/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/31618011/20131123_mta_ah6_301.0.jpg)
Confused? Check out the advanced-stats glossary here.
1. The bones get stronger every year
Every year if feels like I say something similar about San Diego State.
The Aztecs are in a fertile recruiting area. They have no excuse not to be at least decent. They were mostly bad until about 2010. Now they're in much better shape. You probably know the story by now.
The Aztecs are actually reaching an interesting crossroads. After winning 34 games in the nine seasons between 2000-08, the Aztecs have won 34 in four years. They attended four bowls from 1969-2009, and they've now attended four in a row. They are undoubtedly in better shape as a program than they ever have been before.
But eight wins gets boring after a while. Recruiting has been strong and steady, to the point where the Aztecs have former three-star (or better) recruits at every position -- seven at linebacker, five on the defensive line, five in the secondary, four at running back, four on the offensive line, three at wideout, two at tight end, et cetera. The base of talent is strong and getting stronger. But the Aztecs are still losing four or five games per year.
Last year, SDSU was almost done in by an atrocious start, but rebounded. They looked strong down the stretch, beating Boise State for a second straight year and winning the Potato Bowl in dominant fashion. But an 0-3 start and a strange blowout loss to UNLV still added a bit of a sour taste to the season. As an SDSU fan, you have to know how much better off your program is than at any point since the 1970s, but you probably still find yourself getting a little bit frustrated.
Every year more three-star recruits join the program; is there another breakthrough coming at some point, or are the Aztecs destined for an eight- or nine-win lot in life? There are worse things than that, but ... there are better things, too.

2013 Schedule & Results
Record: 8-5 | Adj. Record: 6-7 | Final F/+ Rk: 89 | |||||||
Date | Opponent | Opp. F/+ Rk | Score | W-L | Adj. Score | Adj. W-L | 5-gm Adj. Avg. |
31-Aug | Eastern Illinois | N/A | 19-40 | L | 12.9 - 40.0 | L | |
7-Sep | at Ohio State | 9 | 7-42 | L | 20.1 - 23.2 | L | |
21-Sep | Oregon State | 42 | 30-34 | L | 18.2 - 21.2 | L | |
28-Sep | at New Mexico State | 122 | 26-16 | W | 18.2 - 19.4 | L | |
4-Oct | Nevada | 88 | 51-44 | W | 30.9 - 33.3 | L | -7.3 |
10-Oct | at Air Force | 113 | 27-20 | W | 26.0 - 20.5 | W | -0.8 |
26-Oct | Fresno State | 49 | 28-35 | L | 32.3 - 14.4 | W | 3.4 |
2-Nov | New Mexico | 110 | 35-30 | W | 28.1 - 30.6 | L | 3.5 |
9-Nov | at San Jose State | 74 | 34-30 | W | 27.4 - 18.2 | W | 5.6 |
16-Nov | at Hawaii | 82 | 28-21 | W | 28.4 - 23.9 | W | 6.9 |
23-Nov | Boise State | 45 | 34-31 | W | 18.7 - 14.9 | W | 6.6 |
30-Nov | at UNLV | 96 | 19-45 | L | 18.1 - 37.2 | L | -0.8 |
21-Dec | Buffalo | 80 | 49-24 | W | 39.5 - 18.0 | W | 4.0 |
Category | Offense | Rk | Defense | Rk | Spec. Tms. | Rk |
F/+ | -10.8% | 102 | +1.6% | 55 | -2.4% | 104 |
Points Per Game | 29.8 | 58 | 31.7 | 92 | ||
Adj. Points Per Game | 24.5 | 96 | 24.2 | 29 |
2. September was, shall we say, forgettable
It appears [Adam] Dingwell will be the starter this fall, and despite the presence of a new offensive coordinator (Bob Toledo; yes, that Bob Toledo), one can expect another heavy dose of the ground game. But Dingwell is still going to have to pass, and his ability to avoid sacks and prevent disasters will be a determining factor in just how much SDSU can get away with running the ball and moving the chains.
I said that in last year's SDSU preview. As it turned out, Dingwell couldn't pass. He completed 27 of 63 passes with four interceptions in the season-opening upset loss to Eastern Illinois, and he began the Ohio State game 0-for-5 with a pick.
