<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>SB Nation User Blog:  pbpsean</title>
    <link>http://www.sbnation.com/users/pbpsean</link>
    <description>Posts made by pbpsean on SB Nation</description>
    <item>
      <title>Shake-Up with Rangers TV &amp; Radio?</title>
      <link>http://www.lonestarball.com/2009/11/3/1112994/shake-up-with-rangers-tv-radio</link>
      <author>pbpsean</author>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:49:34 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;Now that the play-by-play position is open with the Frisco Roughriders... what does this mean?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Did they just get rid of Scott Garner or will he join the big club?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I hope this isn't the case... but my gut wonders if Garner will join Eric in the radio booth, Dave Barnett moves to TV PBP to join Tom and Josh Lewin doesn't have his contract renewed. Especially since Garner did a few &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sbnation.com/mlb/teams/TEX&quot; class=&quot;sbn-auto-link&quot;&gt;Rangers&lt;/a&gt; games last season.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Like I say, I hope not because I like the pairing of Lewin and Grieve, and do not like Garner.&amp;nbsp;The Barnett experiment on radio failed miserably last season. Just wasn't very good.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What would you like to see happen with the Rangers radio &amp;amp; TV?&lt;/p&gt;
  


 	&lt;fieldset class=&quot;poll-box&quot;&gt;
  &lt;legend&gt;Poll&lt;/legend&gt; 
  &lt;h5 class=&quot;poll-title&quot;&gt;What Radio/TV pairings would you like to see in 2010?&lt;/h5&gt;
  
    
&lt;div id=&quot;poll_container_54424_1107948646&quot;&gt;
&lt;form action=&quot;/polls/vote/54424?container_id=poll_container_54424_1107948646&quot; method=&quot;post&quot; onsubmit=&quot;new Ajax.Request('/polls/vote/54424?container_id=poll_container_54424_1107948646', {asynchronous:true, evalScripts:true, parameters:Form.serialize(this)}); return false;&quot;&gt;
&lt;ul class=&quot;poll-list clearfix&quot;&gt;

    &lt;li class=&quot;clearfix&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;radio&quot;&gt;&lt;input id=&quot;poll_option_252077&quot; name=&quot;poll_option&quot; type=&quot;radio&quot; value=&quot;252077&quot; /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
        &lt;label for=&quot;poll_option_252077&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;Lewin/Grieve on TV and Nadel/Barnett on radio&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/label&gt;&lt;/li&gt;

    &lt;li class=&quot;clearfix&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;radio&quot;&gt;&lt;input id=&quot;poll_option_252078&quot; name=&quot;poll_option&quot; type=&quot;radio&quot; value=&quot;252078&quot; /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
        &lt;label for=&quot;poll_option_252078&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;Lewin/Grieve on TV and Nadel/Garner on radio&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/label&gt;&lt;/li&gt;

    &lt;li class=&quot;clearfix&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;radio&quot;&gt;&lt;input id=&quot;poll_option_252079&quot; name=&quot;poll_option&quot; type=&quot;radio&quot; value=&quot;252079&quot; /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
        &lt;label for=&quot;poll_option_252079&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;Barnett/Grieve on TV and Nadel/Garner on radio&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/label&gt;&lt;/li&gt;

    &lt;li class=&quot;clearfix&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;radio&quot;&gt;&lt;input id=&quot;poll_option_252080&quot; name=&quot;poll_option&quot; type=&quot;radio&quot; value=&quot;252080&quot; /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
        &lt;label for=&quot;poll_option_252080&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;Grieve and Nadel joined by new partners&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/label&gt;&lt;/li&gt;

    &lt;li class=&quot;clearfix&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;radio&quot;&gt;&lt;input id=&quot;poll_option_252081&quot; name=&quot;poll_option&quot; type=&quot;radio&quot; value=&quot;252081&quot; /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
        &lt;label for=&quot;poll_option_252081&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;None of the Above&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/label&gt;&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;poll-vote-submit&quot;&gt;&lt;input class=&quot;button&quot; name=&quot;commit&quot; type=&quot;submit&quot; value=&quot;Vote!&quot; /&gt; &amp;nbsp;  211 votes | &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; onclick=&quot;new Ajax.Request('/polls/results/54424?container_id=poll_container_54424_1107948646', {asynchronous:true, evalScripts:true}); return false;&quot;&gt;Results&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/form&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
  
