG-2; C-1.5; RG-0; RT-1.5
This is why "stats" are stupid. The sack is going to be hung on Clary, even though it is clearly on Vasquez who gets DROVE. Wilson chips, almost too hard, and this leads to Dombo losing his man. Dielman does a great job helping Dombo. Hardwick does fine but needs to keep playing.
Drive 7
29. 1-10; -28
Ace H-Flanker
25 Base (26 Power fake)
LT-1; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-1
Jackson and Dorsey continue their good performance and both are able to get separation from the tackles.
30. 2-7; -31
Ace Up Tight
29 Sweep (GT)
LT-2; LG-2; C-1; RG-1.5; RT-2
Hardwick gets held blatantly here. The double team he has with Vasquez is good, but since Hardwick is held and can’t get off, his GMP. I’d also like TDEK to see the lane OUTSIDE of Dielman’s block.
31. 3-4; -34
22 Gun Lt.
50 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Tough stunt handled, quick throw helps.
Drive 8
32. 1-10; -20
Blue Twins Lt.
61 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Easy.
33. 2-10; -20
Y-Trips Rt. Open Lt. SB
20 Draw
LT-2; LG-1; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Dielman gets held and can’t release to LB.
34. 3-8; -22
13 Gun Lt.
61 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Hardwick and Vasquez execute a nice switch.
35. (after change of possession) KNEE
End of Half
Drive 9
36. 1-10; -41
Pro Twins Lt. Strong
724 PA Pro Max
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
37. 1-10; 42
Y-Trips Rt. Open Lt. SB
26 Power
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Dielman has a very nice block. All five lineman execute their blocks. TDEK needs to stay behind Dielman here, and he would have a very nice play.
38. 2-8; 40
Pro Lt. Gun Rt. Strong
WR Screen Rt.
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-1
Clary gets a piece of the DB, but it doesn’t matter as Vrabel dissects and blows up the play. I don’t like this call, as we don’t run WR screens, and I don’t like "dabbling" with plays. Move on.
39. 3-4; 36
22 Gun Lt.
61 Pro
LT-1; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Dombo falls, commits a smart hold.
Drive 10
40. 1-10; -34
Ace Twins Rt. H-Flanker
26 Power
LT-2; LG-2; C-1; RG-1; RT-1.5
Clary gets shed towards end. Hardwick falls, and the double team he has with Vasquez is unable to get the LB. This also causes the NT to split the double.
41. 2-6; -38
Ace H-Flanker
60 Pro Gap
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Good.
42. 1-10; 45
Pro Twins Lt. Weak
27 Iso
LT-2; LG-1; C-1; RG-2; RT-2
Hardwick gives up separation and gets no push (although it is a 1 on 1 with a NT). Dielman falls off the LB.
43. 2-7; 42
Pro Rt. Twins Lt. SB Y-Flanker
60 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Very good.
44. 3-7; 42
22 Gun Lt.
61 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Drive 11
45. 1-10; -8
Pro Twins Rt.
27 Iso
LT-1; LG-1.5; C-1.5; RG-2; RT-2
Dombo misses the LB.
46. 2-7; -11
Pro Twins Lt. F-Flanker
70 Pro Gap
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Very good from Dombo.
47. 1-10; -30
Y-Trips Rt. Open Lt. SB
70 Pro Gap
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
All day. Rivers ordered a latte while he dropped back that time.
48. 2-2; -38
Ace H-Flanker
26 Power
LT-2; LG-1; C-2; RG-2; RT-1.5
The double of Hardwick and Vasquez do a great job moving the NT. They don’t get the backside LB, but he takes himself out of the play. Clary needs to stay on. Jackson has done a great job this whole game of getting separation. Dielman can’t square up the LB.
49. 1-10; -41
22 Gun Rt.
60 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
All day…again. Touchdown.
Drive 12
50. 1-10; -10
Ace H-Flanker
29 Toss Stretch
LT-0; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-1.5
Dombo gets nothing and his GMP. Gates can’t get the BS LB (Vrabel). Dielman and Vasquez both get pancakes.
51. 2-5; -15
Pro Rt. Strong
724 PA Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-1.5
52. 1-10; -21
Ace H-Flanker
27 Power
LT-1; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-1
Dielman and Hardwick do very well. The tackles again struggle with the KC DEs.
53. 2-7; -24
Blue Twins Rt.
61 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
54. 1-10; -33
Pro Twins Lt. Weak
724 PA Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
The leak comes from the Y and TDEK.
55. 2-19; -24
22 Gun Rt.
60 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-1
Dielman and Hardwick execute a nice switch. Clary gives up a pressure.