Rocky Long and Bob Toledo turned to junior college transfer Quinn Kaehler; it took him a little while to get going -- he took a few too many sacks, he threw a devastating pick six late against Oregon State, and he looked rather average against New Mexico State -- but once he got his footing, and once an awful September officially ended, he began to figure things out.
By October, Kaehler had established a strong rapport with receiver Ezell Ruffin (23 catches for 454 yards and three touchdowns against Air Force, Fresno State, and New Mexico), and the Aztecs had figured out balance. They both rushed and passed for 200 yards six times in their final nine games. And after a brutal start, the offense was never amazing, but it was average enough to get out of the way of a stellar defense.
Adj. Points Per Game (first 4 games): Opponent 26.0, SDSU 17.4 (minus-8.6)
Adj. Points Per Game (next 7 games): SDSU 27.4, Opponent 22.3 (plus-5.1)
SDSU's defense had occasional issues against the pass, but the Aztecs had one of the best mid-major run defenses in the country. And after the 0-3 start, SDSU finished 8-2.
Strong finishes are nothing new to SDSU, of course. They were 3-2 and finished 6-2 in 2010; they were 4-3 and won four of five to finish the regular season in 2011; and they started 2-3 and won seven in a row to finish the regular season in 2012.
Granted, there are typically some decent names on the schedule early on, but if the Aztecs can get this September thing figured out, they could finally crack the 10-win barrier.
Offense

FIVE FACTORS -- OFFENSE | ||||||
Raw Category | Rk | Opp. Adj. Category | Rk | |||
EXPLOSIVENESS | IsoPPP | 1.31 | 9 | IsoPPP+ | 103.4 | 44 |
EFFICIENCY | Succ. Rt. | 39.1% | 94 | Succ. Rt. + | 80.1 | 117 |
FIELD POSITION | Def. Avg. FP | 30.0 | 71 | Def. FP+ | 99.4 | 66 |
FINISHING DRIVES | Pts. Per Trip in 40 | 3.9 | 88 | Redzone S&P+ | 76.5 | 118 |
TURNOVERS | EXPECTED | 27.9 | ACTUAL | 30 | +2.1 |
Category | Yards/ Game Rk |
S&P+ Rk | Success Rt. Rk |
PPP+ Rk |
OVERALL | 51 | 112 | 118 | 99 |
RUSHING | 69 | 115 | 115 | 104 |
PASSING | 38 | 103 | 115 | 76 |
Standard Downs | 110 | 116 | 52 | |
Passing Downs | 113 | 121 | 47 |
Q1 Rk | 109 | 1st Down Rk | 97 |
Q2 Rk | 117 | 2nd Down Rk | 120 |
Q3 Rk | 75 | 3rd Down Rk | 85 |
Q4 Rk | 115 |
3. Ode to the six-yard gain
Even when things improved for SDSU's offense in 2013, it was because of big plays. The mundane, smaller plays that keep drives alive were woefully rare at times. It seemed as if every drive began on second-and-9 for the Aztecs, who ranked a dreadful 117th in Success Rate+ (as you see above). The big plays were huge -- SDSU ranked 44th in IsoPPP+, a measure of the magnitude of SDSU's successful plays -- but there weren't enough of the smaller ones.
Either in philosophy or simply execution, Bob Toledo's system seemed to emphasize running and short passing on standard downs. SDSU still ran the ball rather frequently on such downs, but when the Aztecs did pass, it was frequently to tight end Adam Roberts or fullback Chad Young. Ezell Ruffin and Colin Lockett were targeted with success at times, but Tim Vizzi and Dylan Denso were almost never targeted until second- or third-and-long.
In theory, this almost seems to be an emphasis on efficiency. Use your good running backs, dump off for short gains to the tight ends and running backs, and gain five to eight yards whenever possible. But it didn't work out that way. Passes to Young and tailback Adam Muema went almost nowhere, and without enough fear of deeper passing, opponents were able to focus on the run and stuff Muema and company near the line.
