Philadelphia Phillies

This is the eleventh best-of-five series in Phillies history. This includes the 1981 Division Series between the Phillies and the Expos, which is sometimes overlooked in record books.The total involves five National League Championship Series under the original format and the most recent five years in the National League Division Series. What is the total record so far? Amazingly even.

Continue reading this post »

Well, now that it is finally over and the new season record has been set at 102-60, here is an updated summary of the season, month by month.

Continue reading this post »

Round numbers are easier to remember, and forty games over .500 is so rare in the Phillies' history that I thought it worth looking at how this team arrived there - and how the other teams that came near to that point also fared.

April - 18-8
Longest winning streak: 5 games (4/20-4/24)
Longest losing streak: 2 games, twice (4/18-4/19 & 4/25-/4/26)
Starters wins: Halladay 4, Lee 2, Hamels 3, Oswalt 3, Blanton 0, Worley 1

May - 16-13
Longest winning streak: 4 games (5/25-5/28)
Longest losing streak: 4 games (5/14-5/17)
Starters wins: Halladay 3, Lee 2, Hamels 4, Oswalt 0, Blanton 1, Worley 1, Kendrick 1

June - 17-10
Longest winning streak: 7 games (6/10-6/16)
Longest losing streak: 4 games (5/31-6/4)
Starters wins: Halladay 3, Lee 5, Hamels 2, Oswalt 1, Worley 1, Kendrick 1

July - 17-8
Longest winning streak: 5 games (7/19-7/24)
Longest losing streak: 2 games (7/27-7/28)
Starters wins: Halladay 3, Lee 1, Hamels 3, Worley 4, Kendrick 1

August - 18-7
Longest winning streak: 9 games (7/29-8/6)
Longest losing streak: 2 games (8/24-8/26)
Starters wins: Halladay 3, Lee 5, Hamels 1, Oswalt 2, Worley 2, Kendrick 1

Overall record: 86-46
1976 at end of August: 83-47 Finished 40 games over .500. 101-61
1977 at end of August: 81-50 Finished 40 games over .500. 101-61
1993 at end of August: 82-50 High point was 35 games over .500
2010 at end of August: 74-58 High point was 33 games over .500

As best as I can figure, 41 games over .500 in late August of 1976 (82-41 & 83-42) is the most games over .500 by any Phillies team. (This has been confirmed by media reports and the Elias Sports Bureau.)

There is a nice article by Marc Narducci about an upcoming MLB Network show (airing Feb 14th at 8 PM) on the game, which was named one of the top 20 Greatest Games in baseball history. Mitch Williams, as always, is the focus. Despite all the right things Williams says about Philadelphia fans, I have to wonder what sort of reaction he would have gotten the next season if he been brought back in 1994.

http://articles.philly.com/2011-02-05/sports/27103042_1_slide-step-major-league-baseball-network-phillies-mitch-williams

Since there seems little else to talk about now except playoffs and there are still a couple of hours before game one against the Giants begins, I thought I'd throw these facts and figures out there just to remind us of how much playoff baseball we've witnessed in the last three years. A lot has been made this week about the playoff experience of the Phillies' core five - Ruiz, Howard, Utley, Rollins, and Victorino - with Werth also involved in almost as many playoff games as the other five. If you throw in the pitchers who've been part of the team every year since 2007 - Hamels, Madson, Romero, and Kendrick (I know, Kendrick was only on the postseason roster in 2007 and Madson didn't pitch in 2007 and Romero didn't pitch in 2009, but they were all part of the team at some point all four years) and you have a level of continuity that few clubs have any more.

But what about the playoff games and series?

Continue reading this post »

So, now that it's official and the season is over we can say that the Philadelphia Phillies have joined an exclusive club - one of only six franchises to ever have a team finish in first place four seasons in a row. Three pennants in a row has been mentioned repeatedly since last fall, and the fact that no NL club has done it since 1944 certainly lends it an aura of greatness that coming in first four times in a row doesn't carry. But going back to the beginning of the 20th century we find that winning three or more consecutive pennants (AL or NL) has been done 19 times. The maximum is five (New York Yankees 1949-1953 & 1960-1964), and the Yankees have done it nearly half of the times it has been done (9 of 19). In addition to the Pittsburgh Pirates 1901-1903 run, which included only one World Series, there were two clubs that won three straight pennants but no world championships: the Detroit Tigers, 1907-1909, and the New York Giants, 1911-1913. Call them the Buffalo Bills of their day.
How about winning four straight titles of any sort, league or division? 