&lt;/fieldset&gt;

      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Perfect world tweaks for a 2010 pennant</title>
      <link>http://www.lonestarball.com/2009/9/17/1034986/perfect-world-tweaks-for-a-2010</link>
      <author>pbpsean</author>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:22:02 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;In a perfect world where money is no object, and the team ownership is settled, I would love if the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sbnation.com/mlb/teams/TEX&quot; class=&quot;sbn-auto-link&quot;&gt;Rangers&lt;/a&gt; brass improved our outfield for 2010... here's how I would do it:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;1) Sign Matt Holliday to a five-year deal and put him in left field. &amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;Since we have two first round picks next year, lets use one to sign this free agent (or another Type A outfield type) and still use the second one on a pitcher in the draft.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;2) Let Marlon Byrd walk.&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;If he achieves Type B status this is a must. I like what Marlon has done and appreciate it, but wouldn't you trade Byrd and a swap of 1st round picks for Holliday? Of course you would!!&amp;nbsp;By giving up the&amp;nbsp;lower 1st round pick to sign Holliday and gaining a supplemental for Byrd when he signs somewhere... its a no-brainer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rangers 2010 outfield to start season (Smoak in AAA):&lt;br /&gt;LF- Holliday, CF- Borbon, RF- Hamilton/Cruz, DH- Hamilton/Cruz, fifth outfielder is Murphy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rangers lineup...&lt;br /&gt;1) Borbon, 2) Andrus, 3) Young, 4) Holliday, 5) Kinsler, 6) Hamilton, 7) Cruz, 8) Davis, 9) Pudge&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I know we won't have the money to sign Holliday. But I think our pitching will be fine and we need runners on base. Holliday certainly delivers and I like him more than Ramirez and Bay at that price.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you want pitching maybe we do Jamey's Greinke/Cruz deal and call it a winter.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lets hear your ideas for a winter with a maximum of one major free agent signing and a maximum of one trade... you can get your pitching or hitting either way. Two hitters, two pitchers, one of each. What would you do to give us a great shot to win in 2010?&lt;/p&gt;

  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Would somebody beat the Angels already!!</title>
      <link>http://www.lonestarball.com/2009/7/24/961550/would-somebody-beat-the-angels</link>
      <author>pbpsean</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:28:39 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sbnation.com/mlb/teams/KAN&quot; class=&quot;sbn-auto-link&quot;&gt;Royals&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sbnation.com/mlb/teams/MIN&quot; class=&quot;sbn-auto-link&quot;&gt;Twins&lt;/a&gt; just took care of business, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sbnation.com/mlb/teams/TEX&quot; class=&quot;sbn-auto-link&quot;&gt;Rangers&lt;/a&gt; would be in first place in teh AL West. Come on American League, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sbnation.com/mlb/teams/ANA&quot; class=&quot;sbn-auto-link&quot;&gt;Angels&lt;/a&gt; are ripe to be beaten! Are the Rangers the only team capable of beating on a consistent basis!?!?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z z z z z z&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sheesh!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>what!?!?!?!?!</title>
      <link>http://www.lonestarball.com/2008/12/3/678877/what</link>
      <author>pbpsean</author>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:38:51 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news?slug=ti-hotstovenotes120308&amp;amp;prov=yhoo&amp;amp;type=lgns&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;According to Yahoo's Tim Brown&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;em&gt;, the Giants &quot;believe they are closing in on signing shortstop &lt;strong&gt;Edgar Renteria&lt;/strong&gt;.&quot;&amp;nbsp; Brown also says the Giants have discussed trading &lt;strong&gt;Jonathan Sanchez&lt;/strong&gt; to the Marlins for &lt;strong&gt;Jorge Cantu&lt;/strong&gt;.&amp;nbsp; That'd be a steal for the Marlins, who plucked Cantu off the scrap heap in January for a half-million bucks.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That better not be true. If I were JD, I would immediately get on the phone and offer all of our spare parts for Sanchez. If the Giants trade Sanchez for just Cantu there should be an investigation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