The result was an offense that had to rely on big plays to succeed. That worked out at times -- Muema and D.J. Pumphrey were explosive in the open field, and four of the top five wideouts averaged at least 14 yards per catch -- but it resulted in quite a few three-and-outs as well.
Quarterback
Note: players in bold below are 2014 returnees. Players in italics are questionable with injury/suspension.
Player | Ht, Wt | 2014 Year |
Rivals | Comp | Att | Yards | TD | INT | Comp Rate |
Sacks | Sack Rate | Yards/ Att. |
Quinn Kaehler | 6'4, 210 | Sr. | NR | 232 | 389 | 3007 | 19 | 9 | 59.6% | 26 | 6.3% | 6.8 |
Adam Dingwell | 27 | 68 | 318 | 0 | 5 | 39.7% | 4 | 5.6% | 4.0 | |||
Chase Favreau | 6'1, 200 | RSFr. | NR | |||||||||
Brad Odeman | 6'3, 220 | Jr. | 2 stars (5.4) | |||||||||
Christian Chapman | 6'0, 180 | Fr. | 3 stars (5.5) | |||||||||
Nick Bawden | 6'3, 225 | Fr. | 2 stars (5.4) |
4. Kaehler, probably
Quinn Kaehler in no way lit the world afire in his first year as SDSU's starter. He was certainly better than Adam Dingwell (who has since retired from football because of injuries), and his interception rate remained relatively low despite throwing a high percentage of his passes on passing downs.
But he was not dominant. He missed spring ball with an elbow injury, which in theory gave other candidates a chance to impress and make up ground. Instead, redshirt freshman Chase Favreau and JUCO transfer Brad Odeman, Jr., simply fought it out for the backup job. It appears Kaehler is the man moving forward, unless he starts the season like Dingwell did last year, anyway.
Running Back
Player | Pos. | Ht, Wt | 2014 Year |
Rivals | Rushes | Yards | TD | Yards/ Carry |
Hlt Yds/ Carry |
Opp. Rate |
Adam Muema | RB | 256 | 1244 | 15 | 4.9 | 5.4 | 36.3% | |||
Donnel Pumphrey | RB | 5'9, 170 | So. | 3 stars (5.5) | 125 | 752 | 8 | 6.0 | 7.7 | 36.8% |
Quinn Kaehler | QB | 6'4, 210 | Sr. | NR | 23 | 91 | 1 | 4.0 | 5.6 | 30.4% |
Chad Young | FB | 22 | 112 | 3 | 5.1 | 4.9 | 31.8% | |||
Chase Price | RB | 5'8, 200 | Jr. | 2 stars (5.4) | 17 | 78 | 0 | 4.6 | 3.6 | 41.2% |
Dwayne Garrett | RB | 6'0, 205 | Jr. | 3 stars (5.5) | 8 | 38 | 0 | 4.8 | 4.1 | 37.5% |
Ezell Ruffin | WR | 6'1, 205 | Sr. | 2 stars (5.4) | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 25.0% |
Adam Dingwell | QB | 4 | 7 | 0 | 1.8 | 4.7 | 25.0% | |||
Marcus Stamps | RB | 6'1, 210 | RSFr. | 3 stars (5.5) | ||||||
Rashaad Penny | RB | 5'11, 200 | Fr. | 3 stars (5.6) |
Receiving Corps
Player | Pos. | Ht, Wt | 2014 Year |
Rivals | Targets | Catches | Yards | Catch Rate | Target Rate |
%SD | Yds/ Target |
NEY | Real Yds/ Target |
RYPR |
