Dan has been giving himself $40,000 raise over the last two years years, even though the football team hasnt finished above 8th in the pac 10, the basketball program missed the tourney two of those three years,  overall athletic department revenue is not keeping pace with the rest of the conference, we lose good coaches because we can't pay them enough, the Pauley renovation didn't meet fundraising goals,  etc, etc.

Good Job if you can get it. Automatic raises, and no accountability. I can only imagine his pension and retirement benefits....

DANIEL GENE GUERRERO MANAGER (FUNCTIONAL AREA) UC Los Angeles

Job Title

2010: MANAGER (FUNCTIONAL AREA) 2009: MANAGER (FUNCTIONAL AREA) 2008: MANAGER (FUNCTIONAL AREA)

2010 Pay

Base pay: $506,559.42, Overtime: $0.00, Other:$0.00
Total pay: $591,552.02

2009 Pay

Base pay: $482,437.50, Overtime: $0.00, Other:$0.00
Total pay: $579,348.69

2008 Pay

Base pay: N/A, Overtime: $0.00, Other:$0.00
Total pay: $553,539.39

Bumped. Good thoughts here. - BN Eds.

Focusing on only the student seating issue gives Dan Guerrero and the Morgan Center an easy way out.

It is important to keep the entire debacle with Pauley in perspective, and not focus on only one issue. Although the student seating issue is important, it is important in my mind primarily because the Morgan Center won't admit the truth: Fund raising for their project is going so poorly that they need to have more premium seats available to sell to make their budget. To get those seats, they are going to have to move the student section to less desirable seats behind the basket. This is clearly a bad outcome, but I don't think the Morgan Center is doing it because they want to (it wasn't in their original plans) they are doing it because they HAVE to.

So, the real question is: Why is fund raising going so poorly that this type of decisions are being made? I would suggest the following factors:

Continue reading this post »

After beginning construction without having secured alternative venues for the 2011 basketball season (business 101), the Morgan Center is now scrambling to find places to play the games. In a letter to season ticket holders, they ask ticket holders to fill in how many games they would attend at which venue. Based on the number of games you can choose for each location, where do you think the majority of our games will be played next season?

Also, notice (from the email) that the Morgan Center has ruled out using LMU's basketball facility, which seats 4,200 and is 9 miles from campus. Our average attendance to out of conference home games this year was 5,500. Do we really think we are going to draw better than that to the sports arena?

Does the Morgan Center believe it is better to have 4,500 fans in the sports arena, leaving 10,500 empty seats, than to fill the LMU facility? What is going on with these guys?

Continue reading this post »

Bumped. GO BRUINS. -N

I was working under that premise, as I have been very disappointed in the way the defense has given up big plays and seemed lost early in games. One thing Bruinsnation has taught me, though, is to actually look at facts before drawing conclusions. So, I looked at the stats (2009 stats are through the Cal game) , and this is what I found:

Source: 2009 FBS Football Statistics (NCAA)

So, what does this tell us? A few things to keep in mind:

1) Last year we turned the ball over so much, and were so offensively inept, I am not sure that it is really a fair comparison

2) Offenses tend to get better as the season wears on, so I am not sure that looking at totals tells you much, but I do think looking at rankings does, and we are a slightly above average defense relative to the rankings.

3) I think the real question is: Is the defense performing up to capability  if we are slightly above average?

Continue reading this post »

and fourth since August. Not a word about UCLA.  There is absolutely no way any bruin can in good conscience support the LA Times when their coverage is so clearly slanted towards USC. I would love a sports editor of the LA Times to come on here and explain why their coverage is either about how great USC is, or how terrible and irrelevant UCLA is.  Do they really think insulting the large contingent of bruin faithful is the way to sell papers?

Boycott the Times until they start offering positive coverage of UCLA athletics. Cancel your subscriptions and tell them why you are canceling. Send letters to the sports editors. Go to the daily news for your UCLA coverage until the Times pulls its head out of its behind. 

Go Bruins! 

Matt Barkley gives USC one to grow on

September 13, 2009

The word kid is gone, vanishing within a pack of bouncing, braying teammates who rode him through a stomach-dropping Saturday night.

Recent columns

• No complaints from Stafon Johnson

  September 11, 2009

  The story was dead. The story came alive.

• Baseball's most obscure coach

  September 9, 2009

  Bob Schaefer sits in a quiet dugout on one of those glorious baseball afternoons in Chavez Ravine, staring out at a gleaming stadium slowly filling with the clatter of dirt-caked groundskeepers, smiling peanut hawkers and grim security toughs.