  
  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Could there be a flip on the way?</title>
      <link>http://www.lonestarball.com/2008/11/14/661432/could-there-be-a-flip-on-t</link>
      <author>pbpsean</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:01:02 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;When reading all of the many opinions of this deal a really interesting thought crossed my mind...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Could the Marlins have grabbed Ceda for the Rangers to help complete a deal for one of our catchers? Could we still get a Boston package and do both deals?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If they could plug him in right now, we might as well consider it too.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hey, I would pay some of Laird's contract for a chance to acquire Ceda.&lt;/p&gt;

  
  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cubs out of options with Hill?</title>
      <link>http://www.lonestarball.com/2008/11/5/654465/cubs-out-of-options-with-h</link>
      <author>pbpsean</author>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 19:01:10 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Chicago Sun-Times reporting that &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rich Hill&lt;/strong&gt;'s lost 2008 season killed his trade value.&amp;nbsp; He'll be out of options next spring.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would be in favor of overpaying the Cubs to acquire Hill. If we could find a match it would be a risk worth taking. Just part of the turn over every rock to improve the club scenario.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bring in Hochevar, Hill and Nippert and see what Maddux can do with them.&lt;/p&gt;

  
  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Interesting Royals discussion...</title>
      <link>http://www.lonestarball.com/2008/11/5/654456/interesting-royals-discuss</link>
      <author>pbpsean</author>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 18:46:40 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;Saw this on MLB Trade Rumors:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kansascity.com/sports/royals/story/875855.html&quot;&gt;Bob Dutton of the Kansas City Star&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;says the Braves appear willing to trade &lt;strong&gt;Jeff Francoeur&lt;/strong&gt;.&amp;nbsp; While no trade talks have taken place, it's known that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2008/11/braves-rumors-l.html&quot;&gt;Royals GM Dayton Moore is a fan&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Dutton speculates that the Royals would not give up &lt;strong&gt;Zack Greinke&lt;/strong&gt; for Francoeur, but may consider offering &lt;strong&gt;Luke Hochevar&lt;/strong&gt;,&lt;strong&gt; Danny Cortes&lt;/strong&gt;, or &lt;strong&gt;Mark Teahen&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'm not real interested in Teahen, but I would have interest in Hochevar and/or Cortes. Wouldn't it be a reasonable risk to take if the Royals would accept David&amp;nbsp;Murphy to KC for Hochevar?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Don't we have better outfielders to trade than Francoeur!?!&lt;/p&gt;

  
  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lower targets for acquiring pitching.</title>
      <link>http://www.lonestarball.com/2008/10/17/637165/lower-targets-for-acquirin</link>
      <author>pbpsean</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:42:11 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;As much as I would like Peavy (whom we can give the two pitchers, CF and catcher they want in a deal) and&amp;nbsp;Sabathia (just don't see us winning his services)... why don't we get creative, while also getting our kids some experience in 2009.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Randy Johnson:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; Because it looks like Arizona doesn't seem to want to pay him, lets go after Randy&amp;nbsp;on a 1yr/$11 million deal.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would also offer him a sweetheart package like Clemens to make it easier for him.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ben Sheets:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; Because of his late season injury, I would go after him with a 3yr/$39 million deal with two option years and incentive bonuses for innings pitched.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think adding those two and entering 2009 with a rotation of: Johnson, Sheets, Padilla/Millwood (one traded for anything in winter/the other traded at the deadline for anything), Harrison, McCarthy and Feldman... with Hurley, Hunter, Mendoza and Mathis in AAA as reinforcements... and mid-season replacements in Feliz and Holland by August 1 if need be.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wouldn't mind Greg Maddux as a player/coach as mention in USA Today. Name him Pitching Coach and let him pitch as much as he wants. Interesting thought.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