56. 1-10; -44
Pro Rt. Weak
27 Iso
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Gates gets beat by Vrabel. Vasquez does very well.
58. 2-7; 30
Pro Lt. Y-Flanker
724 PA Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Very good.
59. 3-9; 32
22 Gun Lt.
61 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-1; RT-2
Clary does very well. Vasquez slips and gives up a hit.
60. 4-9; 32
13 Gun Rt.
60 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Very good all around.
Drive 13
61. 1-10; -33
22 Gun Lt.
61 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Beautiful pocket.
62. 1-10; 45
22 Gun Rt.
60 Pro Gap
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
63. 1-10; 23
Ace Twins Lt. H-Flanker
25 Base (26 Power fake)
LT-2; LG-0; C-1; RG-1; RT-1.5
The double from Hardwick and Vasquez is good enough, but they don’t get the LB (by design??? Counting on him to overplay 26 Power?). Dielman cuts up a gap late.
64. 2-13; 26
Pro Twins Rt. F-Flanker
50 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
All day.
65. 3-3; 16
Blue Twins Lt.
60 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
66. 4-3; 16
Blue Twins Lt.
60 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
67. 1-G; 4
23 Empty
50 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
68. 2-G; 4
22 Gun Lt.
20 Draw
LT-2; LG-2; C-0; RG-2; RT-2
By alignment, this is a good play call (as was the famous Raven debacle of ’09). Hardwick gets beat and Gates misses Vrabel…dooming this play. Dombo’s block was proper for the play design.
69. 3-G; 6
13 Gun Lt.
60 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
70. 4-G; 6
22 Gun Lt.
50 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
End of Game
11 comments
|
6 recs |
Tweet
Pacstud's Chargers O-Line Analysis: Saints (All Starters plays)
2010 Offensive Line Analysis and Grading
Chargers Pre-Season Week 3
Opponent: New Orleans Saints
Date: August 27, 2010
Drive 1
1. 1-10; -18
22 Gun Lt.
61 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Saints send seven, we have six to block. Rivers "picks up" the extra blitzer by throwing to his zone. Perfect.
2. 2-3; -25
Texas Rt. H-Flanker
26 Iso
LT-1.5; LG-1.5; C-1.5; RG-1.5; RT-1.5
Everyone does ok. But no one gets their block completely. Hester has to chip Vasquez’s guy and is late to the Sam. Not bad overall.
3. 1-10; -30
Pro Rt. Strong
26 Power
LT-1; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Dombo struggles to finish his block. Gates needs to get the scraping DT. Legs can’t get the safety.
20 comments
|
5 recs |
Tweet
Why AJ is a Sith Lord
Let me start by saying the following article is not my work. However, it is the work of a genius. I joked about getting permission to plaster this all over the Internet, and he (perhaps foolishly) agreed. I don't like straying from the technical aspect of analysis, and generally leave the front office discussions to those much smarter than I. This was written by just such a man. I reprint here unedited (John, please edit as necessary, with notation). Enjoy:
Let me also add concerning the timing on VJ discussion ...
As I've stated in the past, and I know this is in full disagreement with Florio and the other NFL pundits (and possibly some of you), the best deal for VJ will occur after the season starts. I don't care about the 3 game or 6 game suspensions.
We hold VJ's rights. VJ is a great receiver but a dumb ass off the field. I've read reports that the Chargers decided he was not in their long term plans after he was arrested the morning of the Jet's playoff game for driving too fast and without a license. Short term for $3.5 mil (yes).
Let's take a huge leap and assume that I negotiate things for a living and I'm good. As an experienced negotiator I know that I'm not going to get a deal done until the other side has experienced enough pain to cave into my demands. Its simple. So here we sit in the preseason, teams are loaded with potential talent and everybody is optimistic.
The team to which we may trade VJ, is currently sitting fat and happy right now figuring out who their No. 2 through 4 receivers are going to be. Sure, there are 5-6 teams that would love to have a discussion to know what VJ wants and explore a deal ... but like the Seahawks, very few are willing to sell their left nut (at this time).
VJ and his agents are also sitting at home believing somebody will come knocking and there is already interest from 4-5 teams, if only they could talk to those teams. They know VJ has value and (right now) they have no intention of making a deal that pays him less than their estimate of his value. Agent's are like car salesman ... "there is an a$s for every seat"
August 26th - Nobody is in pain yet. A little discomfort, but no pain.
Fast forward to the start of the season:
Team A loses its number 2 WR for the season in the 2nd game. 3 games into the season Team B realizes its No. 1 and 2 might not even start for the St. Jean High school Co-Ed Flag Football team. Team C, with legitimate playoff hopes loses its No. 1 to an injury that will sideline the player for at least 8 weeks.