• Matt Barkley gets the USC party started

  September 6, 2009

  His first downfield pass was strong and straight, hitting a USC teammate between the numbers.

• Dodgers' Hiroki Kuroda will face fears head-on

  September 4, 2009

  For days now, people have talked in amazement about Hiroki Kuroda's last pitch.

• Despite GM's hot hand, Dodgers not playing with a full deck

  September 2, 2009

  Amid the rows of chilled, sparkling luxury suites at Dodger Stadium, one is not air-conditioned.

• Dodgers' Matt Kemp shows his tremendous upside

  August 31, 2009

  He strolled coolly out of Cincinnati on Sunday night hauling a weekend stash of two homers, five runs batted in and a game-winning fly ball.

• Dodgers' Juan Pierre playing, and acting, like a pro

  August 30, 2009

  In this summer's strange journey of swift Juan Pierre, the most compelling moment occurred when he was standing still.

• The reason isn't clear, but Manny Ramirez isn't right

  August 29, 2009

  He used to own this kind of moment, circling it with his giant swing, swarming it with his giant smile.

• Dodgers' bullpen sees a role reversal

  August 23, 2009

  Eighth inning, Dodgers leading Chicago Cubs by two swings, phone rings in the Dodgers' bullpen for their setup reliever.

• Golf doesn't need a hurry-up offense

  August 12, 2009

  Gentlemen, start your Titleist Pro Titaniums!

• Scout's honor: It's Phil Pote

  August 8, 2009

  The old scout has a shuffling gait from years of chasing prospects, deep wrinkled skin cancer from doing it in the sun, declining vision from describing it all in tiny handwritten notes on crumpled paper.

• Pete Carroll is pushing it

  August 8, 2009

  As the USC football team opens fall practice today for the ninth season under sprinting and shouting Pete Carroll, somebody needs to ignore him.

Bumped. silverlake brings up an interesting idea which I think is worthy of more attention and discussion. GO BRUINS. -N

We are entering a time of great importance in the future of UCLA basketball and the athletic department as whole.

The greatest weakeness of the Athletic Department in the past two decades has been an unwillingness to change and embrace new things, an aversion to risk, and a desire to do things on the cheap.  We have seen this play out in the hiring of cheap inexperienced coaches, the retention of staff and coaches who don't get the job done, allowing Pauley to age ungracefully, and various other shortcomings.

Dan Guerrero has done a lot to address these problems, and I commend him for it. However, I am greatly concerned that the current plans for Pauley Pavillion will be a significant error that will set the athletic department back decades.

While the plans haven't been publicly released, word has filtered out from those in the know that the plan is to remodel Pauley with minimal structural changes. Seating in the 300 section will be as bad as it has always been, and there will only be minimal improvement in the 200s with a centering of the court, and angling the seating. The bottom section should see some improvements and additions of seats.

To do this, and make some other necessary improvements (locker room, donor room, facilities, etc) the athletic department needs $160M. For comparison, that is roughly the cost of building the Galen Center. Spending that much money on something that does not address the greatest weakness of the facility for basketball (the distance of most seats from the court and poor sightlines) is a huge mistake.

I would suggest rather than this plan, the University move forward with a new basketball only arena and keep Pauley where it is for other sports and as a practice and multipurpose facility for other sports.

What we should do is build a new basketball only facility at lot 32.  The benefits are you don't have to tear anything down, you are within walking distance for students, you keep Pauley operational for non-basketball activities, you bring some life into the businesses in westwood, and you have an arena visible from Wilshire Blvd and the 405, with signage and naming rights to sell to help pay for the arena. 

This would be a savior for businesses in Westwood, provide a state of the art facility without the limitations facing Pauley, and still allow practice and other sports to be done at Pauley so Student athletes are not disadvantaged. Also, we would build a building with state of the art seating, restrooms, and amenities, and would make Westwood a destination before and after games.

Why isnt' this being seriously considered? We need to dump the stale thinking of the Morgan Center and think outside the box on this one. The greatness of UCLA is boldness and forward thinking, yet the Pauley project is wrapped in decrepit fearful thinking.

For those of you who don't know, Lot 32 36 is bounded by Wilshire to the south, Gayley to the east, Kinross to the North, and Veteran to the west. There wouldnt be any significant structures that would have to be raised, and being bounded by Willshire would mean easy access for vehicles and public transportation, including eventually the subway.  Here is where lot 32 36 is on a map.

Lot 32 36 Map

We need to demand the same excellence in this project we would for the product on the field and court. I am asking every real true bruin to consider whether a $160M remodel of Pauley that doesn't address the core issues is really the right way to do this, and if not, we should make our voices heard that a new arena is the way to go.