Ezell Ruffin | WR-Z | 6'1, 205 | Sr. | 2 stars (5.4) | 107 | 68 | 1146 | 63.6% | 24.9% | 50.0% | 10.7 | 317 | 11.4 | 108.7 |
Colin Lockett | WR-X | 100 | 52 | 736 | 52.0% | 23.3% | 54.2% | 7.4 | 31 | 7.7 | 69.8 | |||
Tim Vizzi | WR-Z | 41 | 18 | 278 | 43.9% | 9.5% | 22.2% | 6.8 | 9 | 5.2 | 26.4 | |||
Dylan Denso | WR-Z | 35 | 20 | 265 | 57.1% | 8.1% | 36.7% | 7.6 | 7 | 8.3 | 25.1 | |||
Adam Roberts | TE | 6'3, 235 | Sr. | 2 stars (5.4) | 34 | 20 | 217 | 58.8% | 7.9% | 66.7% | 6.4 | -37 | 5.9 | 20.6 |
Donnel Pumphrey | RB | 5'9, 170 | So. | 3 stars (5.5) | 27 | 22 | 224 | 81.5% | 6.3% | 29.2% | 8.3 | -14 | 8.6 | 21.2 |
Chad Young | FB | 24 | 15 | 70 | 62.5% | 5.6% | 65.2% | 2.9 | -114 | 2.9 | 6.6 | |||
Adam Muema | RB | 21 | 18 | 98 | 85.7% | 4.9% | 55.0% | 4.7 | -93 | 4.7 | 9.3 | |||
Eric Judge | WR-X | 6'1, 190 | So. | 2 stars (5.4) | 20 | 13 | 218 | 65.0% | 4.7% | 43.8% | 10.9 | 61 | 12.0 | 20.7 |
Robert Craighead | TE | 6'3, 270 | Jr. | 2 stars (5.3) | 8 | 5 | 32 | 62.5% | 1.9% | 0.0% | 4.0 | -29 | 1.6 | 3.0 |
Larry Clark | WR-Z | 6'4, 210 | Jr. | 3 stars (5.5) | 4 | 3 | 51 | 75.0% | 0.9% | 0.0% | 12.8 | 17 | 14.7 | 4.8 |
Jemond Hazely | WR | 6'1, 185 | Jr. | 2 stars (5.3) | ||||||||||
Lloyd Mills | WR | 5'10, 165 | So. | 2 stars (5.4) | ||||||||||
Kene Anigbogu | WR | 6'4, 205 | So. | NR | ||||||||||
David Wells | TE | 6'5, 250 | RSFr. | 3 stars (5.5) | ||||||||||
Darryl Richardson | TE | 6'5, 240 | RSFr. | 3 stars (5.5) | ||||||||||
Christian Cumberlander | WR-Z | 6'3, 200 | RSFr. | 2 stars (5.4) | ||||||||||
Mikah Holder | WR | 6'0, 175 | Fr. | 3 stars (5.6) | ||||||||||
Dionte Sykes | WR | 6'2, 215 | Fr. | 3 stars (5.5) |
5. How many hits can you take, Ezell and D.J.?
Whatever load D.J. Pumphrey can handle at 5'9, 170 pounds, he should get a chance to handle it in 2014. He lit a spark into the offense with his explosive (and not incredibly efficient) running in late-September and early-October, and he will pair with bigger backs like Chase Price, Marcus Stamps, and Dwayne Garrett to lead a running game that, in theory, has potential for both efficiency and explosiveness.
The line is reasonably experienced -- the Aztecs must replace all-conference tackle Bryce Quigley, but do return five players with starting experience (57 career starts) -- but wasn't that great outside of short-yardage situations. If experience plugs holes, the running game could improve even without Muema.
Meanwhile, Ruffin does return to anchor the receiving corps. He and Colin Lockett combined to see nearly half of all SDSU's targets last year, but he's the only one of the top four wideouts returning this time around. Unless Eric Judge or a newcomer steps up, Ruffin could see one of the country's heaviest receiver loads this fall.