VJ is watching the NFL start and he is on his butt eating bon-bons. The Chargers are playing well without him. He is a competitor and its killing him ... thank God for his bottle of Jack / Schnapps / Scotch or whatever his drink of choice is.
What we have now is PAIN - teams will be willing to give the Chargers more and VJ will be willing to take less.
There is a bonus to waiting (especially because VJ has a 3 game suspension and possibly another 3 games because of the roster exempt list). Assuming VJ's team strikes a discounted deal in principal with Team X, the Chargers now can bring VJ his Agent and Dean together and Dean can do his "awww shucks, we really want you to be with the Chargers ... business is business ... but how about we match the offer and you can retire with the team that drafted and believed in you from the beginning ... your friends are here ... your house is here ...stay here ... all is forgiven"
<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->
Me again. On a totally unrelated, though humorous note, when I read the all caps "PAIN" I can't help but read it in the voice of Clubber Lang from Rocky III. For those culturally deprived, it is the scene where Mr. Lang is asked for a prediction regarding his upcoming bout with Mr. Balboa.
10 comments
|
4 recs |
Tweet
Pacstud's O-Line Analysis: Cowboys (1st Half)
2010 Offensive Line Analysis and Grading
Chargers Pre-Season Week 2
Opponent: Dallas Cowboys
Date: August 21, 2010
Drive 1
1. 1-10; -20
Blue Pro Rt.
23 Iso
LT-2; LG-0; C-1; RG-2; RT-2
Igor shed Dielman easily. Hardwick secures block but gets driven back into FB. FB doesn’t get Mike and GMP. Vasquez does very well.
2. 2-6; -24
Pro Lt. Weak Y-Flanker
RB Screen Rt.
LT-2; LG-2; C-1; RG-2; RT-2
Dielman has a nice peel back. Hardwick falls and can’t lead. Vasquez does very well again.
3. 1-10; -48
Pro Wing Rt.
23 Iso
LT-2; LG-2; C-1; RG-2; RT-2
FB runs into Dielman and doesn’t get Mike. Hardwick again gets pushed into hole. Right side does very well. Both TE and Wing do well.
33 comments
|
5 recs |
Tweet
Pacstud O-Line Analysis: Bears (2nd Half)
Start of 2nd Half
Drive 5
LT – Green LG – Hansen C – McDonald RG – Stephenson RT - Dombrowski
31. 1-10; 11
Pro Wing Rt. Strong
22 Iso
LT-2; LG-1.5; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
LG needs to seal better and the C/RG have a nice double to LB. RB needs to follow FB through A gap.
32. 2-8; 9
Pro Wing Rt. Strong
21 Lead Draw
LT-2; LG-1.5; C-1.5; RG-1.5; RT-1.5
Botched from the start. Banks can’t get edge by alignment. The LG/C combo don’t get the LB (stay on double) and the RG/RT combo does the same thing. Who has the Will? The FB takes Mike.
33. 3-9; 10
22 Gun Lt.
61 Pro
LT-2; LG-.5; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
The LG never sees the loop and couldn’t pick it up even if he did.
8 comments
|
5 recs |
Tweet
Chargers Offensive Line Analysis (Preseason Game 1 vs Bears)
2010 Offensive Line Analysis and Grading
Chargers Pre-Season Week 1
Opponent: Chicago Bears
Date: August 14, 2010
Drive 1
1. 1-10; -22
Blue Pro Lt.
60 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Solid all around, Domb falls down but secures block. Dielman gets donkey punched.
2. 2-5; -27
31 Gun Rt.
50 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Domb gets happy feet and pushed into Rivers. Good otherwise. Clary does well.
3. 3-5; -27
31 Gun Rt.
60 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-1; RT-1
Vasquez can’t get off the 3 and the 7 loops untouched. Nice RB pickup on LB.
19 comments
|
10 recs |
Tweet
Pacstud O-Line Analysis: Terminology Redux
As this is week one, I will begin with a rudimentary explanation of the format I use. I will also explain many of the generic terms used.
Example Play
Let's look at an example play log:-
1-10; 45
Pro Rt.
26 Power
LT-2; LG-1; C-1.5; RG-2; RT-0
Looks like a bit of gibberish, doesn't it? Let's break it down:
1. 1-10; 45
Play#. Down-Distance; Yard Line (a negative denotes Charger side of field)
Pro Rt.
Formation. The formation will only describe the auxiliary personnel as it relates to the offensive line. Therefore, sometimes a tight end (Y) may actually be a receiver. The formations are based on where the "O"s are, not who the "O"s are.
