2017 MAC football power rankings: Toledo’s year, unless WMU screws it up

Photo by Rey Del Rio/Getty Images

Tier 1


If this isn't the Rockets' year, will it ever happen?

Full Profile Team Blog
Western Michigan

WMU will regress, but this is still a MAC contender.

Full Profile Team Blog

I really think this is Toledo’s year to take charge. Granted, I’ve thought that multiple times before, and if Tim Lester is able to click with the talent P.J. Fleck left behind, I won’t be thinking that at the end of this season.

Tier 2

Miami (Ohio)

The RedHawks might be the MAC East favorite.

Full Profile Team Blog
Northern Illinois

NIU collapsed, but their West run might not be done just yet.

Full Profile Team Blog

If UT or WMU doesn’t win, it’s almost certainly going to be one of these two. Anybody from the MAC East has a chance to snare a muddy division title and pull a title game upset, I guess, but from a pure quality standpoint, Miami and NIU are closest to the Rockets and Broncos.

Tier 3

Eastern Michigan

2016 was EMU’s best season since the 1980s, and 2017 could top it.

Full Profile Team Blog
Bowling Green

The Falcons tear down and rebuild as well as anybody. But was 2016 more the former or the latter?

Full Profile Team Blog
Central Michigan

CMU goes 6-6 or so every year, but does it dramatically!

Full Profile Team Blog

Terry Bowden has a weirdly sustainable thing going here.

Full Profile Team Blog

OU is the rare MAC team with a unique identity: disturbing steadiness.

Full Profile Team Blog
Ball State

Ball State is the MAC’s most MAC team. Is that good or bad for 2017?

Full Profile Team Blog

Really, this is a 5a, 5b, 5c, etc., situation. I found almost no way to separate them, and I’ve changed my mind about the order multiple times.

Akron is the most volatile team of the bunch, and Ohio’s the most steady. CMU could break the "six or so losses every year" trend, but close games could skew the win total in either direction. I like EMU more than my numbers do, and the odds of Bowling Green bouncing back are solid but not guaranteed.

Tier 4


One of football’s winningest coaches faces some urgency with one of FBS’ worst programs.

Full Profile Team Blog
Kent State

Can the Golden Flashes save Paul Haynes’ job? Ehhhhhhhh ...

Full Profile Team Blog

Just about every year, a coach pulls off a third-year leap you didn’t see coming. Examples from 2016: EMU’s Chris Creighton and Wyoming’s Craig Bohl. Neither the stats nor eyeballs really see it coming when it happens, and who knows, maybe it’ll happen for UB’s Lance Leipold. He’s still a good coach, after all. But when "Hey, maybe a random leap will occur" is your best reason for optimism, you’re starting pretty far down on the power rankings.

Meanwhile, I’m pretty sure Kent State will be hiring a new coach in about eight months. Hey, Darrell Hazell is available ...

How does S&P+ see things?

Here’s how my statistical system has the MAC laid out for 2017, with 0 equating to an average FBS team. (You can find full 2017 S&P+ projections here.)

S&P+ is higher on Ball State and lower on Akron than I am, basically.

2017 projected standings (per S&P+)

Projected conference wins, with overall wins in parentheses.


  • Miami (Ohio) (4.9, 6.9)
  • Bowling Green (4.3, 5.8)
  • Ohio (4.0, 6.3)
  • Kent State (3.0, 4.3)
  • Akron (2.9, 4.2)
  • Buffalo (2.1, 3.3)

Miami is the front-runner, but three are projected within one conference win of each other. Meanwhile, Akron has just about the hardest conference schedule imaginable, and Kent State has just about the easiest.


  • Toledo (6.0, 8.7)
  • WMU (5.3, 7.3)
  • NIU (4.4, 6.1)
  • Ball State (4.2, 6.5)
  • CMU (3.6, 5.6)
  • EMU (3.5, 5.3)

The most interesting thing to me about these West projections: the fight for a sixth overall win could be fascinating. Toledo and WMU are in front of the pack, but the other four in this division could be taking each other out for bowl eligibility. All of them have a chance at it. (You can’t really say that about the East.)

How these teams looked in 2016

Only two were particularly decent on both sides of the ball, and the home of MACtion didn’t have nearly as many high-octane offenses as its reputation suggests it should. That said, a lot of MAC teams were dealing with quarterback injuries. That might not be the case this fall.

MAC offenses heading into 2017

It was hard to separate yourself from the pack in efficiency, but only a few teams figured out how to carve out bigger chunks of real estate. And Toledo’s was just about the only offense that figured out both efficiency and explosiveness.

Best 2017 offensive players by team (best overall in bold):

There are lots of quarterbacks, which honestly surprised me. But the Bulls will only go as far as Jackson will take them, and Holley might also be the Golden Flashes’ best running back and receiver.

P.S. Stay healthy, Thomas Woodson. I want to see what you’re capable of. You too, Shaq Vann.

Photo by Rey Del Rio/Getty Images

MAC defenses

From an efficiency standpoint, there was almost no separation whatsoever. Ten of the MAC’s 12 teams hovered between about 38 and 44 percent in terms of success rate. But the magnitude of the big plays varied significantly, and only the trio of Ohio, Kent State, and Miami was particularly balanced.

Best 2017 defensive players by team (best overall in bold):

I listed six cornerbacks and a safety above. A league with good QBs and good cover guys? That sounds pretty fun, actually.

Jasen Vinlove-USA TODAY Sports