Offensive Line
Category | Adj. Line Yds |
Std. Downs LY/carry |
Pass. Downs LY/carry |
Opp. Rate |
Power Success Rate |
Stuff Rate |
Adj. Sack Rate |
Std. Downs Sack Rt. |
Pass. Downs Sack Rt. |
Team | 82.5 | 2.66 | 3.37 | 36.1% | 75.4% | 20.8% | 83.2 | 5.7% | 7.2% |
Rank | 120 | 102 | 50 | 96 | 25 | 83 | 90 | 92 | 71 |
Player | Pos. | Ht, Wt | 2014 Year |
Rivals | Career Starts | Honors/Notes |
Bryce Quigley | LT | 38 | 2nd All-MWC | |||
Zach Dilley | LG | 6'5, 295 | Sr. | 3 stars (5.6) | 18 | |
Japheth Gordon | LG | 16 | ||||
Jordan Smith | C | 6'5, 280 | Jr. | 3 stars (5.5) | 14 | |
Darrell Greene | RG | 6'4, 300 | Jr. | 2 stars (5.4) | 12 | |
Terry Poole | LT | 6'5, 300 | Sr. | 2 stars (5.2) | 12 | |
Nico Siragusa | LG | 6'5, 320 | So. | 3 stars (5.6) | 1 | |
Garrett Corbett | RT | 6'5, 295 | Sr. | 2 stars (5.4) | 0 | |
Lenicio Noble | C | 6'2, 285 | Sr. | 2 stars (5.3) | 0 | |
Garrett Corbett | RT | 6'5, 295 | Sr. | 2 stars (5.4) | 0 | |
Arthur Flores | LT | 6'5, 290 | So. | 2 stars (5.3) | 0 | |
Anthony Juarez | LT | 6'6, 310 | RSFr. | 2 stars (5.3) | ||
Antonio Rosales | RT | 6'4, 295 | RSFr. | 2 stars (5.3) | ||
Caleb Brady | OL | 6'5, 310 | Jr. | 3 stars (5.5) | ||
Pearce Slater | RT | 6'7, 340 | Jr. | 3 stars (5.5) | ||
Sergio Phillips | OL | 6'2, 285 | Fr. | 2 stars (5.4) |
Defense

FIVE FACTORS -- DEFENSE | ||||||
Raw Category | Rk | Opp. Adj. Category | Rk | |||
EXPLOSIVENESS | IsoPPP | 1.13 | 55 | IsoPPP+ | 98.0 | 71 |
EFFICIENCY | Succ. Rt. | 39.8% | 37 | Succ. Rt. + | 112.5 | 22 |
FIELD POSITION | Off. Avg. FP | 33.4 | 6 | Off. FP+ | 106.5 | 5 |
FINISHING DRIVES | Pts. Per Trip in 40 | 4.8 | 112 | Redzone S&P+ | 92.2 | 82 |
TURNOVERS | EXPECTED | 21.1 | ACTUAL | 19.0 | -2.1 |
Category | Yards/ Game Rk |
S&P+ Rk | Success Rt. Rk |
PPP+ Rk |
OVERALL | 55 | 32 | 22 | 24 |
RUSHING | 22 | 19 | 14 | 13 |
PASSING | 100 | 40 | 37 | 57 |
Standard Downs | 25 | 19 | 58 | |
Passing Downs | 50 | 39 | 81 |
Q1 Rk | 38 | 1st Down Rk | 16 |
Q2 Rk | 16 | 2nd Down Rk | 38 |
Q3 Rk | 37 | 3rd Down Rk | 60 |
Q4 Rk | 52 |
6. Neither SDSU nor its opponent had an efficient offense
It would make sense that Rocky Long runs a program that is further along on defense than offense. Whereas the 3-3-5 defense has become a novelty or an underdog tactic in portions of the country, it is a way of life for Long, who mastered the defense as New Mexico's head coach and quickly installed it with success as Brady Hoke's SDSU defensive coordinator in 2009-10.
Despite preconceptions -- fewer linemen and more defensive backs equals speed over size and pass defense over run defense -- SDSU's defense was outstanding against the run last year. Ohio State and New Mexico, two of the best rushing teams in the country, averaged 6.4 yards per carry against the Aztecs last year; everybody else averaged 3.1. SDSU eliminated the run and took its chances with the pass, and while there were a few big pass plays along the way, this combination worked pretty well. SDSU held opponents to 5.2 yards per play or lower in nine of 13 games and, despite a lot of high-pace opponents, allowed more than 30 points just three times in the final 10 games after a shaky start.
With four of the top five linemen and five of the top seven linebackers returning, and with the front six adding an impact transfer and two three-star redshirt freshmen, it stands to reason that SDSU's run defense will be good once again. But the secondary has some questions to answer.