26 Power
Play name. I generally use standard terminology and often simply for ease. In run plays, the first number is the ball carrier (1 = QB, 2 = RB, 3 = FB, 4 = WR) and the second number is the hole. I usually approximate the hole, but even is right and odd is left. The smaller the number, the closer to center. 8 and 9 is for outside runs. On pass pro, a two digit number represents a "regular" protection without PA. the first number represents the number blocking and the second numer (a 1 or 0) represents right or left for RB help. So 50 Pro is a 5 man protection, 60/61 is six man, and so on. A three digit number represents play action. 726 is 26 Power play action with 70 protection, 800 and 900 are boots, and 100/200 are sprint outs (not that we really ever sprint out). Obviously the actual calls are far more complex, but for our purposes this will allow us to analyze the offensive line play with quite a bit of accuracy.
LT-2; LG-1; C-1.5; RG-2; RT-0
I use Milt Tenopir's two point grading scale. I do NOT grade differently based on sacks, penalties, pancakes, or anything else. I grade on the BLOCKING. Too many time a QB can not get sacked even though the blocking was poor, or the QB gets sacked even though the blocking was good. A RB can get a lot of yards with bad blocking, and can get stuffed for a loss due to a TE’s missed block. So the RB’s performance is simply a HORRIBLE correlation to offensive line performance.
A zero represents no block, or a missed block. If the zero block has extenuating circumstances, it is still a zero but I will add an explanation (Dielman has two of these against Chicago).
A one represents either:
- The lineman secured one of two blocks required
- The lineman secured his block but did not maintain long enough.
A two represents a successfully engaged and completed block.
I will occasionally use a .5 or 1.5 if I feel the block falls somewhere in between.
Formation Terms
- 22 Gun Lt./Rt.: Shotgun sets. I do not differentiate receiver location as that would require an exponential set of terminology. I use a rudimentary scout system which identifies the number of receivers on either side, reading from left to right. So 22 is a 2 X 2 set with two receivers on both sides. 31 is Trips left and Open Right or three receivers on the left and one on the right…and so on. In Empty looks I will add the "Empty" tag, though one can identify Empty by seeing a 32, 23, 14, or 41 number before Gun.
- Blue: Two back shotgun sets. Just remember "Blue" means "two".
- Pro Rt./Lt.: Basic I formation. Pro as a formation refers to a Pro Set. It is an I formation with a FB, tight end, and two receivers. The Rt./Lt. determines tight end (Y) orientation. In single back sets where the FB is removed and there is an extra receiver, the Pro Rt./Lt. describes the side where the Y and Z are. In this case, the other side will almost always be Twins.
- Twins: Two receiver side
- Trips: Three receiver side
- Texas: Two tight end I formation
- SB: Single Back
- Ace: Single Back two tight end set
- Wing: Man outside of Y or H who is not on the LOS
- LOS: Line of Scrimmage
- Flanker: Man outside of offensive tackle who is not on the LOS
- Up: Used with the Y or H when they are in a two point stance. Remember, the Y is determined (for our purposes) by location not personnel.
- Strong/Weak: Used in Pro sets to describe an offset FB. Strong is to the Y, weak is away.
- Y: Primary tight end
- H: Secondary tight end
- X: On receiver
- Z: Off receiver
- Tight: Used to describe receiver(s) who is/are close to the box
OK, this should get you started. Please ask question as we go.
2 comments
|
3 recs |
Tweet
Pacstud Terminology Guide
Pacstud's O-Line Terminology
Translation Guide
Here is a basic guide to translating the terms used in my offensive line analysis. None of this is mine. It is all basic jargon used throughout the football industry. Most of these terms have synonyms that are used. I try to stay consistent, but will sometimes name formations or plays differently. I hope this helps.
Example:
3. 3-2; -47
Pro Rt.
26 Power
LT-2; LG-1.5; C-1; RG-2; RT-1
The first line
3. 3-2; -47
Is
Play #. Down-Distance; Yard Line (negative indicating opponent's half of field)
Punts and FGs are not included in the play # tally. I have begun to label the start of series as well.
The second line is formation
Pro Rt.
This may take a while. It is important to remember that you really don't need the formation to follow the play. It does help, though, to know where everyone is lining up in regards to the offensive line.
The third line is the play
26 Power
Run plays are fairly easy to diagnose and label, with a small number of exceptions. Pass protection is slightly more difficult, but we can still find basic structures.
The fourth line is the player grade
LT-2; LG-1.5; C-1; RG-2; RT-1
This is on a 0-2 point scale. 0 represents a "whiff" or being beaten completely on a play. 2 represents a successful and complete block. .5-1.5 is everything in between. While grades may vary slightly from one person to the next, consistency from a single graded over a period of time is the essential element.