  
  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Let's call the Marlins!</title>
      <link>http://www.lonestarball.com/2008/10/7/630224/let-s-call-the-marlins</link>
      <author>pbpsean</author>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:13:40 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;Bill Shaikin of the LA Times&amp;nbsp;says the Angels have considered acquiring &lt;strong&gt;Dan Uggla&lt;/strong&gt; as a way to compensate if Teixeira leaves.&amp;nbsp; Uggla would probably play third base.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HELLO! There could be our answer for third base in 2009. The Rangers and Marlins could come together and make a blockbuster deal that helps BOTH teams get stronger!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Palm Beach Post says that Uggla ($417k in 08) and 1B Mike Jacobs ($395k in 08) could be among those dealt this offseason along with LHP Scott Olson ($405k in 08).&amp;nbsp; The Post thinks that Uggla and Jacobs would make a combined $6 million in arbitration next season and that Olson should make $6 million himself.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So for $12 million you could have a long-term 3B, a nice DH/1B and a left handed starter. Consider their average stats over the past three years:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Uggla, 28yo righty bat: 153gp, 105r, 155h, 37dbl, 4trip, 30hr, 90rbi, 64bb, 153k, 13 errors at 2B.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jacobs, 28yo lefty bat: 130gp, 59r, 118h, 30dbl, 2trip, 23hr, 71rbi, 37bb, 108k, 8 errors at 1B.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Olson, 25yo LHP: 32starts, 186ip, 10w, 12l, 194h, 111r, 96er, 27hr, 76bb, 137k.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I believe you give Uggla and Jacobs to Rudy as a project to try and cut down the strikeouts and increase the walks. That is all they need to be above average hitters.&amp;nbsp; And then you let Nolan and Hawkins work with Olson to cut down the hits, home runs and walks while increasing the strikeouts and you have a solid lefty for a long time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you could make a deal for these three with Florida (or even just Uggla and Olson), then get either Jackson or Sonnanstine from the Rays or Snell from the Pirates... you would be finished dealing this winter.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Then you would have an infield of Davis, Kinsler, Young and Uggla. An outfield of Hamilton, Byrd and Cruz with Boggs/Murphy as 4th outfielder,&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;Jacobs as 1b/DH.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would send Laird, Murphy/Boggs, Arias and two pitching prospects to Florida for Uggla, Jacobs, Olson and a pitching prospect.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do we want Uggla... Jacobs...&amp;nbsp;Olson? And at what price? Could we sign Uggla long-term and trade Young and cash to the Dodgers for low level prospects?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One other question... if we are just looking for a stopgap at 3B until we move Young there, would you consider trading a prospect or two to Seattle for Beltre? Hate to trade with Seattle but it could be a nice 3B bridge to Young.&lt;/p&gt;

  
  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Olney: Jake Peavy might be available!</title>
      <link>http://www.lonestarball.com/2008/10/1/626116/olney-jake-peavy-might-be</link>
      <author>pbpsean</author>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:35:26 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;According to Olney:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Jake Peavy, Padres: He won the 2007 Cy Young Award and posted a solid 10-11 record with a 2.85 ERA, with 166 strikeouts in 173 2/3 innings this season. He is under contract for the next four seasons, at salaries of $8 million, $15 million, $16 million and $17 million (with a $22 million option for 2013). But he has become increasingly vocal in his frustration with the Padres, and with the team reducing its payroll to something in the neighborhood of $50 million this year, Peavy's salary will increasingly become top-heavy within the San Diego budget. General manager Kevin Towers has been quoted as saying that the Padres have no untouchable players, and there are executives who say they think Peavy could be taken for the right package of prospects. Peavy has a full no-trade clause and would have to agree to any deal. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would rather pay a little more in prospects for five years of Peavy than two years of Greinke.&amp;nbsp; Get Peavy and let the chips fall where they may.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lets discuss. What would we be comfortable trading for Peavy?&lt;/p&gt;

  
  


      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
