<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>SB Nation User Blog:  the wolf</title>
    <link>http://www.sbnation.com/users/the%20wolf</link>
    <description>Posts made by the wolf on SB Nation</description>
    <item>
      <title>Mid-season comparison
</title>
      <link>http://www.southsidesox.com/2006/7/5/174232/8571</link>
      <author>the wolf</author>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 21:42:32 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;At roughly the halfway point, some interesting W-L team comparisons between Detroit, Minnesota and our White Sox:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Detroit&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
vs. .500 or better: 25-18, .581&lt;br /&gt;
vs. under .500: 31-10, .756&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Minnesota&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
vs. .500 or better: 21-20, .512&lt;br /&gt;
vs. under .500: 25-16, .610&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;b&gt;White Sox&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
vs. .500 or better: 28-10, .737&lt;br /&gt;
vs. under .500: 26-19, .578&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Sox and Tigers, separated only by 1 1/2 games, have taken starkly different paths to their records. As some here have suspected, the Sox have a tendency to sometimes "play down" to the level of their weaker opponents (failing to finish off recent series, for example, against both Pittsburgh and the Flubs). Detroit, by contrast, is a beefy 14-0 vs. Seattle, KC and the Flubs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As a Sox fan, one can look at the second half of the schedule optimistically or pessimistically; the Sox play 46 of their final 79 games against teams &lt;i&gt;currently&lt;/i&gt; .500 or better. Should their first-half trend continue, they will be sitting pretty at the end of the season. However, Detroit plays only 33 of it's final 78 against teams currently over the .500 mark.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Finally, the two teams have 14 games against each other, which will (obviously) go a long way toward determining who will take the division.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The hard-charging Twins notwithstanding.&lt;/p&gt;



  

  


      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Depending on the Big 3
</title>
      <link>http://www.southsidesox.com/2006/6/2/155611/3466</link>
      <author>the wolf</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 19:56:11 -0000</pubDate>
      <description type="html">
&lt;p&gt;Today I was thinking about how much the Sox depend on Thome, Konerko and Dye to drive in runs, so I decided to take a look at how they stack up against other teams' three top RBI guys. &amp;nbsp;Looking at the numbers, I wonder if there any long-term implications of having such a dependence on these three. &amp;nbsp;The Sox are not in very good company at the top of that list. &amp;nbsp;In fact, there is a group of very solid teams whose "Big 3" are around the 40% range:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Team (Top 3)    Total RBI    Team Total      %&lt;/b&gt;
Tampa Bay          109          213      51.2%
LA Angels          109          223      48.9%
Chicago Sox        134          278      48.2%
Oakland            110          232      47.4%
Seattle            107          232      46.1%
Toronto            125          280      44.6%
Baltimore          109          263      41.4%
Boston             111          269      41.3%
Minnesota           95          231      41.1%
NY Yankees         123          304      40.5%
Detroit             99          255      38.8%
Texas              102          263      38.8%
Cleveland          110          290      37.9%
Kansas City         68          192      35.4%
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apologies for the formatting...it looks ok in the box but not when posted.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



  

  


      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