I usually try to add any relevant comments afterwards. These are most helpful if combined with video.
Here is a glossary of terms used in Formation description:
Ace: A two tight end, single running back formation with two wide receivers.
Blue: A shotgun formation with two backs next to the quarterback. Used with a Twins set to one side and an Open set to the other. (Remember: Blue = Two)
Bootleg: A play-action look with a QB roll out opposite of the run fake.
Bunch: A trips set with three receivers clustered near the box. Usually the tight end is set in the middle and on the line of scrimmage, with the other two set off the line of scrimmage.
Empty: This is a formation with five wide outs and the quarterback is the only player in the backfield. Usually, though not always, out of a Gun set.
F: Letter designation for fullback.
Flanker: This is a spot on the field. A flanker is off the line of scrimmage (LOS) and adjacent to the offensive tackle.
Gun: A shotgun formation
H: Letter designation for secondary tight end. It also can be used to designate slot receiver (third receiver).
Lt.: Left. So "Pro Lt." would be an I formation with the tight end set to the left.
Naked: A bootleg without any protection to the roll out side.
On: This is a term used to designate that a player otherwise split out wide by formation is "On" the line and adjacent to the offensive tackle. Almost exclusively used for the tight end.
Open: Used to signify a single receiver set out wide. This can be used with or without a tight end on the same side.
Pro: Basic I formation
Rt.: Right. Strength is declared to the tight end. So "Pro Rt." would be an I formation with the tight end set to the right.
SB: Acronym for a Single Back set. While there may be an F or fullback in the formation, that player would not be in the backfield. An SB designation is not used in shotgun sets where there is no tight end.
Strong: An I formation (Pro) set with an offset fullback "F". In a strong set, the fullback is offset toward the tight end.
Texas: A combination of Ace and Pro. This is a formation with two tight ends and a fullback. This leaves only a single wide out. Often the single wide out is lined up in a wing or flanker position. Also, the wide out is sometimes a third tight end.
TO: Acronym for a Tackle Over set. Strength is still declared to the tight end side, which is opposite the tackle over.
Trips: Three wide receivers set to one side. Often this will include the tight end, designated as "Y". Otherwise, same as twins in regards to strength. Please note that if the Y is included in the trips call, then strength would be to the trips, not opposite.
Twins: Two wide receivers set to one side. I do not designate which is on or off, or their distance from the line (all things that would be done in a "real" formation call). When used, the Rt./Lt. call designates the Twins side. So "Pro Twins Lt." means we have a Twins set left, and by default the tight end (and strength) is opposite, or right.
Up: Used to denote that the player (usually tight end or "Y") is in a two point standing position instead of a three point stance. Up is not used if the player is "open" or "split out wide", it would then be inferred.
Weak: An I formation (Pro) set with an offset fullback "F". In a weak set, the fullback is offset away from the tight end.
Wing: This is a spot on the field. A wing is off the line of scrimmage (LOS) and adjacent to the tight end.
X: Letter designation for secondary wide receiver. Usually set on the line of scrimmage (LOS).
Y: Letter designation for primary tight end. Please note that often a "Y" is designated for schematic purposes, while the actual player may be a wide-out or back.
Z: Letter designation for primary wide receiver. Usually set off the line of scrimmage (LOS).
13, 22, 23, 31, 32: A basic description of "spread" sets. To try and describe any spread set requires multiple terms and numbers, so I use a general "left to right" rule. The first number is how many receivers are set out to the left, the second number to the right. Obviously, 13, 22, and 31 are four receiver sets. 32 and 23 (and I suppose 41 and 14) are Empty sets. If a receiver is set in a wing or flanker slot, I try to label accordingly.
Here is a glossary of terms used in Play description:
Run Plays (I will update throughout the season as needed)
Iso: Short for "isolation" (also known as Lead), the intent is to isolate a LB with your Fullback. The playside blocking is man. There is usually at least one double team. The double team is also responsible for the backside LB. The backside blocking can be man or zone.
Pacstud Note: I will update as this project continues. Trying to get diagrams inserted.
23 comments
|
5 recs |
Tweet
Week 8 - Raider Game II
Week 8 - Raider Game II
http://www.boltsfromtheblue.com/2009/11/5/1117571/pacstud-terminology-guide
1. 1-10; -41
Ace Y-Up H-Flanker SB
829 Naked
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Easy protection, but I wish Norv would quit running it up the middle for one yard on first down!