Defensive Line
Category | Adj. Line Yds |
Std. Downs LY/carry |
Pass. Downs LY/carry |
Opp. Rate |
Power Success Rate |
Stuff Rate |
Adj. Sack Rate |
Std. Downs Sack Rt. |
Pass. Downs Sack Rt. |
Team | 110.5 | 2.66 | 3.34 | 36.1% | 69.0% | 18.8% | 86 | 3.8% | 5.4% |
Rank | 29 | 28 | 69 | 33 | 77 | 69 | 91 | 81 | 95 |
Name | Pos | Ht, Wt | 2014 Year |
Rivals | GP | Tackles | % of Team | TFL | Sacks | Int | PBU | FF | FR |
Dontrell Onuoha | DT | 6'2, 270 | Sr. | 3 stars (5.6) | 13 | 19.5 | 2.7% | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Jon Sanchez | DE | 6'2, 265 | Jr. | 3 stars (5.5) | 13 | 16.5 | 2.3% | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Jordan Thomas | DE | 13 | 16.0 | 2.3% | 5.5 | 1.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Sam Meredith | DL | 6'4, 275 | Sr. | 3 stars (5.5) | 8 | 11.5 | 1.6% | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Alex Barrett | DT | 6'3, 245 | So. | 2 stars (5.4) | 12 | 11.5 | 1.6% | 5.0 | 3.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Everett Beed | DE | 6'3, 255 | Sr. | 3 stars (5.5) | 13 | 5.0 | 0.7% | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Paul Rodriguez | DE | 6'7, 295 | Jr. | 2 stars (5.4) | |||||||||
Kenny Galea'i | NT | 6'1, 280 | Jr. | 2 stars (5.3) | |||||||||
Jordan Watson | DL | 6'5, 285 | RSFr. | 2 stars (5.4) | |||||||||
Dakota Turner | DE | 6'3, 245 | RSFr. | 2 stars (5.3) | |||||||||
Christian Heyward (USC) | NT | 6'3, 300 | Jr. | 4 stars (5.8) |
Linebackers
Name | Pos | Ht, Wt | 2014 Year |
Rivals | GP | Tackles | % of Team | TFL | Sacks | Int | PBU | FF | FR |
Nick Tenhaeff | OLB | 13 | 60.0 | 8.4% | 15.0 | 6.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |||
Josh Gavert | MLB | 6'2, 220 | Sr. | 3 stars (5.5) | 13 | 51.0 | 7.2% | 6.0 | 3.0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
Vaness Harris | OLB | 12 | 45.0 | 6.3% | 4.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |||
Cody Galea | OLB | 6'3, 255 | Sr. | 2 stars (5.4) | 12 | 28.5 | 4.0% | 3.5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Derek Largent | OLB | 6'4, 240 | Sr. | NR | 12 | 26.0 | 3.7% | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Jake Fely | MLB | 5'10, 220 | Sr. | 3 stars (5.5) | 4 | 17.5 | 2.5% | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Micah Seau | MLB | 6'3, 250 | So. | 3 stars (5.5) | 11 | 6.0 | 0.8% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Calvin Munson | OLB | 6'1, 215 | So. | 2 stars (5.3) | 11 | 3.5 | 0.5% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fred Melifonwu | OLB | 6'5, 235 | RSFr. | 3 stars (5.6) | |||||||||
Tyler Morris | LB | 6'3, 215 | RSFr. | 3 stars (5.5) | |||||||||
Devante Davis | LB | 6'2, 210 | Jr. | 2 stars (5.4) | |||||||||
Donavin Buck | LB | 6'5, 205 | Fr. | 3 stars (5.5) | |||||||||
Jay Henderson | LB | 6'2, 205 | Fr. | 3 stars (5.5) |
7. Replacing Tenhaeff
Linebacker Vaness Harris and end Jordan Thomas were solid players, combining for 10 tackles for loss, three sacks, and three passes defensed. They provided decent play-making ability, but they are exactly the type of player a good defense loses every year.
The biggest loss in the front six comes at the other OLB position. Nick Tenhaeff was an underrated play-maker for SDSU; in 2012-13, he logged 28 tackles for loss and nine sacks. Last fall, he was easily the Aztecs' best pass rusher on a defense that didn't get enough pressure on the quarterback overall.