Continue reading this post »

I enjoy taking a look at how the season has gone at different stages. Recently I've been interested in how the now solid rotation has performed, somewhat akin to Schmenkman's stat notes today. I see the season so far in three phases. The dates and games may be different for others, but I think most us can agree that the season started strongly until mid-May, dropped off drastically through the All-Star Break, and then picked up with the 8-game winning streak that began on July 22nd in St. Louis. My breakdown would be Part I: 26-15 (.634) through May 21st. Part II begins with the Dice-K one-hitter, the first of four shutouts within five games, and extends through the Carpenter(s) game of July 21st, with a record of 22-31 (.415). Finally, Part III runs through today at 30-12 (.714), an astounding achievement for approximately a quarter of a season. You can see that it is 3 1/2 games better than the record at the start of the year. 

Continue reading this post »

Last  night and tonight marked a couple of game totals that I think make for an interesting way to look at what the team has done lately. In the hope that some others might enjoy this kind of analysis here goes a little two-part study of the Phillies at the 2/3 mark (108 of 162 games after Thursday) and how the last 15 games have sorted out as three times through the rotation. Part One and Part Two below. 
And I added a third part about the wild card at the end.

Continue reading this post »

   Over the weekend I had some thoughts about the matchups for the first round of interleague games and wondered how important these "traditional" rivalries are in giving a sense of continuity to the sometimes crazy and haphazard  matchups we see.

  What caught my attention last weekend was the large number (to my thinking) of unusual matchups and small number of traditional ones that would be repeated next month. To wit, only half of the 14 interleague series were on the schedule in June for a re-match: NY vs. NY, Bos-Phi, Wash-Balt, Cinc-Cleve, Minn-Mil, Oak-SF, and SD-Sea. Since the Ohio teams and Minnesota and Milwaukee are logical rivals geogrqphically, that leaves only two that are only "semi" traditional I guess, but MLB seems to think the best interleague pairing for Seattle is San Diego (which makes some sense as they are the two other West Coast teams) and Boston and Toronto seem to be splitting time as Philadelphia's special team. I have no argument with any of the other matchups, they seem natural. And there are five other matchups that we have come to expect: Chi vs. Chi, Tex-Hstn, LA-Ana, TB-Fla, and StL-KC, the battle for Missouri. The first two of these will actually see two series played in June.

  Who is left out of any traditional matchup? The two AL teams on the outside are Detroit and Toronto, although Toronto shares Philadelphia. The four NL teams without a partner are Pittsburgh, Atlanta, Colorado and Arizona. I would suggest making the Detroit-Pittsburgh matchup a traditional home-and-away annual event, call it the 1909 Memorial Two Best Hitters of the Early 20th Century (Ty Cobb and Honus Wagner) Reunion Event and the fans should respond. That would leave Atlanta to alternate with Philadelphia between Toronto and Boston (the Braves began in Boston, of course, and Toronto beat both Atlanta and Philadelphia for its two World Series titles) - and those 1990s-era expansion teams, Colorado and Arizona could become a special NL-only rivalry that wouldn't be that special since they play each other 18 times a year, but that's what happens when you have one league with 16 teams and another with 14.

Continue reading this post »

Everybody has a first playoffs experience: it might be for their home team or just seeing the World Series and realizing it's something special. For me, it was 50 years ago, not the World Series but a couple of afternoon games between the Milwaukee Braves and the Los Angeles Dodgers to decide who would go to the 1959 World Series and face the Chicago White Sox. I was only in my first year of following baseball and I knew most of the players' names from their baseball cards, since baseball was seldom on TV and I didn't own a radio. So baseball cards and boxscores was almost all I knew about the game until Monday, September 28th when the Braves hosted the Dodgers and I got to see most of the game when I got home from school that afternoon.

For the rest of the story ....

Continue reading this post »

I was going to wait until later this weekend to post this, but today's game is/was so boring I've got the time now. Let me also say I'm not saying the playoff lineup is set or that the Phillies will be in the playoffs, just basing this on what appears likely.

I became curious how often the set of teams returning to the playoffs was the same or nearly the same from year to year, since a number of people have commented about the possibility of a Dodgers-Phillies rematch in October. So, I decided to look at the year-to-year lineup of the eight teams that made the playoffs each year since 1995, the first year for the wild card format. A couple of interesting points appeared, plus the general theme that on average two teams in each league will be repeaters from the previous year, but the American League has significantly more repetition among its playoff participants. Right now, the odds favor each league having two repeaters and two teams that didn't make it last year - although saying the Yankees' making it is a change sounds a bit misleading.