2. 1-G; 6
Pro Twins Rt. TO Weak Gun Z-Flanker (Wildfrog)
16 Power
LG-1.5; C-2; RG-2; LT-2; RT-2
The Wildfrog makes its' debut! We run a Tackle Over set (TO) and offset the FB to the weak side (declaring strength to Y/Tight End still). We motion to a flanker on the backside to seal for the pulling guard. Notice the defender that goes over to cover our X (Rivers) is the first one to contact LT (the QB). Dielman pulls nicely and actually misses the safety/LB. However, the defender has to spin out to avoid contact and can't make the play. The double team from Vasquez and McNeil is great, and they don't have to come off to pick up the Will or the Safety (Will runs through backside, out of play. Safety gets caught up in the wash). Clary and Hester both make nice blocks. Touchdown.
Start of 2nd Series
3. 1-10; -29
Pro Twins Lt. Open Rt.
22 Iso
LT-2; LG-2; C-1.5; RG-1; RT-2
McNeil seals backside nicely. Dielman does a good job of picking up the Will. MCow does decently, but continues to struggle with staying locked on. Vasquez falls as Hester gets a nice block, though he received more than he gave...OUCH.
4. 2-5; -34
Pro Twins Lt. Open Rt. Strong
70 Pro Max
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Good protection, penalty on the play.
5. 1-10; -39
Trips Bunch Rt. Open Lt. SB
27 Dart
LT-2; LG-2; C-1; RG-2; RT-2
Dart isn't a new play, but we haven't seen it a ton. Dart (sometimes called Tag) is a basic pull play where the backside Tackle pulls around into the playside gap. A very good play against Even front teams (4-3). On this play, McNeil seals out, and the double team from Dielman and MCow is good. However, MCow is unable to get the LB when he comes off the double team. Clary's pull is nice, as is Vasquez's backside seal. Now, it may look like Gates is pulling as well...he's not. He simply can't handle #77 (Who had a career game against us). Why he doesn't cut him, I can't say. But it basically wrecks the whole play. LT does well to get 3. The WR isn't to blame, he's counting on the play staying inside.

6. 2-7; -42
Trips Bunch Lt. Open Rt. Gun Rt. (RB motions to a Quads Lt. Empty Gun look, 4 X 1)
50 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Very nice switch between Mcow and Vasquez.
7. 1-10; 48
Pro Rt. Twins Lt. Y-Flanker Up SB
26 Power
LT-2; LG-1.5; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Dielman's pull is nice, but he can't stick to the LB. Gates can't get 77 (again), sigh.
8. 2-9; 47
Pro Twins Rt. Open Lt. Weak
50 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
9. 3-9; 47
Pro Trips Rt. Gun Lt.
61 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Absolutely horrible penalty call.
Start of 3rd Series
10. 1-10; -37
Pro Twins Lt. Y-Up
28 Stretch
LT-1; LG-2; C-2; RG-1; RT-1
Watch VJack and Gates. Both do pretty awful jobs here. McNeil gets away with a pretty blatant false start (he'll get away with another in the 2nd half) and then can't get a LB, safety, anything? Dielman's pancake is the highlight of the play, as Vasquez is shed along with Clary (after some initial push from both).
11. 2-19; -28 (After Manu Penalty)
Pro Twins Lt. F-Wing SB
725 Pro Max
LT-2; LG-2; C-1; RG-1; RT-2
Vasquez gets shed and beat. MCow comes off too soon and is unable to adjust to the LB rush.
12. 3-1; -46
Pro Rt. Y-Flanker Up
32 Belly
LT-2; LG-2; C-0; RG-2; RT-1
Have I mentioned that Gates isn't a very good blocker? McNeil does a good job here. MCow is "posterized" with a snap down. Vasquez does a good job on the right side, but Clary is driven inside a bit much.
13. 1-10; -49
Pro Twins Lt. F-Wing
726 Pro Max
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Good protection here.
Start of 4th Series
14. 1-10; -22
Pro Lt.
29 Sweep
LT-2; LG-2; C-1; RG-2; RT-2
A great job all around...almost. MCow is unable to cut his man and gets driven. The right side does very well here.
15. 2-10; -22
Pro Trips Rt. Gun Lt.
61 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Nice switch between McNeil and Dielman.
16. 3-7; -25
22 Gun Lt.
50 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-1.5; RG-1; RT-2
Vasquez lunges and misses. MCow hesitates when he thinks he sees a switch coming which causes him to get beat towards the end. This basically puts two guys on Dielman, who holds up...barely.
17. 1-10; -45
Pro Rt.
25 Iso
LT-2; LG-2; C-1.5; RG-2; RT-2
MCow is unable to come off the double team cleanly and can't get the LB.
18. 1-10; 44
Pro Lt.
21 Iso
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-1; RT-2
Good double from McNeil and Dielman with Dielman getting a nice cut block on the LB. Vasquez needs to keep going, as his GMP (guy makes play).