Former end Cody Galea will now fill one of the OLB slots, and while his size will perhaps add further heft and prowess to the run defense -- the addition of USC transfer Christian Heyward to the rotation will go even further in that regard -- it might be up to newcomers like redshirt freshmen Fred Melifonwu and Dakota Turner and JUCO transfer Devante Davis to get pressure on the quarterback.
Secondary
Name | Pos | Ht, Wt | 2014 Year |
Rivals | GP | Tackles | % of Team | TFL | Sacks | Int | PBU | FF | FR |
Nat Berhe | AZTEC | 13 | 79.5 | 11.2% | 5.5 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | |||
Eric Pinkins | WAR | 13 | 62.0 | 8.7% | 7 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | |||
King Holder | CB | 13 | 53.5 | 7.5% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | |||
Damontae Kazee | CB | 5'11, 175 | So. | 2 stars (5.4) | 12 | 34.5 | 4.9% | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 |
J.J. Whittaker | CB | 5'10, 185 | Sr. | 3 stars (5.5) | 13 | 28.0 | 3.9% | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 1 | 0 |
Marcus Andrews | WAR | 13 | 26.5 | 3.7% | 0.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |||
Rene Siluano | WAR | 13 | 17.5 | 2.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |||
Malik Smith | WAR | 6'0, 170 | So. | 2 stars (5.3) | 12 | 16.0 | 2.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Gabe Lemon | WAR | 6 | 15.5 | 2.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
David Lamar | CB | 6'2, 185 | Sr. | 3 stars (5.5) | 13 | 14.0 | 2.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Stan Sedberry | WAR | 6'2, 210 | Jr. | NR | 12 | 5.0 | 0.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Tony Bell | DB | 6 | 3.5 | 0.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Pierre Romain | CB | 5'8, 165 | Jr. | NR | 13 | 3.0 | 0.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
T.J. Hickman | WAR | 6'0, 185 | Jr. | NR | 13 | 2.5 | 0.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Billy Vaughn, Jr. | DB | 6'1, 180 | So. | 2 stars (5.4) | 1 | 2.0 | 0.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Brandon Porter | AZTEC | 5'11, 185 | So. | 2 stars (5.4) | 10 | 2.0 | 0.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Kendrick Mathis | WAR | 6'0, 195 | So. | 2 stars (5.4) | |||||||||
Kalan Montgomery | CB | 6'1, 185 | RSFr. | 3 stars (5.5) | |||||||||
Billy Vaughn, Jr. | CB | 6'1, 180 | RSFr. | 2 stars (5.4) | |||||||||
Davontae Merriweather | DB | 6'1, 200 | Jr. | 3 stars (5.5) | |||||||||
Na'im McGee | AZTEC | 6'0, 200 | So. | 3 stars (5.5) |
8. Strength gets stronger, weakness gets weaker
Thanks to the loss of both starting cornerbacks, the secondary was a question mark heading into 2013. But after a slow start, the trio of King Holder, Damontae Kazee, and J.J. Whittaker came along rather nicely. By the end of the season, these three had combined for 26 passes defensed (14 from Whittaker), seven tackles for loss, and five forced fumbles. Holder is gone, but Kazee and Whittaker return, and the cornerback position seems well accounted for in 2014. Now about those safeties ...
There is almost no experience at the safety position. The returning leading tackler is sophomore Malik Smith with 16.0. SDSU welcomes two three-star JUCO transfers (Davontae Merriweather and Na'im McGee) and a three-star redshirt freshman (Kalan Montgomery) to the rotation, but after a couple of years of stellar play from Nat Berhe and Eric Pinkins, the safeties are starting over.
In other words, last year's strength (run defense) could be even stronger while last year's weakness (big plays, especially through the air) could be even weaker.
