<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>SB Nation User Blog:  pingu</title>
    <link>http://www.sbnation.com/users/pingu</link>
    <description>Posts made by pingu on SB Nation</description>
    <item>
      <title>Home Ice
</title>
      <link>http://www.milehighhockey.com/2008/4/12/194756/549</link>
      <author>pingu</author>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 23:47:56 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">


&lt;p&gt;Home crowds reputedly don't make much difference to the outcome of a game.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now, before you jump down my throat, I'm not saying that home ice isn't an advantage, its just not in the way people think. I recently read an article (an English one, but covering many sports including the NHL) that had delved into what gives teams an advantage at home.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The argument goes as follows - teams which have just moved to a new stadium do not have as good a record as they normally do at home. It seems that a good record at home is more due to the players being used to the stadium than due to the home fans getting behind them. In a new arena, the away team are just as used to the surroundings, and thus perform on a more level playing field.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'd love to test this theory out on the Avs' record after moving to the Pepsi Centre, but I can't seem to find a game by game breakdown of anything preceding the 2000-01 season. So, for now this theory is somewhat untested.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just thought I would throw that out there. Of course, it doesn't mean the Avs don't have an advantage at the Can (the altitude alone has to be important), and I don't expect anyone at the game to shout any less. Perhaps the message should be that they shout a little louder to make sure that the they make a difference.&lt;/p&gt;



  

  


      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