19. 2-9; 43
23 Gun Empty Y-On
50 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Very good job!
20. 1-10; 29
Trips Bunch Rt. Open Lt. SB
27 Dart
LT-2; LG-2; C-1.5; RG-.5; RT-2
Vasquez gets shed and his GMP. MCow does well, but allows the LB to spin out and his GMP. Clary gets blown up but gets the block. Dielman gets a pancake!
21. 2-5; 24
Y Trips Rt. Open Lt. SB
28 Sweep
LT-1; LG-2; C-1; RG-2; RT-2
Gates gets blown up (great angle, he takes a false step with his left foot and places his helmet on inside instead of outside). Vasquez has to get 77 for Gates. MCow makes a bad cut block. Dielman does well, but McNeil has to overtake this block so Dielman can release to LB. McNeil goes over Dielman's block, and has no chance of getting the LB.
22. 3-10; 29
32 Gun Empty
50 Pro
LT-1; LG-1.5; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
McNeil stumbles, and is unable to switch with Dielman.
23. 1-10; 15
Pro Rt. Strong
26 Power
LT-2; LG-0; C-2; RG-1; RT-1
Dielman doesn't turn up to get the Mike, who's in the hole. Vasquez and Clary are piled up on their double team, so that neither can come off to Will.
24. 2-8; 13
22 Gun Rt.
60 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
25. 3-3; 8
23 Gun Empty Y-On
50 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-1
Clary is beat by a swim move. Watch the endzone angle. What is Dielman doing with his right arm? Almost inexplicable. Injury? Coaching? It doesn't cost us here, but I can't explain this technique. Touchdown.
Start of 5th Series
26. 1-10; -20
Texas Rt.
24 Iso
LT-2; LG-2; C-.5; RG-2; RT-2
A good job from Dielman and Clary. The double team from Vasquez and MCow starts with promise. Possibly due to not enough help from Vasquez, MCow is unable to take over and secure the DT. Vasquez does a very good job on the LB.
27. 2-9; -21
23 Gun Empty
50 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Good switches from both T-G combos.
28. 3-4; -26
Pro Trips Lt. Gun Rt.
60 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Very nice overall. Vasquez is just a tad slow on the switch.
29. 1-10; 45
Pro Rt.
25 Iso
LT-2; LG-1.5; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Dielman does a good job on the double team, but can't secure the LB completely. The double between Vasquez and Clary is also good, but Clary needs to latch on better.
30. 2-1; 36
Pro Rt.
32 Belly
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
OK, some honesty here. I tried, but was only to grade Clary as a legit 2. So why does everyone else get a pass? Because we ran Belly and got the 1st down, OK? If anyone wants to try to catch LT-RG and grade ‘em, go for it. #90 is the GMP if that helps.
31. 1-10; 33
22 Gun Rt.
RB Screen Rt.
LT-2; LG-2; C-1; RG-2; RT-1
MCow...oh MCow. Why don't you turn upfield? I understand that Vasquez was a tad slow on his release, but you know Vasquez has the kick out and you're the lead. Clary, normally is money on screens with his invite and snapdown. On this one though, 77 continues his HOF day and is the GMP.
32. 2-2; 25
Y-Trips Rt. Open Lt. SB
26 Power
LT-2; LG-1.5; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Lucky for us, 77 goes out after running down the screen. Gates is able to block the 7 tech, getting away with a hold in the process. The double from Vasquez and Clary is good. Dielman misses mostly, but forces the defender around him creating a seal.
33. 1-G; 10
Pro Rt. Twins Lt. SB
20 Trap (That's right, this was the game winner in Chargers-Raiders I)
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Dielman pulls and traps with a pancake (OK, the guy fell he bit so hard, but a pancake's a pancake). Great job by Vasquez and Clary. Touchdown.

Start of 6th Series
34. Kneel down. No grade.
End of Half
Start of 7th Series
35. 1-10; -20
Pro Rt. Wing Rt.
25 Zone Cut (?)
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-1
Clary takes a bad angle to the LB and is unable to secure completely. The holding call was bogus imo. LT is shot by a sniper.
36. 1-20; -10
Pro Rt.
25 Iso
LT-2; LG-2; C-0; RG-2; RT-2
Great double from Dielman and MCow is wasted when MCow can't come off to get the LB and his GMP.
37. 2-19; -11
Blue Twins Rt. Open Lt.
50 Pro Max
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Nice.

38. 3-19; -11
Blue Twins Rt. Open Lt.
50 Pro Max
LT-2; LG-1.5; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Dielman actually has two switches on this play. The first he handles fine. The second, which appears impromptu, he's unable to get and allows mild pressure on Rivers.