Special Teams
Punter | Ht, Wt | 2014 Year |
Punts | Avg | TB | FC | I20 | FC/I20 Ratio |
Joel Alesi | 6'0, 235 | Sr. | 53 | 39.4 | 2 | 21 | 17 | 71.7% |
Seamus McMorrow | 5'11, 195 | Jr. | 3 | 39.3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 66.7% |
Kicker | Ht, Wt | 2014 Year |
Kickoffs | Avg | TB | OOB | TB% |
Seamus McMorrow | 5'11, 195 | Jr. | 47 | 62.1 | 18 | 3 | 38.3% |
Wes Feer | 21 | 63.3 | 9 | 2 | 42.9% |
Place-Kicker | Ht, Wt | 2014 Year |
PAT | FG (0-39) |
Pct | FG (40+) |
Pct |
Wes Feer | 21-25 | 5-7 | 71.4% | 3-5 | 60.0% | ||
Seamus McMorrow | 5'11, 195 | Jr. | 18-20 | 0-3 | 0.0% | 0-1 | 0.0% |
Returner | Pos. | Ht, Wt | 2014 Year |
Returns | Avg. | TD |
Colin Lockett | KR | 31 | 24.5 | 0 | ||
Tim Vizzi | KR | 7 | 16.3 | 0 | ||
Tim Vizzi | PR | 17 | 12.5 | 2 |
Category | Rk |
Special Teams F/+ | 104 |
Field Goal Efficiency | 123 |
Punt Return Efficiency | 54 |
Kick Return Efficiency | 60 |
Punt Efficiency | 81 |
Kickoff Efficiency | 48 |
Opponents' Field Goal Efficiency | 108 |
9. Strength gets weaker, weakness gets stronger
Special teams was a mixed bag last year. On one hand, you had a collection of strong field position weapons in return men Colin Lockett and Tim Vizzi and a solid kickoffs guy in Seamus McMorrow. On the other, you had the place-kicking situation. Wes Feer was 7-for-7 on field goals in the first three games of the year, then finished 1-for-5. Seamus McMorrow went 0-for-4. It made no sense, and it was an extreme weakness.
In 2014, McMorrow returns, and Lockett and Vizzi are gone. So ... it's the opposite situation as the SDSU defense -- strengths get weaker, and weaknesses (in theory) get stronger with experience.
2014 Schedule & Projection Factors
2014 Schedule | ||
Date | Opponent | Proj. Rk |
30-Aug | Northern Arizona | NR |
6-Sep | at North Carolina | 36 |
20-Sep | at Oregon State | 39 |
27-Sep | UNLV | 109 |
3-Oct | at Fresno State | 46 |
10-Oct | at New Mexico | 116 |
18-Oct | Hawaii | 93 |
1-Nov | at Nevada | 62 |
8-Nov | Idaho | 120 |
15-Nov | at Boise State | 18 |
21-Nov | Air Force | 105 |
29-Nov | San Jose State | 82 |
Five-Year F/+ Rk | -3.1% (67) |
Two-Year Recruiting Rk | 75 |
TO Margin/Adj. TO Margin* | -11 / -6.9 |
TO Luck/Game | -1.6 |
Approx. Ret. Starters (Off. / Def.) | 11 (6, 5) |
10. A familiar tale
In my first SDSU season preview back in 2011, I mentioned that I liked the Rocky Long hire as a short-term way of maintaining the momentum SDSU had established in the brief, two-year Brady Hoke era. I was unsure about the Aztecs' long-term prognosis under Long, but so far there has been a lot to like. Each year San Diego State loses a couple of high-caliber players -- in 2011, it was Ronnie Hillman, Ryan Lindley, and company; this year, it's Adam Muema, Colin Lockett, Nick Tenhaeff, etc. -- and produces another sound season, then signs a load of solid recruits in the offseason.
This program is in good shape, and recruiting has had a clear impact on depth and athleticism. The only question remaining, really, is whether SDSU can at some point break into double digits in the win column. It hasn't happened yet, usually because the offense starts slow and SDSU drops some games against quality non-conference foes early on.
We could certainly see something similar in 2014. Early trips to North Carolina and Oregon State and a mostly rebuilt corps of skill position players and safeties could certainly result in a 1-2 or 2-3 start. But with six quite winnable home games, six opponents projected 90th or worse, and plenty of team strengths -- run defense, explosiveness, an experienced quarterback, stellar cornerbacks -- SDSU should be counted on to get back to the eight- or nine-win range by the end of the year.
The Aztec calendar might not begin until October, and I doubt this is the year for a 10-win season, but a fifth straight bowl should very much be in the works.