Each league has been dominated by one team as far as playoff appearances go: the Yankees have been in 13 of 14 years so far, with another appearance virtually assured. The Braves were in the playoffs 11 years in a row. No one else is that close in either league. The Red Sox appear headed to their 9th playoff spot; the Indians have been 6 times; and the Angels will make it 6 this year. Runners-up in the NL are the Cardinals, headed to their 8th playoff spot. Next highest, surprisingly, is Houston, with 6 trips to the post-season.

Only once has a league had a complete slate of four new contenders that hadn't been there the year before. That was in 2007 in the NL. And only once have all four teams repeated: 1999 in the AL. Because the Yankees and, to some extent, either the Indians or Red Sox were so consistent in making the post-season, the AL average for repeat teams per year is 2.43. The NL average is only 1.79.

Finally, as the Phillies close in on their third straight playoff appearance I thought it might be worth noting the few teams besides the Yankees and Braves that have done that: Indians, 1995-99; Astros, 1997-99; A's, 2000-03; Cardinals, 2000-02; Twins, 2002-04;  Red Sox, 2003-05; and Cardinals, 2004-06. The Phillies, Angels, and Red Sox could all make it three straight this year.

I was watching It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia the other night and when Mac (Rob McElhenney) first came on I thought for a second, isn't that Brad Lidge? The pictures below may not be the best, but if they couldn't pass for twins I bet if you put Rob in a Phillies uniform and put him on the mound he'd blow a three-run lead in the ninth.

via sportscomplex.blogs.citypaper.net

via www.zap2it.com

Looking back on the recent bad spell in June (sometimes referred to as three weeks of sucking) when the Phillies went 5-13, I was reminded of a couple of other similar bad periods. The fact that the 2008 Phillies were playing exactly .600 ball beforehand (39-26) was probably what made me think of the 1964 Phillies, who were playing exactly .600 ball (90-60) before their infamous 10-game losing streak. So, I thought now during the All-Star break it might be interesting to compare those bad spells. Also, after I checked out those two years I thought of another similar bad streak, the 1976 Phillies' late-season struggle to finish first for the first time in 26 years.

These are the basic facts:

2008:

End of day 6/9/08:

Team                   W     L      GB

Philadelphia     39    26    ---               (.600)

Florida                34   29      4

Atlanta                32   32       6 1/2

New York           30   32      7 1/2

End of day 6/29/08:

Team                   W     L      GB

Philadelphia      44   39    ---              (.530)  Went 5-13

Florida                42    39      1               Went 8-10/gained 3 games

New York           40    41     3                 Went 10-9/gained 4 1/2 games

Atlanta                40    43      4                Went 8-11/gained 2 1/2 games

Phillies - Runs Scored in 18 games = 74 (4.1/game)     Runs Allowed = 80 (4.4)

Take away the 20-2 game vs. St. Louis, and the average drops to 3.2 runs scored per game and 4.6 runs allowed per game. Obviously, the biggest problem was scoring runs, as the runs allowed is only slightly higher than it's been in the other games this season.

Notes: 0-5 in one-run games, 1-0 in two-run games, 0-1 in extra innings.  Lost six in a row. Were shut out twice (but won two shutouts among the five wins).

1964:

End of day 9/20/64:

Philadelphia      90    60     ----        (.600)

St.Louis              83    66      6 1/2

Cincinnati          83     66     6 1/2

End of day 10/4/64:

Philadelphia      92    70      1        (.568)   Went 2-10

St.Louis              93    69     ----        Went 10-3/gained 7 1/2 games

Cincinnati          92     70     1           Went 9-4/gained 6 1/2 games

Phillies - Runs Scored in 12 games =  48 (4.0/game) Runs Allowed = 68 (5.7)

Take away the 10-0 final day victory and the average drops to 3.5 runs scored per game and 6.2 runs allowed per game, a very poor defense for a team that allowed only 3.9 runs per game for the year.

Notes: 1-1 in one-run games, 0-5 in two-run games (including 4 straight early in the losing streak), 0-1 in extra innings. Lost ten in a row.  Were shut out once (1-0, Chico Ruiz steals home) and won behind a Jim Bunning shutout to end the season.