Start of 8th Series
39. 1-10; -38
Y-Trips Rt. Open Lt. SB
61 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-1
LT does a VERY nice job of picking up a DT on this one. I don't like the pick up scheme, putting LT on a DT is not a good idea but he makes it work. Clary gets driven back but secures the block.
40. 1-10; -49
Pro Twins Lt. Open Rt. Strong
60 Pro Max
LT-2; LG-1.5; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
This one's a little on Rivers. McNeil does right and walls the LB, but his ultimately his GMP. 92 gets some leverage on Dielman, forcing Rivers to step up and he then gets flushed.
41. 2-10; -49
Pro Lt.
29 Sweep
LT-2; LG-1; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Gates actually does a good job here (credit where it's due Antonio). Hester does not do a good job. The problem is caused by a LB blitz in the middle. Pre-snap MCow is going to get 92, and Dielman will pull to get LB. The LB blitzes at the last second and MCow picks him up. Dielman starts to pull, then realizes he needs to get Seymour. He does, but is driven back in the process.
42. 3-10; -49
13 Gun Lt.
70 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
The Raiders bring 7 and we have six in to block. Rivers is in charge of "picking up" the seventh man. That man should have been VJack who is WAO (Wide *** Open). Tough and fast read, but that's the throw.
Start of 9th Series
43. 1-10; -8
Pro Lt. Twins Rt. SB
70 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
44. 2-10; -8
Y-Trips Rt. Open Lt. Gun Lt.
61 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
45. 3-10; -8
Blue Twins Rt. Open Lt.
60 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Thank you Chris Chambers, for all you've done for San Diego! You will be missed (until we play the Chiefs).
46. 1-10; -28
Pro Rt. Strong
26 Power
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
McNeil's GMP, but not really his fault as LT inexplicably cuts back. Dielman hits the Mike in the wash, MCow seals to what should be backside (his GMP as well). Vasquez releases from the double team a tad slow.
47. 2-9; -29
Pro Rt.
724 Pro
LT-2; LG-1.5; C-1.5; RG-2; RT-2
Chop block on Dielman and MCow not called.
48. 1-10; -44
Pro Rt.
28 Sweep
LT-1.5; LG-1; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Gates does better than horrible, and we have a play! Backside troubles as McNeil gets away with his second false start, and then struggles to overtake. Dielman falls before he can get to the LB. Tolbert and Vasquez switch on the fly, it's beautiful to watch. Clary's kick out is very, very nice.

49. 2-1; 47
Pro Rt.
32 Belly
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-1.5; RT-2
Vasquez gets caught in a pile and can't get the LB. Dielman does a good job here.
50. 1-10; 44
Pro Rt. Strong
20 Iso (Read Norv's lips...20 ISO!)
LT-1; LG-.5; C-2; RG-2; RT-0
McNeil can't reach his 4i, Dielman gets blown up and Clary has a whiff on the DE's swim move. The Will never triggers, so MCow and Vasquez stay on their good double team.
51. 1-5; 39 (after penalty)
Pro Twins Lt. TO Weak
827 Bootleg
RT-2; LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2
52. 1-10; 25
Pro Rt. Wing Rt. Strong
26 Power
LT-0; LG-1.5; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
92 tools McNeil on this one. Dielman does a good job, dives a bit early. Vasquez gets the backside LB nicely.
53. 2-6; 21
Pro Lt. Strong
27 Power
LT-0; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Both guards do a great job. Vasquez annihilates the Mike. McNeil is visibly lost...get the Will!
54. 3-1; 16
Texas Lt. TO
26 Power
LG-2; C-2; RG-2; LT-1.5; RT-2
Great pull from Dielman, this is how you do it!
55. 1-G; 8 (after penalty)
Pro Rt. Wing Rt. Strong
26 Power
LT-2; LG-1; C-2; RG-2; RT-1.5
Dielman can't find the Mike in the wash, but may have if Sproles had stayed on track. Clary struggles to overtake the double team when Vasquez leaves to get the Will. Good job from MCow here.
56. 2-G; 6
Pro Rt. Wing Rt. Strong
50 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-0
Clary gets beat and gives up the sack, 77 to the HOF!
57. 3-G; 10
22 Gun Lt.
61 Pro
LT-2; LG-2; C-2; RG-2; RT-2
Raiders bring seven and play man behind this. Six of the blitzers are picked up, leaving number seven for Rivers. Doesn't happen L Field Goal.

Start of 10th Series
58. Kneel down. No Grade.
59. Kneel down. No Grade.
13 comments
|
12 recs |
Tweet
Showing 1 - 16 of 16
by 





