http://www.sbnation.com/users/sgtprey Posts made by sgtprey on SBNation.com http://www.turfshowtimes.com/2011/9/6/2408250/are-the-eagles-over-looking-us sgtprey Tue, 06 Sep 2011 18:16:37 -0000 <p>At least their fans are. I have read several posts about the upcoming game on our site and game day is still five days away.As fans we are locked in. I just went to the eagles site and revieved the last five days of posts and headlines and we are only mentioned once in an effort to vote it the game of the week. A wonderful article about M. Vick being a role model is there. I had to read that one. Please, Really a Role model!? I guess they are a one pillar team. I'm sure there will be a pregame anylisis post as a coutesey before their victory. They really are drinking the dream team kool aid. Please let us grind them into dust! GO RAMS!....btw spell check didn't work sorry</p> <p>At least their fans are. I have read several posts about the upcoming game on our site and game day is still five days away.As fans we are locked in. I just went to the eagles site and revieved the last five days of posts and headlines and we are only mentioned once in an effort to vote it the game of the week. A wonderful article about M. Vick being a role model is there. I had to read that one. Please, Really a Role model!? I guess they are a one pillar team. I'm sure there will be a pregame anylisis post as a coutesey before their victory. They really are drinking the dream team kool aid. Please let us grind them into dust! GO RAMS!....btw spell check didn't work sorry</p> http://www.turfshowtimes.com/2011/7/30/2306112/romance-and-the-back-up-running-back sgtprey Sat, 30 Jul 2011 22:10:47 -0000 <p>First i wish i had wrote this a week ago, sorry. The idea that we would land a big name back up rb has been bounced around quite a bit. The argument that we need less touches for Sjax as one of the arguements. Imho our offensive shift has turned to passing. That alone will give Sjax less touches and his&nbsp;backup even less. I believe we will use Sjax to bring&nbsp;defenses back&nbsp;towards the box as they cheat out of the box to stop the passing game. which will make his gains even larger as the box won't be stacked against him. We will&nbsp;rely more on the threat of Sjax running the ball then relying on him to carry the offensive load.&nbsp;&nbsp;A total turn around from the past years. I don't see the f/o spending large amounts of money for a b/u rb. please point out where I'm wrong. <br></p> <p></p> <p>First i wish i had wrote this a week ago, sorry. The idea that we would land a big name back up rb has been bounced around quite a bit. The argument that we need less touches for Sjax as one of the arguements. Imho our offensive shift has turned to passing. That alone will give Sjax less touches and his&nbsp;backup even less. I believe we will use Sjax to bring&nbsp;defenses back&nbsp;towards the box as they cheat out of the box to stop the passing game. which will make his gains even larger as the box won't be stacked against him. We will&nbsp;rely more on the threat of Sjax running the ball then relying on him to carry the offensive load.&nbsp;&nbsp;A total turn around from the past years. I don't see the f/o spending large amounts of money for a b/u rb. please point out where I'm wrong. <br></p> <p></p>