Extra notes: The rotation really was Bunning and Short and somebody else. In those12 games, Bunning went 1-3 and Short went 0-2 with two no decisions. Bunning opened the four game series vs. Milwaukee on Thursday night and pitched the fourth game of the same series on Sunday afternoon. The attendance at Connie Mack Stadium on a Saturday afternoon, game #156 of the season, was 14,330.

1976:

Compared to the '64 collapse, the 1976 stumble appears in retrospect as just a minor correction in an otherwise fantastic regular season. When they opened a four-game series at Cincinnati on August 26th with an extra-inning victory the standings looked like this:

End of day 8/26/76:

Philadelphia      83    42     ----        (.664)

Pittsburgh          68    57     15

To all observers, the NL East race appeared to be over, but things changed starting in Cincinnati where they blew back-to-back games with 9th inning leads and went on to lose 8 straight. By  the end of play 15 games later, another extra-inning loss, the standings looked like this:

End of day 9/11/76:

Philadelphia      85    55     ----        (.607)   Went 2-13

Pittsburgh          81    59     4             Went 13-2/gained 11 games

Phillies - Runs Scored in 15 games =  33 (2.2/game) Runs Allowed = 60 (4.0)

This was clearly an overall collapse, but the offense was the big culprit, scoring less than half as many runs per game than overall for the season.

Notes: 0-6 in one-run games, 2-1 in two-run games, 0-2 in extra innings. Lost eight in a row.  Were shut out twice, back-to-back 1-0 games. Lost a doubleheader to Pittsburgh. Six games after this period the Phillies'  lead was down to 3 games, having steadied themselves and gone 3-3. But after that they went 13-3 to finish the season  at 101-61, and they ended with a 9-game margin over Pittsburgh.

Nothing major to be learned from these examples except that there have been worse periods by first-place Phillies teams - and the 2008 team definitely benefited by having its closest pursuers playing at a mediocre level while the Phillies stumbled.

After seeing the fortunes of Cole Hamels and Brett Myers the last two nights, I took a look at the schedule from now until the All-Star break. If the Phillies stay on schedule with no rainouts or postponements, they will play 96 games before the break; and if they stay with their current five-man rotation that has held up all season, we will end up with the extra game for the first half being pitched by Brett Myers, not Cole Hamels.

However, there are three scheduled off days between now and July 1st, giving an excellent opportunity for Charlie Manuel to make a switch from Myers to Hamels as the number one guy in the rotation without having to pitch Hamels on anything shorter than his usual every fifth day. I doubt that an extra day of rest will mess up Myers - and Hamels should be the top of the rotation guy, in my opinion. It just seems strange this season to keep going through the intact rotation and coming back to the top and seeing Myers there. As far as I can see, the only changes Manuel has made to the rotation this season were the two flip-flops with Eaton and Kendrick - once when Kendrick got shelled by the Mets and Manuel wanted to get Eaton lined up for the next Mets series, and then after Kendrick had the short outing because of the rain, against Toronto. Manuel probably thinks that as long as the rotation is working, why change it.

Well, what would the Phillies get by flipping Hamels and Myers on Saturday June 21st (after a day off at home between the Red Sox and Angels series) - or after the off days on June 23rd or June 30th (which one of the three doesn't affect Hamels' and Myers' slots at all)?

Without going through all the matchups, the end result is that moving Hamels ahead means he pitches against the Braves and Diamondbacks and misses the Mets series (the one drawback to the switch). Myers would basically get Hamels' start against the Mets and would miss the Braves and Diamondbacks.  What's more, if they don't move Hamels ahead of Myers, at this point he would pitch a Wednesday game against the Cardinals and then sit until after the All Star game, and he'd be a prime candidate for multiple inning use in the All Star game if he's selected and hasn't pitched in nearly a week. I hope Charlie Manuel can see the benefit of making this switch.

After Sunday's frustrating loss did anyone else notice how poorly the Phillies are doing on weekends this season - especially compared to what they're doing Mondays through Fridays. Seven weekends into the season and they have a grand total of four wins on Saturdays & Sundays - and ten losses - while they were doing great with a record of 20-11 on other days of the week. Maybe it's just a quirk - or is there something like a letdown going on after the excitement of Fridays, when the only game they've lost all year was the Hamels-Santana battle. (This weekend vs. Houston should be a good way to check the day of the week theory - Adam Eaton is scheduled on Friday and Cole Hamels on Sunday.)